To Compare Blephapad Combo vs Standard Treatment for Eyelid Cleansing in Bilateral Posterior Blepharitis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of, and patient satisfaction with Blephapad Combo in the treatment of posterior blepharitis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Blepharitis is the most common condition in patients seeking an eye examination due to discomfort or eye irritation. Treatment of blepharitis is recommended even in mild cases as chronic inflammation may cause permanent damage to the Meibomian glands.
Each eye of each patient represents an experimental unit. Each patient will apply Blephapad Combo to one eye and standard treatment to the other eye in accordance with the randomization procedure.
The aim of this randomized, controlled study with a closed sequential design is to evaluate versus standard treatment the efficacy of, and patient satisfaction with Blephapad Combo in the treatment of posterior blepharitis.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Study treatment Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. |
Combination Product: Blephapad Combo
Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia.
The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes.
|
Other: Standard treatment Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. |
Other: Standard treatment
Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) [from baseline to week 4]
The total score of the meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) grading scale was automatically computed by the system as the sum of the six sub-scores (i.e. Lid margin findings of vascularity, Plugging of gland orifices, Lid margin irregularity, Lid margin thickening, Partial glands and Gland dropout), ranging from 0 to 15, where higher values rapresent a worse outcome. The first four parameters were evaluated using photographic images of anterior segments, while the last two were evaluated using infrared images of the meibomian glands Based on the percentage change from baseline to week 4 of the total score of MGD score, Investigators will choose which of the two eyes had a better change of clinical features.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Improved vs Not Improved) [From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4)]
For each eye change from baseline to week 4 in the total score of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction was also expressed as one of the following outcomes: Eye on Blephapad Combo: Improved-Eye on Standard: Improved Eye on Blephapad Combo: Improved-Eye on Standard: NOT Improved Eye on Blephapad Combo: NOT Improved-Eye on Standard: Improved Eye on Blephapad Combo: NOT Improved-Eye on Standard: NOT Improved The total score was automatically computed by the system as the sum of the six sub-scores (i.e. Lid margin findings of vascularity, Plugging of gland orifices, Lid margin irregularity, Lid margin thickening, Partial glands and Gland dropout), ranging from 0 to 15 (higher values rapresent a worse outcome).If the change of the total score was positive or equal to 0 the specific eye was referred as "NOT improved",on the contrary if the change of the total score resulted negative the specific eye was referred as "Improved". For each patient the results on the two eyes were combined.
- Number of Patients Preferring the Standard or the Study Treatment (i.e. Answers to a Specific Question on Patient Preference: Study Drug vs. Standard Treatment) [at Visit 3 (week 4)]
At the end of study patients was asked to state their preference on the treatments used.
Other Outcome Measures
- Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events Reported Throughout the Study [From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4)]
A targeted physical examination was performed at all visits and monitoring for ocular and systemic adverse events occurred throughout the study
- Compliance to Treatment Evaluated by Counting the Applications (Wet Wipes) to Each Eyes [From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4)]
Adherence to treatment was evaluated at Visit 3 by counting given wipes/gauze and unused/lost/damaged wipes/gauze. The compliance to treatment was evaluated by counting given wipes/gauze and unused/lost/damaged wipes/gauze. The following formula was applied: (Given wipes/gauze - (sum of unused/lost/damaged wipes/gauze)) / Expected number of wipes/gauze used) x 100. Where the "given wipes/gauze" were 60 and the "expected number of wipes/gauze used" were 2 per days per 4 weeks = 56.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age > 40 years
-
Male or female
-
Diagnosis of bilateral posterior blepharitis
-
Written informed consent of patient
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Treatment with topical ophthalmic drugs (artificial tears allowed)
-
Ocular surgery in the previous 6 months
-
Pregnant or breastfeeding women
-
Alcohol abuse
-
Psychiatric disorders
-
Cognitive impairment that could affect evaluation of preferences
-
Participation in other clinical studies in the last month
-
Hypersensitivity to one or more components of the study products
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | A.O.U. Policlinico Mater Domini | Catanzaro | CZ | Italy | 88100 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- NTC srl
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Vincenzo Scorcia, A.O.U. Policlinico Mater Domini
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- BLEPHA 01-2017
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Patients were enrolled between May 2017 and January 2018 at the Ophthalmology Unit of the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro in Italy |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | During a 2-week run-in period starting at Visit 1, and after the patient has provided informed consent, the Investigator will collect demographic data and medical history and perform a physical examination of the patient. |
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 19 | 19 |
COMPLETED | 18 | 18 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Overall eyes | 18 | 18 | 36 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
5
27.8%
|
5
27.8%
|
10
55.6%
|
>=65 years |
13
72.2%
|
13
72.2%
|
26
144.4%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
66.9
(9.03)
|
66.9
(9.03)
|
66.9
(9.03)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
9
50%
|
9
50%
|
18
100%
|
Male |
9
50%
|
9
50%
|
18
100%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
18
100%
|
18
100%
|
36
200%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Italy |
18
100%
|
18
100%
|
18
100%
|
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) at baseline (visit 2) (score on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
9.17
(2.64)
|
9.39
(2.73)
|
9.28
(2.65)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) |
---|---|
Description | The total score of the meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) grading scale was automatically computed by the system as the sum of the six sub-scores (i.e. Lid margin findings of vascularity, Plugging of gland orifices, Lid margin irregularity, Lid margin thickening, Partial glands and Gland dropout), ranging from 0 to 15, where higher values rapresent a worse outcome. The first four parameters were evaluated using photographic images of anterior segments, while the last two were evaluated using infrared images of the meibomian glands Based on the percentage change from baseline to week 4 of the total score of MGD score, Investigators will choose which of the two eyes had a better change of clinical features. |
