A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer Progressing After First-Line Therapy With Avastin and Chemotherapy (TANIA)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized, open-label, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and s afety of Avastin (bevacizumab) in combination with chemotherapy versus chemother apy alone as second- and third-line therapy in patients with locally recurrent o r metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line therapy with Avastin and chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized to receive either Avastin (15 mg/kg e very 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously) plus standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Anticipated time on study treatment is until third-line disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1
|
Drug: Chemotherapy
Standard chemotherapy (doublets not allowed)
|
Experimental: 2
|
Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]
10 mg/ kg iv every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg iv every 3 weeks
Drug: Chemotherapy
Standard chemotherapy (doublets not allowed)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With Second-Line Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) [Baseline (less than or equal to [≤] 28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years]
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For target lesions (TLs), PD was defined at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the largest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Second-Line PFS [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years]
The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line PFS event. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 6 [Month 6]
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 12 [Month 12]
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without secondline PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 18 [Month 18]
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their secondline of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 24 [Month 24]
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Second-Line PFS by Baseline Risk Factor (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years]
The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line PFS event according to the following baseline risk factors: hormone receptor negative, HER2 negative (triple negative), hormone receptor positive/HER-2 negative (HR-pos/HER-neg), first-line PFS less than (<) 6 months, first-line PFS greater than or equal to (≥) 6 months, taxane chemotherapy (chemo), non-taxane chemo, vinorelbine chemo, LDH ≤ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN), LDH greater than (>) 1.5 ULN, < 65 years of age, ≥ 65 years of age, < 70 years of age, ≥ 70 years of age, < 3 metastatic organ sites, ≥ 3 metastatic organ sites, bevacizumab-free (B-free) interval ≤ 6 weeks, B-free > 6 weeks, disease-free (D-free) interval ≤ 24 months, D-free > 24 months, D-free ≤ 12 months, and D-free > 12 months. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. PD: defined in Outcome measure 1. The 95% CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
- Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST v1.1 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years]
BOR was defined as a confirmed CR or PR during second-line treatment. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
- Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line CR, PR, Stable Disease, and PD According to RECIST v1.1 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years]
For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; SD was defined as neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels; stable disease was defined as the persistence of 1 or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits; and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. The 95% CI was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
- Duration of Second-Line Objective Response (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years]
The median time, in months, from the date of the first second-line documentation of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 to the date of the first second-line documentation of PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants with CR or PR who had experienced neither disease progression nor died were censored at the date of the last available tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free.
- Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line Documented CR or PR According to RECIST v1.1 Estimated to be Alive and Free of Disease Progression at Months 3, 6, and 9 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Months 3, 6, and 9]
Duration of objective response was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of the first second-line documentation of CR or PR to the date of the first second-line documentation of PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants with CR or PR who had experienced neither disease progression nor died were censored at the date of the last available tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free.
- Percentage of Participants With Third-Line PFS According to RECIST v1.1 [First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (assessed every 8-9 weeks, over a period of approximately 14 months)]
Third-line PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of third-line bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy to the date of third-line PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Third-Line PFS [First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (over a period of approximately 14 months)]
The median time, in months, from the first dose of third-line bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy to third-line PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants With Second- and Third-Line PFS According to RECIST v1.1 [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years]
Second- and third-line PFS was defined as the time from the date randomization to the date of third-line PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Second- and Third-Line PFS [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years]
The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line and third-line PFS event. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants With Second- and Third-Line Tumor Progression [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years]
Second- and third-line tumor progression was defined as occurrence of third-line PD according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to progression of disease. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death due to progression of disease were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Time to Second- and Third-Line Tumor Progression [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years]
The median time, in months, from randomization to second- and third-line tumor progression. Second- and third-line tumor progression was defined as third-line PD according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to progression of disease. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
- Percentage of Participants Who Died [Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years)]
Percentage of participants who died due to any reason were reported.
- Overall Survival (OS) [Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years)]
OS was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the date the patient was last known to be alive.
- Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Surviving at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24 [Months 6, 12, 18, and 24]
OS was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of death, due to any cause.
- Percentage of Participants Experiencing Problems by European Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Category (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility (M) ("no problems"="I have no problems in walking about" to "extreme problems"="I am confined to bed"), self-care (SC) ("no problems"="I have no problems with self-care" to "extreme problems"="I am unable to wash or dress myself"), usual activities (UA) ("no problems"="I have no problems performing my usual activities" to "extreme problems"="I am unable to perform my usual activities"), pain/discomfort (P/D) ("no problems"="I have no pain or discomfort" to "extreme problems"="I have extreme pain or discomfort"), and anxiety/depression (A/D) ("no problems"="I am not anxious or depressed" to "extreme problems"='I am extremely anxious or depressed").
