European New Texture Implant Clinical Experience With Round Breast Implants
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to obtain clinical experience with the use of new texture, round breast implants in bilateral primary breast augmentation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: All Participants All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Device: New texture round breast implants
Breast implant surgery
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Investigator Overall Satisfaction With the Device Using a 5-Point Scale [3 months]
The investigator evaluated the overall satisfaction with the device using a 5-point scale where 1=definitely dissatisfied with the device to 5=definitely satisfied with the device.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Subject Satisfaction With Breasts Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire [6 months]
Participants evaluated satisfaction with their breasts using the BREAST-Q. Summary scores were computed by summing the score of each response and transferring them to a 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale.
- Investigator Evaluation of Whether the Implant is Palpably Distinguishable From the Tissue [6 months]
The investigator examined the breasts and evaluated whether the implant was palpably distinguishable from the tissue using a 5-point scale where 1=implant very easy to distinguish from the tissue to 5=implant indistinguishable from the tissue.
- Percentage of Participants With Capsular Contracture Evaluated by Four-Grade Baker Scale [Interim analysis: 12 months]
The investigator evaluated capsular contracture (lining of cells formed around the device as the body's response to a foreign object) using the Four-Grade Baker scale where: Grade I= Breast is normally soft and looks natural, Grade II= Breast is a little firm but looks normal, Grade III=Breast is firm and looks abnormal or Grade IV= Breast is hard, painful, and looks abnormal. The percentage of participants in each Baker Grade is reported.
- Percentage of Participants With Local Complications [Interim analysis: 12 months]
The percentage of participants experiencing local complications (in the area of the implant) is reported.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Be willing to undergo bilateral breast augmentation with subglandular, submuscular, or biplanar placement of the breast implants by inframammary approach only
-
Be a candidate for the device styles and sizes available in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Have tuberous breasts, congenital anomalies of the breast (e.g., Poland's Syndrome), or grade 3 ptosis
-
Have undergone any previous breast surgery
-
Have tissue covering determined inadequate or unsuitable by the surgeon
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Praxisklinik Siepe Friedrichstraße 57 | Bonn | Germany | 53111 | |
2 | Malteser Krankenhaus | Bonn | Germany | 53123 | |
3 | Akademikliniken 10 | Stockholm | Sweden | 11542 | |
4 | Dolan Park Hospital | Birmingham | United Kingdom | B60 1LY |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Allergan
Investigators
- Study Director: Per Heden, Allergan
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ENTICE-001
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 18 |
COMPLETED | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 18 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Overall Participants | 18 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
31.9
(8.89)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
18
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Investigator Overall Satisfaction With the Device Using a 5-Point Scale |
---|---|
Description | The investigator evaluated the overall satisfaction with the device using a 5-point scale where 1=definitely dissatisfied with the device to 5=definitely satisfied with the device. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis population included all participants. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Measure Participants | 18 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
4.6
(0.62)
|
Title | Subject Satisfaction With Breasts Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire |
---|---|
Description | Participants evaluated satisfaction with their breasts using the BREAST-Q. Summary scores were computed by summing the score of each response and transferring them to a 0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis population included all participants. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Measure Participants | 18 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
89.3
(11.69)
|
Title | Investigator Evaluation of Whether the Implant is Palpably Distinguishable From the Tissue |
---|---|
Description | The investigator examined the breasts and evaluated whether the implant was palpably distinguishable from the tissue using a 5-point scale where 1=implant very easy to distinguish from the tissue to 5=implant indistinguishable from the tissue. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis population included all participants. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Measure Participants | 18 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
2.7
(0.96)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Capsular Contracture Evaluated by Four-Grade Baker Scale |
---|---|
Description | The investigator evaluated capsular contracture (lining of cells formed around the device as the body's response to a foreign object) using the Four-Grade Baker scale where: Grade I= Breast is normally soft and looks natural, Grade II= Breast is a little firm but looks normal, Grade III=Breast is firm and looks abnormal or Grade IV= Breast is hard, painful, and looks abnormal. The percentage of participants in each Baker Grade is reported. |
Time Frame | Interim analysis: 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis population included all participants. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Measure Participants | 18 |
Baker Grade I |
88.9
493.9%
|
Baker Grade II |
11.1
61.7%
|
Baker Grade III |
0.0
0%
|
Baker Grade IV |
0.0
0%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Local Complications |
---|---|
Description | The percentage of participants experiencing local complications (in the area of the implant) is reported. |
Time Frame | Interim analysis: 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis population included all participants. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. |
Measure Participants | 18 |
Breast mass, cyst, lump |
16.7
92.8%
|
Breast pain |
100.0
555.6%
|
Implant malposition |
11.1
61.7%
|
Swelling |
11.1
61.7%
|
Other: Epitheliolysis |
5.6
31.1%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | All Participants | |
Arm/Group Description | All participants who had new texture round breast implants surgically implanted. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
All Participants | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
All Participants | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/18 (11.1%) | |
General disorders | ||
Device dislocation | 2/18 (11.1%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
All Participants | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 18/18 (100%) | |
Cardiac disorders | ||
Bradycardia | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Nausea | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
General disorders | ||
Breast complication associated with device | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
Genitourinary tract infection | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Pneumonia | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Urinary tract infection | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Post procedural complication | 2/18 (11.1%) | |
Post procedural swelling | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Procedural dizziness | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Procedural headache | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Procedural pain | 18/18 (100%) | |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Back pain | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Neck pain | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Tenosynovitis | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||
Benign breast neoplasm | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Dizziness | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Hypoaesthesia | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Depression | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||
Breast cyst | 2/18 (11.1%) | |
Breast pain | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
Drug eruption | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Erythema | 1/18 (5.6%) | |
Vascular disorders | ||
Phlebitis superficial | 1/18 (5.6%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Therapeutic Area Head, |
---|---|
Organization | Allergan, Inc |
Phone | 714-246-4500 |
clinicaltrials@allergan.com |
- ENTICE-001