The Prevalence, Risk Factors and Optimal Biopsy Protocol of BE

Sponsor
E-DA Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05818072
Collaborator
(none)
165
1
3
34
4.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Detections of goblet cells and dysplasia are crucial for diagnosis and determining the surveillance program of Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, the optimal biopsy numbers and their yield rates of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia are still uncertain, especially in Asia. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal biopsy protocol of BE.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Different biopsy protocol for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus
N/A

Detailed Description

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is premalignant lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and defined as the distal esophageal squamous epithelium replaced by columnar epithelium with histologic confirmation of intestinal metaplasia (IM). The accurate prevalence of BE is difficult to assess because part of people with BE are asymptomatic. However, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) which is the main factor associated with BE has increased almost 50% during the last 20 years. Meanwhile, the general population prevalence of BE is estimated to increase to 3-10% in Western countries. The systematic review and meta-analysis also reported an upward trend in prevalence of BE in Asian countries. BE is an important heathy issue to investigate in either Western or Asian countries.

The annual rate of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma is around 0.2% to 0.5% in patients with BE. However, the annual adenocarcinoma progression risk is different between the non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE), BE with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD). The annual incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is 0.33%, 0.54% and 6.58% in patients with NDBE, BE with LGD and HGD, respectively. Among patients with NDBE, patients with short segment BE (SSBE) have the lower rate of progression to EAC than those who with long segment BE (LSBE) (0.07% vs 0.25%). Therefore, endoscopic surveillance of patients with BE is recommended by clinical practice guideline.

Detections of goblet cells and dysplasia are crucial for diagnosis and determining the surveillance program of BE. According to the Seattle protocol which has been widely recommended by clinical practice guidelines, biopsy specimens should be obtained every one cm to two cm interval across the four quadrants of the columnar epithelium of esophagus. Fewer endoscopists adhered to this protocol in clinical practice because of its laboriousness and time consumption. Most of patients with BE were categorized as SSBE and SSBE seems to be more prevalent in Asian populations. As the report of previous study which reviewed the general prevalence of BE in Western and Asian general populations, the ratio of SSBE to LSBE was ranging from 1.8 to 17.4 in the Western countries and 1.7 to 103 in the Asian countries. It's more difficult to adhere to the protocol in patients with SSBE.

However, the optimal biopsy numbers and their yield rates of IM and dysplasia are still uncertain, especially in Asia. The investigators aimed to assess the biopsy numbers and yield rates of IM and dysplasia in patients with columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) to determine the optimal biopsy protocol.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
165 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
The Prevalence, Risk Factors and Optimal Biopsy Protocol of Barrett's Esophagus in Taiwan - A Prospective Randomized Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 30, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 28, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 28, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: One biopsy

Do one biopsy at proximal part of the columnar-lined esophagus for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus

Diagnostic Test: Different biopsy protocol for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus
To assess the biopsy numbers and yield rates of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in patients with columnar-lined esophagus to determine the optimal biopsy protocol.

Active Comparator: Three biopsy

Do three biopsy at proximal, middle and distal part of the columnar-lined esophagus for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus

Diagnostic Test: Different biopsy protocol for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus
To assess the biopsy numbers and yield rates of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in patients with columnar-lined esophagus to determine the optimal biopsy protocol.

Sham Comparator: Seattle protocol

Adhere to Seattle protocol to do biopsy for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus

Diagnostic Test: Different biopsy protocol for patients with suspected Barrett's Esophagus
To assess the biopsy numbers and yield rates of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in patients with columnar-lined esophagus to determine the optimal biopsy protocol.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The yield rate of intestinal metaplasia [Up to 7 days histologic confirmation]

    Defined as the proportion of histologic confirmation of goblet cells

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The yield rate of dysplasia [Up to 7 days histologic confirmation]

    Defined as the proportion of histologic confirmation of columnar-lined epithelium with dysplasia

  2. Adverse events [From the date of procedure until any events, assessed up to 2 weeks]

    Including bleeding and perforation

  3. Procedure time [From forcep insertion to biopsy complete, assessed up to 1 minutes]

    Defined as from forcep insertion to biopsy complete

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adults with columnar-lined esophagus
Exclusion Criteria:
  • A prior history of endoscopic treatment for Barrett's Esophagus

  • A prior history of upper gastrointestinal malignancy

  • A prior history of total or subtotal gastrectomy

  • Esophageal varices noted during the procedure

  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy

  • Taking antiplatelet drug or anticoagulant

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 E-DA Hospital Kaohsiung City Taiwan 82445

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • E-DA Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ying Nan Tsai, MD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-Da Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
E-DA Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05818072
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EDAHS-111031
First Posted:
Apr 18, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Apr 18, 2023
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by E-DA Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 18, 2023