Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction

Sponsor
Future University in Egypt (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05150665
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
14
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

There's a scarcity in literature concerning mini-esthetics specially maxillary gingival display changes following en-masse retraction and two-step retraction. The purpose of this study is to determine, In orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which technique of retraction will result in better esthetics upon smiling following en-masse retraction or two step retraction mechanics.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: En-masse retraction
  • Procedure: Two step Retraction
N/A

Detailed Description

This study will be conducted in order to evaluate which technique of retraction will provide better outcome regarding mini and macro esthetics. In terms of mini esthetics, posed smiles will be analyzed to evaluate maxillary gingival display, as well as the analysis of smile arc, buccal corridor, inter-labial gap. In terms of macro esthetics, frontal and profile poses will be assessed to evaluate the nasolabial angle, mentolabial angle and upper and lower lip protrusion/ E- plane.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Only the outcome assessors will be blind. The patients name will be sealed from pre and post photographs and cephalometric radiographs. Then two assessors will carry out, blindly and independently, the measurements and analysis of the study
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction in Maxillary Protrusion Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 29, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 28, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 28, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: En-Masse Retraction

Six anterior teeth (en-Masse) retracted using a crimpable hook distal to the upper lateral incisor and a power chain

Procedure: En-masse retraction
Power chain and Crimpable hook for En-Masse Retraction Retraction will start on a 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 200 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the miniscrew

Experimental: two step retraction

Six anterior teeth are retracted by two step technique by canine retraction followed by four anterior teeth retraction using a crimpable hook distal to the upper lateral incisor and a power chain

Procedure: Two step Retraction
Retraction of canine started on a 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 150 g per side)followed by anterior teeth retraction on 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 160 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Mini-esthetics including [From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)]]

    Evaluation of (maxillary gingival display, Smile arc, buccal corridor) from social smile photograph Evaluation of (inter-labial gap) from At Rest photograph All primary outcome characteristics will be measured before and after retraction (measured Linear/ horizontal/ vertical in millimeters) by Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Macro-esthetics evaluation of profile photograph including [upto 6 months from the start of orthodontic treatment.]

    1. Nasolabial angle. 2. Mentolabial angle. 3. Incisors Inclination (Angular measurement in degrees). 4. Upper lip protrusion/ E- plane. 5. Lower lip protrusion/ E- plane. (Linear measurement in millimeters.) Cephalometric radiographs and Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
16 Years to 24 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adults and Adolescent patients (both genders)

  • Age range (16-24)

  • Patients with maxillary protrusion requiring first premolars extraction (Bimaxillary Protrusion or Class II division 1 cases).

  • Patients with fully erupted permanent teeth (not necessarily including the third molar).

  • Cases requiring maximum anchorage during retraction.

  • Good general and oral health

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients suffering from any neural disorders or systemic diseases interfering with tooth movement.

  • Patients with soft tissue problems such as cleft-palate patients

  • Patients with extracted or missing permanent teeth. (except for third molars).

  • Patients with badly decayed teeth.

  • Patients with any parafunctional habits (i.e. Bruxism, tongue thrusting, mouth breathing, etc....).

  • Patients with previous orthodontic treatment.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Future University In Egypt Cairo Egypt

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Future University in Egypt

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yehya mostafa, Professor and chairman, Future University in Egypt

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sara Usama Saeed Imam, Principle Investigator, Future University in Egypt
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05150665
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • FUE.REC(26)/12-2019
First Posted:
Dec 9, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Dec 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sara Usama Saeed Imam, Principle Investigator, Future University in Egypt

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 9, 2021