Effectiveness of AI Genetic Counseling Program vs In-person Genetic Counseling in Breast Cancer

Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04354675
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
2
30.1
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to help better understand the uptake and impact of genetic testing for women diagnosed with breast cancer who do not meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. By doing so, the research team will gain a better understanding of the clinical implications for offering genetic testing for all patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer versus only offering genetic testing to those meeting NCCN criteria.

By offering genetic counseling and genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with breast cancer, there will be a shortage of genetic counselors. This study will also assess the feasibility of using artificial intelligence to assist in the genetic counseling process.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Genetic: Automated program (ChatBot)
  • Genetic: Genetics counselor
  • Other: BCGCKQ Survey
  • Other: Satisfaction Survey
  • Device: Genetic testing
N/A

Detailed Description

This is a randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of pre-test genetic counseling using an artificial intelligence program and traditional in-person genetic counseling in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer who do not currently meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing.

The primary objectives of this study are:
  1. To determine up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing

  2. To assess overall patient satisfaction and comprehension in both groups

The secondary objectives of this study are:
  1. To assess mutation rate in the overall cohort

  2. Identify reasons for not pursuing genetic testing

  3. Identify any specific areas of improvement in satisfaction and comprehension

  4. Assess the impact of genetic testing on Time to Treatment in this cohort

  5. Develop workflow for offering genetic testing, providing pre-test genetic counseling, ordering testing, and delivering results

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Screening
Official Title:
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pre-test Genetic Counseling Using an Artificial Intelligence Program and Traditional In-person Genetic Counseling in Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Who do Not Currently Meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Criteria for Genetic Testing.
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 29, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Artificial intelligence program

Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.

Genetic: Automated program (ChatBot)
Pre-test counseling and information through a pre-test automated genetic counseling program (ChatBot)

Other: BCGCKQ Survey
Survey assessing Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BCGCKQ)
Other Names:
  • Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BCGCKQ)
  • Other: Satisfaction Survey
    Survey assessing satisfaction with Decision-Genetic Testing

    Device: Genetic testing
    Genetic testing for all participants will assess for a mutation in 47 genes commonly associated with hereditary cancer syndromes (Invitae's Common Hereditary Cancer Panel) for those who choose to complete testing.

    Active Comparator: in-person genetic counseling

    Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor

    Genetic: Genetics counselor
    Traditional in-person genetic counseling

    Other: BCGCKQ Survey
    Survey assessing Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BCGCKQ)
    Other Names:
  • Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BCGCKQ)
  • Other: Satisfaction Survey
    Survey assessing satisfaction with Decision-Genetic Testing

    Device: Genetic testing
    Genetic testing for all participants will assess for a mutation in 47 genes commonly associated with hereditary cancer syndromes (Invitae's Common Hereditary Cancer Panel) for those who choose to complete testing.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent of participants who took up genetic testing after not meeting NCCN guidelines for genetic testing [2 years]

      Up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing

    2. Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing: survey [2 years]

      Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing as assessed by survey. The survey is a previously validated six-question Likert scale based survey. The scale ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Satisfaction will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Published data suggest that standard deviation on the satisfaction survey is 3. A 2 point difference in average satisfaction score between groups is considered to be relevant

    3. Overall comprehension as assessed by BCGCKQ [3 years]

      Comprehension as assessed by previously validated survey consisting of 27 questions, which are a blend of True or False and multiple choice questions. The scale ranges from to , with higher scores indicating more comprehension. Comprehension will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of overall cohort with mutation [2 years]

      Mutation rate as described by percentage of overall cohort with mutation. Groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test

    2. Number of patients who decline genetic testing [2 years]

      Number of patients who decline genetic testing. Groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test

    3. Frequencies of most common reasons for not pursuing genetic testing [2 years]

      Reasons for not pursuing genetic testing in those who declined will be collected as a descriptive measure and then analyzed as frequencies of the different responses, summarizing the most common answers

    4. Time to treatment [3 years]

      Time to treatment will be compared between patients who had genetic testing to those who did not using t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test among all study patients.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subjects diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer.

    • Patients who do not satisfy current NCCN criteria for referral to a genetics counselor and genetics testing.

    • Must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document as well as complete the study questionnaires.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Personal history of breast cancer

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Cleveland Ohio United States 44195

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Zahraa Al-Hilli, MD, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04354675
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CASE12119
    First Posted:
    Apr 21, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    May 26, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 26, 2022