Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Bladder Cancer Undergoing Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized phase II trial studies how well erlotinib hydrochloride works in treating patients with bladder cancer undergoing surgery. Erlotinib hydrochloride may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine if there is a difference in EGFR phosphorylation in normal appearing bladder epithelium adjacent to tumor approximately 9-18 hours post-study dose, between patients randomized to erlotinib hydrochloride (erlotinib) weekly as compared to placebo.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
-
Assess the tolerance of high dose weekly erlotinib compared to placebo. II. Assess the expression of phosphorylated EGF receptor in tumor tissue when available.
-
Assess the expression of e-cadherin and Ki67 in normal and abnormal urothelium.
-
Assess the expression of phosphorylated ERK in normal and abnormal urothelium.
-
Assess limited pharmacokinetics of weekly erlotinib. VI. Assess the expression of p53 in normal and abnormal urothelium. VII. Assess the expression of let-7 in normal and abnormal urothelium. VIII. Exploratory assessment of urination symptoms in men.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups.
GROUP I: Patients receive erlotinib hydrochloride orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1, 8, and 15. Patients then undergo transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) or cystectomy on day 16.
GROUP II: Patients receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Patients then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 7-14 days.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group I (erlotinib hydrochloride) Patients receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Patients then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Drug: Erlotinib Hydrochloride
Given PO
Other Names:
Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Other: Pharmacological Study
Correlative studies
Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Procedure: Therapeutic Conventional Surgery
Undergo TURBT or cystectomy
|
Placebo Comparator: Group II (placebo) Patients receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Patients then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Other: Pharmacological Study
Correlative studies
Other: Placebo
Given PO
Other Names:
Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Procedure: Therapeutic Conventional Surgery
Undergo TURBT or cystectomy
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- EGFR Phosphorylation in Normal Appearing Bladder Epithelium Adjacent to Tumor [Up to 18 hours after last study drug dose (on day 28)]
EGFR phosphorylation will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater mean optical density is associated with greater phosphorylation. The difference between the placebo group and the erlotinib hydrochloride group will be tested as-randomized using a two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- EGFR Phosphorylation in Neoplastic Bladder Epithelium 9-18 Hours Post-study Dose [Up to 18 hours after last study drug dose (on day 28)]
EGFR phosphorylation will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater mean optical density is associated with greater phosphorylation.
- Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Erlotinib in Blood [Baseline, day 8, and day 16 (day of surgery)]
Will be summarized by treatment arm (and, if applicable, by visit) with appropriate descriptive statistics.
- Pharmacokinetic Parameters: OSI-420 in Blood [Baseline, day 8, and day 16 (day of surgery)]
Will be summarized by treatment arm (and, if applicable, by visit) with appropriate descriptive statistics.
- Frequency of Urination Symptoms in Men Only, Graded According to International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) [Baseline up to 18 hours after last study drug dose (on day 28)]
A well documented survey called the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) of urination symptoms which correlates with prostatic hyperplasia in men will be filled out by men at baseline and end of study. The I-PSS is an 8-item survey; 7 questions scored from 0-5 where 0 is 'none' or 'not at all' and 5 is 'five times' or 'almost always'. The sum of the scores for the first 7 questions has a total range of 0-35 where 0 is asymptomatic, 1-7 is mild symptoms, 8-19 is moderate symptoms, and 20-35 are severe symptoms. A final quality of life question is scored from 0-6 where 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). This question serves as a conversation starting point between the patient and physician.
- Expression of E-cadherin [At time of surgery (approximately day 16)]
E-Cadherin expression will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater membrane optical density was associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used.
- Percentage of Cells Expressing Ki67 [At time of surgery (approximately day 16)]
Ki-67 expression will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater positivity was associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used.
- Difference Between Normal and Neoplastic Tissue Phosphorylated ERK [At time of surgery (approximately day 16)]
Phosphorylated ERK will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater mean optical density is associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used.
- Difference Between Normal and Neoplastic Tissue of p53 [At time of surgery (approximately day 16)]
p53 expression will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater nucleus optical density and positivity was associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used.
