MELODY: The Effect of Melatonin on Depression, Anxiety, Cognitive Function and Sleep Disturbances in Breast Cancer Patients

Sponsor
Melissa Voigt Hansen (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT01355523
Collaborator
University of Copenhagen (Other), Rigshospitalet, Denmark (Other), Pharma Nord (Industry)
54
1
2
18.1
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of 6 mg melatonin daily for 1 week preoperatively to 12 weeks postoperatively on depressive symptoms, anxiety, cognitive function and sleep disturbances in breast cancer patients. Furthermore the investigators will examine whether a specific clock-gene (HPER3) is correlated with an increased risk of depression, sleep disturbances or cognitive dysfunction.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine)
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

About 1.4 million women are diagnosed with breast cancer every year. Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide constituting about 1/5 of all cancer types. Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, and the months following primary therapy are stressful times for most women. Aside from the actual "cancer threat" many women experience various degrees of depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances and memory/concentration problems (cognitive dysfunction). Naturally these factors influence the quality of life but also contribute to morbidity and mortality.

Melatonin is a regulatory circadian hormone having, among others, hypnotic, sedative, anxiolytic and possibly anti-depressive effects. It has very low toxicity and very few adverse effects.

The purpose of this project is to test melatonin (6 mg daily for 1 week preoperatively to 12 weeks postoperatively) on breast cancer patients and hopefully hereby be able to prevent depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances and cognitive dysfunction. On an overall perspective this will hopefully contribute to improving the quality of life for these patients and extend their lifetime. Furthermore the investigators will be examining whether a specific gene called a clock-gene (HPER3) is correlated with an increased risk of depression, sleep disturbances or cognitive dysfunction. If this is the case it could become possible to identify women with an increased risk and provide prophylactic treatment for those with a risk of developing a depression, sleep disturbances or cognitive disturbances.

Sample size calculations were based on our primary outcome parameter. Using a conservative estimate for the incidence of depression, the investigators expect to find a reduction from 30% to 15% with melatonin treatment. Sample size is sufficient to include our secondary and tertiary outcome parameters as well. The sample size calculations were calculated with a power of 80%, a type I error of 5% and a type II error of 20%.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
54 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Effect of Melatonin on Depression, Anxiety, Cognitive Function and Sleep Disturbances in Breast Cancer Patients
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Melatonin

6 mg oral melatonin daily

Drug: Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine)
6 mg oral melatonin daily 1 hour before bedtime
Other Names:
  • Melatonin
  • N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamin
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    6 mg oral placebo daily

    Drug: Placebo
    6 mg oral placebo daily 1 hour before bedtime

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Major Depression Inventory (MDI)- Depression at One Point in the Study [Depression at one point in the study (not including baseline) out of 4 measurements at app. day 21, day 35, day 63 and day 91 of the study.]

      MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Diagnostic scale using the ICD-10 algorithm: Mild depression: 2 core symptoms and 2 other symptoms Moderate depression: 2 core symptoms and 4 other symptoms Severe depression: 3 core symptoms and 5 other symptoms Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50

    2. Per Protocol - Depression at One Point in the Study Period [Per protocol - depression at one point in the study period (not baseline)]

      MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50 This analysis includes only patients who have taken study medication as planned.

    3. Intention to Treat (Underestimate) - Depression at One Point in the Study Period [Intention to treat (underestimate) - depression at one point in the study period (not baseline)]

      MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50 For this analysis all missing MDI data have been analyzed as "NO" depression.