- Quality of Life Assessed As an Index Score Using the EQ-5D (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Based on large population surveys, an algorithm was used to combine the responses to each of these 5 measures into 1 single EQ-5D index score ranging from -0.59 (extreme problems) to +1 (no problems).
- Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Index Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Based on large population surveys, an algorithm was used to combine the responses to each of these 5 measures into 1 single EQ-5D index score ranging from -0.59 (extreme problems) to +1 (no problems) where a negative value indicated a worsening of perceived quality of life and a positive value indicated an improvement of perceived quality of life.
- Quality of Life Assessed Using the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The participant was asked to rate their overall health on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) vertical scale, where the lowest endpoint=0 (labeled as worst imaginable health state) and the highest endpoint =100 (labeled as the best imaginable health state). The participant marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the bottom was measured in millimeters. A higher value indicated a better health state.
- Change From Baseline in VAS Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The participant was asked to rate their overall health on a 0-100 mm vertical scale, where the lowest endpoint = 0 (labeled as worst imaginable health state) and the highest endpoint =100 (labeled as the best imaginable health state). The participant marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the bottom was measured in millimeters. A negative value indicated a worsening of perceived quality of life and a positive value indicated an improvement of perceived quality of life.
- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) is composed of 5 multi-item sections where participants responded to questions assessing symptoms (scale: 0-4; 0="not at all" and 4="very much"), as follows: physical well-being (PWB) (7 items, total score 0-28), social/family well-being (SWB) (7 items, total score 0-28), emotional well-being (EWB) (6 items, total score 0-24), functional well-being (FWB) (7 items, total score 0-28); and breast cancer score based on the additional concerns section of FACT-B (10 items, total score 0-40). The FACT-B Trial Outcomes Index (TOI) score=sum of PWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-96). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscales scores (total score 0-108). The FACT-B total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscales scores (total score 0-148). In all cases a higher value indicated a better perceived quality of life.
- Change From Baseline in FACT-B Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) [Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)]
The FACT-B is composed of 5 multi-item sections where participants responded to questions assessing symptoms (scale: 0-4; 0="not at all" and 4="very much"), as follows: PWB (7 items, total score 0-28), SWB (7 items, total score 0-28), EWB (6 items, total score 0-24), FWB (7 items, total score 0-28); and breast cancer score based on the additional concerns section of FACT-B (10 items, total score 0-40). The FACT-B TOI score=sum of PWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-96). The FACT-G total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscales scores (total score 0-108). The FACT-B total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-148). In all cases a higher value indicated a better perceived quality of life.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Female patients, >/= 18 years of age
-
Histologically confirmed HER2-negative breast cancer
-
Disease progression during or following first-line treatment with Avastin and chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
-
Avastin treatment in first-line setting must have been a minimum of 4 cycles (15 mg/kg) or 6 cycles (10 mg/kg) in combination with chemotherapy
-
ECOG performance status 0-2
-
At least 28 days since prior radiation therapy or surgery and recovery from treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Anti-angiogenic therapy or anti-vascular endothelial growth factors other than Avastin for first-line treatment
-
Active malignancy other than superficial basal cell and superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix or breast within the last 5 years
-
Inadequate renal function
-
Clinically relevant cardio-vascular disease
-
Known CNS disease except for treated brain metastases
-
Chronic daily treatment with high-dose aspirin (>325 mg/day) or clopidogrel (>75 mg/day)
-
Pregnant or lactating women
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Buenos Aires | Argentina | C1199ACI | ||
2 | Buenos Aires | Argentina | C1280AEB | ||
3 | Buenos Aires | Argentina | C1426ANZ | ||
4 | San Miguel de Tucuman | Argentina | T4000IAK | ||
5 | Feldkirch | Austria | 6807 | ||
6 | Graz | Austria | 8036 | ||
7 | Innsbruck | Austria | 6020 | ||
8 | Krems | Austria | 3500 | ||
9 | Salzburg | Austria | 5020 | ||
10 | Steyr | Austria | 4400 | ||
11 | Villach | Austria | 9500 | ||
12 | Wien | Austria | 1090 | ||
13 | Goiania | GO | Brazil | 74140-050 | |
14 | Porto Alegre | RS | Brazil | 90430-090 | |
15 | Itajai | SC | Brazil | 88301-220 | |
16 | Split | Croatia | 21000 | ||
17 | Amiens | France | 80090 | ||
18 | Angers | France | 49933 | ||
19 | Besancon | France | 25030 | ||
20 | Bordeaux | France | 33000 | ||
21 | Boulogne Sur Mer | France | 62222 | ||
22 | Brest | France | 29609 | ||
23 | Caen | France | 14076 | ||
24 | Clermont Ferrand | France | 63011 | ||
25 | Dijon | France | 21079 | ||
26 | Grenoble | France | 38028 | ||
27 | Limoges | France | 87039 | ||
28 | Marseille | France | 13285 | ||
29 | Montpellier | France | 34298 | ||
30 | Nancy | France | 54100 | ||
31 | Nantes | France | 44202 | ||
32 | Paris | France | 75970 | ||
33 | Pierre Benite | France | 69495 | ||
34 | Reims CEDEX | France | 51056 | ||
