NATRELLE® 410 X-Style and L-Style Breast Implants Continued Access Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study to provide access to and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-Filled X-Style and L-Style Breast Implants for breast augmentation, reconstruction, or revision.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Augmentation Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Device: Anatomically shaped, silicone-filled breast implants with low height/projection or extra-full projection
Surgical implant
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Reconstruction Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Device: Anatomically shaped, silicone-filled breast implants with low height/projection or extra-full projection
Surgical implant
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Revision-Augmentation Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Device: Anatomically shaped, silicone-filled breast implants with low height/projection or extra-full projection
Surgical implant
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Revision-Reconstruction Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Device: Anatomically shaped, silicone-filled breast implants with low height/projection or extra-full projection
Surgical implant
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants According to Investigator Satisfaction With Implants [5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015)]
The investigator rated their satisfaction with the participant's breast implant for each breast on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4=Somewhat satisfied, 5=Definitely satisfied). If there was a different response for the left and right breasts the worst response was used. The percentage of participants where the investigator responded: "Definitely satisfied" or "Somewhat satisfied" is reported.
- Percentage of Participants According to Participant Satisfaction With Implants [5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015)]
The participant rated their satisfaction with the breast implant for each breast on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4=Somewhat satisfied, 5=Definitely satisfied). If there was a different response for the left and right breasts the worst response was used. The percentage of participants who responded: "Definitely satisfied" or "Somewhat satisfied" is reported.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With Local Complications [5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015)]
Kaplan-Meier risk rates (estimation of the percentage of participants) of developing local complications is presented. Local complications collected in the study were: Asymmetry, Breast pain, Capsular contracture, Delayed wound healing, Fluid accumulation/seroma, Hematoma, Hypertrophic scarring/other abnormal scarring, Implant extrusion, Implant malposition, Implant palpability/visibility, Implant rupture, Infection, Redness, Skin rash, Swelling, Tissue/skin necrosis, Upper pole fullness, Wrinkling/rippling and Other complications .
- Percentage of Participants With Reoperations [5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015)]
Kaplan-Meier risk rates (estimation of the percentage of participants) of reoperation is reported.
- Percentage of Participants With Implant Removal With or Without Replacement [5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015)]
Kaplan-Meier risk rates (estimation of the percentage of participants) of implant removal with or without replacement is reported.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
For entry in this study, participants must have either been enrolled in the 410 CA Clinical Study or 410 CARE Clinical Study under the inclusion criteria below and received NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-Filled X- or L-Style Breast Implants in 1 or both breasts; or be planning to be implanted with NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-Filled X- or L-Style Breast Implants in 1 or both breasts and meet the inclusion criteria listed below:
-
Female, age 18 or older (age 22 or older for breast augmentation participants who are implanted under Protocol 410CAXL-001)
-
Present with 1 or more of the following conditions:
-
Primary breast augmentation (i.e., no previous breast implant surgery) indicated for participant dissatisfaction with size or shape of breast (e.g., mammary hypoplasia), asymmetry, ptosis, or aplasia
-
Primary breast reconstruction (i.e., no previous breast implant surgery other than implantation of tissue expanders or contralateral augmentation for asymmetry) indicated, in the affected breast, for mastectomy for cancer, prophylactic mastectomy, or breast trauma, (resulting in mastectomy) and for the unaffected breast, contralateral asymmetry (may be performed on the date of the mastectomy or the date when permanent implants are placed in the reconstructed breast)
