Two Different Surgical Methods of Blepharospasm

Sponsor
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02765113
Collaborator
(none)
40
2
19

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

  1. Background: Blepharospasm refers to orbital and periorbital orbicularis muscle spontaneous spasmodic contraction. Continuous spasm can be long or short, the performance of non spasm will strongly closed repeatedly. At present, the pathogenesis of blepharospasm is not clear, in addition, there is no particularly effective treatment.

  2. Purpose:compare two different surgical methods, observe the improvement of symptoms and prognosis of patients with blepharospasm.

  3. Scientific hypothesis: At present, the pathogenesis of blepharospasm is not clear, but clinical patients with blepharospasm showed bilateral eyelid twitching, eyes open difficulties and the symptoms are worse when tension, anxiety, insomnia, light stimulation and wind outside stimulation. At the same time, in the clinic,the investigators found that facial nerve and trigeminal nerve combing can improve the clinical symptoms of the patients. Therefore, the investigators speculated that over activity were related to clinical symptoms and corneal reflex pathway of blepharospasm patients.

  4. Research content: the blepharospasm patients were randomly divided into two groups, prospective comparative analysis of two different surgical methods for the treatment of blepharospasm. One group of patients were performed facial nerve combing and microvascular decompression, the other group of patients were performed facial nerve, trigeminal nerve combing with microvascular decompression, to observation of postoperative clinical improvement of two groups of patients.

  5. Expected results:To define a surgical method for the treatment of blepharospasm, and to promote the use of the academic and clinical practice.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Facial nerve combing
  • Procedure: Facial and Trigeminal nerve combing
Early Phase 1

Detailed Description

Background: Blepharospasm refers to orbital and periorbital orbicularis muscle spontaneous spasmodic contraction. Continuous spasm can be long or short, the performance of non spasm will strongly closed repeatedly. At present, the pathogenesis of blepharospasm is not clear, in addition, there is no particularly effective treatment.

Purpose:compare two different surgical methods, observe the improvement of symptoms and prognosis of patients with blepharospasm.

Scientific hypothesis: At present, the pathogenesis of blepharospasm is not clear, but clinical patients with blepharospasm showed bilateral eyelid twitching, eyes open difficulties and the symptoms are worse when tension, anxiety, insomnia, light stimulation and wind outside stimulation. At the same time, in the clinic,the investigators found that facial nerve and trigeminal nerve combing can improve the clinical symptoms of the patients. Therefore, the investigators speculated that over activity were related to clinical symptoms and corneal reflex pathway of blepharospasm patients.

Research content: the blepharospasm patients were randomly divided into two groups, prospective comparative analysis of two different surgical methods for the treatment of blepharospasm. One group of patients were performed facial nerve combing and microvascular decompression, the other group of patients were performed facial nerve, trigeminal nerve combing with microvascular decompression, to observation of postoperative clinical improvement of two groups of patients.

Expected results:To define a surgical method for the treatment of blepharospasm, and to promote the use of the academic and clinical practice.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effect of Two Different Surgical Methods on the Prognosis of Patients With Blepharospasm
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2016
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Facial nerve combing

Facial nerve combing and Microvascular Decompression(MVD) was performed in all the patients in this group.

Procedure: Facial nerve combing
Facial nerve combing:To sort out the facial nerve using the nerve combing knife. MVD: explore the facial nerve and trigeminal nerve and then perform microvascular decompression.

Active Comparator: Facial and Trigeminal nerve combing

Facial nerve combing、trigeminal nerve combing and Microvascular Decompression(MVD) was performed in all the patients in this group.

Procedure: Facial and Trigeminal nerve combing
Facial nerve combing:To sort out the facial nerve using the nerve combing knife. Trigeminal nerve combing:To sort out the trigeminal nerve using the nerve combing knife. MVD: explore the facial nerve and trigeminal nerve and then perform microvascular decompression.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Improvement of symptoms in patients with blepharospasm [up to 12 months]

    Evaluation of patients with blepharospasm by rating scale.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of facial numbness [up to 12 months]

  2. Incidence of facial paralysis [up to 12 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with bilateral blepharospasm

  2. Clinical symptoms more than 1 years.

  3. Patients who are willing to undergo surgery.

  4. Preoperative patients who had not been treated with botulinum toxin.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with serious heart and lung dysfunction can not tolerate surgery.

  2. The clinical symptoms of the patients less than 1 years.

  3. Patients who received local botulinum toxin treatment for a long time.

  4. Patients with severe mental disorders.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02765113
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • XH-16-008
First Posted:
May 6, 2016
Last Update Posted:
May 6, 2016
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 6, 2016