    4. Intention to Treat (Overestimate) - Depression at One Point in the Study Period [Intention to treat (overestimate) - depression at one point in the study period (not baseline)]

      MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50 For this analysis all missing MDI data have been analyzed as "YES" for depression.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Anxiety - Immediate Postoperative Period [Daily - from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively]

      Anxiety measured by VAS (visual analog scale). A subjective feeling of anxiety was registered on a VAS going from "no anxiety", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible anxiety", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %

    2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Anxiety - Long-term Postoperative Period [App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively]

      Anxiety measured by VAS (visual analog scale). Completed every 14th day. A subjective feeling of anxiety was registered on a VAS going from "no anxiety", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible anxiety", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %

    3. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Data on Sleepiness (KSS) - Immediate Postoperative Period [Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively]

      Sleepiness measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. KSS is a 9-point scale from 1 (very awake) to 9 (very sleepy) where a score of 7 or more reflects pathological sleepiness. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %

    4. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Data on Sleepiness (KSS) - Long-term Postoperative Period [App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively]

      Sleepiness measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. KSS is a 9-point scale from 1 (very awake) to 9 (very sleepy) where a score of 7 or more reflects pathological sleepiness. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %

    5. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Fatigue - Immediate Postoperative Period [Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively]

      Fatigue on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out daily. A subjective feeling of fatigue was registered on a VAS going from "no fatigue", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible fatigue", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %

    6. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Fatigue - Long-term Postoperative Period [App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively]

      Fatigue on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out every 14th day. A subjective feeling of fatigue was registered on a VAS going from "no fatigue", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible fatigue", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %

    7. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Data on General Well-being - Immediate Postoperative Period [Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively]

      General well-being on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out daily. A subjective feeling of general well-being was registered on a VAS going from "very high well-being", equivalent to 0mm to "very low well-being", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %

    8. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on General Well-being - Long-term Postoperative Period [App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively]

      General well-being on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out every 14th day. A subjective feeling of general well-being was registered on a VAS going from "very high well-being", equivalent to 0mm to "very low well-being", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %

    9. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Pain - Immediate Postoperative Period [Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively]

      Pain on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out daily. A subjective feeling of pain was registered on a VAS going from "no pain", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible pain", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %

    10. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Pain - Long-term Postoperative Period [App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively]

      Pain on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out every 14th day. A subjective feeling of pain was registered on a VAS going from "no pain", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible pain", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %

    11. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Sleep Quality - Immediate Postoperative Period [Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively]

      Subjective sleep score on Visual Analog Scale. Subjective sleep quality was registered on a VAS going from "best possible sleep", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible sleep", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %

    12. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Sleep Quality - Long-term Postoperative Period [App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively]

      Subjective sleep on a Visual Analog Scale. Subjective sleep quality was registered on a VAS going from "best possible sleep", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible sleep", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %

    13. Sleep Architecture [From inclusion till 14 days postoperatively]

      Actigraphy (total minutes asleep, sleep effectiveness, sleep latency, awakenings). A wrist actigraph will be worn from inclusion till 14 days postoperatively.

    14. HPER3 Genotype [At inclusion = day-7]

      A blood sample will be taken at inclusion and analysed for HPER3 genotype (4/4, 4/5, 5/5) and this will be investigated for a correlation with sleep, cognitive function and depressive symptoms 7 patients did not give blood samples

    15. Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) App. 2 Weeks Postoperatively. [App. 2 weeks postoperatively]

      Calculations for POCD were based on normative data from 133 females aged 40-60 years. We evaluated changes from the preoperative baseline to the 2 postoperative test sessions. In controls we calculated mean and standard deviations (SD) of these differences. The mean change in this group may be taken as estimated learning effects. For the individual patients, we compared baseline scores with the 2- and 12-week postoperative test results, subtracted the average learning effect from the changes and divided the result by the SD of the control group to obtain a Z score for the 7 individual test outcomes. A large positive Z score indicated deterioration in cognitive function from baseline in patients. We defined a composite Z score as the sum of the 7 Z scores and normalized this using the SD for that sum in the controls. POCD was defined as a combined Z score >1.96 or a Z score >1.96 in at least 2 of the 7 subtests. Units of measure = % of patients with YES to POCD

    16. Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) App. 10 Weeks Postoperatively [App. 10 weeks postoperatively]

