ZYCTFEA: Evaluation of the Ability of CT-based Finite Element Analysis (CTFEA) to Predict Fractures in Patients With Metastases: a Randomized Controlled Study.

Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03453905
Collaborator
(none)
162
2
48

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients with metastases to proximal femur, who are evaluated fr the risk of pathologic fracture in order to decide on preventive fixation vs follow-up constitute the study population. The patients will be randomized in two arms. First arm - the decision of treatment will rely on conventional decision algorithm including specialist judgement and Mirels' score. Second arm- the decision on treatment will be supported by CTFEA analysis of bone structure and quantitative simulation-based estimate of fracture risk, in addition to the conventional decision algorithm. Operation rates, pathologic fracture rates and additional secondary outcomes will be compared between the two study arms.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: CTFEA
  • Other: Conventional decision algorithm
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
162 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be randomized to two arms and followed prospectivelyPatients will be randomized to two arms and followed prospectively
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Ability of CT-based Finite Element Analysis (CTFEA) to Predict Fractures in Patients With Metastases: a Randomized Controlled Study.
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: CTFEA

Decision on preventive surgery vs follow-up will be based on expert judgement, Mirels' score and CTFEA

Diagnostic Test: CTFEA
CT scans are used to generate a finite element model of patient-specific long bones. The bone model is loaded in stance position. Load based on patient's weight and the mechanical response, including the risk of fracture, is computed.
Other Names:
  • CT-based Finite Element Analysis
  • Other: Mirels

    Decision on preventive surgery vs follow-up will be based on expert judgement and Mirels' score

    Other: Conventional decision algorithm
    Decision on surgery vs follow-up will be based on expert opinion and Mirels' score
    Other Names:
  • Conventional
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Primary efficacy hypothesis [four years]

      To compare proportion of patients undergoing surgery in the treatment group vs the control group.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Composite endpoint [4 months]

      pathological fracture during 4 months of follow up OR death within 30 days after prophylactic surgery in patients who underwent surgery OR surgical complications within 4 months of follow up: infection, re-operation, mechanical failure

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. All-cause mortality [4 years]

      All-cause mortality

    2. Number of patients who became unable to ambulate [4 years]

      Number of patients who became unable to ambulate for any reason. Inability to ambulate will be determined by an orthopedic surgeon from anamnesis and physical examination.

    3. Number of participants who sustained a pathological fracture [4 months]

      Number of participants who sustained a pathological fracture. Diagnosis of pathological fracture will be determined by an orthopedic surgeon based on imaging.

    4. Death [30 days]

      Death within 30 days after prophylactic surgery

    5. Surgical complications [4 months]

      Infection, re-operation, mechanical failure within 4 months of follow up

    6. Number of surgeries avoided [4 months]

      The number of surgeries "avoided" - presented only in the group of Intervention and only in patients without the safety endpoint within 4 months of follow up. Specifically, number of patients without the safety endpoint in whom a physician changed his/her decision to operate based on the CT-based FE analysis.

    7. Agreement of two measures of fracture risk [One week]

      Agreement between the pathological fracture risk estimated using Mirels' scale and the pathological fracture risk CT-based FE simulation analysis. Risk levels determined by either of the estimates: low, medium, high

    8. Patients who denied surgery [4 months]

      Number of patients who did not undergo a prophylactic surgery, in whom the CT-based FE analysis showed a risk above moderate for fractures in future and who developed a fracture during the 4 months of follow-up - calculated in both study groups.

    9. Complications that could be prevented by CTFEA [One month]

      Number of patients who underwent a prophylactic surgery, in whom the CT-based FE analysis showed a mild-moderate risk of a fracture and who devel-oped a complication (as defined in a composite safety endpoint) - calculated in both study groups

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 120 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Metastatic bone disease of femur

    2. Patients who undergo a CT scan (soft tissue kernel/filter, 120 kVp), and have at least 2/3 of both femurs visible in the CT scan. If CT scan is performed at the Sourasky medical center it must be according to the protocol in Appendix A.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Ipsilateral previous surgery with or without implants

    2. Low quality CT scan or CT does not include at least 2/3 of the femurs.

    3. History of fractures, radiation or surgeries in lower limbs.

    4. Inability to provide informed consent

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Amir Sternheim, MD, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03453905
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 0532-17-TLV
    First Posted:
    Mar 5, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 5, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2018
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 5, 2018