DuringSOZO: Body Composition During Cancer Treatment
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess how bone density and body composition changes over a cancer patient's treatment via SOZO measurements, DEXA scan (bone density and whole body composition), performance status tests, food log, urine color test, and other study assessments. These assessments will begin after cancer diagnosis but prior to intervention, and continue during treatment and at post-treatment visits.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
This is an observational, prospective device use study. 50 subjects will be enrolled in the study. The study will look at the changes in the participants body composition as they go through cancer treatment using the SOZO device. The SOZO device is intended to estimate the following body composition parameters: Fluid status (TBW, ECF, ICF), Total body composition (fat free mass, fat mass, % of weight), Metabolic report (active tissue mass, extracellular mass, basal metabolic rate), Skeletal muscle mass, Phase angle, Body mass index (BMI), Weight, and Hydration index (Hy-Dex) analysis. Participants will have 5 study visits during the course of their cancer treatment where SOZO measurements will be taken as well as other study measurements.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
During Cancer Treatment Group Participants' body composition will be estimated using a SOZO device at 5 different time points across their cancer treatment. Participant will also complete questionnaires and physical assessments during each study visit. These include waist & hip measurements, weight/BMI, brief fatigue inventory, timed up and go test, cancer distress assessment, ECOG performance status, hand grip strength test, and 24-hour food recall. DEXA scans will be performed before treatment and after completion of treatment. |
Device: SOZO Device
SOZO device will estimate fluid status, total body composition, metabolic report, skeletal muscle mass, phase angle, body mass index, weight, and hydration index analysis. SOZO measurements will be performed before the start of cancer treatment, at the 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 time points of treatment, and after completion of treatment. Participants be asked to fast for at least 8 hours before each visit, but water may be consumed to ensure they are well-hydrated. Participants will be asked to provide a urine sample at each visit and to report the color of your urine to the staff so they can determine how well hydrated the participants are. If not hydrated to the extent needed, participants will be asked to drink water and repeat the urine sample again after 30 minutes.
Device: DEXA Scan
DEXA scan bone density reading with hip and spine measurements as well as a whole body composition scan will be performed. Where DEXA cannot be collected on the same day as other study assessments, Weight/BMI, Urine Color, and SOZO should all be collected (or repeated if already done) to coincide with the DEXA scan if SOZO is available at DEXA location.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- SOZO device can detect changes in body composition [Up to 6 months]
Assess change in body composition from baseline to final visit
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Correlate SOZO with 24-hour food recall. [Up to 6 months]
Assess correlation of SOZO measurements with 24-hour food recall.
- Correlate SOZO with DEXA scan [Up to 6 months]
Assess correlation of SOZO measurements and DEXA scan (bone density with hip and spine measurements and whole body composition) results
- Correlate SOZO with standard of care [Up to 6 months]
Assess correlation of SOZO measurements with standard of care measurements
- Detect changes in physical performance [Up to 6 months]
Change from baseline in 6 minute walk test distance
- Correlate SOZO with urine color test [Up to 6 months]
Assess correlation of SOZO measurements with urine color test.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Willingness and ability to provide consent
-
Mentally and physically able to comply with protocol
-
Age 18 and over
-
Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 40 or body weight of <300 pounds
-
Received first cancer diagnosis within 45 days of the Screening/Baseline study visit
-
Diagnosis of cancer stage I-III
-
Attempts to remove the cancer via chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation, etc. have not been initiated. Subjects will ideally enroll prior to any surgical cancer treatment, but enrollment post-surgery is allowable (capped at 15 subjects)
-
Planned chemotherapy treatment not to exceed 6 months adjuvant treatment. Planned radiation and/or surgery, as well as planned maintenance therapy is allowable (i.e. continued treatment with endocrine therapy, monoclonal antibodies, or other longer-term treatments with minimal side effects) as determined by PI and approved by sponsor.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Active implanted medical device (cardiac pacemakers, defibrillators) or connected to electronic life support devices or patients with other metallic devices that would interfere with BIS measurements
-
Amputees
-
Any acute swelling condition diagnosed or actively being treated within 30 days of screening/baseline (including, but not limited to: acute heart failure, renal disease with dialysis, pulmonary edema, thrombophlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, pleural effusion, ascites, pregnancy)
-
Patients with basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell skin cancer
-
Currently suffering from uncontrolled intercurrent illness, including: ongoing/active infection, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia
-
Enrollment of female breast cancer patients not to exceed 60% of total projected enrollment. Once this threshold has been reached, these subjects will be excluded
-
Planned orthopedic implant surgery
-
Planned breast implant surgery
-
Presence of or plan for breast expanders post-mastectomy
-
Dependent upon transfusions
-
Any history of organ transplant
-
Presence of colostomy/ostomy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Prisma Health Cancer Institute Center for Integrative Oncology and Survivorship | Greenville | South Carolina | United States | 29605 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Prisma Health-Upstate
- ImpediMed Limited
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Larry Gluck, MD, Prisma Health-Upstate
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bachmann J, Heiligensetzer M, Krakowski-Roosen H, Büchler MW, Friess H, Martignoni ME. Cachexia worsens prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jul;12(7):1193-201. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0505-z. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
- Churm D, Andrew IM, Holden K, Hildreth AJ, Hawkins C. A questionnaire study of the approach to the anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with cancer by staff in a district general hospital. Support Care Cancer. 2009 May;17(5):503-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0486-1. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
- Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, Band PR, Bennett JM, Bertino JR, Cohen MH, Douglass HO Jr, Engstrom PF, Ezdinli EZ, Horton J, Johnson GJ, Moertel CG, Oken MM, Perlia C, Rosenbaum C, Silverstein MN, Skeel RT, Sponzo RW, Tormey DC. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):491-7.
- Falconer JS, Fearon KC, Ross JA, Elton R, Wigmore SJ, Garden OJ, Carter DC. Acute-phase protein response and survival duration of patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1995 Apr 15;75(8):2077-82.
- Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Review.
- Fearon KC, Voss AC, Hustead DS; Cancer Cachexia Study Group. Definition of cancer cachexia: effect of weight loss, reduced food intake, and systemic inflammation on functional status and prognosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jun;83(6):1345-50.
- Pacelli F, Bossola M, Rosa F, Tortorelli AP, Papa V, Doglietto GB. Is malnutrition still a risk factor of postoperative complications in gastric cancer surgery? Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;27(3):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
- Spiro A, Baldwin C, Patterson A, Thomas J, Andreyev HJ. The views and practice of oncologists towards nutritional support in patients receiving chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2006 Aug 21;95(4):431-4. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
- Strassmann G, Fong M, Kenney JS, Jacob CO. Evidence for the involvement of interleukin 6 in experimental cancer cachexia. J Clin Invest. 1992 May;89(5):1681-4.
- Terwee CB, Nieveen Van Dijkum EJ, Gouma DJ, Bakkevold KE, Klinkenbijl JH, Wade TP, van Wagensveld BA, Wong A, van der Meulen JH. Pooling of prognostic studies in cancer of the pancreatic head and periampullary region: the Triple-P study. Triple-P study group. Eur J Surg. 2000 Sep;166(9):706-12.
- Tisdale MJ. Mechanisms of cancer cachexia. Physiol Rev. 2009 Apr;89(2):381-410. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00016.2008. Review.
- Pro00077264