BOSCOT : A Randomised Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Borderline Personality Disorder

Sponsor
University of Aberdeen (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00538135
Collaborator
Wellcome Trust (Other), University of Glasgow (Other), University of London (Other), University of York (Other)
106
1
2
36.9
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the study was to investigate if the addition of cognitive behavioural therapy to treatment as usual (CBT plus TAU) in participants with borderline personality disorder would decrease the number of participants with emergency (i.e. unplanned) psychiatric or accident and emergency room contact or episode of deliberate self-harm over twelve months treatment and twelve months follow-up, compared with treatment as usual (TAU). The study also examined whether CBT plus TAU would lead to superior improvement in quality of life, social, cognitive and mental health functioning than TAU alone.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
  • Other: Treatment as usual
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The trial is being carried out in three centres in the UK: Glasgow, London and Ayrshire (Ayrshire and Arran). Treatment as Usual (TAU) therefore reflected what is likely to be available in the UK.

Patients were eligible if they satisfied the following criteria:
  1. Aged between 18 and 65.

  2. Met criteria for at least 5 items of the borderline personality disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID -II)(First, Gibbon, Spitzer, Williams & Benjamin, 1997)

  3. Had received either in-patient psychiatric services or an assessment at Accident and Emergency services or an episode of deliberate self-harm (either suicidal act or self-mutilation) in the previous 12 months.

  4. Able to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria were as follows:
  1. Currently receiving in-patient treatment for a mental state disorder,

  2. Currently receiving a systematic psychological therapy or specialist service, particularly psychodynamic psychotherapy,

  3. Insufficient knowledge of English to enable them to be assessed adequately and to understand the treatment approach,

  4. Temporarily resident in the area,

  5. The existence of an organic illness, mental impairment, alcohol or drug dependence, schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, as assessed by SCID I,/P (W/ Psychotic Screen)(version 2) (First, Spitzer, Gibbon, Williams, 1996).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
106 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
BOSCOT: A Randomised Control Trial of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Plus Treatment as Usual Versus Treatment as Usual in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2002
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2005

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 1

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy plus Treatment as Usual (CBT plus TAU) for borderline personality disorder. CBT is a structured, time limited, psycho-social intervention developed to treat Cluster B personality disorder. Patients are encouraged to engage in treatment through a formulation of their problems within a cognitive framework. Interventions focus on the patient's beliefs and behaviour that impair social and adaptive functioning. Thirty sessions of CBT over one year, each lasting up to one hour, are required to work on long-standing problems and develop new ways of thinking and behaving. Priority is given to behaviours that cause harm to self or others. In addition, participants received the usual treatment they would have received if the trial had not been in place

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

Other: Treatment as usual
Standard National Health Service treatment as usual for borderline personality disorder

Active Comparator: 2

Treatment as Usual. All participants received the standard treatment (TAU) they would have received if the trial had not been in place. Although standard treatment may vary across the three sites, and depend on the specific problems of the individual participant, it was thought that all participants would be in contact with mental health services and would have some contact with Accident and Emergency services for repeated self-harm episodes. TAU will be documented carefully after each patient exits the trial.

Other: Treatment as usual
Standard National Health Service treatment as usual for borderline personality disorder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The primary outcome will be the composite outcome of the number of in-patient psychiatric hospitalisations, the number of A& E contacts, and the number of suicidal acts. [At both 12 and 24 months post randomisation.]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Secondary outcome measures include the Brief Symptom Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Social Functioning Questionnaire, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, Schema Questionnaire (Young), Euro-Qol (EQ-5D) [6, 12, 18 and 24 months post randomisation]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Aged between 18 and 65.

  2. Met criteria for at least 5 items of the borderline personality disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID -II)(First, Gibbon, Spitzer, Williams & Benjamin, 1997)

  3. Had received either in-patient psychiatric services or an assessment at Accident and Emergency services or an episode of deliberate self-harm (either suicidal act or self-mutilation) in the previous 12 months.

  4. Able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Currently receiving in-patient treatment for a mental state disorder,

  2. Currently receiving a systematic psychological therapy or specialist service, particularly psychodynamic psychotherapy,

  3. Insufficient knowledge of English to enable them to be assessed adequately and to understand the treatment approach,

  4. Temporarily resident in the area,

  5. The existence of an organic illness, mental impairment, alcohol or drug dependence, schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, as assessed by SCID I,/P (W/ Psychotic Screen)(version 2) (First, Spitzer, Gibbon, Williams, 1996).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Psychological Medicine Glasgow Strathclyde United Kingdom G12 0XH

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Aberdeen
  • Wellcome Trust
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of London
  • University of York

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kate Davidson, PhD, University of Glasgow

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00538135
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 064027/Z/01/Z
First Posted:
Oct 2, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Oct 2, 2007
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2007

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 2, 2007