Brief Behavioral Intervention for Insomnia During Chemotherapy

Sponsor
Stanford University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02165839
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH)
139
1
2
65
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE(S):

To evaluate the efficacy of the Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I) in treating insomnia among breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE(S):
  • To evaluate the efficacy of the BBT-I in treating cancer-related symptoms such as cancer-related fatigue and cognitive difficulties in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

  • To examine potential moderators and mediators of BBT-I intervention effects on insomnia, cognitive difficulties, and fatigue. In particular, we are interested in age, depression and anxiety and side effects (hot flashes) as potential moderators of the intervention effects as well as evaluating modifiable behavioral and physiological mechanisms as hypothesized mediators

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
  • Behavioral: Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
139 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Brief Behavioral Intervention for Insomnia During Chemotherapy
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 19, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL)

Control group.

Behavioral: Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL)

Experimental: Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)

Behavioral: Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) [12 months]

    The effects of the Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I) intervention on insomnia will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The ISI survey questionnaire is a 7-question survey, with each question having 5 possible answers (none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe), scored as 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. The full range of ISI scores is from 0 to 28. Lower scores are considered good, better, or healthy, and increasingly higher scores are considered to indicate greater insomnia. Clinical interpretation is as follows: 0 to 7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8 to14 = Sub-threshold insomnia (mild) 15 to 21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22 to 28 = Clinical insomnia (severe) ISI survey will be conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean ISI score at baseline; immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal); 6 months; and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) [12 months]

    The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) survey questionnaire is a 9-question survey, with each question having 11 possible answers ("No fatigue" to "As bad as you can imagine"), scored from 0 to 10, with the total score being the sum of a participant's individual questions scores at a timepoint and will range from 0 to 90. Lower scores are considered good, better, or healthy, and increasingly higher scores are considered to indicate greater fatigue. The BFI survey was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the overall BFI scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

  2. Clinical Assessment of Depression (CAD) [12 months]

    Anxiety and depression will be assessed by administration of the Clinical Assessment of Depression (CAD). The CAD questionnaire is a 50-item survey, with each statement having 4 possible responses ("Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree"), scored from 1 to 4, The raw scores are then converted to T-scores. A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation. The CAD survey was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the overall CAD scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

  3. Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) [At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months]

    Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT), an assessment of simple attention and executive function, consisting of 5 dot-to-dot exercises that increase with complexity and difficulty. A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation. Thus, a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the mean, while a score of 30 is two standard deviations below the mean. Overall, higher values indicate better executive functioning, attention, and processing speed. The CTMT assessment was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the overall CTMT scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

  4. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) Sub-test for Delayed Recall [At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months]

    Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Delayed Recall sub-test from the overall Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R). The result values are known as the T score. A higher T scores indicating better memory (recall).A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation The HVLT-R sub-test assessment for Delayed Recall was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean score with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

  5. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) Sub-test for Verbal Learning & Memory [At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months]

    Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Verbal Learning and Memory sub-test from the overall Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R). The result values are known as the T score.The higher T scores indicating better memory (recall). A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation The HVLT-R sub-test assessment for Verbal Learning and Memory was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean score with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

  6. Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) [At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months]

    Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), a verbal fluency task that assesses complex cognition. The test value is the the count of words that meet pre-defined criteria within 1 minute, so the minimum is 0 and no fixed maximum exists. Adjustments are made to the raw score based on participant age and education level, resulting in a scaled score. Higher scores reflect a better outcome, meaning better cognition and verbal fluency. The COWAT assessment was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the COWAT score with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

  7. Mobile Cognitive Assessment Battery (MCAB) [At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months]

    Cognitive difficulties will be assessed by administration of the Mobile Cognitive Assessment Battery (MCAB), comprised of 3 neuropsychological tests and a self-reported assessment. MCAB measures cognitive flexibility, accuracy, processing speed, working memory and multitasking. The MCAB survey was to be conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome was to be reported as the mean of the overall MCAB scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
21 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Female

  • Diagnosis of Breast Cancer (Stage I-IIIA)

  • Scheduled for planned cancer treatment (eg, chemotherapy or biologic agents), or treatment is continuing

  • Has ≥ 6 weeks of cancer treatment (eg, chemotherapy or biologic agents) remaining

  • ≥ 21 years of age.