Time Frame | from baseline to week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
patients with symmetrical bilateral posterior blepharitis |
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. |
Measure Participants | 18 | 18 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of change in the total score] |
-38.5
(21.3)
|
-29.9
(17.6)
|
Title | Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Improved vs Not Improved) |
---|---|
Description | For each eye change from baseline to week 4 in the total score of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction was also expressed as one of the following outcomes: Eye on Blephapad Combo: Improved-Eye on Standard: Improved Eye on Blephapad Combo: Improved-Eye on Standard: NOT Improved Eye on Blephapad Combo: NOT Improved-Eye on Standard: Improved Eye on Blephapad Combo: NOT Improved-Eye on Standard: NOT Improved The total score was automatically computed by the system as the sum of the six sub-scores (i.e. Lid margin findings of vascularity, Plugging of gland orifices, Lid margin irregularity, Lid margin thickening, Partial glands and Gland dropout), ranging from 0 to 15 (higher values rapresent a worse outcome).If the change of the total score was positive or equal to 0 the specific eye was referred as "NOT improved",on the contrary if the change of the total score resulted negative the specific eye was referred as "Improved". For each patient the results on the two eyes were combined. |
Time Frame | From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patiens with symmetrical bilateral posterior blepharitis who applied treatment at least once in one eye and had a baseline evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. |
Measure Participants | 18 | 18 |
Eye improved |
16
88.9%
|
15
83.3%
|
Eye NOT improved |
1
5.6%
|
2
11.1%
|
Missing |
1
5.6%
|
1
5.6%
|
Title | Number of Patients Preferring the Standard or the Study Treatment (i.e. Answers to a Specific Question on Patient Preference: Study Drug vs. Standard Treatment) |
---|---|
Description | At the end of study patients was asked to state their preference on the treatments used. |
Time Frame | at Visit 3 (week 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patiens with symmetrical bilateral posterior blepharitis who applied treatment at least once in one eye and had a baseline evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint. One patient didn't express the preference therefore 17 patients were considered. |
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. |
Measure Participants | 17 | 17 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
12
66.7%
|
5
27.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Study Treatment, Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.071 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | Patient preference for one of the two treatments at Visit 3 was presented overall in terms of number and percentage of patients preferring the standard or the study treatment. Patient preference was compared between the standard and the study treatment with a Chi-Square test for equal proportion. |
Title | Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events Reported Throughout the Study |
---|---|
Description | A targeted physical examination was performed at all visits and monitoring for ocular and systemic adverse events occurred throughout the study |
Time Frame | From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patiens with symmetrical bilateral posterior blepharitis who applied treatment at least once in one eye. One patient reported a treatment-emergent systemic adverse event, i.e. "Suspected colon cancer" of mild severity that led to permanent treatment discontinuation. |
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. |
Measure Participants | 18 | 18 |
Eyes with Serious Ocular Adverse Event |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Eyes with Ocular Adverse Event |
8
44.4%
|
7
38.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Study Treatment, Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7353 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | The incidence of all the treatment-emergent systemic Adverse Events recorded in the eCRF was presented overall at patient level; the incidence of all the treatment-emergent ocular Adverse Events recorded in eCRF was presented by treatment group at eye level. Incidence of treatment-emergent ocular Adverse Events was compared between treatment groups by means of a Chi-square test. |
Title | Compliance to Treatment Evaluated by Counting the Applications (Wet Wipes) to Each Eyes |
---|---|
Description | Adherence to treatment was evaluated at Visit 3 by counting given wipes/gauze and unused/lost/damaged wipes/gauze. The compliance to treatment was evaluated by counting given wipes/gauze and unused/lost/damaged wipes/gauze. The following formula was applied: (Given wipes/gauze - (sum of unused/lost/damaged wipes/gauze)) / Expected number of wipes/gauze used) x 100. Where the "given wipes/gauze" were 60 and the "expected number of wipes/gauze used" were 2 per days per 4 weeks = 56. |
Time Frame | From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patiens with symmetrical bilateral posterior blepharitis who applied treatment at least once in one eye. |
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. |
Measure Participants | 18 | 18 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of Application (Wet Wipes)] |
96.1
(8.8)
|
94.2
(9.5)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | from baseline to week 4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The patient will be given a diary on which to record the application of all morning and evening treatments, as well as any adverse events occurred. The diary is to be returned at Visit 3 for review | |||
Arm/Group Title | Study Treatment | Standard Treatment | ||
Arm/Group Description | Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics. Blephapad Combo: Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes. | Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month. Standard treatment: Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Study Treatment | Standard Treatment | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/18 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Study Treatment | Standard Treatment | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/18 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Study Treatment | Standard Treatment | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 8/18 (44.4%) | 7/18 (38.9%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Dry eye | 3/18 (16.7%) | 3/18 (16.7%) | ||
Ocular pain | 4/18 (22.2%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | ||
Irritation | 2/18 (11.1%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | ||
Itching or discomfort | 3/18 (16.7%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | ||
Increased lacrimation | 2/18 (11.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | ||
Conjunctival hyperaemia | 1/18 (5.6%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | ||
Ocular secretions | 1/18 (5.6%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | ||
Crusts on eyelid margins | 1/18 (5.6%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | ||
Blurred vision | 1/18 (5.6%) | 0/18 (0%) | ||
Ocular hyperaemia | 2/18 (11.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | ||
Purulent discharge | 1/18 (5.6%) | 0/18 (0%) | ||
Madarosis | 0/18 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Alessandro Colombo |
---|---|
Organization | NTC srl |
Phone | +39 02 4385 0490 |
alessandro.colombo@ntcpharma.com |
- BLEPHA 01-2017