NOSE-400: A Clinical Trial With Intranasal Fentanyl in Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain

Sponsor
Takeda (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01429051
Collaborator
(none)
46
11
1
17.1
4.2
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical trial was to demonstrate the efficacy of a 400 μg dose strength of intranasal fentanyl spray (INFS, Instanyl®) and to evaluate the safety and to establish long term tolerability of treatment with INFS doses of 50, 100, 200 and 400 μg.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a clinical trial with 12 weeks treatment of Intranasal fentanyl (INFS) in cancer patients with breakthrough pain (BTP). It was composed of a dose titrated, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, cross-over efficacy phase, combined with a titration and a tolerability phase assessing the safety and nasal tolerability of INFS. The trial is set up with a screening period and three treatment phases: a titration phase (I), an efficacy phase (II) and a tolerability phase (III). The entire trial period for each completed patient consisted of the one week screening period and 12 weeks treatment with INFS.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
46 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Dose Titrated Clinical Trial With a Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomised, Cross-over Phase to Demonstrate the Efficacy of 400 μg Intranasal Fentanyl (INFS) Dose Strength, and to Evaluate 12 Weeks Safety and Nasal Tolerability of All Dose Strengths Between 50 μg and 400 μg, in Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain.
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)

All participants were step-wise titrated to an effective dose of 50, 100, 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase (I). Participants titrated to 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase were randomized to an 8-spray sequence in the Efficacy Phase (II); 6 BTP episodes were treated with 400 μg INFS and 2 BTP episodes with placebo in a random sequence. Participants entered the Tolerability Phase (III) either directly from the Titration Phase (with an effective dose of 50 or 100 μg) or from the Efficacy Phase (400 μg) and continued with this specific dose, unless adjustment was needed, for a total treatment time of 12 weeks.

Drug: Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)
Applied as 1 puff (= 1 dose) in one nostril, or applied as two puffs (= 2 doses, 1 in each nostril) with ten minutes apart.
Other Names:
  • Instanyl®
  • Drug: Placebo
    Matching intranasal placebo spray

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Induction Phase: Pain Intensity Difference at 10 Minutes (PID10) After Treatment [During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose of study drug.]

      During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID10 is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to 10 minutes. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a ≥ 2-point difference is considered as clinically important.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Incidence of Improvement or Worsening in Nasal Mucosa Sign or Abnormality Score [Baseline and at 12 weeks]

      Medical examination of the nasal cavity by rhinoscopy was performed by an oto-rhino-laryngologist before the start of study treatment and at 12 weeks. Signs and any abnormalities were observed for each nostril using the following 4 points assessment scale: • 0 =not present; • 1 =present in a mild degree; • 2 =present in a moderate degree; • 3 =present in a severe degree. A difference in score of 1 or more from Baseline to the end of treatment represented a worsening, while a negative value indicated an improvement of the observed clinical sign. The oto-rhino-laryngologist also assessed whether worsening of a sign was related to study drug. Assessments for both left and right nostrils are presented together. The incidence is calculated as the number of assessments (n) in the improvement or worsening category divided by the number of assessments with a non-missing score for the Nasal Mucosa or Abnormality assessment. Only those signs or abnormalities with n>0 were included

    2. Efficacy Phase: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5, 30, and 60 Minutes After First Dose of Study Drug [During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug.]

      During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a ≥ 2-point difference is considered as clinically important.

    3. Efficacy Phase: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID0-60 and SPID0-30) Derived From PI Scores [During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug]

      The SPID30 and SPID60 represent the average improvement in pain intensity over the 30 minute interval and 60 minute interval, respectively. SPIDt was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) for Pain Intensity Difference over the time interval 0 to t minutes, respectively, divided by the length of the time interval (t minutes). A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain. Pain intensity was assessed at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point.