  • Able to understand written and spoken English.

  • Sleep disturbance of 8 or greater on the ISI, and insomnia that began or got worse with diagnosis of cancer or treatment with chemotherapy (to exclude pre-existing, chronic insomnia).

  • Karnofsky score ≥ 70

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Have an unstable self-reported medical or psychiatric illness (Axis I - current or within the last 5 years).

  • Be currently pregnant or nursing

  • History of substance abuse or meet criteria for current alcohol abuse or dependence

  • History (self-reported) of sleep apnea or restless leg syndrome (RLS)

  • Self-report or have a medical record of an unstable comorbid medical or psychiatric condition that would make it unsafe or impossible to adhere to the study protocol

  • Unable or unwilling to discontinue anxiolytics within 4 hours of education sessions

  • Irregular heartbeat or arrhythmia (self-reported or in the medical record)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Stanford University, School of Medicine Palo Alto California United States 94305

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stanford University
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oxana Palesh, PhD, Stanford University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Oxana Palesh, Oxana Palesh PhD, MPH, Stanford University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02165839
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB-30470
  • BRS0042
  • 1R01CA181659-01A1
First Posted:
Jun 18, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Dec 3, 2020
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental Group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 66 73
COMPLETED 66 73
NOT COMPLETED 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I) Total
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I) Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 66 73 139
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
63
95.5%
63
86.3%
126
90.6%
>=65 years
3
4.5%
10
13.7%
13
9.4%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
49.7
(10.0)
51.1
(11.5)
50.4
(10.8)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
66
100%
73
100%
139
100%
Male
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
14
21.2%
6
8.2%
20
14.4%
Not Hispanic or Latino
48
72.7%
62
84.9%
110
79.1%
Unknown or Not Reported
4
6.1%
5
6.8%
9
6.5%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Asian
17
25.8%
15
20.5%
32
23%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1
1.5%
1
1.4%
2
1.4%
Black or African American
2
3%
4
5.5%
6
4.3%
White
40
60.6%
49
67.1%
89
64%
More than one race
2
3%
0
0%
2
1.4%
Unknown or Not Reported
4
6.1%
4
5.5%
8
5.8%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
66
100%
73
100%
139
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Description The effects of the Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I) intervention on insomnia will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The ISI survey questionnaire is a 7-question survey, with each question having 5 possible answers (none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe), scored as 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. The full range of ISI scores is from 0 to 28. Lower scores are considered good, better, or healthy, and increasingly higher scores are considered to indicate greater insomnia. Clinical interpretation is as follows: 0 to 7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8 to14 = Sub-threshold insomnia (mild) 15 to 21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22 to 28 = Clinical insomnia (severe) ISI survey will be conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean ISI score at baseline; immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal); 6 months; and 12 months.
Time Frame 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T2 (Post intervention): 5 participants were lost to follow up & didn't complete any measures. T3 (6 months follow-up): 16 participants did not complete any measures & were lost to follow up (including 2 deceased). T4 (12 months follow-up): 14 participants did not complete any measures & were lost to follow up (including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
13.73
(5.11)
14.93
(4.84)
T2 (Post intervention)
11.28
(5.43)
10.16
(4.31)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
9.53
(5.33)
8.87
(5.87)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
9.51
(5.35)
8.98
(4.93)
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Description The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) survey questionnaire is a 9-question survey, with each question having 11 possible answers ("No fatigue" to "As bad as you can imagine"), scored from 0 to 10, with the total score being the sum of a participant's individual questions scores at a timepoint and will range from 0 to 90. Lower scores are considered good, better, or healthy, and increasingly higher scores are considered to indicate greater fatigue. The BFI survey was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the overall BFI scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T2: 5 participants were lost to follow up & did not complete any measures. T3: 16 participants did not complete any measures & were lost to follow up (including 2 deceased). T4: 14 participants did not complete any measures & were lost to follow up (including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
4.44
(2.28)
4.02
(2.27)
T2 (Post intervention)
4.32
(2.20)
3.88
(2.20)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
3.27
(2.07)
3.00
(2.03)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
3.28
(2.18)
2.80
(2.09)
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Clinical Assessment of Depression (CAD)
Description Anxiety and depression will be assessed by administration of the Clinical Assessment of Depression (CAD). The CAD questionnaire is a 50-item survey, with each statement having 4 possible responses ("Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree"), scored from 1 to 4, The raw scores are then converted to T-scores. A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation. The CAD survey was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the overall CAD scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T2(Post intervention): 6 participants were lost to follow & did not complete any measures. T3(6 months follow-up): 19 participants did not complete follow-up study visit & were lost to follow up (including 2 deceased). T4(12 months follow-up): 17 participants did not complete follow-up study visit & were lost to follow up (including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