- Difference Between Normal and Neoplastic Tissue of Let-7 [At time of surgery (approximately day 16)]
A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Participants must have a confirmed or suspected invasive or non-invasive bladder tumor (initial or recurrent) discovered on cystoscopy or radiologic imaging performed within 120 days of randomization
-
Patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) must have never received and currently be ineligible for cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to any of the following:
-
Calculated creatinine clearance of < 60 ml/min
-
Karnofsky performance status (KPS) < 80
-
Solitary kidney or
-
Patient refusal to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy
-
The participant may have prior treatment for bladder tumor (excluding radiation therapy) provided that treatment:
-
Was completed greater than 30 days prior to the first dose of study agent
-
Participants must be a candidate for a trans-urethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT), cystectomy (partial or radical) or cystoscopy with biopsy at a participating organization
-
Karnofsky >= 60%
-
White blood cells (WBC) >= 3000/mm^3
-
Platelets >= 100,000mm^3
-
Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL
-
Alkaline phosphatase =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal
-
Bilirubin =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal
-
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal
-
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal
-
Bilirubin for Gilbert's =< 3.0 mg/dl
-
A calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft Gault) of >= 30 ml/min
-
Sodium >= 130 mg/dl and =< upper limit of normal
-
Potassium >= 3.0 mg/dl and =< upper limit of normal
-
Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her study physician immediately
-
Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Any treatment for the bladder tumor other than intravesical therapy between the pre-study cystoscopy or radiologic imaging which identified the suspected bladder tumor and the scheduled surgical removal or cystoscopy-guided biopsy of that tumor
-
Any chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy received =< 3 months of study entry and any immunotherapy received =< 6 months of study entry (with the exception of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin [BCG] treatment)
-
Any prior external beam radiation to the pelvis
-
A concurrent skin rash or skin condition requiring treatment with a prescription medication
-
The following medications may not be taken within 24 hours of the first dose of study agent or at any time while a participant is taking study agent
-
Coumadin
-
Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors including ketoconazole, atazanavir, boceprevir, ceritinib, clarithromycin, cobicistat, darunavir, dasabuvir, idelalisib, indinavir, itraconazole, lopinavir, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ombitasvir, paritaprevir, posaconazole, ritonavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin, voriconazole, and grapefruit or grapefruit juice
-
CYP3A4 inducers including rifampicin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, primidone, enzalutamide, fosphenytoin, lumacaftor, mitotane, and St. John's wort
-
Agents which decrease gastric acid are allowed but should be avoided if possible
-
Participants may resume inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 > 14 days after their last dose of study agent
-
Participants requiring daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with the exception of =< 81 mg aspirin per day; during study participation, acetaminophen is preferred for treatment of pain; the use of NSAIDs, as needed for pain, is discouraged
-
Participants may not be receiving any other investigational agents
-
History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to erlotinib or clindamycin (topical agent for potential skin toxicity)
-
An underlying predisposition to rectal or gastrointestinal bleeding or uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
-
Females who are pregnant or lactating may not participate in this study; females of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before starting study agent; patients who have had a bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or are greater than 1 year since their last menses are not considered to be of child-bearing potential
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21287 |
2 | Lahey Hospital and Medical Center | Burlington | Massachusetts | United States | 01805 |
3 | University of Rochester | Rochester | New York | United States | 14642 |
4 | Carolina Urologic Research Center | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | United States | 29572 |
5 | Urology San Antonio Research PA | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
6 | University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics | Madison | Wisconsin | United States | 53792 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tracy Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- NCI-2014-01320
- NCI-2014-01320
- HHSN261201200033I
- N01-CN-2012-00033
- CO12336
- UWI2013-01-02
- N01CN00033
- P30CA014520
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 50 were consented, 13 participants ineligible |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 24 | 13 |
COMPLETED | 24 | 12 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 24 | 13 | 37 |
Age, Customized (years) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Participant Age |
70.25
|
69.32
|
69.93
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
3
12.5%
|
3
23.1%
|
6
16.2%
|
Male |
21
87.5%
|
10
76.9%
|
31
83.8%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
1
4.2%
|
2
15.4%
|
3
8.1%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
23
95.8%
|
11
84.6%
|
34
91.9%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
2
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
2
5.4%
|
White |
22
91.7%
|
13
100%
|
35
94.6%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
24
100%
|
13
100%
|
37
100%
|
Karnofsky Performance Status (Count of Participants) | |||
80 |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.7%
|
90 |
4
16.7%
|
3
23.1%
|
7
18.9%
|
100 |
19
79.2%
|
10
76.9%
|
29
78.4%
|
Ever Smoked (Count of Participants) | |||
Yes |
21
87.5%
|
11
84.6%
|
32
86.5%
|
No |