    4. Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 1, 2 or 3 Point Reduction in Pain Intensity [During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug]

      Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • greater than or equal to 1 point reduction in pain intensity (PI) from time 0, • greater than or equal to 2 point reduction in PI from time 0, and • greater than or equal to 3 point reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain".

    5. Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 33% or 50% Reduction in Pain Intensity [During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug]

      Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • Greater than 33% reduction in PI from time 0; • Greater than or equal to 50% reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain".

    6. Efficacy Phase: General Impression (GI) Score at 60 Minutes After First Dose [During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, 60 minutes after first dose of study drug.]

      Participants assessed their general impression (GI) of treatment efficacy for treated BTP episodes at 60 minutes after first dose of study drug. The validated, categorical 5-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was used for this assessment and scored as follows: 0 =poor; 1 =fair; 2 =good; 3 =very good; 4 =excellent.

    7. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) [12 weeks]

      The severity (intensity of each AE was assessed as mild (transient symptoms, no interference with daily activities), moderate (marked symptoms, moderate interference with daily activities), or severe (considerable interference with daily activities) by the investigator. Serious adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death or is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. The investigator assessed each AE as either related or not related to study treatment.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    All inclusion criteria were answered 'yes' for a patient to participate in the clinical trial.

    • Is the patient a cancer patient with breakthrough Pain (BTP)?

    • Has the patient received either oral opioids or transdermal fentanyl for treatment of background pain (BGP) within the last month prior to the screening visit?

    • Is the current dose of prescribed opioids (for BGP) equivalent to 60-1000 mg oral morphine/day?

    • Has the patient's BGP for the last 7 days prior to the screening visit been generally stable, and on average controlled to a mild level (defined as ≤ 4 on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale [NRS])?

    • Does the patient (at the time of the screening visit) experience his/her current BTP episodes to be of such severe pain intensity, that he/she in general needs additional analgesia (i.e. on top of the background opioid treatment)?

    • Has the patient on average for the last 7 days prior to the screening visit had at least three BTP episodes per week, but no more than four BTP episodes per day?

    • Is the patient able to use intranasal drugs?

    • Is the life expectancy of the patient at least 3 months from the date of the screening visit?

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Has the patient had an illicit substance abuse within the last year prior to screening?

    2. Does the patient have severe hepatic impairment? - defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT or) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels > 3x upper limit of normal (ULN)

    3. Does the patient have severe renal impairment? - defined as serum creatinine ≥ 3.0 mg/dl (265 micromol/L)

    4. Has the patient ever had facial radiotherapy or is the patient scheduled to facial radiotherapy?

    5. Has the patient been treated with any monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors within the last 14 days prior to the screening visit?

    6. Does the patient have severe impaired respiratory function, which may increase the risk of clinically relevant respiratory depression by BTP fentanyl treatment?

    7. Is the patient known to be hypersensitive to fentanyl or to other opioids or any of their excipients?

    8. Does the patient have any head injury, primary brain tumor or other pathological conditions, which could significantly increase the risk of increased intracranial pressure or impaired consciousness?

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Budapest Hungary
    2 Debrecen Hungary
    3 Kazincbarcika Hungary
    4 Nyíregyháza Hungary
    5 Pécs Hungary
    6 Drammen Norway
    7 Trondheim Norway
    8 Moscow Russian Federation
    9 Smolensk Russian Federation
    10 St. Petersburg Russian Federation
    11 Yaroslavl Russian Federation

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Takeda

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Medical Director, Clinical Science, Takeda