35 | Rouen | France | 76038 | ||
36 | Saint Gregoire | France | 35768 | ||
37 | Saint Jean | France | 31240 | ||
38 | St Cloud | France | 92210 | ||
39 | St Priest En Jarez | France | 42271 | ||
40 | St Quentin | France | 02321 | ||
41 | Strasbourg | France | 67010 | ||
42 | Toulouse | France | 31076 | ||
43 | Amberg | Germany | 92224 | ||
44 | Aschaffenburg | Germany | 63739 | ||
45 | Berlin | Germany | 10367 | ||
46 | Berlin | Germany | 10719 | ||
47 | Bielefeld | Germany | 33604 | ||
48 | Chemnitz | Germany | 09116 | ||
49 | Dresden | Germany | 01307 | ||
50 | Düsseldorf | Germany | 40235 | ||
51 | Essen | Germany | 45122 | ||
52 | Essen | Germany | 45136 | ||
53 | Freiburg | Germany | 79110 | ||
54 | Göttingen | Germany | 37073 | ||
55 | Hamburg | Germany | 20249 | ||
56 | Hannover | Germany | 30177 | ||
57 | Heidelberg | Germany | 69115 | ||
58 | Heidelberg | Germany | 69120 | ||
59 | Karlsruhe | Germany | 76135 | ||
60 | Koeln | Germany | 50935 | ||
61 | Mannheim | Germany | 68161 | ||
62 | Muenster | Germany | 48149 | ||
63 | München | Germany | 80639 | ||
64 | Naunhof | Germany | 04683 | ||
65 | Neuss | Germany | 41462 | ||
66 | Nordhausen | Germany | 99734 | ||
67 | Osnabrueck | Germany | 49076 | ||
68 | Ravensburg | Germany | 88212 | ||
69 | Stade | Germany | 21680 | ||
70 | Stralsund | Germany | 18435 | ||
71 | Wiesbaden | Germany | 65199 | ||
72 | Athens | Greece | 11528 | ||
73 | Ioannina | Greece | 455 00 | ||
74 | Patras | Greece | 265 00 | ||
75 | Thessaloniki | Greece | 546 45 | ||
76 | Budapest | Hungary | 1122 | ||
77 | Budapest | Hungary | 1145 | ||
78 | Szeged | Hungary | 6720 | ||
79 | Beer Sheva | Israel | 8410101 | ||
80 | Jerusalem | Israel | 91120 | ||
81 | Kfar-Saba | Israel | 4428164 | ||
82 | Petach Tikva | Israel | 4941492 | ||
83 | Ramat Gan | Israel | 52620-00 | ||
84 | Rehovot | Israel | 7610001 | ||
85 | Tel Aviv | Israel | 6423906 | ||
86 | Tel Aviv | Israel | |||
87 | Cosenza | Calabria | Italy | 87100 | |
88 | Benevento | Campania | Italy | 82100 | |
89 | Napoli | Campania | Italy | 80131 | |
90 | Reggio Emilia | Emilia-Romagna | Italy | 42100 | |
91 | Udine | Friuli-Venezia Giulia | Italy | 33100 | |
92 | Roma | Lazio | Italy | 00168 | |
93 | Monza | Lombardia | Italy | 20052 | |
94 | Macerata | Marche | Italy | 62100 | |
95 | Cagliari | Sardegna | Italy | 09121 | |
96 | Sassari | Sardegna | Italy | 07100 | |
97 | Catania | Sicilia | Italy | 95100 | |
98 | Firenze | Toscana | Italy | 50134 | |
99 | Pisa | Toscana | Italy | 56100 | |
100 | Pontedera | Toscana | Italy | 56025 | |
101 | Verona | Veneto | Italy | 37126 | |
102 | Bardejov | Slovakia | 085 01 | ||
103 | Bratislava | Slovakia | 812 50 | ||
104 | Kosice | Slovakia | 04001 | ||
105 | Nove Zamky | Slovakia | 940 34 | ||
106 | Presov | Slovakia | 080 01 | ||
107 | Santander | Cantabria | Spain | 39008 | |
108 | San Sebastian | Guipuzcoa | Spain | 20080 | |
109 | Palma De Mallorca | Islas Baleares | Spain | 07014 | |
110 | La Laguna | Tenerife | Spain | 38320 | |
111 | Barcelona | Spain | 08035 | ||
112 | Barcelona | Spain | 08036 | ||
113 | Barcelona | Spain | 08041 | ||
114 | Castellon | Spain | 12002 | ||
115 | Cordoba | Spain | 14004 | ||
116 | Leon | Spain | 24071 | ||
117 | Lerida | Spain | 25198 | ||
118 | Madrid | Spain | 28007 | ||
119 | Madrid | Spain | 28033 | ||
120 | Madrid | Spain | 28034 | ||
121 | Madrid | Spain | 28040 | ||
122 | Madrid | Spain | 28041 | ||
123 | Madrid | Spain | 28046 | ||
124 | Madrid | Spain | 28223 | ||
125 | Malaga | Spain | 29010 | ||
126 | Murcia | Spain | 30008 | ||
127 | Sevilla | Spain | 41014 | ||
128 | Valencia | Spain | 46009 | ||
129 | Zaragoza | Spain | 50009 | ||
130 | Aarau | Switzerland | 5000 | ||
131 | Chur | Switzerland | 7000 | ||
132 | Zürich | Switzerland | 8038 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- MO22998
- 2010-020998-16
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | A total of 556 participants were screened and of these, 494 were randomized. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Chemotherapy (CT) Arm | Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab (CT+BV) Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), intravenously (IV), every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 247 | 247 |
COMPLETED | 45 | 54 |
NOT COMPLETED | 202 | 193 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 247 | 247 | 494 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.7
(10.83)
|
55.8
(11.17)
|
55.2
(11.01)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
247
100%
|
247
100%
|
494
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants With Second-Line Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) |
---|---|
Description | Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For target lesions (TLs), PD was defined at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the largest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (less than or equal to [≤] 28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population - all randomized participants. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
88.7
35.9%
|
93.9
38%
|
Title | Second-Line PFS |
---|---|
Description | The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line PFS event. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
4.2
|
6.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0204 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.79 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.65 to 0.97 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Cox proportional hazards methodology. The stratification factors used in the analysis were hormone receptor status, first-line PFS, choice of chemotherapy, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0245 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.81 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.67 to 0.97 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Unstratified analysis. |