-
Breast implant revision surgery (i.e., removal and replacement of breast implants) indicated for previous augmentation or reconstruction with silicone-filled or saline-filled breast implants
-
Has adequate tissue available to cover implants
Exclusion Criteria:
For entry in this study, participants must have either been enrolled in the 410 CA Clinical Study or 410 CARE Clinical Study and did not meet the exclusion criteria listed below or plan to undergo implantation with NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-Filled X- or L-Style Breast Implants in 1 or both breasts and does not meet the exclusion criteria listed below:
-
Has an advanced fibrocystic disease considered to be premalignant without accompanying subcutaneous mastectomy
-
Has an existing carcinoma of the breast, without mastectomy
-
Has an abscess or infection in the body at the time of enrollment
-
Is pregnant or nursing
-
Has any disease, including uncontrolled diabetes (e.g., hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 8%), that is clinically known to impact wound healing ability
-
Shows tissue characteristics that are clinically incompatible with mammaplasty, such as tissue damage resulting from radiation, inadequate tissue, compromised vascularity, or ulceration
-
Has or is under treatment for any condition that may constitute an unwarranted surgical risk (e.g., unstable cardiac or pulmonary problems)
-
Shows psychological characteristics that may be incompatible with the surgical procedure and the prosthesis, such as inappropriate attitude or motivation (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder)
-
Is not willing to undergo further surgery for revision, if medically required
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Anthony Griffin | Beverly Hills | California | United States | 90211 |
2 | Laurence Berkowitz | Campbell | California | United States | 95008 |
3 | Mary Powers | Long Beach | California | United States | 90806 |
4 | Roy Hong | Palo Alto | California | United States | 94301 |
5 | Eric Bachelor | Pleasanton | California | United States | 94566 |
6 | Douglas Reavie | San Diego | California | United States | 92128 |
7 | Steven Teitelbaum | Santa Monica | California | United States | 90404 |
8 | Tad Heinz | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States | 80909 |
9 | Gary Snider | Denver | Colorado | United States | 80218 |
10 | Terrence Murphy | Englewood | Colorado | United States | 80113 |
11 | Orlando De Lucia | Farmington | Connecticut | United States | 06032 |
12 | Lewis Berger | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33607 |
13 | Gerard Mosiello | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33647 |
14 | James Namnoum | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30342 |
15 | Peter Johnson | Des Plaines | Illinois | United States | 60016 |
16 | Stephen Madry | Elk Grove Village | Illinois | United States | 60007 |
17 | Janet Turkle | Carmel | Indiana | United States | 46290 |
18 | Bruce Van Natta | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46290 |
19 | Christine Kelley-Patteson | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46290 |
20 | Brad Storm | Olathe | Kansas | United States | 66061 |
21 | Julene Samuels | Louisville | Kentucky | United States | 40241 |
22 | Timothy Mickel | Monroe | Louisiana | United States | 71201 |
23 | Paul Davis | Shreveport | Louisiana | United States | 71105 |
24 | Bradley Bengtson | Grand Rapids | Michigan | United States | 49503 |
25 | John Renucci | Grand Rapids | Michigan | United States | 49503 |
26 | Steven Morris | Midland | Michigan | United States | 48640 |
27 | Charles Nathan | Chesterfield | Missouri | United States | 63005 |
28 | Herluf Lund Jr. | Chesterfield | Missouri | United States | 63005 |
29 | Patricia McGuire | Creve Coeur | Missouri | United States | 63141 |
30 | Schuyler Meltis | Hannibal | Missouri | United States | 63401 |
31 | Perry Johnson | Omaha | Nebraska | United States | 68102 |
32 | Perry Johnson | Omaha | Nebraska | United States | 68118 |
33 | Peter Hyans | Berkeley Heights | New Jersey | United States | 07922 |
34 | Isaac Starker | Florham Park | New Jersey | United States | 07932 |
35 | Peter Hetzler | Little Silver | New Jersey | United States | 07739 |
36 | Marc Alan Drimmer | Princeton | New Jersey | United States | 08540 |
37 | Caroline Glicksman | Sea Girt | New Jersey | United States | 08750 |
38 | Lloyd Gayle | New York | New York | United States | 10021 |
39 | John Sherman | New York | New York | United States | 10028 |
40 | Tracy Pfeifer | New York | New York | United States | 10028 |