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Takeda
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01429051
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • FT-1301-032-SP
    • 2010-021096-85
    • U1111-1133-6364
    • 2011/776
    First Posted:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2014
    Keywords provided by Takeda
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Participants took part in the study at 11 investigative sites in Hungary, Norway and Russia from 08 August 2011 to 04 January 2013.
    Pre-assignment Detail The first dose of Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) was taken at the clinic for training purposes and was not related to treatment of a BTP episode. One patient received the initial 50 μg test dose but did not receive INFS for titration, but is included in the safety analysis set.
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)
    Arm/Group Description All participants were step-wise titrated to an effective dose of 50, 100, 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase (I). Participants titrated to 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase were randomized to an 8-spray sequence in the Efficacy Phase (II); 6 BTP episodes were treated with 400 μg INFS and 2 BTP episodes with placebo in a random sequence. Participants entered the Tolerability Phase (III) either directly from the Titration Phase (with an effective dose of 50 or 100 μg) or from the Efficacy Phase (400 μg) and continued with this specific dose, unless adjustment was needed, for a total treatment time of 12 weeks.
    Period Title: Titration Phase
    STARTED 45
    COMPLETED 33
    NOT COMPLETED 12
    Period Title: Titration Phase
    STARTED 15
    COMPLETED 13
    NOT COMPLETED 2
    Period Title: Titration Phase
    STARTED 31
    COMPLETED 16
    NOT COMPLETED 15

