Comparison of Interfascial Injection Versus Subpectineal Injection on Ultrasound-guided Obturator Nerve Block

Sponsor
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05540847
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
3
20.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided interfascial injection approach with the subpectineal injection technique for obturator nerve block in bladder cancers undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) under spinal anesthesia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Interfascial Injection
  • Procedure: Subpectineal Injection
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Interfascial Injection Versus Subpectineal Injection on Ultrasound-guided Obturator Nerve Block
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 20, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 15, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 20, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Ultrasound guided interfascial obturator nerve block

In supine position, ultrasound probe will be placed on inguinal region, 2-3 cm below to the inguinal crease. Patients in this group will receive interfascial obturator nerve block under ultrasound guidance.

Procedure: Interfascial Injection
Interfascial Injection on Ultrasound-guided Obturator Nerve Block

Experimental: Ultrasound guided subpectineal obturator nerve block

In supine position, the ultrasound probe will be placed on in inguinal region, 1-2 cm below to the inguinal crease to identiy the subpectineal area. Patients in this group will receive subpectineal obturator nerve block under ultrasound guidance.

Procedure: Subpectineal Injection
Subpectineal Injection on Ultrasound-guided Obturator Nerve Block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Success rate of obturatr nerve block [Peroperative period]

    The success or fail of the obturator nerve block will be conformed using nerve stimulator. Detecting muscles twitch will br considered to be a fail.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of adductor muscle spazms [Intraoperative period]

    Number of adductor muscle spazms in each group will be noted during the intraoperative period.

  2. Sensory block [30 minutes after the intervention]

    Sensory block area will be evaluated by a pin prick at in the dermatomal areas related obturator nerve and branches.

  3. Patient satisfaction [Peroperative period]

    Changes in overall satisfaction will be assessed using a 5 point Likert Scale ( 1-very dissatisfied, 2- dissatisfied, 3- neutral, 4-satisfied, 5 - very satisfied

  4. Procedure time [During the procedure]

    Block performance time will be recorded from the time the first ultrasound image is obtained until the procedure is completed

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Lateral wall bladder tumour

  • ASA I-II patients

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Contraindications for spinal anesthesia,

  • Tumors that disrupt the integrity of the bladder,

  • Coagulation disorders,

  • Uncooperative patients,

  • Allergy to local anesthetics.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Health Science University Diskapi Yildirim Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital Yenimahalle Ankara Turkey 06170

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Halil Cihan Kose, Principal investigator, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05540847
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 141/09
First Posted:
Sep 15, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Sep 16, 2022
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Halil Cihan Kose, Principal investigator, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 16, 2022