Risperidone and Divalproex Sodium With MRI Assessment in Pediatric Bipolar

Sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00176202
Collaborator
(none)
65
3
2
57
21.7
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study is to examine the null hypothesis that risperidone and divalproex sodium are equally effective in treating/stabilizing pediatric bipolar disorder.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Pediatric Bipolar Disorder (PBD) severely impairs a child's emotional development, and is associated with alarming rates of suicide, school failure, aggression, risk taking behaviors and substance abuse (Geller et al, 1998; 2001; Carlson et al, 1998). At present, very little is known about the pathophysiology or optimal treatment of PBD. The long range goals of this proposal are threefold: to investigate a range of pharmacotherapeutic agents that are safe and efficacious for PBD, to use fMRI techniques to examine abnormalities in brain function in this disorder, as well as any change in brain function after treatment.

In contrast to the adult literature, we are aware of only two prospective studies assessing the efficacy of standard mood stabilizers in a pediatric sample. In one, lithium was found to be moderately effective in PBD with comorbid substance abuse (Geller et al, 1998). In the other, divalproex sodium, lithium and carbamazepine produced a maximum of 50% symptom reduction (Kowatch et al, 2000). Subsequently, Kafantaris et al (2001) observed a potentiation of lithium's antimanic effect when combined with risperidone. Further, a prospective, open trial of olanzapine for PBD reported a 70% symptom reduction (Frazier et al, 2001) with a retention rate of 96% compared to only 7% with classic mood stabilizers (Kowatch et al, 2000).

Thus, parallelling adult studies (Sachs et al, 2000), novel antipsychotics are a promising treatment in this population. Further, up to 60% of acute PBD episodes present with psychotic features (Geller et al, in press). Finally, the time to full effect with mood stabilizers is often 4 weeks in children (Kowatch et al, 2000; Geller et al, 1998; Kafantaris et al, 2001), whereas antipsychotics usually have a more rapid response onset (Pavuluri et al, in press). Given the potential efficacy of novel antipsychotics for PBD, the aim is to conduct a randomized trial comparing a novel antipsychotic to a standard mood stabilizer:

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
65 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Controlled Trial of Risperidone and Divalproex Sodium With MRI Assessment of Affected Circuitry in Pre and Post Treatment in Pediatric Bipolar
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2003
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2008

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Risperidone

Risperidone is an antimanic medication and is a second generation antipsychotic

Drug: risperidone
Risperidone is a second generation antipsychotic and antimanic drug
Other Names:
  • antipsychotic
  • risperdal
  • Active Comparator: Divalproex sodium

    Divalproex sodium is an antiepileptic medication and is a mood stabilizer

    Drug: Divalproex Sodium
    Divalproex sodium is a mood stabilizer
    Other Names:
  • antiepileptic
  • valproic acid
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) [Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).]

      This measure has 11 items. The purpose of each item is to rate the severity of that abnormality in the patient. A severity rating is assigned to each of the eleven items, based on the patient's subjective report of his or her condition over the previous forty-eight hours and the clinician's behavioral observations during the interview, with the emphasis on the latter. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Total score of zero to 60 is possible, zero being normal and 60 being severe, 12 serving as a cut off point for illness if equal or above. There are several ways to show change in outcome. We show the mean and standard deviation at week 0 and 6.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Child Depression Rating Scale- Revised (CDRS-R) [Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).]

      Response for depressive symptoms was defined as a score less than 40 on the CDRS-R. Range is 18 to 120. Score 18 is normal and higher score signifies depression. The Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) is a 16-item measure used to determine the severity of depression in children 6-18 years of age. Items are measured on 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-point scales. The mean and standard deviation are measured in this study to illustrate outcome at baseline and when the subject ended the study.

    2. Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS) [Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).]

      Child Mania rating scale is a parent rated measure to screen for symptoms of mania. It includes 21 items reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. Each item is answered on a four-point Likert type scale anchored by 0 (Never/Rare), 1 (Sometimes), 2 (Often), and 3 (Very Often). Maximum score possible is 63. Score higher than 20 is considered clinically significant, and this is a dimensional score of manic severity.

    3. Clinical Global Improvement in Bipolar Disorder Overall (CGI-BP Overall) [Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).]

      Severity of Illness and Global Improvement are rated on a 7-point scale by the clinician. In addition to rating the overall illness with the CGI-BP, severity and improvement are considered on various other dimensions such as mania, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity, psychosis, aggression and sleep difficulties. Score of 1, 2 and 3 would mean there is clinically observed symptom improvement where 1 is the best outcome than 2 or 3. The point 4 is the point where the subject presents at baseline of that specific individual. If they become worse on clinical symptoms, they are rated as 5, 6 or 7 where 7 is worse than 5.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    10 Years to 20 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Children with Bipolar Disorder

    • Must be able to swallow tablets

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Children with general medical condition such as head injury, epilepsy, endocrine disorders

    • Those who are on mood altering medications such as steroids, and those diagnosed with mental retardation are excluded to avoid confounding and contributing factors to mood swings.