Title | Second-Line PFS by Baseline Risk Factor (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line PFS event according to the following baseline risk factors: hormone receptor negative, HER2 negative (triple negative), hormone receptor positive/HER-2 negative (HR-pos/HER-neg), first-line PFS less than (<) 6 months, first-line PFS greater than or equal to (≥) 6 months, taxane chemotherapy (chemo), non-taxane chemo, vinorelbine chemo, LDH ≤ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN), LDH greater than (>) 1.5 ULN, < 65 years of age, ≥ 65 years of age, < 70 years of age, ≥ 70 years of age, < 3 metastatic organ sites, ≥ 3 metastatic organ sites, bevacizumab-free (B-free) interval ≤ 6 weeks, B-free > 6 weeks, disease-free (D-free) interval ≤ 24 months, D-free > 24 months, D-free ≤ 12 months, and D-free > 12 months. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. PD: defined in Outcome measure 1. The 95% CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed equals (=) participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number (n) = number of participants included in the analysis for the specified risk factor. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 226 | 219 |
HR-neg (n=60,56) |
2.1
|
4.9
|
HR-pos/HER-neg (n=187,191) |
4.7
|
6.7
|
PFS <6 months (n=69,68) |
3.9
|
5.1
|
PFS ≥6 months (n=178,179) |
4.6
|
6.4
|
Taxane chemo (n=32,32) |
3.2
|
6.9
|
Non-taxane chemo (n=191,188) |
4.4
|
6.0
|
Vinorelbine chemo (n=24,27) |
2.4
|
6.5
|
LDH ≤ 1.5 ULN (n=207,210) |
4.4
|
6.3
|
LDH > 1.5 ULN (n=40,37) |
2.1
|
5.8
|
< 65 years of age (n=196,183) |
4.2
|
6.1
|
≥ 65 years of age (n=51,64) |
4.2
|
6.7
|
< 70 years of age (n=226,219) |
4.2
|
6.2
|
≥ 70 years of age (n=21,28) |
7.8
|
6.7
|
< 3 metastatic organ sites (n=158,167) |
4.2
|
6.9
|
≥ 3 metastatic organ sites (n=88,80) |
4.0
|
4.7
|
B-free ≤ 6 weeks (n=165,149) |
4.2
|
5.8
|
B-free > 6 weeks (n=81,98) |
4.4
|
7.6
|
D-free ≤ 24 months (n=58,53) |
2.8
|
5.8
|
D-free > 24 months (n=138,156) |
4.9
|
6.5
|
D-free ≤ 12 months (n=24,18) |
2.1
|
5.8
|
D-free > 12 months (n=172,191) |
4.3
|
6.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: HR-neg | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0088 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.59 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.40 to 0.88 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: HR-pos/HER-neg | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1196 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.84 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.67 to 1.05 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: PFS <6 months | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0110 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.62 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.43 to 0.90 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: PFS ≥6 months | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0816 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.82 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.65 to 1.03 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: taxane chemo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0395 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.55 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.31 to 0.98 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: non-taxane chemo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1385 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.84 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.68 to 1.06 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: vinorelbine chemo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0029 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.41 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.22 to 0.75 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: LDH ≤ 1.5 ULN | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0171 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.77 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.62 to 0.96 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: LDH > 1.5 ULN | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1797 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.73 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.46 to 1.16 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: < 65 years of age | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0229 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.77 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.62 to 0.97 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: ≥ 65 years of age | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.2139 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.77 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.51 to 1.16 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: < 70 years of age | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0021 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.73 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.59 to 0.89 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: ≥ 70 years of age | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.5216 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.24 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.64 to 2.39 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: < 3 metastatic organ sites | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0148 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.74 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.58 to 0.94 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: ≥ 3 metastatic organ sites | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3102 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.84 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.61 to 1.17 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: B-free ≤ 6 weeks | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0967 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.82 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.64 to 1.04 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: B-free > 6 weeks | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0489 