AMEBICA: Safety and Efficacy of Modified Folfirinox Versus Gemcis in Bile Duct Tumours

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02591030
Collaborator
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (Other)
191
42
2
49.1
4.5
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Bile duct tumours are rare. They are the 6th most common type of digestive cancer. Their therapeutic management is complex and must be multidisciplinary in nature. Most of the time, an endoscopic or radiological biliary drainage is necessary before any tumour treatment.

Their prognosis is poor due to the fact that they are normally diagnosed late, which makes curative surgery impossible. A population study in the Côte d'Or region of France reported a survival rate at 5 years of approximately 10%.

For the locally advanced or metastatic forms, treatment has not been properly codified. With respect to chemotherapy, prospective studies, most often phase II, are difficult to interpret due to a limited number of patients and due to the heterogeneity of this type of tumour (bile duct and pancreas tumours). Treatment with 5FU alone provides an objective response in approximately 10% of cases. In combination with mitomycin or carboplatin, the objective response rate is 20%, with a median survival period of 5 months. Interferon combined with 5FU has a better response rate (30%), but occurrences of different types of toxicity are more frequent.

More recently, gemcitabine and the 5FU-cisplatin combinations demonstrated objective tumour control in 50% of patients with a median survival period of 10 months. Gemcitabine combined with oxiplatin or with cisplatin has shown the same response rate but a median survival period of approximately 12 months.

The benefit of this combination has been confirmed in a phase III trial that compared the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination to gemcitabine alone, in 410 patients with locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic bile duct cancer. The results were in favour of the combined treatment with a median survival period of 11.7 months (versus 8.1 months - HR 0.64 [0.52 - 0.80]). This combination is currently the reference first-line treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

At the same time as these results, triple therapies involving 5FU + oxiplatin + irinotecan have objectively shown a significant increase in overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to gemcitabine alone (median of 11.1 months versus 6.8 months, HR = 0.57 [0.45 - 0.73] p < 0.0001). The response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) have also been improved with these triple therapies; the response rates were 31.6% versus 9.4% p < 0.001 and the median PFS 6.4 months versus 3.3 months p < 0.001, respectively.

The adverse events observed with the triple therapy occurred more frequently, for febrile neutropaenia (5.4%), with the need to treat with growth factors (G-CSF for 42.5% of patients). Haematological and digestive toxicity was also higher: grade 3-4 neutropaenia was observed for 45.7% of patients in the FOLFIRINOX arm and 18.7% of patients in the gemcitabine arm (p = 0.0001); vomiting was noted for 14.5% of patients in the FOLFIRINOX arm and 4.7% in the gemcitabine arm (p = 0.002). Quality of life was improved in the FOLFIRINOX arm.

Due to the histological, therapeutic and prognostic similarities between pancreatic and bile duct cancer, it is interesting to assess this triple therapy compared to the current reference treatment in bile duct cancers: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin (GEMCIS). Due to the known higher levels of toxicity for this triple therapy (digestive and haematological), the investigators modified the conventional FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFOLFIRINOX) by removing the 5-FU bolus at D1 of each cycle. This modification to the regimen would appear not to decrease the efficacy of the treatment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
191 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomised Phase II/III Study, Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Modified Folfirinox Versus Gemcis in Locally Advanced, Unresectable and/or Metastatic Bile Duct Tumours
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 15, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 27, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 16, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: GEMCIS

Drug: GEMCIS
At D1 and D8 of each cycle, i.e. every 21 days for 6 months: Cisplatin 25 mg/m² over 1 hour at D1 and D8 Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² over 30 minutes at D1 and D8.

Experimental: mFOLFIRINOX

Drug: mFolfirinox
At D1 of each cycle, i.e. every 15 days for 6 months: Oxiplatin: 85 mg/m² (IP/120 minutes) Irinotecan: 180 mg/m² (IV/90 minutes) Folinic acid: 400 mg/m² (or 200 mg/m² if Elvorine [calcium levofolinate]) (IV/2 hours), via a Y connector at the same time as irinotecan 5-FU: 2400 mg/m² (IV over 46 hours) without 5FU bolus at D1

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. percentage of patients who are alive without radiological progession [up to 6 months]

    In phase II, the primary endpoint is the percentage of patients alive without radiological progression (assessed according to the RECIST v1.1 criteria) at 6 months (after randomisation). Patients who are in radiological progression or who have died before the 6 months have elapsed will be considered a failure for the primary endpoint at 6 months (after randomisation). A medical review will be conducted to decide on patients without radiological progression at 6 months; in the light of their entire medical file, they may be considered a failure (i.e. in progression) or they may be considered to be truly non-assessable (a 5% surplus of patients has been planned for this situation).

  2. overall survival [up to 6 years]

    In phase III, the primary endpoint is overall survival. This is defined as the period between the date of randomisation and the date of death (regardless of the cause). Patients who are lost to follow-up will be censored at the end-point for the analysis, or at the date when they were last heard of.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. overall survival [up to 6 months]

    In phase II, this is defined as the period between the date of randomisation and the date of death (regardless of the cause). Patients who are lost to follow-up will be censored at the end-point for the analysis, or at the date when they were last heard of.