3
12.5%
|
2
15.4%
|
5
13.5%
|
Current Smoker (Count of Participants) | |||
Yes |
6
25%
|
3
23.1%
|
9
24.3%
|
No |
18
75%
|
10
76.9%
|
28
75.7%
|
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [mmHg] |
134.62
|
136.69
|
135.35
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [mmHg] |
76.62
|
78.23
|
77.19
|
Pulse (beats per minute) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [beats per minute] |
74.75
|
69.85
|
73.03
|
Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [degrees Fahrenheit] |
97.67
|
97.48
|
97.61
|
Height (cm) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [cm] |
174.77
|
174.40
|
174.64
|
Weight (kg) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [kg] |
89.67
|
86.83
|
88.67
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [kg/m^2] |
29.37
|
28.25
|
28.96
|
Medical History / Baseline Presence of Abnormality or Disease (participants) [Number] | |||
Genitalia |
1
4.2%
|
2
15.4%
|
3
8.1%
|
Prostate |
2
8.3%
|
1
7.7%
|
3
8.1%
|
Musculoskeletal |
2
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
2
5.4%
|
Skin |
2
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
2
5.4%
|
Abdomen |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.7%
|
Appearance |
0
0%
|
1
7.7%
|
1
2.7%
|
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.7%
|
Heart |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.7%
|
Lungs |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.7%
|
Vascular |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.7%
|
Breasts |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Chest |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Lymph Nodes |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Neurologic |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Pelvis |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Rectal |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Thyroid |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | EGFR Phosphorylation in Normal Appearing Bladder Epithelium Adjacent to Tumor |
---|---|
Description | EGFR phosphorylation will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater mean optical density is associated with greater phosphorylation. The difference between the placebo group and the erlotinib hydrochloride group will be tested as-randomized using a two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. |
Time Frame | Up to 18 hours after last study drug dose (on day 28) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 8 |
Nucleus P-EGFR in Benign Tissue |
0.216
(0.063)
|
0.181
(0.073)
|
Cytoplasm P-EGFR in Benign Tissue |
0.159
(0.046)
|
0.133
(0.062)
|
Membrane P-EGFR in Benign Tissue |
0.179
(0.053)
|
0.148
(0.074)
|
Entire Cell P-EGFR in Benign Tissue |
0.190
(0.054)
|
0.159
(0.069)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Nucleus P-EGFR in benign tissue between erlotinib and placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.208 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Cytoplasm P-EGFR in benign tissue between erlotinib and placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.208 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Membrane P-EGFR in benign tissue between erlotinib and placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.272 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Entire Cell P-EGFR in benign tissue between erlotinib and placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.220 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | EGFR Phosphorylation in Neoplastic Bladder Epithelium 9-18 Hours Post-study Dose |
---|---|
Description | EGFR phosphorylation will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater mean optical density is associated with greater phosphorylation. |
Time Frame | Up to 18 hours after last study drug dose (on day 28) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Patients then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. Erlotinib Hydrochloride: Given PO Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Pharmacological Study: Correlative studies Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo TURBT or cystectomy | Patients receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Patients then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Pharmacological Study: Correlative studies Placebo: Given PO Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo TURBT or cystectomy |
Measure Participants | 21 | 11 |
Nucleus P-EGFR Tumor Tissue |
0.175
(0.060)
|
0.155
(0.059)
|
Cytoplasm P-EGFR Tumor Tissue |
0.161
(0.053)
|
0.146
(0.070)
|
Membrane P-EGFR Tumor Tissue |
0.170
(0.058)
|
0.154
(0.072)
|
Entire Cell P-EGFR Tumor Tissue |
0.170
(0.056)
|
0.151
(0.061)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Nucleus P-EGFR in Tumor Tissue, p-value between placebo and Erlotinib | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.361 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Cytoplasm P-EGFR in Tumor Tissue, p-value between placebo and Erlotinib | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.383 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Membrane P-EGFR in Tumor Tissue, p-value between placebo and Erlotinib | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.427 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Entire Cell P-EGFR in Tumor Tissue, p-value between placebo and Erlotinib | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.416 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Erlotinib in Blood |
---|---|
Description | Will be summarized by treatment arm (and, if applicable, by visit) with appropriate descriptive statistics. |
Time Frame | Baseline, day 8, and day 16 (day of surgery) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 24 | 13 |
Baseline |
0.0
(0.0)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Day 8 |
169.7
(581.3)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Day 16 (Surgery) |
2218.4
(1096.1)
|
0.3
(1.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Baseline visit - p-value between erlotinib and placebo arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 1.000 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Day 8 - p-value between erlotinib and placebo arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.199 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Surgery visit - p-value between erlotinib and placebo arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Pharmacokinetic Parameters: OSI-420 in Blood |