    • If we discover during the interview that the parent and/or child does not understand the consent/assent procedures, we will exclude them.

    We expect only a small number of children to be excluded from the study due to exclusionary criteria. Selection of the subjects is not based on sex, race, or ethnic group.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Neuro Psychiatric Institute (NPI) Chicago Illinois United States 60612
    2 NPI, University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois United States 60612
    3 NPI Chicago Illinois United States 60612

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Illinois at Chicago

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Mani Pavuluri, MD, University of Ilinois at Chicago

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Mani Pavuluri, Director of BRAIN Center, University of Illinois at Chicago
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00176202
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RIS-BIP-407
    First Posted:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 5, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2015

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Dates of recruitment :From Sep2005 - Jan 2008.in Clinic Subjects enrolled:65
    Pre-assignment Detail Exclusion Criteria: Children with general medical condition such as head injury, epilepsy, endocrine disorders Those who are on mood altering medications such as steroids, and those diagnosed with mental retardation are excluded to avoid confounding and contributing factors to mood swings.
    Arm/Group Title Risperidone Divalproex Sodium
    Arm/Group Description The study aimed to compare the antipsychotic medication i.e., risperidone's efficacy with that of divalproex sodium (which is an antiepileptic medication) in treating/stabilizing pediatric bipolar disorder. This is antiepileptic medication and is a comparator drug to see if it is as efficacious as risperidone assumption is both have equal efficacy with no difference between the two.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 32 33
    COMPLETED 27 17
    NOT COMPLETED 5 16