41 | Robert Jacobs | Port Jefferson Station | New York | United States | 11776 |
42 | John Decorato | Staten Island | New York | United States | 10306 |
43 | Raymond Isakov | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44195 |
44 | Craig Colville | Toledo | Ohio | United States | 43615 |
45 | Frank Barone | Toledo | Ohio | United States | 43623 |
46 | Derek Shadid | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73134 |
47 | Robert Hein | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73134 |
48 | Mark Jewell | Eugene | Oregon | United States | 97401 |
49 | John Lettieri | Spartanburg | South Carolina | United States | 29303 |
50 | Kristina D. O'Shaughnessy | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37203 |
51 | Patrick Maxwell | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37212 |
52 | William Carpenter | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75246 |
53 | Jeffrey Friedman | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
54 | Natan Yaker | Plano | Texas | United States | 75093 |
55 | William Adams | University Park | Texas | United States | 75205 |
56 | Gloria Duda | McLean | Virginia | United States | 22101 |
57 | Gavin Dry | Bellevue | Washington | United States | 98005 |
58 | Allen Gabriel | Vancouver | Washington | United States | 98664 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Allergan
Investigators
- Study Chair: Andrew Schumacher, Allergan
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 410CAXL-001
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
STARTED | 288 | 206 | 1222 | 235 |
COMPLETED | 260 | 192 | 1092 | 205 |
NOT COMPLETED | 28 | 14 | 130 | 30 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 278 | 201 | 1180 | 225 | 1884 |
Age (years) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||||
Mean (Full Range) [years] |
34.5
|
47.3
|
50.3
|
54.4
|
48.1
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
278
100%
|
201
100%
|
1180
100%
|
225
100%
|
1884
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants According to Investigator Satisfaction With Implants |
---|---|
Description | The investigator rated their satisfaction with the participant's breast implant for each breast on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4=Somewhat satisfied, 5=Definitely satisfied). If there was a different response for the left and right breasts the worst response was used. The percentage of participants where the investigator responded: "Definitely satisfied" or "Somewhat satisfied" is reported. |
Time Frame | 5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants from the Evaluable population, all participants enrolled under this study protocol who received a NATRELLE® 410 X- or L-style device, with data available for analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Measure Participants | 77 | 34 | 247 | 52 |
Definitely satisfied |
94.8
34.1%
|
85.3
42.4%
|
74.1
6.3%
|
73.1
32.5%
|
Somewhat satisfied |
3.9
1.4%
|
8.8
4.4%
|
21.5
1.8%
|
23.1
10.3%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants According to Participant Satisfaction With Implants |
---|---|
Description | The participant rated their satisfaction with the breast implant for each breast on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4=Somewhat satisfied, 5=Definitely satisfied). If there was a different response for the left and right breasts the worst response was used. The percentage of participants who responded: "Definitely satisfied" or "Somewhat satisfied" is reported. |
Time Frame | 5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants from the Evaluable population, all participants enrolled under this study protocol who received a NATRELLE® 410 X- or L-style device, with data available for analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Measure Participants | 77 | 34 | 247 | 52 |
Definitely satisfied |
88.3
31.8%
|
76.5
38.1%
|
68.0
5.8%
|
65.4
29.1%
|
Somewhat satisfied |
5.2
1.9%
|
17.6
8.8%
|
24.7
2.1%
|
25.0
11.1%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Local Complications |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier risk rates (estimation of the percentage of participants) of developing local complications is presented. Local complications collected in the study were: Asymmetry, Breast pain, Capsular contracture, Delayed wound healing, Fluid accumulation/seroma, Hematoma, Hypertrophic scarring/other abnormal scarring, Implant extrusion, Implant malposition, Implant palpability/visibility, Implant rupture, Infection, Redness, Skin rash, Swelling, Tissue/skin necrosis, Upper pole fullness, Wrinkling/rippling and Other complications . |
Time Frame | 5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Evaluable population was defined as all participants enrolled under this study protocol who received a NATRELLE® 410 X- or L-style device. |
