BARTHO-KT: Cost-utility Analysis Treatment of Bartholin's Abscess : Word Catheter Versus Incision-drainage.

Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04093310
Collaborator
(none)
302
17
2
50.4
17.8
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Bartholin's gland abscess is a condition requiring emergency consultation. Placement of a Word catheter, which is a minor technique used in France as a treatment of bartholin's Abscess, can be done in an emergency room without hospitalization. Actually, incision-drainage, which is the most widespread treatment in France, is performed on day surgery with or without overnight hospitalization. Our hypothesis is that the use of Word catheter compared to incision-drainage would not modify the quality of life of the patients but would allow a saving of up to 3 M€ per year in France.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Word Catheter
  • Procedure: Incision-drainage
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
302 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cost-utility Analysis Treatment of Bartholin's Abscess : Word Catheter Versus Incision-drainage.
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 17, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Word catheter

The abscess is incised and the Word catheter is inserted into the residual cavity to create a neo-channel to prevent recurrence. The catheter is removed after 4 weeks during a consultation

Device: Word Catheter
Use of the Word catheter to remove the Bartholin's abscess

Active Comparator: Incision-drainage

This procedure performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia consists in incising the abscess, draining the pus build-up and placing a wick in the residual cavity to promote progressive healing from the inside out.

Procedure: Incision-drainage
Incision-drainage to remove the Bartholin's abscess

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. cost-utility ratio, according to the societal perspective of the of the management of Bartholin's gland abscess by the Word catheter compared to the incision-drainage [12 months]

    The utility will be measured by: Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D 5L) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 5 answers are possible. The costs will be measured by the addition of the following costs: Outpatient resource consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire. Hospital care resources using the the database of the Medicalised Information System Program of each recruiting site

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Budget impact analysis for the health insurance point of view in case of diffusion of the Word catheter [5 years]

    Comparison of intervention costs on the study sample and projection of these costs over 5 years, from the health insurance and hospital perspectives

  2. Non inferiority evaluation of Word catheter vs. Incision drainage in terms of pain [at baseline and day 1]

    Pain numeric scale from 0 to 10

  3. Non inferiority evaluation of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of recurrence rate [12 months]

    Number of homolateral recurrences of Bartholin's abscess, declared by the patient

  4. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage concerning pain [12 months]

    Pain numeric scale from 0 to 10

  5. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage concerning management time [Day 0 (procedure day), Day 1]

    Date and time of patient initial management (randomization) Date and time of the beginning of the procedure date and time of the end of the procedure date and time of the hospital departure

  6. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of complications [12 months]

    number of complications related to the procedure (healing complications, infection, lost of the Word catheter), contro-lateral Bartholin's abscess occurrence

  7. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of surgical failure [Immediate post-operative (D0) and one month]

    Word catheter: insertion failure, loss, removal decision (from the patient or the surgeon) Incision-drainage: incomplete drainage

  8. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of impact on sexual activity [Baseline, one month, 6 months and 12 months]

    Score of the Female Sexual Function Index: self-questionnaire including 19 questions assessing different parameters of the sexual activity

  9. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of quality of life using the SF-12-HS [Baseline, one month, 6 months and 12 months]

    Short-Form-12-Health-Survey questionnaire score: self-questionnaire including 12 questions measuring different aspects of quality of life

  10. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of quality of life using the EQ-5D [Baseline, one day, one month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months]

    EQ-5D 5L score (described in primary outcome)

  11. Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms global patient impression and improvement [One day, one month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months]

    Patient Global Impression and Improvement (PGI-I) global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy (transition scale). It is a single question asking the patient to rate their global condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 - very much better to 7 - very much worse

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Abscess of Bartholin's gland Patient able to understand the protocol Patient who signed informed consent Patient with social insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

Spontaneous fistulization of the abscess before surgical treatment Abscess volume under 3 ml Medical treatment which avoid incision or word catheter placement patients under guardianship Unable to complete questionnaires Patients not affiliated to social protection regimen Pregnant or post-partum women (until 4 weeks after delivery)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Chu Angers Angers France
2 Bordeaux University Hospital Bordeaux France
3 CHU CAEN Caen France
4 Ch Antoine Beclere Clamart France
5 Chu Estaing Clermont-Ferrand France
6 Institut Franco Britannique Levallois-Perret France
7 Chu Lille Lille France
8 Nancy University Hospital Nancy France
9 Chu Nantes Nantes France
10 Chu Caremeau Nîmes France
11 Ch Kremlin Bicetre Paris France
12 Chu Cochin Paris France
13 Chu Robert Debre Paris France
14 Chi Poissy Poissy France
15 Chu Poitiers Poitiers France
16 Rennes University Hospital Rennes France
17 Chu Toulouse Toulouse France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nantes University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thibault Thubert, PhD, CHU de Nantes

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nantes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04093310
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RC19_0179
First Posted:
Sep 18, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Dec 7, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Nantes University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 7, 2021