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.72 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.51 to 1.00 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: D-free ≤ 24 months | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0176 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.62 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.41 to 0.92 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: D-free > 24 months | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.2318 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.85 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.66 to 1.11 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: D-free ≤ 12 months | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0568 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.52 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.26 to 1.03 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 21
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | Subgroup analysis: D-free > 12 months | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1143 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.83 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.66 to 1.05 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST v1.1 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | BOR was defined as a confirmed CR or PR during second-line treatment. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population; only randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 185 | 182 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
16.8
6.8%
|
20.9
8.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3457 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 4.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.2 to 12.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% CI was estimated using Hauck-Anderson methodology. |
Title | Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line CR, PR, Stable Disease, and PD According to RECIST v1.1 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; SD was defined as neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels; stable disease was defined as the persistence of 1 or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits; and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. The 95% CI was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population; only randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 185 | 182 |
CR |
1.1
0.4%
|
0.5
0.2%
|
PR |
15.7
6.4%
|
20.3
8.2%
|
Stable disease |
33.5
13.6%
|
48.9
19.8%
|
PD |
41.1
16.6%
|
24.2
9.8%
|
Unable to assess |
8.6
3.5%
|
6.0
2.4%
|
Title | Duration of Second-Line Objective Response (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The median time, in months, from the date of the first second-line documentation of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 to the date of the first second-line documentation of PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants with CR or PR who had experienced neither disease progression nor died were censored at the date of the last available tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population; only randomized participants with a CR or PR were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 31 | 38 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
10.6
|
8.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.9825 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.01 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.51 to 1.99 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% CI was estimated using Cox proportional hazards methodology. The stratification factors used in stratified analysis were hormone receptor status, first-line PFS, choice of chemotherapy, and LDH level. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3601 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.31 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.73 to 2.34 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Unstratified analysis. |
Title | Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line Documented CR or PR According to RECIST v1.1 Estimated to be Alive and Free of Disease Progression at Months 3, 6, and 9 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | Duration of objective response was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of the first second-line documentation of CR or PR to the date of the first second-line documentation of PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants with CR or PR who had experienced neither disease progression nor died were censored at the date of the last available tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free. |
Time Frame | Months 3, 6, and 9 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population; only randomized participants with a CR or PR were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 31 | 38 |
Month 3 |
96.7
39.1%
|
100.0
40.5%
|
Month 6 |
69.0
27.9%
|
72.8
29.5%
|
Month 9 |
60.9
24.7%
|
40.8
16.5%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Third-Line PFS According to RECIST v1.1 |
---|---|
Description | Third-line PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of third-line bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy to the date of third-line PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (assessed every 8-9 weeks, over a period of approximately 14 months) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Third line ITT population: all randomized participants who received third-line treatment. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 105 | 129 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
94.3
38.2%
|
96.1
38.9%
|
Title | Third-Line PFS |
---|---|
Description | The median time, in months, from the first dose of third-line bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy to third-line PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (over a period of approximately 14 months) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Third line ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 105 | 129 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