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)
    Arm/Group Description All participants were step-wise titrated to an effective dose of 50, 100, 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase (I). Participants titrated to 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase were randomized to an 8-spray sequence in the Efficacy Phase (II); 6 BTP episodes were treated with 400 μg INFS and 2 BTP episodes with placebo in a random sequence. Participants entered the Tolerability Phase (III) either directly from the Titration Phase (with an effective dose of 50 or 100 μg) or from the Efficacy Phase (400 μg) and continued with this specific dose, unless adjustment was needed, for a total treatment time of 12 weeks.
    Overall Participants 46
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    61.0
    (9.09)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    31
    67.4%
    Male
    15
    32.6%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
    White
    46
    100%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Hungary
    33
    71.7%
    Norway
    10
    21.7%
    Russian Federation
    3
    6.5%
    Site of Primary Tumour Reported in >5% Patients (participants) [Number]
    Breast
    14
    30.4%
    Lung respiratory system
    5
    10.9%
    Gastro-oesophageal
    1
    2.2%
    Colon/rectal
    3
    6.5%
    Pancreas
    6
    13%
    Female genital
    3
    6.5%
    Prostate
    3
    6.5%
    Urological
    7
    15.2%
    Unknown Primary Tumour
    2
    4.3%
    Liver
    1
    2.2%
    Other
    1
    2.2%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Induction Phase: Pain Intensity Difference at 10 Minutes (PID10) After Treatment
    Description During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID10 is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to 10 minutes. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a ≥ 2-point difference is considered as clinically important.
    Time Frame During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose of study drug.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The Full Analysis Set consisted of all randomly assigned participants who entered the Efficacy Phase (II) of the trial and were treated for at least 1 BTP episode with double-blind INFS in the Efficacy Phase of the trial.
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) Placebo
    Arm/Group Description In the Efficacy phase participants received 400 μg INFS for 6 episodes of breakthrough pain. In the Efficacy Phase Participants received placebo intranasal spray for 2 episodes of breakthrough pain.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale]
    2.5
    1.4
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS), Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.002
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments A mixed effects model with episode baseline PI as a covariate, treatment as a fixed effect and patient as a random effect.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value 1.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.41 to 1.179
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Incidence of Improvement or Worsening in Nasal Mucosa Sign or Abnormality Score
    Description Medical examination of the nasal cavity by rhinoscopy was performed by an oto-rhino-laryngologist before the start of study treatment and at 12 weeks. Signs and any abnormalities were observed for each nostril using the following 4 points assessment scale: • 0 =not present; • 1 =present in a mild degree; • 2 =present in a moderate degree; • 3 =present in a severe degree. A difference in score of 1 or more from Baseline to the end of treatment represented a worsening, while a negative value indicated an improvement of the observed clinical sign. The oto-rhino-laryngologist also assessed whether worsening of a sign was related to study drug. Assessments for both left and right nostrils are presented together. The incidence is calculated as the number of assessments (n) in the improvement or worsening category divided by the number of assessments with a non-missing score for the Nasal Mucosa or Abnormality assessment. Only those signs or abnormalities with n>0 were included
    Time Frame Baseline and at 12 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety Analysis Set, which included all patients who received at least 1 dose of INFS (including the initial test dose) with non-missing assessments.
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)
    Arm/Group Description All participants were step-wise titrated to an effective dose of 50, 100, 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase (I). Participants titrated to 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase were randomized to an 8-spray sequence in the Efficacy Phase (II); 6 BTP episodes were treated with 400 μg INFS and 2 BTP episodes with placebo in a random sequence. Participants entered the Tolerability Phase (III) either directly from the Titration Phase (with an effective dose of 50 or 100 μg) or from the Efficacy Phase (400 μg) and continued with this specific dose, unless adjustment was needed, for a total treatment time of 12 weeks.
    Measure Participants 46
    Measure Nostrils 54
    Change of color: Improvement
    0.06
    Change of color: Worsening
    0.09
    Change of color: Worsening related to study drug
    0.09
    Inflammation: Improvement
    0.04
    Inflammation: Worsening
    0.07
    Inflammation: Worsening related to study drug
    0.07
    Sore nose: Improvement
    0.04
    Sore nose: Worsening
    0.04
    Sore nose: Worsening related to study drug
    0.04
    Ulceration: Improvement
    NA
    Ulceration: Worsening
    0.04
    Ulceration: Worsening related to study drug
    0.04
    Dry nose: Improvement
    0.09
    Dry nose: Worsening
    0.06
    Dry nose: Worsening related to study drug
    NA
    Runny nose: Improvement
    0.04
    Runny nose: Worsening
    0.13
    Runny nose: Worsening related to study drug
    0.10
    Stuffed nose: Improvement
    0.06
    Stuffed nose: Worsening
    0.17
    Stuffed nose: Worsening related to study drug
    0.08
    Oedema: Improvement
    0.04
    Oedema: Worsening
    0.17
    Oedema: Worsening related to study drug
    0.08
    Epistaxis: Improvement
    0.02
    Epistaxis: Worsening
    0.02
    Epistaxis: Worsening related to study drug
    0.02
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Efficacy Phase: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5, 30, and 60 Minutes After First Dose of Study Drug
    Description During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a ≥ 2-point difference is considered as clinically important.
    Time Frame During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Efficacy Phase, Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) Placebo
    Arm/Group Description In the Efficacy phase participants received 400 μg INFS for 6 episodes of breakthrough pain. In the Efficacy Phase Participants received placebo intranasal spray for 2 episodes of breakthrough pain.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    PID at 5 minutes
    1.3
    0.8
    PID at 30 minutes
    3.0
    1.8
    PID at 60 minutes
    3.3
    2.2
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Efficacy Phase: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID0-60 and SPID0-30) Derived From PI Scores
