Improving Ultrasound Images in Brain Tumour Surgery With the Use of an Acoustic Coupling Fluid Mimicking Brain Tissue.

Sponsor
St. Olavs Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT03181581
Collaborator
Norwegian National Advisory Unit for Ultrasound and Image-guided Therapy (Other), SINTEF Health Research (Other)
5
1
4
22
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Tools for improving brain tumor surgery, in particular for gliomas, are increasing. There seems to be an agreement that achieving extensive resections, when done safely without jeopardizing neurological function, improves survival.

Ultrasound is currently used as a tool for providing 2D or 3D images for tumor localization and resection control. For the use in resection control the resection cavity is filled with saline to provide acoustic coupling between the ultrasound transducer and tissue. However, attenuation of acoustic waves is very low in saline compared to the brain and this difference in attenuation is the cause of artifacts that may severely degrade the ultrasound images. Such artifacts are seen as high-intensity signal at the resection cavity wall and beyond. The artificial signal enhancement can potentially mask small tumor remnants and is generally making the interpretation of images more difficult.

This research group has developed an acoustic coupling fluid intended for use in the resection cavity instead of saline. Tests in laboratory measurements have shown that the fluid reduces artifacts and has the potential to enhance ultrasound image quality in brain tumor surgery. Three different concentrations of the acoustic coupling fluid have been tested in a phase 1 study that included 15 patients with glioblastoma. The concentration that provided the optimal ultrasound images, from qualitative and quantitative inspection, is used in the current phase II study. This study is a randomized controlled trial aiming to include 82 patients with glial brain tumours. Its purpose is to test the fluid during surgery of glial brain tumours to further investigate safety and efficacy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: acoustic coupling fluid
  • Biological: Ringer's acetate
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
5 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Improving Ultrasound Images in Brain Tumour Surgery With the Use of an Acoustic Coupling Fluid Mimicking Brain Tissue: a Phase II Technical and Safety Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: High grade gliomas stage 1 ACF

In the first stage 12-15 patients with high-grade gliomas will be included in the trial (acoustic coupling fluid) group.

Biological: acoustic coupling fluid
ultrasound images obtained with both ACF and Ringer's acetate
Other Names:
  • ACF
  • Experimental: Low-high grade gliomas stage 2 ACF

    If the interim safety assessments validate that the study can continue, the second stage involves inclusion in the trial (acoustic coupling fluid) group of 22-25 patients with both low-grade and high-grade glioma

    Biological: acoustic coupling fluid
    ultrasound images obtained with both ACF and Ringer's acetate
    Other Names:
  • ACF
  • Active Comparator: High grade gliomas stage 1 control

    In the first stage 12-15 patients with high-grade gliomas will be included in the Ringer's acetate (control) group.

    Biological: Ringer's acetate
    ultrasound images obtained with Ringer's acetate only

    Active Comparator: Low-high grade gliomas stage 2 control

    If the interim safety assessments validate that the study can continue, the second stage involves inclusion in the Ringer's acetate (control) group of 22-25 patients with both low-grade and high-grade glioma

    Biological: Ringer's acetate
    ultrasound images obtained with Ringer's acetate only

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. difference in serious adverse event rates (test minus control) [72 hours]

      Non-inferiority (i.e. test serious adverse event rate is "not worse" than control) is shown if the 95%-confidence interval around the mean difference in event rates has an upper value below 0.3 which is the predefined margin

    2. difference in serious adverse event rates (test minus control) [30 days]

      Non-inferiority (i.e. test serious adverse event rate is "not worse" than control) is shown if the 95%-confidence interval around the mean difference in event rates has an upper value below 0.3 which is the predefined margin

    3. difference in serious adverse event rates (test minus control) [6 months]

      Non-inferiority (i.e. test serious adverse event rate is "not worse" than control) is shown if the 95%-confidence interval around the mean difference in event rates has an upper value below 0.3 which is the predefined margin

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. image artefacts [1 day]

      during the operation; Qualitative score of ultrasound image quality (poor-medium-good)

    2. image artefacts [1 day]

      during the operation; Qualitative score of artefacts in ultrasound images (none-some-much)

    3. depiction of outline of the anatomy surrounding the resection cavity [1 day]

      during the operation; Qualitative score of ultrasound image quality (poor-medium-good)

    4. depiction of outline of the anatomy surrounding the resection cavity [1 day]

      during the operation; Qualitative score of artefacts in ultrasound images (none-some-much)

    5. image signal-to-noise ratio [1 day]

      after the operation: image analysis by quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Quality of Life [1 month]

      assessed by EQ5D (generic)

    2. Quality of Life [1 month]

      assessed by QLQ-C30 (cancer specific)

    3. Quality of Life [6 months]

      assessed by EQ5D (generic)

    4. Quality of Life [6 months]

      assessed by QLQ-C30 (cancer specific)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • A diffuse glial tumour (high-grade (stage 1), low-grade or high-grade (stage 2)) is suspected from the diagnostic magnetic resonance images (MRI).

    • In cases where histopathology is not known from previous biopsy or resection (i.e. diagnosis is suspected based on MRI findings and not from previous surgery) a tissue sample for frozen section is necessary to confirm the diagnosis.

    • Karnofsky performance status >=70

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Not able to consent (e.g. severe cognitive impairment)

    • Intended biopsy only (meaning: cases not suitable for resection)

    • Hypersensitivity to egg protein

    • Hypersensitivity to soya or peanut protein

    • Hypersensitivity to glycerol

    • Pregnancy of breast-feeding

    • Intention to become pregnant during the time of the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Department of Neurosurgery, St Olavs Hospital Trondheim Norway

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • St. Olavs Hospital
    • Norwegian National Advisory Unit for Ultrasound and Image-guided Therapy
    • SINTEF Health Research

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Petter Aadahl, phd md, St. Olavs Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    St. Olavs Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03181581
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ACF-02
    • 2016-003025-42
    First Posted:
    Jun 9, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 10, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2019
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by St. Olavs Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 10, 2019