      Calculations for POCD were based on normative data from 133 females aged 40-60 years. We evaluated changes from the preoperative baseline to the 2 postoperative test sessions. In controls we calculated mean and standard deviations (SD) of these differences. The mean change in this group may be taken as estimated learning effects. For the individual patients, we compared baseline scores with the 2- and 12-week postoperative test results, subtracted the average learning effect from the changes and divided the result by the SD of the control group to obtain a Z score for the 7 individual test outcomes. A large positive Z score indicated deterioration in cognitive function from baseline in patients. We defined a composite Z score as the sum of the 7 Z scores and normalized this using the SD for that sum in the controls. POCD was defined as a combined Z score >1.96 or a Z score >1.96 in at least 2 of the 7 subtests. Units of measure = % of patients with YES to POCD

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    30 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Women, age 30-75, with breast cancer who are admitted for a lumpectomy or mastectomy at Herlev Hospital

    • ASA score I-III

    • No sign of depression measured my Major Depression Inventory (MDI)

    • Not pregnant

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    • Treatment with SSRI, Warfarin or other anticoagulants (except 75 mg ASA daily), MAO inhibitors or calcium blockers

    • Rotor or Dubin-Johnson syndrome

    • Epilepsy

    • Known allergic reaction to melatonin

    • Known and treated sleep apnea

    • Diabetes Mellitus - insulin treated

    • Ongoing or previous medically treated depression or bipolar disorder

    • Known autoimmune diseases - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and sclerose

    • Incompensated liver cirrhosis

    • Severe kidney disease

    • Previous or current cancer

    • Known medically treated sleep-disorder (insomnia, restless legs etc)

    • Shift-work and night-work

    • Daily alcohol intake of more than 5 units

    • Pre-operative treatment with psychopharmacological drugs, opioids or anxiolytics (including all sleeping pills)

    • Predicted bad compliance

    • Pregnant or breast-feeding

    • Pre-operative Mini Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) score less than 24

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Herlev Hospital Copenhagen Denmark 2730

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Melissa Voigt Hansen
    • University of Copenhagen
    • Rigshospitalet, Denmark
    • Pharma Nord

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Melissa V Hansen, MD, Herlev Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Melissa Voigt Hansen, M.D., ph-D student, Herlev Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01355523
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MVH-03
    • 2010-022460-12
    • 2007-58-0015/HEH.750.89-12
    • H-4-2011-007
    First Posted:
    May 18, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    May 6, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Keywords provided by Melissa Voigt Hansen, M.D., ph-D student, Herlev Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details The recruitment period was from July 2011 till December 2012. The location was The Department of Breast Surgery - Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen - Denmark.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 28 26
    COMPLETED 27 16
    NOT COMPLETED 1 10