54.38
(11.86)
55.44
(10.80)
T2 (Post intervention)
53.14
(11.25)
54.32
(11.59)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
51.15
(13.13)
51.40
(10.58)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
49.74
(12.58)
50.60
(10.66)
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT)
Description Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT), an assessment of simple attention and executive function, consisting of 5 dot-to-dot exercises that increase with complexity and difficulty. A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation. Thus, a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the mean, while a score of 30 is two standard deviations below the mean. Overall, higher values indicate better executive functioning, attention, and processing speed. The CTMT assessment was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the overall CTMT scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T1(Baseline): 1 participant did not complete baseline assessment. T2(Post intervention): Total 7 participants were not analyzed; 6 participants were lost to follow up and 1 participant did not complete this measure T3(6 months follow-up): 19 participants did not complete follow-up (including 2 deceased). T4(12 months follow-up): 18 participants did not complete follow-up(including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
44.22
(7.76)
41.44
(7.98)
T2 (Post intervention)
48.68
(8.79)
45.04
(8.68)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
48.68
(8.29)
46.53
(8.33)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
49.26
(7.86)
47.92
(7.56)
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) Sub-test for Delayed Recall
Description Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Delayed Recall sub-test from the overall Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R). The result values are known as the T score. A higher T scores indicating better memory (recall).A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation The HVLT-R sub-test assessment for Delayed Recall was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean score with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T2 (Post intervention): 6 participants were lost to follow up & did not complete any measures. T3(6 months follow-up): 18 participants did not complete follow-up study visit (including 2 deceased). T4(12 months follow-up): 17 participants did not complete follow-up study visit (including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
49.05
(10.83)
49.42
(9.58)
T2 (Post intervention)
49.06
(10.95)
46.96
(11.05)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
50.70
(9.78)
51.68
(9.63)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
52.95
(8.30)
52.68
(8.67)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) Sub-test for Verbal Learning & Memory
Description Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Verbal Learning and Memory sub-test from the overall Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R). The result values are known as the T score.The higher T scores indicating better memory (recall). A score of 50 represents the mean. A difference of 10 from the mean in either the positive or negative direction indicates a difference of one standard deviation The HVLT-R sub-test assessment for Verbal Learning and Memory was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean score with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T2(Post intervention): 6 participants were lost to follow up & did not complete any measures. T3 (6 months follow-up): 18 participants did not complete follow-up visit (including 2 deceased). T4 (12 months follow-up): 17 participants did not complete follow-up visit (including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I).
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
48.94
(11.45)
50.23
(11.30)
T2 (Post intervention)
49.44
(12.27)
50.42
(11.32)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
53.21
(10.78)
53.85
(9.66)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
56.05
(9.60)
56.93
(9.99)
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
Description Neuropsychological assessments will be conducted using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), a verbal fluency task that assesses complex cognition. The test value is the the count of words that meet pre-defined criteria within 1 minute, so the minimum is 0 and no fixed maximum exists. Adjustments are made to the raw score based on participant age and education level, resulting in a scaled score. Higher scores reflect a better outcome, meaning better cognition and verbal fluency. The COWAT assessment was conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome is reported as the mean of the COWAT score with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
T2: 6 participants were lost to follow & did not complete any measures. T3: 18 participants did not complete the 6-month follow-up study visit & were lost to follow up (including 2 deceased). T4: 17 participants did not complete the 12-month follow-up study visit & were lost to follow up (including 3 deceased).
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I).
Measure Participants 66 73
T1 (Baseline)
41.95
(9.87)
39.51
(11.97)
T2 (Post intervention)
42.19
(11.36)
40.43
(12.36)
T3 (6 months follow-up)
45.72
(11.11)
43.53
(12.06)
T4 (12 months follow-up)
44.61
(10.22)
42.73
(11.77)
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Mobile Cognitive Assessment Battery (MCAB)
Description Cognitive difficulties will be assessed by administration of the Mobile Cognitive Assessment Battery (MCAB), comprised of 3 neuropsychological tests and a self-reported assessment. MCAB measures cognitive flexibility, accuracy, processing speed, working memory and multitasking. The MCAB survey was to be conducted at baseline, post intervention, 6 months, and 12 months. The outcome was to be reported as the mean of the overall MCAB scores with standard deviation at baseline, immediately post-intervention (6 weeks nominal), 6 months, and 12 months.
Time Frame At baseline, post intervention, 6 months and 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
No analysis. The MCAB analysis was determined to not be a validated measure, and the analysis was not conducted as the scores are not standardized and results do not have meaning at this time.
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I).
Measure Participants 0 0