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Measure Participants | 278 | 201 | 1180 | 225 |
Any complication |
6.62
2.4%
|
9.09
4.5%
|
14.50
1.2%
|
10.19
4.5%
|
Asymmetry |
1.11
0.4%
|
1.99
1%
|
2.34
0.2%
|
2.67
1.2%
|
Breast pain |
1.93
0.7%
|
1.08
0.5%
|
0.51
0%
|
1.07
0.5%
|
Capsular contracture |
1.85
0.7%
|
7.90
3.9%
|
20.14
1.7%
|
27.03
12%
|
Delayed wound healing |
0.00
0%
|
0.50
0.2%
|
0.34
0%
|
1.78
0.8%
|
Fluid accumulation/seroma |
0.37
0.1%
|
0.50
0.2%
|
0.57
0%
|
1.78
0.8%
|
Hematoma |
0.00
0%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.43
0%
|
0.44
0.2%
|
Hypertrophic scarring/other abnormal scarring |
0.72
0.3%
|
1.29
0.6%
|
0.75
0.1%
|
0.44
0.2%
|
Implant extrusion |
0.00
0%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.98
0.1%
|
0.60
0.3%
|
Implant malposition |
2.21
0.8%
|
1.00
0.5%
|
1.22
0.1%
|
1.33
0.6%
|
Implant palpability/visibility |
0.48
0.2%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.25
0%
|
0.44
0.2%
|
Implant rupture |
2.14
0.8%
|
6.15
3.1%
|
2.03
0.2%
|
3.84
1.7%
|
Infection |
0.36
0.1%
|
1.49
0.7%
|
1.21
0.1%
|
3.18
1.4%
|
Redness |
0.00
0%
|
0.50
0.2%
|
0.83
0.1%
|
3.31
1.5%
|
Skin rash |
0.36
0.1%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.08
0%
|
0.00
0%
|
Swelling |
0.72
0.3%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.17
0%
|
0.44
0.2%
|
Tissue/skin necrosis |
0.00
0%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.17
0%
|
0.50
0.2%
|
Upper pole fullness |
0.00
0%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.00
0%
|
0.44
0.2%
|
Wrinkling/rippling |
0.00
0%
|
0.50
0.2%
|
1.61
0.1%
|
0.00
0%
|
Other complications |
1.46
0.5%
|
2.99
1.5%
|
4.37
0.4%
|
1.43
0.6%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Reoperations |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier risk rates (estimation of the percentage of participants) of reoperation is reported. |
Time Frame | 5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Evaluable population was defined as all participants enrolled under this study protocol who received a NATRELLE® 410 X- or L-style device. |
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Measure Participants | 278 | 201 | 1180 | 225 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
13.02
4.7%
|
25.08
12.5%
|
39.70
3.4%
|
35.75
15.9%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Implant Removal With or Without Replacement |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier risk rates (estimation of the percentage of participants) of implant removal with or without replacement is reported. |
Time Frame | 5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Evaluable population was defined as all participants enrolled under this study protocol who received a NATRELLE® 410 X- or L-style device. |
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. |
Measure Participants | 278 | 201 | 1180 | 225 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
7.17
2.6%
|
19.09
9.5%
|
19.54
1.7%
|
20.59
9.2%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 06 May 2008 and 08 January 2015) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Adverse events were not collected in this study. Deaths are reported as Serious Adverse Events. Specific local complications were collected and are reported in the Outcome Measure section. Evaluable population. | |||||||
Arm/Group Title | Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction | ||||
Arm/Group Description | Women who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | Women who had revision of previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 7/1180 (0.6%) | 1/225 (0.4%) | ||||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||
Breast cancer | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 2/1180 (0.2%) | 0/225 (0%) | ||||
Metastatic carcinoma to liver | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 1/1180 (0.1%) | 0/225 (0%) | ||||
Recurrence of breast cancer | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 1/1180 (0.1%) | 0/225 (0%) | ||||
Liver cancer | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 0/1180 (0%) | 1/225 (0.4%) | ||||
Metastatic breast cancer | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 2/1180 (0.2%) | 0/225 (0%) | ||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Pulmonary hypertension | 0/278 (0%) | 0/201 (0%) | 1/1180 (0.1%) | 0/225 (0%) | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Augmentation | Revision-Augmentation | Reconstruction | Revision-Reconstruction | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Therapeutic Area, Head |
---|---|
Organization | Allergan |
Phone | 714-246-4500 |
clinicaltrials@allergan.com |
- 410CAXL-001