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 28 26 54
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    20
    71.4%
    16
    61.5%
    36
    66.7%
    >=65 years
    8
    28.6%
    10
    38.5%
    18
    33.3%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    54.50
    (10.69)
    58.23
    (11.36)
    56.30
    (11.07)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    28
    100%
    26
    100%
    54
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Denmark
    28
    100%
    26
    100%
    54
    100%
    Type of surgery (Number) [Number]
    Mastectomy + axillary dissection +/- SN
    1
    3.6%
    3
    11.5%
    4
    7.4%
    Mastectomy + SN
    4
    14.3%
    3
    11.5%
    7
    13%
    Lumpectomy + axillary dissection +/- SN
    6
    21.4%
    6
    23.1%
    12
    22.2%
    Lumpectomy + SN
    16
    57.1%
    12
    46.2%
    28
    51.9%
    Lumpectomy converted to mastectomy + SN
    1
    3.6%
    0
    0%
    1
    1.9%
    Bilateral lumpectomy + axillary dissection + SN
    0
    0%
    2
    7.7%
    2
    3.7%
    Surgery duration (Minutes) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ]
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Minutes]
    92
    125
    110
    Anaesthesia duration (Minutes) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ]
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Minutes]
    155
    190
    171
    Oncological treatment (Number) [Number]
    None
    3
    10.7%
    3
    11.5%
    6
    11.1%
    Radiation
    5
    17.9%
    6
    23.1%
    11
    20.4%
    Chemotherapy
    16
    57.1%
    7
    26.9%
    23
    42.6%
    Chemotherapy + radiation
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Radiation x 1 only
    3
    10.7%
    1
    3.8%
    4
    7.4%
    Drop-out before chemo/radiation
    1
    3.6%
    9
    34.6%
    10
    18.5%
    Anti-hormone therapy (Number) [Number]
    NO
    20
    71.4%
    10
    38.5%
    30
    55.6%
    YES
    7
    25%
    7
    26.9%
    14
    25.9%
    Drop-out before anti-hormone therapy
    1
    3.6%
    9
    34.6%
    10
    18.5%
    MDI - Major Depression Inventory (Scores on a scale) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ]
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Scores on a scale]
    6.5
    7
    7
    Menopausal status (Number) [Number]
    Premenopausal
    14
    50%
    10
    38.5%
    24
    44.4%
    Postmenopausal
    14
    50%
    16
    61.5%
    30
    55.6%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Major Depression Inventory (MDI)- Depression at One Point in the Study
    Description MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Diagnostic scale using the ICD-10 algorithm: Mild depression: 2 core symptoms and 2 other symptoms Moderate depression: 2 core symptoms and 4 other symptoms Severe depression: 3 core symptoms and 5 other symptoms Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50
    Time Frame Depression at one point in the study (not including baseline) out of 4 measurements at app. day 21, day 35, day 63 and day 91 of the study.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Includes all patients who have completed at least one other MDI than baseline
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 20
    NO
    24
    85.7%
    11
    42.3%
    YES
    3
    10.7%
    9
    34.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.008
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Number need to treat
    Estimated Value 2.95
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.703 to 11.024
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Relative Risk
    Estimated Value 0.25
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.076 to 0.797
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Per Protocol - Depression at One Point in the Study Period
    Description MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50 This analysis includes only patients who have taken study medication as planned.
    Time Frame Per protocol - depression at one point in the study period (not baseline)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Includes only patients who have taken the study medication as planned
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    NO
    24
    85.7%
    11
    42.3%
    YES
    3
    10.7%
    5
    19.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.125
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Intention to Treat (Underestimate) - Depression at One Point in the Study Period
    Description MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50 For this analysis all missing MDI data have been analyzed as "NO" depression.
    Time Frame Intention to treat (underestimate) - depression at one point in the study period (not baseline)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All missing MDI data have been analyzed as "NO" depression.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 26
    NO
    25
    89.3%
    21
    80.8%
    YES
    3
    10.7%
    5
    19.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.460
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    4. Primary Outcome
    Title Intention to Treat (Overestimate) - Depression at One Point in the Study Period
    Description MDI is a self-rating depression scale with 12 questions. MDI has previously been investigated in a Danish population. On a six-point Likert scale, the items measure how much time the symptoms have been present during the last 14 days. MDI is scored according to specific guidelines and can be used either as a rating scale or diagnostic instrument. For inclusion we used the diagnostic instrument (depression was an exclusion criteria) and for all other MDI measurements we used the rating scale. Rating scale: No depression - score from 0-20 Mild depression - score from 21-25 Moderate depression - score from 26-30 Severe depression - score from 31-50 For this analysis all missing MDI data have been analyzed as "YES" for depression.
    Time Frame Intention to treat (overestimate) - depression at one point in the study period (not baseline)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All missing data have been analyzed as "YES" depression.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 26
    NO
    23
    82.1%
    11
    42.3%
    YES
    5
    17.9%
    15
    57.7%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.002
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Anxiety - Immediate Postoperative Period
    Description Anxiety measured by VAS (visual analog scale). A subjective feeling of anxiety was registered on a VAS going from "no anxiety", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible anxiety", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %
    Time Frame Daily - from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 22
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*day]
    85
    140
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.264
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Anxiety - Long-term Postoperative Period
    Description Anxiety measured by VAS (visual analog scale). Completed every 14th day. A subjective feeling of anxiety was registered on a VAS going from "no anxiety", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible anxiety", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %
    Time Frame App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety in the long-term postoperative period. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*2 weeks]
    14
    19
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.351
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Data on Sleepiness (KSS) - Immediate Postoperative Period
    Description Sleepiness measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. KSS is a 9-point scale from 1 (very awake) to 9 (very sleepy) where a score of 7 or more reflects pathological sleepiness. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %
    Time Frame Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 22
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on KSS*day]
    35
    39
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.446
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Data on Sleepiness (KSS) - Long-term Postoperative Period
    Description Sleepiness measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. KSS is a 9-point scale from 1 (very awake) to 9 (very sleepy) where a score of 7 or more reflects pathological sleepiness. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %
    Time Frame App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on KSS*2 weeks]
    13
    14
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.122
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Fatigue - Immediate Postoperative Period
    Description Fatigue on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out daily. A subjective feeling of fatigue was registered on a VAS going from "no fatigue", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible fatigue", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %
    Time Frame Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 22
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*day]
    307
    300
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.907
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Fatigue - Long-term Postoperative Period
    Description Fatigue on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out every 14th day. A subjective feeling of fatigue was registered on a VAS going from "no fatigue", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible fatigue", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %
    Time Frame App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*2 weeks]
    90
    88
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.555
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Data on General Well-being - Immediate Postoperative Period
    Description General well-being on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out daily. A subjective feeling of general well-being was registered on a VAS going from "very high well-being", equivalent to 0mm to "very low well-being", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %
    Time Frame Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 22
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*day]
    282
    372
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.930
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on General Well-being - Long-term Postoperative Period
    Description General well-being on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out every 14th day. A subjective feeling of general well-being was registered on a VAS going from "very high well-being", equivalent to 0mm to "very low well-being", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %
    Time Frame App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*2 weeks]
    95
    (141)
    89
    (44)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.386
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Pain - Immediate Postoperative Period
    Description Pain on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out daily. A subjective feeling of pain was registered on a VAS going from "no pain", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible pain", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %
    Time Frame Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 22
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*day]
    97
    130
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.241
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Pain - Long-term Postoperative Period
    Description Pain on a Visual Analog Scale - filled out every 14th day. A subjective feeling of pain was registered on a VAS going from "no pain", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible pain", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %
    Time Frame App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*2 weeks]
    13
    22
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.339
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Sleep Quality - Immediate Postoperative Period
    Description Subjective sleep score on Visual Analog Scale. Subjective sleep quality was registered on a VAS going from "best possible sleep", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible sleep", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed daily VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness for at least 8 days postoperatively. Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 2 %
    Time Frame Daily from inclusion till 8 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 28 22
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*day]
    279
    355
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.578
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve (AUC) for VAS Data on Sleep Quality - Long-term Postoperative Period
    Description Subjective sleep on a Visual Analog Scale. Subjective sleep quality was registered on a VAS going from "best possible sleep", equivalent to 0mm to "worst possible sleep", equivalent to 100mm. Patients were only included in the analysis if they had completed VAS on anxiety, sleep quality, general well-being, fatigue, pain and sleepiness in the long-term postoperative period (every 14th day). Single missing data were filled out using last observation carried forward (LOCF). % of cases filled out by LOCF < 1 %
    Time Frame App. 14 days postoperatively till 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 27 16
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm*2 weeks]
    101
    116
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Melatonin, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 1.000
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Sleep Architecture
    Description Actigraphy (total minutes asleep, sleep effectiveness, sleep latency, awakenings). A wrist actigraph will be worn from inclusion till 14 days postoperatively.
    Time Frame From inclusion till 14 days postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title HPER3 Genotype
    Description A blood sample will be taken at inclusion and analysed for HPER3 genotype (4/4, 4/5, 5/5) and this will be investigated for a correlation with sleep, cognitive function and depressive symptoms 7 patients did not give blood samples
    Time Frame At inclusion = day-7

