Comparison Study of Narrow Band Imaging Versus White Light Resection in Patients With Bladder Tumors/Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the recurrence rate at 1 year following Narrow Band Imaging and trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor with White Light and TURB in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Currently bladder tumors are diagnosed visually with standard cystoscopy that uses white light, or light that is generated encompassing the entire visual spectrum. Some tumors such as carcinoma in situ may not be visible using white light and require patients to undergo random bladder biopsies in order to find the cancer. Recently the development of photodynamic agents have been shown to enhance these procedures to accomplish better resection and identify over-looked tumors. However, these methods often require the instillation of dyes into the bladder as well as specialized cystoscopes. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is now available which uses a special filter to limit the light to only certain wavelengths which allows the identification of areas of increased vascularity or abnormalities without the need for dyes. NBI has been investigated in gastro-intestinal disease and found to be beneficial. Early reports in urology suggest that this technology may reduce the number of tumors that are missed which could impact the recurrence rate of bladder tumors, but this is not known at this time.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Narrow Band Imaging Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) |
Device: Narrow Band Imaging
Narrow Band Imaging
|
Other: White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light Trans Urethral Resection |
Device: White Light
White Light Cystoscopy
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer. [1 year after treatment]
The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate at 1 year. A recurrence was defined as the new occurrence of a bladder cancer at the same site as or at a different site from the index cancer.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection [3 months after treatment]
- Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System. [30 days]
Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade III-a Intervention not under general anaesthesia Grade III-b Intervention under general anaesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications: brain haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid bleeding, but excluding transient ischaemic attacks) requiring IC/ICU management Grade IV-a Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Grade IV-b Multi-organ dysfunction Grade V Death of a patient
- Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment. [peri-operative]
We looked at different perioperative complications in order to discover peri-operative morbidity after instrumental treatment. The following variables were analyzed: Bleeding, Fever, UTI, Bladder cramps, DVT, CVA/TIA, Lung embolism, Sepsis, Acute Abdomen, and Other perioperative complications.
- Recurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB. [Until 135 days]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients scheduled for treatment of primary or recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
-
Patients greater than 18 years of age
-
No tumors in the upper tract (kidneys or ureters)
-
No previous pelvic radiation
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Gross hematuria at the time of resection making visualization with NBI not possible
-
Participation in other clinical studies with investigations drugs concurrently or within 30 days.
-
Pregnancy
-
Conditions associated with a risk of poor compliance or unwilling to follow up
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society
Investigators
- Study Director: Jean de la Rosette, MD, AMC University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 10-004660
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 484 | 481 |
COMPLETED | 303 | 293 |
NOT COMPLETED | 181 | 188 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 484 | 481 | 965 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
65.8
(12.5)
|
66.7
(12.3)
|
66.24
(12.41)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
94
19.4%
|
98
20.4%
|
192
19.9%
|
Male |
390
80.6%
|
383
79.6%
|
773
80.1%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
Austria |
4
0.8%
|
8
1.7%
|
12
1.2%
|
Canada |
52
10.7%
|
40
8.3%
|
92
9.5%
|
China |
41
8.5%
|
34
7.1%
|
75
7.8%
|
Czechia |
51
10.5%
|
67
13.9%
|
118
12.2%
|
Hong Kong |
23
4.8%
|
17
3.5%
|
40
4.1%
|
India |
14
2.9%
|
13
2.7%
|
27
2.8%
|
Italy |
3
0.6%
|
10
2.1%
|
13
1.3%
|
Japan |
97
20%
|
75
15.6%
|
172
17.8%
|
South Korea |
43
8.9%
|
48
10%
|
91
9.4%
|
Norway |
13
2.7%
|
16
3.3%
|
29
3%
|
Romania |
29
6%
|
30
6.2%
|
59
6.1%
|
Russia |
9
1.9%
|
13
2.7%
|
22
2.3%
|
Spain |
9
1.9%
|
13
2.7%
|
22
2.3%
|
Netherlands |
41
8.5%
|
38
7.9%
|
79
8.2%
|
Turkey |
38
7.9%
|
39
8.1%
|
77
8%
|
United States |
11
2.3%
|
17
3.5%
|
28
2.9%
|
United Arab Emirates |
6
1.2%
|
3
0.6%
|
9
0.9%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer. |
---|---|
Description | The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate at 1 year. A recurrence was defined as the new occurrence of a bladder cancer at the same site as or at a different site from the index cancer. |
Time Frame | 1 year after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 484 | 481 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
104
21.5%
|
109
22.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | The expected recurrence rate in the WL-assisted TURBT group was 35%.14 To detect a clinically relevant difference in recurrence detection rates ≥10% at a 5% significance level and a power of 80%, the required sample size per treatment was calculated to be 329 patients (658 patients in total). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.585 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 3 months after treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy |
Measure Participants | 484 | 481 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
59
12.2%
|
61
12.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.742 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System. |
---|---|
Description | Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade III-a Intervention not under general anaesthesia Grade III-b Intervention under general anaesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications: brain haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid bleeding, but excluding transient ischaemic attacks) requiring IC/ICU management Grade IV-a Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Grade IV-b Multi-organ dysfunction Grade V Death of a patient |
Time Frame | 30 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Clavien grading of perioperative complications variable contains missings, therefore the valid percentages are presented in the outcome measure data table. The NBI group had 2 missing values, and the WL group had 3 missing values. Therfore, the overall number deviates from 484 and 481. Below shown is a categorical variable with 8 categories |
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy |
Measure Participants | 482 | 478 |
None |
415
85.7%
|
429
89.2%
|
I |
28
5.8%
|
19
4%
|
II |
23
4.8%
|
21
4.4%
|
IIIA |
11
2.3%
|
4
0.8%
|
IIIB |
3
0.6%
|
5
1%
|
IVA |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
IVB |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
