Haemodynamical Optimization During Brain Surgery

Sponsor
University Hospital Hradec Kralove (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04114799
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
44
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The decision to give fluids perioperatively could be based on methods used to identify preload responsiveness, either invasive or noninvasive estimates of stroke volume variation during mechanical ventilation. This study compares fluid management using invasive measurement SPV/PPV (Aisys GE) and noninvasive haemodynamic measurement (ClarSight, Edwards).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Hemodynamic management based on invasive fluid responsiveness parameters
  • Procedure: Hemodynamic management based on noninvasive cardiac output and SVV measurement
N/A

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to optimise fluid management and to reduce perioperative risks during brain surgery. Adequate perioperative management guided by hemodynamic monitoring can help to reduce the risk of complications and thus potentially improve outcomes.

This study compares fluid management algorithms based either on invasive detection of fluid responsiveness using pulse pressure variation (PPV) and systolic pressure variation (SPV) values (Aisys GE monitoring system) in group A, or on noninvasive measurement of haemodynamics (stroke volume variation (SVV), cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) values) (ClearSight, Edwards) in group B.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Comparison of Perioperative Fluid Management Using Invasive Haemodynamical Measurement of Fluid Responsiveness (Aisys GE) and Non-invasive Measurement of Haemodynamics (ClearSight System, Edwards) During Brain Surgery
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A invasive haemodynamical measurement

No continuous infusion of fluids will be used intraoperatively. A defined amount of fluid (20 ml of Plasmalyte, Baxter) will be used to flush the anesthetics and other drugs only. Fluid bolus will be applied in case of protocol defined hypotension according to the value of systolic pressure variation SPV (Aisys GE). The value of SPV (tidal volume 6 ml/kg) above 8% will be used to predict fluid responsiveness. In case of fluid responsiveness, bolus of 2ml/kg of Plasmalyte will be given within 10 minutes. Boluses will be repeated in hypotensive patients if fluid responsiveness persists. Norepinephrine will be used in hypotensive patients without predicted fluid responsiveness.

Procedure: Hemodynamic management based on invasive fluid responsiveness parameters
In case of hypotension (reduction of MAP for more than 15% of individual blood pressure) the SPV value more than 8% will be used as a trigger for the bolus of 2 ml/kg of Plasmalyte (Baxter)

Experimental: Group B non-invasive haemodynamical measurement

No continuous infusion of fluids will be used intraoperatively. A defined amount of fluid (20 ml of Plasmalyte, Baxter) will be used to flush the anesthetics and other drugs only. Fluid management and the use of norepinephrine will follow a protocol based on the values of cardiac index level, systemic vascular resistance and systolic volume variation (SVV) (ClearSight, Edwards).

Procedure: Hemodynamic management based on noninvasive cardiac output and SVV measurement
In case of hypotension (reduction of MAP for more than 15% of individual blood pressure) the systemic vascular resistance (SVR) value will be used to trigger norepinephrine infusion. In patients with low SVR norepinephrine infusion will be started. In patients with high SVR value either fluid bolus (in patient with SVV value above 8%), or dobutamine infusion (in patients with SVV value below or equal 8%) will be used.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. fluid balance difference [up to 5 hours after start of operation]

    the difference between fluid intake and output and losses during surgery will be calculated

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. mean dose of norepinephrine [up to 5 hours after start of operation]

    mean dose of norepinephrine will be calculated from total delivered dose devided by time of the surgery

  2. level of creatinin [24 hours]

    plasma level of creatinin measured on the first postoperative day

  3. postoperative lung dysfunction [1 day]

    postoperative lung dysfunction defined as SpO2 value less than 92% or oxygen therapy more than 6 hours postoperatively

  4. length of postoperative stay [up to 2 month after surgery]

    number of days of stay in the hospital after the surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Glasgow Coma scale 15

  • ASA Physical Status Classification System I-III

  • planed surgery for brain tumor to 5 hours

  • postoperative awakening

  • sinus rhythm

Exclusion Criteria:
  • NYHA III, IV

  • BMI over 40 in females and over 35 in men

  • awake operation

  • postoperative artificial ventilation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czechia 50005

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital Hradec Kralove

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pavel Dostal, MD, Ph.D., University Hospital Hradec Kralove

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Dostalova Vlasta, MD, PhD, principal investigator, University Hospital Hradec Kralove
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04114799
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • UHradec Kralove
First Posted:
Oct 3, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Oct 7, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Dostalova Vlasta, MD, PhD, principal investigator, University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 7, 2021