Study of Dual-energy (DE) Contrast-enhanced (CE) Digital Mammography
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a feasibility study to evaluate dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced (CE) digital mammography to detect breast cancer in patients with increased breast density (BI-RADS category c or d). Eligible patients will be invited to have full-field digital mammography and dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced (CE) digital mammography to compare accuracy of the imaging methods for the detection of breast cancer.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This is a feasibility study to evaluate dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced (CE) digital mammography to detect breast cancer in patients with increased breast density (Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System category c or d). Eligible patients will be invited to have full-field digital mammography and dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced (CE) digital mammography to compare accuracy of the imaging methods for the detection of breast cancer
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Contrast enhanced mammography vs standard digital mammogram Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . |
Device: Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced (DECE) mammography
Contrast mammography
Other Names:
Device: digital mammography
routine digital mammography
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percent Accuracy of Contrast Mammography [1 year]
•The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the accuracy of DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) category c or d breast density).
- Number of Participants With Cancer Detected [1 year]
•The primary endpoint of this study is to detect the presence of cancer using DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (BI-RADS category c or d breast density).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Call Backs With Contrast Mammography [1 year]
•The patients identified for additional imaging based on unconfirmed findings.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Signed informed consent
-
At least 19 years old
-
Glomerular filtration rate> 60
-
Heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS category c or d).
Exclusion Criteria:
-
History of iodinated contrast allergy
-
Pregnant or lactating as determined by routine standard practice
-
Personal history of breast cancer
-
History of prior breast excisional biopsy (Patients with a history of core needle biopsy will not be excluded)
-
History of prior breast reduction mammoplasty surgery
-
History of prior breast augmentation surgery
-
Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | The Kirklin Clinic | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | 35294 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Heidi R Umphrey, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- F141210004
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced (DECE) mammography: Contrast mammography |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 128 |
COMPLETED | 114 |
NOT COMPLETED | 14 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . DECE mammography: Contrast mammography |
Overall Participants | 128 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
100
78.1%
|
>=65 years |
28
21.9%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
128
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
Hispanic or Latino |
100
78.1%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
26
20.3%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
2
1.6%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percent Accuracy of Contrast Mammography |
---|---|
Description | •The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the accuracy of DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) category c or d breast density). |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Consented 128 patients, 114 patients completed both mammograms |
Arm/Group Title | Contrast Enhanced Mammography | Standard Digital Mammogram |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . DECE mammography: Contrast mammography | Full field digital mammography for the detection breast cancer digital mammography: routine digital mammography |
Measure Participants | 114 | 114 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of accuracy] |
100
|
67
|
Title | Number of Participants With Cancer Detected |
---|---|
Description | •The primary endpoint of this study is to detect the presence of cancer using DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (BI-RADS category c or d breast density). |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Consented 128 patients, 114 patients completed both mammograms |
Arm/Group Title | Contrast Enhanced Mammography | Standard Digital Mammogram |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . DECE mammography: Contrast mammography | Full field digital mammography for the detection breast cancer digital mammography: routine digital mammography |
Measure Participants | 114 | 114 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
3
2.3%
|
2
NaN
|
Title | Number of Call Backs With Contrast Mammography |
---|---|
Description | •The patients identified for additional imaging based on unconfirmed findings. |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Consented 128 patients, 114 patients completed both mammograms |
Arm/Group Title | Contrast Enhanced Mammography | Standard Digital Mammogram |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . DECE mammography: Contrast mammography | Full field digital mammography for the detection breast cancer digital mammography: routine digital mammography |
Measure Participants | 114 | 114 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
10
7.8%
|
11
NaN
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse events will be recorded on the CRFs up to 30 days after administration of the last dose of study treatment. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm | |
Arm/Group Description | Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer . DECE mammography: Contrast mammography | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/128 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/128 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/128 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Rachael Lancaster, MD |
---|---|
Organization | University of Alabama at Birmingahm |
Phone | 205-934-4080 |
mvetrano@uabmc.edu |
- F141210004