V |
2
0.4%
|
0
0%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | The statistical analyses refers to comparison of the different 8 categories (one variable) mentioned of the Clavien grading of perioperative complications between Narrow Band Imaging and White Light Trans Urethral Resection. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.170 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments | The analysis was performed by using the Fisher exact test, because the criteria for using the Chi square test were not met. |
Title | Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment. |
---|---|
Description | We looked at different perioperative complications in order to discover peri-operative morbidity after instrumental treatment. The following variables were analyzed: Bleeding, Fever, UTI, Bladder cramps, DVT, CVA/TIA, Lung embolism, Sepsis, Acute Abdomen, and Other perioperative complications. |
Time Frame | peri-operative |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The variables contain missing values, therefore the numbers in the below table differs from the overall numbers reported |
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy |
Measure Participants | 484 | 481 |
Bleeding |
36
7.4%
|
27
5.6%
|
Fever |
9
1.9%
|
7
1.5%
|
UTI |
8
1.7%
|
10
2.1%
|
Bladder cramps |
19
3.9%
|
10
2.1%
|
DVT |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
CVA/TIA |
2
0.4%
|
0
0%
|
Lung embolism |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Sepsis |
2
0.4%
|
0
0%
|
Acute Abdomen |
1
0.2%
|
1
0.2%
|
Other perioperative complication |
9
1.9%
|
13
2.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison of the numbers in 'Bleeding' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.311 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison of the numbers in 'Fever' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.666 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'UTI' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.569 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'Bladder cramps' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.111 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'DVT' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | Non of the participants/patients had DVT. Therefore, the p-value is not available |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'CVA/TIA' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.500 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'Lung embolism' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | Non of the participants/patients had a lung embolism. Therefore, no p-value was available |
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'Sepsis' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.500 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'Acute Abdomen' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 1.000 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | Comparison in the number of 'Other perioperative complication' between NBI and WL | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.170 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Recurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB. |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Until 135 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 61 of the patients in the total population in the NBI group, and 69 of the patients in the total population of the WL group received a Re-TURBT after initial TURBT (within 135 days). These numbers therefore differ and deviate from the Participant Flow module. |
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy |
Measure Participants | 61 | 70 |
Number [participants] |
27
5.6%
|
27
5.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Narrow Band Imaging, White Light |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.553 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Only Serious Adverse Events were monitored | |||
Arm/Group Title | Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection | ||
Arm/Group Description | Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 25/484 (5.2%) | 27/481 (5.6%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
patient died of cardiac arrest | 1/484 (0.2%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of heart attack | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
patient died of asystolia | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
rectorrhagia | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of intestinal obstruction | 1/484 (0.2%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
herniainguinalis | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of pancreas cancer | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
patient died of unknown cause | 2/484 (0.4%) | 2/481 (0.4%) | ||
euthanasia | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
galbladder carcinoma | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of biliary tract cancer | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
urinary tract infection | 1/484 (0.2%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
campylobacter colitis | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
acute prostatitis | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
infection of unknown origin | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of septicaemia | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
patient died by car accident | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
obturator kick | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
urethral injury occurred at time of TUR | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
hip's fracture | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
patient died of another neoplasm | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
patient died of cancer | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
radical cystectomy | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
hydronephrosis | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
transurethral urethrotomy | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
patient died of bladder cancer | 2/484 (0.4%) | 5/481 (1%) | ||
patient died by renal insuffiency and prostate cancer | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
transurethral resection prostate | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
transurethral urinary resection | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of kidney failure | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
hematuria | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
radical cystectomy + bricker | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
lung adenocarcinoma | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of chest infection | 1/484 (0.2%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
acute exacerbation of COPD | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
patient died of respiratory insuffiency by bilaterial pneumonia | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
cardiogenic embolism | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
cerebrovascular attack | 1/484 (0.2%) | 0/481 (0%) | ||
pulmonary embolism | 0/484 (0%) | 1/481 (0.2%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Narrow Band Imaging | White Light Trans Urethral Resection | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | J. de la Rosette, chairman CROES |
---|---|
Organization | CROES |
Phone | +31 20 5666030 |
info@croesoffice.org |
- 10-004660