    Description The SPID30 and SPID60 represent the average improvement in pain intensity over the 30 minute interval and 60 minute interval, respectively. SPIDt was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) for Pain Intensity Difference over the time interval 0 to t minutes, respectively, divided by the length of the time interval (t minutes). A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain. Pain intensity was assessed at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain". PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point.
    Time Frame During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Efficacy Phase, Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) Placebo
    Arm/Group Description In the Efficacy phase participants received 400 μg INFS for 6 episodes of breakthrough pain. In the Efficacy Phase Participants received placebo intranasal spray for 2 episodes of breakthrough pain.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    SPID30
    0.6
    0.4
    SPID60
    0.7
    0.5
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 1, 2 or 3 Point Reduction in Pain Intensity
    Description Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • greater than or equal to 1 point reduction in pain intensity (PI) from time 0, • greater than or equal to 2 point reduction in PI from time 0, and • greater than or equal to 3 point reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain".
    Time Frame During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Efficacy Phase, Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) Placebo
    Arm/Group Description In the Efficacy phase participants received 400 μg INFS for 6 episodes of breakthrough pain. In the Efficacy Phase Participants received placebo intranasal spray for 2 episodes of breakthrough pain.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    Measure breakthrough pain episodes 88 29
    ≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 5 minutes
    0.61
    0.45
    ≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 10 minutes
    0.74
    0.55
    ≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 30 minutes
    0.81
    0.66
    ≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 60 minutes
    0.86
    0.69
    ≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 5 minutes
    0.33
    0.24
    ≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 10 minutes
    0.51
    0.31
    ≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 30 minutes
    0.60
    0.41
    ≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 60 minutes
    0.65
    0.48
    ≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 5 minutes
    0.18
    0.17
    ≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 10 minutes
    0.32
    0.24
    ≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 30 minutes
    0.45
    0.34
    ≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 60 minutes
    0.50
    0.48
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 33% or 50% Reduction in Pain Intensity
    Description Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • Greater than 33% reduction in PI from time 0; • Greater than or equal to 50% reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is "worst possible pain".
    Time Frame During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Efficacy Phase, Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) Placebo
    Arm/Group Description In the Efficacy phase participants received 400 μg INFS for 6 episodes of breakthrough pain. In the Efficacy Phase Participants received placebo intranasal spray for 2 episodes of breakthrough pain.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    Measure breakthrough pain episodes 88 29
    > 33% reduction in PI at 5 minutes
    0.23
    0.17
    > 33% reduction in PI at 10 minutes
    0.44
    0.24
    > 33% reduction in PI at 30 minutes
    0.55
    0.34
    > 33% reduction in PI at 60 minutes
    0.58
    0.48
    ≥ 50% reduction in PI at 5 minutes
    0.11
    0.07
    ≥ 50% reduction in PI at 10 minutes
    0.31
    0.21
    ≥ 50% reduction in PI at 30 minutes
    0.49
    0.31
    ≥ 50% reduction in PI at 60 minutes
    0.52
    0.34
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Efficacy Phase: General Impression (GI) Score at 60 Minutes After First Dose
    Description Participants assessed their general impression (GI) of treatment efficacy for treated BTP episodes at 60 minutes after first dose of study drug. The validated, categorical 5-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was used for this assessment and scored as follows: 0 =poor; 1 =fair; 2 =good; 3 =very good; 4 =excellent.
    Time Frame During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, 60 minutes after first dose of study drug.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Efficacy Phase, Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) Placebo
    Arm/Group Description In the Efficacy phase participants received 400 μg INFS for 6 episodes of breakthrough pain. In the Efficacy Phase Participants received placebo intranasal spray for 2 episodes of breakthrough pain.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [units on a scale]
    1.9
    1.1
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
    Description The severity (intensity of each AE was assessed as mild (transient symptoms, no interference with daily activities), moderate (marked symptoms, moderate interference with daily activities), or severe (considerable interference with daily activities) by the investigator. Serious adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death or is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. The investigator assessed each AE as either related or not related to study treatment.
    Time Frame 12 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Titration Phase Efficacy Phase Tolerability Phase
    Arm/Group Description All participants were step-wise titrated to an effective dose of 50, 100, 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase. Participants titrated to 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase were randomized to an 8-spray sequence in the Efficacy Phase (II); 6 BTP episodes were treated with 400 μg INFS and 2 BTP episodes with placebo in a random sequence. Participants entered the Tolerability Phase (III) either directly from the Titration Phase (with an effective dose of 50 or 100 μg) or from the Efficacy Phase (400 μg) and continued with this specific dose, unless adjustment was needed, for a total treatment time of 12 weeks.
    Measure Participants 45 15 31
    Any AE
    23
    50%
    6
    NaN
    22
    NaN
    Any AE reported as related to treatment
    14
    30.4%
    4
    NaN
    6
    NaN
    Non-serious adverse events
    22
    47.8%
    5
    NaN
    17
    NaN
    Serious adverse events
    2
    4.3%
    2
    NaN
    8
    NaN
    Deaths
    2
    4.3%
    1
    NaN
    5
    NaN
    Severe adverse events
    2
    4.3%
    2
    NaN
    7
    NaN
    AEs leading to withdrawal
    2
    4.3%
    2
    NaN
    3
    NaN
    AEs possibly associated with nasal intolerability
    2
    4.3%
    0
    NaN
    6
    NaN
    AEs with an onset within 30 minutes of first dose
    11
    23.9%
    3
    NaN
    5
    NaN