---|---|
Description | Will be summarized by treatment arm (and, if applicable, by visit) with appropriate descriptive statistics. |
Time Frame | Baseline, day 8, and day 16 (day of surgery) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 24 | 13 |
Baseline |
0.0
(0.0)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Day 8 |
2.5
(7.3)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Day 16 (Surgery) |
44.4
(34.6)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Baseline visit - p-value between erlotinib and placebo arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 1.000 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Day 8 - p-value between erlotinib and placebo arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.288 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Surgery visit - p-value between erlotinib and placebo arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Frequency of Urination Symptoms in Men Only, Graded According to International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) |
---|---|
Description | A well documented survey called the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) of urination symptoms which correlates with prostatic hyperplasia in men will be filled out by men at baseline and end of study. The I-PSS is an 8-item survey; 7 questions scored from 0-5 where 0 is 'none' or 'not at all' and 5 is 'five times' or 'almost always'. The sum of the scores for the first 7 questions has a total range of 0-35 where 0 is asymptomatic, 1-7 is mild symptoms, 8-19 is moderate symptoms, and 20-35 are severe symptoms. A final quality of life question is scored from 0-6 where 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). This question serves as a conversation starting point between the patient and physician. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 18 hours after last study drug dose (on day 28) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A participant in the placebo group had no survey response at baseline. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 7 |
Mild (score of 1-7) |
7
29.2%
|
3
23.1%
|
Moderate (score of 8-19) |
7
29.2%
|
3
23.1%
|
Severe (score of 20-35) |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
Mild (score of 1-7) |
7
29.2%
|
5
38.5%
|
Moderate (score of 8-19) |
7
29.2%
|
2
15.4%
|
Severe (score of 20-35) |
1
4.2%
|
0
0%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | P-value between groups at Baseline | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.792 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | P-value between groups at surgery visit | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.261 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Expression of E-cadherin |
---|---|
Description | E-Cadherin expression will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater membrane optical density was associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used. |
Time Frame | At time of surgery (approximately day 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 9 |
Benign Tissue |
0.615
(0.126)
|
0.572
(0.198)
|
Tumor Tissue |
0.616
(0.070)
|
0.563
(0.079)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Expression of e-cadherin in Benign Tissue, P-Value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.721 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Expression of e-cadherin in Tumor Tissue, P-Value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.108 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Cells Expressing Ki67 |
---|---|
Description | Ki-67 expression will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater positivity was associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used. |
Time Frame | At time of surgery (approximately day 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 9 |
Benign Tissue |
0.093
(0.142)
|
0.080
(0.111)
|
Tumor Tissue |
0.148
(0.142)
|
0.170
(0.137)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Expression of KI-67 in Benign Tissue, P-Value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.444 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Expression of KI-67 in Tumor Tissue, P-Value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.663 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Difference Between Normal and Neoplastic Tissue Phosphorylated ERK |
---|---|
Description | Phosphorylated ERK will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater mean optical density is associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used. |
Time Frame | At time of surgery (approximately day 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 5 |
Nucleus P-ERK Normal-Tumor |
-0.071
(0.167)
|
-0.077
(0.183)
|
Cytoplasm P-ERK Normal-Tumor |
-0.104
(0.187)
|
-0.098
(0.170)
|
Entire Cell P-ERK Normal-Tumor |
-0.084
(0.171)
|
-0.085
(0.173)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in p-ERK between Normal and Tumor Tissue, P-Value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 1.000 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in Cytoplasm p-ERK between Normal and Tumor Tissue, P-Value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.792 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in Entire Cell p-ERK between Normal and Tumor Tissue, p-value between arms | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 1.000 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Difference Between Normal and Neoplastic Tissue of p53 |
---|---|
Description | p53 expression will be assessed using Immunohistochemistry (IHC), greater nucleus optical density and positivity was associated with greater expression. A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used. |
Time Frame | At time of surgery (approximately day 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Number analyzed differs from number of participants in each arm for two reasons: sample size insufficient for analysis and sample not obtained. As well as there was not enough tissue to complete this analysis for all participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 8 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Optical Density (OD)] |
-0.052
(0.185)
|
-0.115
(0.305)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.772 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | |
Comments |
Title | Difference Between Normal and Neoplastic Tissue of Let-7 |
---|---|
Description | A two-sample t-test with normalizing transformation if necessary or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used. |
Time Frame | At time of surgery (approximately day 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
This analysis was not completed after discussions with DCP. Participant samples were rationed for multiple analyses, Let-7 analysis was determined to be low on the priority list and it was decided to forego this analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | up to 9 weeks | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants receive erlotinib hydrochloride PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | Participants receive placebo PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Participants then undergo TURBT or cystectomy on day 16. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/24 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/24 (4.2%) | 2/13 (15.4%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Surgical and Medical Procedures, Other | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 2/13 (15.4%) | 2 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Group I (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) | Group II (Placebo) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 22/24 (91.7%) | 8/13 (61.5%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders, Other | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Leukocytosis | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Lymph Node Pain | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Tinnitus | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Endocrine disorders | ||||
Endocrine Orders, Other | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Eye disorders | ||||
Dry Eye | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal Pain | 2/24 (8.3%) | 3 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Bloating | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Diarrhea | 9/24 (37.5%) | 13 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Dry Mouth | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Dyspepsia | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease | 1/24 (4.2%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal Disorders, Other | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal Pain | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Mucositis Oral | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Nausea | 1/24 (4.2%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Oral Pain | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Vomiting | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 2/13 (15.4%) | 2 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Infections and Infestations, Other | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary Tract Infection | 3/24 (12.5%) | 3 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Bruising | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations | ||||
Blood Bilirubin Increased | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations, Other | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Anorexia | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Joint Range of Motion Decreased | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Muscle Weakness Upper Limb | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissues Disorder, Other | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Pain in Extremity | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Amnesia | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Cognitive Disturbance | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Dizziness | 2/24 (8.3%) | 4 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Headache | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Hypersomnia | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Paresthesia | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Tremor | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Bladder Spasm | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Hematuria | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary Incontinence | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary Retention | 3/24 (12.5%) | 3 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary Tract Pain | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary Urgency | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Allergic Rhinitis | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Aspiration | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Cough | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Dyspnea | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Epistaxis | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Nasal Congestion | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders, Other | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Sneezing | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Sore Throat | 2/24 (8.3%) | 3 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Wheezing | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Dry Skin | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Pruritus | 4/24 (16.7%) | 5 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Rash Acneiform | 6/24 (25%) | 11 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Rash Maculo-Papular | 4/24 (16.7%) | 5 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Scalp Pain | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and Subcuteaneous Tissue Disorders, Other | 3/24 (12.5%) | 3 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Urticaria | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Surgical and Medical Procedures, Other | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 2/13 (15.4%) | 2 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Flushing | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Hot Flashes | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 |
Hypertension | 9/24 (37.5%) | 11 | 4/13 (30.8%) | 4 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Tracy Downs |
---|---|
Organization | University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center |
Phone | 608-263-9534 |
downs@urology.wisc.edu |
- NCI-2014-01320
- NCI-2014-01320
- HHSN261201200033I
- N01-CN-2012-00033
- CO12336
- UWI2013-01-02
- N01CN00033
- P30CA014520