Adverse Events

Time Frame 52 months
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Arm/Group Description Control group. Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Experimental group. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
All Cause Mortality
Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/66 (0%) 3/73 (4.1%)
Serious Adverse Events
Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 3/66 (4.5%) 7/73 (9.6%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood Transfusion 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Febrile neutropenia 2/66 (3%) 2 1/73 (1.4%) 1
General disorders
Disease Progression 0/66 (0%) 0 3/73 (4.1%) 3
Infections and infestations
Sepsis 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Shingles 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Flu like symptoms 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Healthy Eating Education Learning (HEAL) Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (BBT-I)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 17/66 (25.8%) 19/73 (26%)
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Chest pain- cardiac 2/66 (3%) 2 0/73 (0%) 0
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders- other, specify: Crohn's 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
General disorders
Pain 2/66 (3%) 2 0/73 (0%) 0
Fever 2/66 (3%) 2 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Localized Edema 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Immune system disorders
Allergic reaction 4/66 (6.1%) 5 0/73 (0%) 0
Infections and infestations
Skin infection 1/66 (1.5%) 1 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Infection: not specified 2/66 (3%) 2 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Urinary tract infection 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Breast infection 0/66 (0%) 0 2/73 (2.7%) 2
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Fall 4/66 (6.1%) 4 2/73 (2.7%) 2
Infusion related reaction: GI symptoms (unspecified) 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Ankle fracture 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Wrist fracture 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Intraoperative breast injury: Breast necrosis 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration 0/66 (0%) 0 2/73 (2.7%) 2
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity 1/66 (1.5%) 1 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other, specify:Dermatomyositis 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Back pain 0/66 (0%) 0 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Bone pain 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Psychiatric disorders
Depression 3/66 (4.5%) 3 6/73 (8.2%) 6
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash Acneiform 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Nail loss 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0
Vascular disorders
Hematoma 1/66 (1.5%) 1 1/73 (1.4%) 1
Hypotension 1/66 (1.5%) 1 0/73 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Oxana Palesh, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Organization Stanford University
Phone (650) 725-7011
Email oxana.palesh@stanford.edu
Responsible Party:
Oxana Palesh, Oxana Palesh PhD, MPH, Stanford University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02165839
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB-30470
  • BRS0042
  • 1R01CA181659-01A1
First Posted:
Jun 18, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Dec 3, 2020
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2020