Prostate Bipolar Enucleation and Resection Versus Open Prostatectomy

Sponsor
Helwan University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05416606
Collaborator
(none)
64
1
2
20
3.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. In this study, a mixed technique called transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate (TBERP) was compared to the standard open prostatectomy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
  • Procedure: open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
N/A

Detailed Description

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. In this study, a mixed technique called transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate (TBERP) was compared to the standard open prostatectomy.

This is a Comparative, Prospective Study conducted on men over 50 years.The patients were randomly distributed into two groups treated by TBERP and OP. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1-week post catheter removal and 1-3-months postoperatively in terms of blood loss, operation time, the weight of resected prostatic tissues, post-operative catheterisation period, hospital stay, IPSS, PVR, prostate volume, early complications (recatheterization, urine retention, UTI and irritative symptoms) and late complications (urinary incontinence, urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
64 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
In this study, a hybrid technique, that combines two types of techniques using the same cutting current and technological setup, will be proposed enucleation of the prostate gland with the plasma vaporization electrode and resection with a TURis cutting loop. This technique is defined as transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate (TVERP) comparing it with open prostatectomy.In this study, a hybrid technique, that combines two types of techniques using the same cutting current and technological setup, will be proposed enucleation of the prostate gland with the plasma vaporization electrode and resection with a TURis cutting loop. This technique is defined as transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate (TVERP) comparing it with open prostatectomy.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Transurethral Bipolar Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate Versus Open Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate

transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate

Procedure: transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
Other Names:
  • TUVERP
  • Active Comparator: open prostatectomy

    open surgical transvesical prostatectomy

    Procedure: open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
    open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
    Other Names:
  • Transvesical prostatectomy
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. operative time [Three months]

      To measure the difference between the two procedure regarding operative time measured in minutes.

    2. recovery outcome [Three months]

      To measure the difference between the two procedure regarding mean hospital stays measured in days and catheterization period measured in days

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. peri-operative complication [Three months]

      to measure the difference between the two procedures regarding incidence of early complications including re-catheterization, acute urinary retention, early irritative symptoms and urinary tract infections and incidence of late complications Including urinary incontinence, Urethral strictures,and bladder neck contracture.

    2. weight of resected prostatic tissues [Three months]

      to measure the difference between the two procedures regarding weight of resected prostatic tissues Measured in gram

    3. post-operative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score. [Three months]

      to measure the difference between the two procedures regarding IPSS score. Score 0 to 7 points considered mild symptoms, 8 to 19 points considered moderate symptoms, 20 to 35 points considered severe symptoms

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    50 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male patients

    • Age more than 50 years

    • Prostate size of more than 80 ml

    • IPSS ≥ 8, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 15 mL/s

    • Indications for surgery

    • Refractory retention (failed ≥1 trial of voiding).

    • Associated bladder Stones.

    • Associated recurrent gross Hematuria.

    • Associated with recurrent Infections.

    • Associated renal insufficiency.

    • Bother symptoms refractory to medical treatment.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Uncorrectable coagulopathy.

    • Patient with active UTI.

    • Prostate less than 80 ml.

    • Severe associated comorbidities.

    • Previous urethral, prostate, and bladder surgeries,

    • Patients diagnosed with neurogenic bladder.

    • Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Helwan university faculty of medicine Helwan Egypt 11731

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Helwan University

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Tarek Salem, professor, Helwan university faculty of medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Mohamed Fawzy Hassan Mahdy Elsyaad, Principal Investigator, Helwan University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05416606
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 51-2020
    First Posted:
    Jun 13, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 13, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Mohamed Fawzy Hassan Mahdy Elsyaad, Principal Investigator, Helwan University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 13, 2022