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Risperidone Divalproex Total
    Arm/Group Description Risperidone is an antipsychotic medication and is used to treat mania. Its trade name is Risperdal. Aim of the study is to cross compare the relative efficacy and safety of risperidone and divalproex sodium in treating/stabilizing mania in pediatric bipolar disorder. Divalproex sodium, also referred to as divalproex is an antiepileptic medication used for mania and is referred to as mood stabilizer. Its trade name is Depakote. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 32 33 65
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    10.47
    (3.18)
    11.23
    (3.50)
    10.85
    (3.34)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    12
    37.5%
    14
    42.4%
    26
    40%
    Male
    20
    62.5%
    19
    57.6%
    39
    60%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    32
    100%
    33
    100%
    65
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
    Description This measure has 11 items. The purpose of each item is to rate the severity of that abnormality in the patient. A severity rating is assigned to each of the eleven items, based on the patient's subjective report of his or her condition over the previous forty-eight hours and the clinician's behavioral observations during the interview, with the emphasis on the latter. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Total score of zero to 60 is possible, zero being normal and 60 being severe, 12 serving as a cut off point for illness if equal or above. There are several ways to show change in outcome. We show the mean and standard deviation at week 0 and 6.
    Time Frame Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Inclusion criteria were a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder Type I (mixed or manic episode); 8 to 18 years old; and medication free or currently clinically unstable on medication, justifying termination of the ineffective regimen.
    Arm/Group Title Divalproex Risperidone
    Arm/Group Description Divalproex was titrated up to 15 mg/kg/day over 3 days and serum level was measured at the end of 5 days. Divalproex dose was immediately adjusted on obtaining the serum level to aim for 80-120 μg/ml- trough, while ensuring that the dose was tolerated when increased. Serum valproate level was repeated at the end of the study. Risperidone was initiated at 0.25 mg to 0.50 mg per day. The dose was titrated to a maximum of 2 mg per day by increments of 0.25-0.5 mg every 2 days to achieve a maximum tolerable level by day 7.
    Measure Participants 33 32
    Baseline
    25.09
    (7.51)
    30.59
    (7.04)
    Last observation carried forward (LOCF)
    15.24
    (12.49)
    10.22
    (10.50)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Divalproex
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Risperidone
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Child Depression Rating Scale- Revised (CDRS-R)
    Description Response for depressive symptoms was defined as a score less than 40 on the CDRS-R. Range is 18 to 120. Score 18 is normal and higher score signifies depression. The Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) is a 16-item measure used to determine the severity of depression in children 6-18 years of age. Items are measured on 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-point scales. The mean and standard deviation are measured in this study to illustrate outcome at baseline and when the subject ended the study.
    Time Frame Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Divalproex Risperidone
    Arm/Group Description Divalproex was titrated up to 15 mg/kg/day over 3 days and serum level was measured at the end of 5 days. Divalproex dose was immediately adjusted on obtaining the serum level to aim for 80-120 μg/ml- trough, while ensuring that the dose was tolerated when increased. Serum valproate level was repeated at the end of the study. Risperidone was initiated at 0.25 mg to 0.50 mg per day. The dose was titrated to a maximum of 2 mg per day by increments of 0.25-0.5 mg every 2 days to achieve a maximum tolerable level by day 7.
    Measure Participants 33 32
    Baseline
    40.76
    (13.34)
    41.72
    (17.44)
    Last Observation Carried Forward (p<.01)
    35.76
    (15.01)
    25.88
    (9.13)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Divalproex
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Risperidone
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
    Description Child Mania rating scale is a parent rated measure to screen for symptoms of mania. It includes 21 items reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. Each item is answered on a four-point Likert type scale anchored by 0 (Never/Rare), 1 (Sometimes), 2 (Often), and 3 (Very Often). Maximum score possible is 63. Score higher than 20 is considered clinically significant, and this is a dimensional score of manic severity.
    Time Frame Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Risperidone Divalproex Sodium
    Arm/Group Description Antipsychotic medication used as a anti manic agent Antiepileptic medication used as mood stabilizer/antimanic agent
    Measure Participants 32 33
    Baseline
    30.84
    (10.87)
    28.0
    (9.02)
    LOCF
    16.35
    (13.09)
    19.20
    (12.66)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Divalproex
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments In case of both risperidone and divalproex sodium.
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter effect size
    Estimated Value -1.59
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Risperidone
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Effect size
    Estimated Value -1.33
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Clinical Global Improvement in Bipolar Disorder Overall (CGI-BP Overall)
    Description Severity of Illness and Global Improvement are rated on a 7-point scale by the clinician. In addition to rating the overall illness with the CGI-BP, severity and improvement are considered on various other dimensions such as mania, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity, psychosis, aggression and sleep difficulties. Score of 1, 2 and 3 would mean there is clinically observed symptom improvement where 1 is the best outcome than 2 or 3. The point 4 is the point where the subject presents at baseline of that specific individual. If they become worse on clinical symptoms, they are rated as 5, 6 or 7 where 7 is worse than 5.
    Time Frame Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Risperidone Divalproex Sodium
    Arm/Group Description Antipsychotic medication used as a anti manic agent Antiepileptic medication used as mood stabilizer/antimanic agent
    Measure Participants 32 33
    Baseline
    4.80
    (1.06)
    4.37
    (0.67)
    LOCF
    2.77
    (1.28)
    2.97
    (1.50)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Divalproex
    Comments baseline is compared to LOCF to determine the p value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Risperidone
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Weekly from baseline and for 6 weeks; 7 waves of data.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Risperidone Depakote or Divalproex Sodium
    Arm/Group Description Likely side effects include weight gain, muscle stiffness, sedation and tiredness. Clarification: We did not note any serious side effects with either drug. We reported any adverse event that is found in greater than 5% of the participants in each group. Frequency of adverse events do not equal the fact that they are serious adverse events at any individual level. Likely side effects include gastrointestinal side effects such as stomach discomfort, weight gain, agitation and sedation, fatigue or tiredness. Clarification: We did not note any serious side effects with either drug. We reported any adverse event that is found in greater than 5% of the participants in each group. Frequency of adverse events do not equal the fact that they are serious adverse events at any individual level.
    All Cause Mortality
    Risperidone Depakote or Divalproex Sodium
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Risperidone Depakote or Divalproex Sodium
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/32 (0%) 0/33 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Risperidone Depakote or Divalproex Sodium
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 8/32 (25%) 10/33 (30.3%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    stomach discomfort 6/32 (18.8%) 6 5/33 (15.2%) 5
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Increased appetite 8/32 (25%) 8 10/33 (30.3%) 10
    weight gain 3/32 (9.4%) 3 4/33 (12.1%) 4
    Nervous system disorders
    Irritable/agitated 0/32 (0%) 0 7/33 (21.2%) 7
    sleepiness 5/32 (15.6%) 5 4/33 (12.1%) 4
    fatigue/tiredness 5/32 (15.6%) 5 4/33 (12.1%) 4
    insomnia 0/32 (0%) 0 4/33 (12.1%) 4

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr Mani Pavuluri
    Organization University of Illinois at Chicago
    Phone 3124130064
    Email mpavuluri@psych.uic.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Mani Pavuluri, Director of BRAIN Center, University of Illinois at Chicago
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00176202
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RIS-BIP-407
    First Posted:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 5, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2015