Accuracy, Yield and Clinical Impact of a Low-Cost HRME in the Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Sponsor
Anandasabapathy, Sharmila, M.D. (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02018367
Collaborator
William Marsh Rice University (Other), Baylor College of Medicine (Other)
100
1
2
111
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The overall goal of the study is to determine whether imaging with the low-cost High Resolution Microendoscope(HRME) will increase the efficiency and yield of the current standard of endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. We believe the HRME will provide an in-vivo "optical biopsy" that will be comparable to gold standard histopathology and allow the endoscopist to make a more informed decision about whether to obtain a biopsy or even perform endoscopic therapy (i.e. endoscopic mucosal resection, EMR).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Proflavine, high resolution imaging
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Primary outcomes:
  • the diagnostic yield (defined as the proportion of mucosal biopsy samples with neoplasia) of HRME with directed biopsy

  • compared to standard white-light endoscopy with 4-quadrant random biopsy (WL) for the diagnosis of BE-associated neoplasia in flat mucosa as well as mucosal lesions

  • the clinical impact of HRME on the diagnosis and endoscopic surveillance of BE- associated neoplasia

  • does HRME alter the decision to obtain a mucosal biopsy or perform endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)

  • the total number of total mucosal biopsies taken per procedure; does HRME alter the number of biopsies necessary?

Secondary outcomes:
  • sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HRME for the in-vivo diagnosis of neoplasia in a routine surveillance population of patients with BE (using histopathologic diagnosis of mucosal biopsies as the reference standard)

  • the total procedure time for imaging and mucosal biopsy acquisition of HRME - compared with WL, stratified by length of BE (< 3 cm and > 3cm)

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Accuracy, Yield and Clinical Impact of a Low-Cost High Resolution Microendoscope in the Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Proflavine, high resolution imaging

Proflavine hemisulfate will be used as a topical contrast agent in conjunction with the high resolution imaging device to visualize and image areas suspicious for neoplasia. Biopsies will be taken per Seattle biopsy protocol for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance.

Drug: Proflavine, high resolution imaging
5-10mL of proflavine hemisulfate (0.01%) will be sprayed on the esophageal mucosa. The HRME will then be inserted through the biopsy channel of the endoscope and gently placed against the mucosa. The endoscopist will image each discrete lesion observed during white light endoscopy. For each HRME imaged area, an optical read will be obtained followed by a tissue biopsy.
Other Names:
  • Proflavine hemisulfate
  • No Intervention: Standard of care

    Standard of care examination of the upper GI tract using the standard high resolution endoscope with bipsies taken per Seattle biopsy protocol for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The diagnostic yield (defined as the proportion of mucosal biopsy samples with neoplasia) of HRME with directed biopsy [1 day]

      Compared to standard white-light endoscopy with 4-quadrant random biopsy (WL) for the diagnosis of BE-associated neoplasia in flat mucosa as well as mucosal lesions

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. The diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of HRME for the in-vivo diagnosis of neoplasia. [1 day]

      To be determined using histopathologic diagnosis of mucosal biopsise as the reference standard

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. The clinical impact of HRME on the diagnosis and endoscopic surveillance of BE- associated neoplasia [1 day]

      Does HRME alter the decision to obtain a mucosal biopsy or perform endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) The total number of total mucosal biopsies taken per procedure; does HRME alter the number of biopsies necessary?

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • outpatients with > 1 cm biopsy-proven Barrett's Esophagus who are undergoing standard of care endoscopic surveillance for metaplasia, dysplasia, or neoplasia.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Allergy or prior reaction to the fluorescent contrast agent proflavine

    • Patients who are unable to give informed consent.

    • Known advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, or dysplastic/suspected malignant esophageal lesion > 2 cm in size not amenable to EMR

    • Patients with a history of a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis)

    • Patients unable to undergo routine endoscopy with biopsy :

    • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

    • Prothrombin Time > 50% of control; PTT > 50 sec, or INR > 2.0)

    • Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardio-pulmonary instability or other

    • Patients with known, untreated esophageal strictures, prior partial esophageal resection, or altered anatomy preventing passage of the endomicroscope

    • Patients with known severe esophagitis

    • Patients with suspected but no biopsy confirmed BE

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas United States 77030

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Anandasabapathy, Sharmila, M.D.
    • William Marsh Rice University
    • Baylor College of Medicine

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Sharmila Anandasabapathy, MD, Baylor College of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Anandasabapathy, Sharmila, M.D.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02018367
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • GCO #12-0289, H-36538
    First Posted:
    Dec 23, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 14, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2021
    Keywords provided by Anandasabapathy, Sharmila, M.D.
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 14, 2021