Early Versus Late Intervention After Biliary Tract Injury Post Cholecystectomy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe associated with significant peri operative morbidity and mortality(1, 2) reduced long term survival(3) and quality of life(4, 5) and high rates of subsequent litigation6. It should be regarded as preventable.
The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has resulted in a resurgence of interest in bile duct injury and its subsequent management. Population based studies(6.7) suggest a significant increase in the incidence of injury (0•1 to 0•5 per cent) following the implementation of the laparoscopic approach(8) Bile duct injury should be regarded as preventable, but over 70 per cent of surgeons regard it as unavoidable(9). Although most injuries occur within the surgeon's first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, one third happen after the surgeon has performed more than 200; it is more than inexperience that leads to bile duct injury(10). It has been suggested that the commonest cause of common bile duct injury is misidentification of biliary anatomy (70-80 per cent of injuries)(11,12),a reduction in risk if surgeons perform routine intraoperative cholangiography Recognition of bile duct injury at the time of cholecystectomy allows an opportunity for the hepatobiliary surgeon to assess its severity and the presence of any vascular injury
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe associated with significant peri operative morbidity and mortality(1, 2) reduced long term survival(3) and quality of life(4, 5) and high rates of subsequent litigation6. It should be regarded as preventable.
The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has resulted in a resurgence of interest in bile duct injury and its subsequent management. Population based studies(6.7) suggest a significant increase in the incidence of injury (0•1 to 0•5 per cent) following the implementation of the laparoscopic approach(8) Bile duct injury should be regarded as preventable, but over 70 per cent of surgeons regard it as unavoidable(9). Although most injuries occur within the surgeon's first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, one third happen after the surgeon has performed more than 200; it is more than inexperience that leads to bile duct injury(10). It has been suggested that the commonest cause of common bile duct injury is misidentification of biliary anatomy (70-80 per cent of injuries)(11,12),a reduction in risk if surgeons perform routine intraoperative cholangiography Recognition of bile duct injury at the time of cholecystectomy allows an opportunity for the hepatobiliary surgeon to assess its severity and the presence of any vascular injury
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: group with biliary injury group for Early versus late intervention after biliary tract injury post cholecystectomy |
Procedure: CBD exoloration
Early versus late intervention after biliary tract injury post cholecystectomy
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- faliure of interventon [two months]
By mesurment liver functon as direct billirubin
Secondary Outcome Measures
- plan for improving [two months]
by mesurment of liver function as AST
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients with post cholecystectomy biliary tract injury admitted at Assuit university hospital at the period of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any case with biliary leakage not post cholecystectomy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Assiut University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- biliary tract injury