  2. Tumour response [up to 6 months]

    In phase II, the best tumour response will be assessed across all the treatments and will be described using the figures for the different categories: complete response, partial response, stable, progression or non-assessable.

  3. Tumour response [up to 6 years]

    In phase III, the best tumour response will be assessed across all the treatments and will be described using the figures for the different categories: complete response, partial response, stable, progression or non-assessable.

  4. Toxicity of the treatment assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0 [up to 6 months]

    In phase II, different types of toxicity assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0. Type of toxicity : Haematological (platelets and Neutrophils), Non-haematological (except for nausea, vomiting and alopecia) and neurological (paraesthesia)

  5. Toxicity of the treatment assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0 [up to 6 years]

    In phase III, different types of toxicity assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0. Type of toxicity : Haematological (platelets and Neutrophils), Non-haematological (except for nausea, vomiting and alopecia) and neurological (paraesthesia)

  6. Biliary complications [up to 6 years]

    In phase III : angiocholitis, obstruction of the main bile ducts or biliary stent obstruction

  7. Biliary complications [up to 6 months]

    In phase II : angiocholitis, obstruction of the main bile ducts or biliary stent obstruction

  8. quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 ) [up to 6 years]

    EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life. Quality-of-life assessments will be performed until progression of the disease

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
    • WHO 0 or 1
  • Age ≥ 18 years

  • Tumour of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic (and/or hilar) bile ducts, or of the gallbladder

  • Measurable abdominal metastases (at least a lesion >10 mm) and/or measurable, unresectable primary tumour

  • Disease proven by histopathology or cytology (on metastasis or primary tumour)

  • If there are no abdominal metastases, the unresectability must be confirmed by a hepatobiliary surgeon in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting

  • Bilirubin <1.5 N (after endoscopic or trance hepatic optimum biliary drainage, if necessary), AST and ALT <10N

  • Serum creatinine <130 µmol/L, creatinine clearance >60 mL/min

  • Neutrophils ≥ 1500/mm3 and platelets ≥ 75,000/mm3

  • Prothrombin index > 70%

  • Serum albumin > 25 g/L

  • Patient registered with a social security scheme (including CMU)

  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:
    • Non-measurable metastases and primary tumour
  • Ampullary carcinoma or cancer of the pancreas with infiltration of the bile ducts or mixed tumours (hepatocholangiocarcinoma)

  • Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy within the last 4 months

  • Other malignant tumour except in situ basal cell carcinoma or curatively treated carcinoma of the uterine cervix or other malignant tumour that has been treated and has been considered cured for at least 5 years

  • Major comorbidity factors (unstable angina, myocardial infarction that has occurred within the last 6 months, heart failure ≥2 according to the NYHA classification, uncontrolled high blood pressure)

  • Woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding, or patient of either sex who is of childbearing age and not using an adequate contraceptive method

  • Not able to undergo the trial medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Chu Picardie Amiens France
2 Ico Paul Papin Angers France
3 CH Victor Dupouy Argenteuil France
4 CH de la Côte Basque Bayonne France 64109
5 CHRU Besançon Besançon France
6 Hôpital Avicenne Bobigny France
7 Hôpital Saint-André Bordeaux France 33000
8 Polyclinique Nord Bordeaux France 33000
9 Hôpital Duchenne Boulogne sur Mer France
10 Centre François Baclesse Caen France
11 Chu D'Estaing Clermont-Ferrand France
12 Hôpitaux Civils Colmar France
13 Ch Sud Francilien Corbeil-Essonnes France 91100
14 Centre de radiothérapie et oncologie du Parc Dijon France 21000
15 Centre Georges François Leclerc Dijon France
16 Hôpital Michallon Grenoble France
17 CHD Vendée La Roche sur Yon France
18 Clinique du cap d'Or La Seyne sur Mer France
19 CH Le Kremlin Bicetre Le Kremlin-Bicêtre France
20 CHRU Lille Lille France
21 Centre Hospitalier de Longjumeau Longjumeau France 91160
22 Clinique de la Sauvegarde Lyon France 69000
23 Centre Léon Bérard Lyon France
24 Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Lyon France
25 Hôpital Lyon Sud Lyon France
26 Hôpital Saint-Joseph Marseille France
27 Centre Catherine de Sienne Nantes France
28 CHR Orléans Orléans France
29 HEGP Paris France
30 Hôpital Cochin Paris France
31 Hôpital Saint-Jean Perpignan France
32 CHU La Miletrie Poitiers France
33 CHU Reims Reims France
34 Centre Eugène Marquis Rennes France
35 Hôpital Drôme Nord Romans sur Isère France
36 Chu Rouen Rouen France
37 CHU Saint-Etienne Saint-Etienne France 42055
38 CH Saint-Jean de Luz Saint-Jean de Luz France 64500
39 CH Saint-Quentin Saint-Quentin France
40 Ch Robert Morlevat Semur en Auxois France
41 CAC Paul Strauss Strasbourg France 67065
42 CHU Tours Tours France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
  • Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Marc Phelip, PhD, CHU Saint-Etienne

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02591030
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1408212
  • 2015-002282-35
First Posted:
Oct 29, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Feb 24, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 24, 2022