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 26 21
    4/4 genotype
    14
    50%
    10
    38.5%
    4/5 genotype
    10
    35.7%
    10
    38.5%
    5/5 genotype
    2
    7.1%
    1
    3.8%
    Missing
    2
    7.1%
    5
    19.2%
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) App. 2 Weeks Postoperatively.
    Description Calculations for POCD were based on normative data from 133 females aged 40-60 years. We evaluated changes from the preoperative baseline to the 2 postoperative test sessions. In controls we calculated mean and standard deviations (SD) of these differences. The mean change in this group may be taken as estimated learning effects. For the individual patients, we compared baseline scores with the 2- and 12-week postoperative test results, subtracted the average learning effect from the changes and divided the result by the SD of the control group to obtain a Z score for the 7 individual test outcomes. A large positive Z score indicated deterioration in cognitive function from baseline in patients. We defined a composite Z score as the sum of the 7 Z scores and normalized this using the SD for that sum in the controls. POCD was defined as a combined Z score >1.96 or a Z score >1.96 in at least 2 of the 7 subtests. Units of measure = % of patients with YES to POCD
    Time Frame App. 2 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis includes only patients who completed all parts of the neuropsychological test battery at baseline and 2 weeks postoperatively.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 26 20
    Number [Percentage of patients]
    0
    0
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) App. 10 Weeks Postoperatively
    Description Calculations for POCD were based on normative data from 133 females aged 40-60 years. We evaluated changes from the preoperative baseline to the 2 postoperative test sessions. In controls we calculated mean and standard deviations (SD) of these differences. The mean change in this group may be taken as estimated learning effects. For the individual patients, we compared baseline scores with the 2- and 12-week postoperative test results, subtracted the average learning effect from the changes and divided the result by the SD of the control group to obtain a Z score for the 7 individual test outcomes. A large positive Z score indicated deterioration in cognitive function from baseline in patients. We defined a composite Z score as the sum of the 7 Z scores and normalized this using the SD for that sum in the controls. POCD was defined as a combined Z score >1.96 or a Z score >1.96 in at least 2 of the 7 subtests. Units of measure = % of patients with YES to POCD
    Time Frame App. 10 weeks postoperatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis includes only patients who completed all parts of the neuropsychological test battery at baseline and 10 weeks postoperatively.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    Measure Participants 26 16
    Number [Percentage of patients]
    0
    6.25