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 12 weeks
    Adverse Event Reporting Description At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Titration Phase Efficacy Phase Tolerability Phase
    Arm/Group Description Participants were step-wise titrated to an effective dose of 50, 100, 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase (I). Participants titrated to 200 or 400 μg INFS in the Titration Phase were randomized to an 8-spray sequence in the Efficacy Phase (II); 6 BTP episodes were treated with 400 μg INFS and 2 BTP episodes with placebo in a random sequence. Participants entered the Tolerability Phase (III) either directly from the Titration Phase (with an effective dose of 50 or 100 μg) or from the Efficacy Phase (400 μg) and continued with this specific dose, unless adjustment was needed, for a total treatment time of 12 weeks.
    All Cause Mortality
    Titration Phase Efficacy Phase Tolerability Phase
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Titration Phase Efficacy Phase Tolerability Phase
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 2/45 (4.4%) 2/15 (13.3%) 8/31 (25.8%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiovascular insufficiency 0/45 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/31 (0%)
    General disorders
    Device occlusion 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Disease progression 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Jaundice 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Femur fracture 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Malignant neoplasm progression 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Metastases to lung 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depression 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Azotaemia 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Respiratory depression 0/45 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Titration Phase Efficacy Phase Tolerability Phase
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 22/45 (48.9%) 5/15 (33.3%) 17/31 (54.8%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Tachycardia 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal discomfort 0/45 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/31 (0%)
    Abdominal hernia 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Abdominal pain upper 1/45 (2.2%) 1/15 (6.7%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Constipation 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Diarrhoea 3/45 (6.7%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Dry mouth 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Nausea 10/45 (22.2%) 1/15 (6.7%) 8/31 (25.8%)
    Vomiting 3/45 (6.7%) 1/15 (6.7%) 4/31 (12.9%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Discomfort 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Face oedema 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Fatigue 3/45 (6.7%) 1/15 (6.7%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    General physical health deterioration 2/45 (4.4%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Irritability 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Pyrexia 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Influenza 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Nasopharyngitis 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Procedural dizziness 0/45 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/31 (0%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Cachexia 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Decreased appetite 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Dehydration 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Joint stiffness 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Joint swelling 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Muscle rigidity 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal pain 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Osteoarthritis 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Malignant neoplasm progression 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 8/45 (17.8%) 2/15 (13.3%) 4/31 (12.9%)
    Headache 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 3/31 (9.7%)
    Horner's syndrome 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Hypoaesthesia 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Paraesthesia 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Sedation 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Somnolence 2/45 (4.4%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Tremor 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Emotional distress 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Insomnia 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Sleep disorder 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Dysuria 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dry throat 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Dyspnoea 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%)
    Epistaxis 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Hiccups 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Nasal congestion 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Nasal discomfort 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 3/31 (9.7%)
    Nasal dryness 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Nasal oedema 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 3/31 (9.7%)
    Nasal ulcer 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Hyperhidrosis 2/45 (4.4%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Pruritus 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Urticaria 0/45 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/31 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hot flush 1/45 (2.2%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)
    Superior vena cava syndrome 0/45 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/31 (3.2%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Medical Director
    Organization Takeda
    Phone +1-800-778-2860
    Email clinicaltrialregistry@tpna.com
    Responsible Party:
    Takeda
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01429051
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • FT-1301-032-SP
    • 2010-021096-85
    • U1111-1133-6364
    • 2011/776
    First Posted:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2014