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From inclusion (app. 1 week preoperatively) till the final visit (app. 10 weeks postoperatively)
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Only includes patients who have at least taken 1 dose of the study drug.
    Arm/Group Title Melatonin Placebo
    Arm/Group Description 6 mg oral melatonin daily 6 mg oral placebo daily
    All Cause Mortality
    Melatonin Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Melatonin Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/27 (0%) 0/24 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Melatonin Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 15/27 (55.6%) 9/24 (37.5%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial fibrillation 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Dizziness 4/27 (14.8%) 1/24 (4.2%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea 1/27 (3.7%) 2/24 (8.3%)
    Reflux 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Abdominal pain 0/27 (0%) 1/24 (4.2%)
    Obstipation 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Vomitus 0/27 (0%) 1/24 (4.2%)
    Diarrhoea 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Diffuse pain in the lower abdomen 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    General disorders
    Difficulty falling asleep 1/27 (3.7%) 2/24 (8.3%)
    More awakenings at night 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Tiredness 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Lower back pain 0/27 (0%) 1/24 (4.2%)
    Joint pain 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Itch (arms) 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 3/27 (11.1%) 4/24 (16.7%)
    Sleepiness 1/27 (3.7%) 1/24 (4.2%)
    Paraesthesia (mouth region, arms/legs) 3/27 (11.1%) 0/24 (0%)
    Memory problems 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Urinary urgency 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Breathing difficulties 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Cough 0/27 (0%) 1/24 (4.2%)
    Pneumonia 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dry mouth 1/27 (3.7%) 0/24 (0%)
    Flushing/sweating 2/27 (7.4%) 1/24 (4.2%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Premature termination (54/260). Only included about 8% (54/703) of the patients assessed for eligibility.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title MD Melissa Voigt Hansen
    Organization Herlev Hospital, Department of Surgery
    Phone +45 20661119
    Email melissa.voigt.hansen@regionh.dk
    Responsible Party:
    Melissa Voigt Hansen, M.D., ph-D student, Herlev Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01355523
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MVH-03
    • 2010-022460-12
    • 2007-58-0015/HEH.750.89-12
    • H-4-2011-007
    First Posted:
    May 18, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    May 6, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2014