2.9
|
3.8
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1080 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.79 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.59 to 1.06 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% CI was estimated using Cox proportional hazards methodology. The stratification factors used in stratified analysis were hormone receptor status, first-line PFS, choice of chemotherapy, and LDH level. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0625 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.78 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.59 to 1.02 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Unstratified analysis. |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Second- and Third-Line PFS According to RECIST v1.1 |
---|---|
Description | Second- and third-line PFS was defined as the time from the date randomization to the date of third-line PD or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
71.7
29%
|
83.4
33.8%
|
Title | Second- and Third-Line PFS |
---|---|
Description | The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line and third-line PFS event. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
10.7
|
12.8
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1349 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.85 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.68 to 1.05 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% CI was estimated using Cox proportional hazards methodology. The stratification factors used in stratified analysis were hormone receptor status, first-line PFS, choice of chemotherapy, and LDH level. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0863 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.84 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.68 to 1.03 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Unstratified analysis. |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Second- and Third-Line Tumor Progression |
---|---|
Description | Second- and third-line tumor progression was defined as occurrence of third-line PD according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to progression of disease. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death due to progression of disease were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
67.2
27.2%
|
75.3
30.5%
|
Title | Time to Second- and Third-Line Tumor Progression |
---|---|
Description | The median time, in months, from randomization to second- and third-line tumor progression. Second- and third-line tumor progression was defined as third-line PD according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to progression of disease. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
11.2
|
13.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0744 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.81 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.65 to 1.02 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% CI was estimated using Cox proportional hazards methodology. The stratification factors used in stratified analysis were hormone receptor status, first-line PFS, choice of chemotherapy, and LDH level. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0503 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.81 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.66 to 1.00 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Unstratified analysis. |
Title | Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 6 |
---|---|
Description | Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
40.7
16.5%
|
54.2
21.9%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Died |
---|---|
Description | Percentage of participants who died due to any reason were reported. |
Time Frame | Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
63.2
25.6%
|
66.0
26.7%
|
Title | Overall Survival (OS) |
---|---|
Description | OS was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the date the patient was last known to be alive. |
Time Frame | Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
18.7
|
19.7
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7253 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.96 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.76 to 1.21 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The 95% CI was estimated using Cox proportional hazards methodology. The stratification factors used in stratified analysis were hormone receptor status, first-line PFS, choice of chemotherapy, and LDH level. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | CT Arm, CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.5332 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.93 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.75 to 1.16 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Unstratified analysis. |
Title | Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Surviving at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24 |
---|---|
Description | OS was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of death, due to any cause. |
Time Frame | Months 6, 12, 18, and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Month 6 |
85.2
34.5%
|
90.4
36.6%
|
Month 12 |
68.6
27.8%
|
72.4
29.3%
|
Month 18 |
52.8
21.4%
|
54.9
22.2%
|
Month 24 |
38.4
15.5%
|
37.6
15.2%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Experiencing Problems by European Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Category (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility (M) ("no problems"="I have no problems in walking about" to "extreme problems"="I am confined to bed"), self-care (SC) ("no problems"="I have no problems with self-care" to "extreme problems"="I am unable to wash or dress myself"), usual activities (UA) ("no problems"="I have no problems performing my usual activities" to "extreme problems"="I am unable to perform my usual activities"), pain/discomfort (P/D) ("no problems"="I have no pain or discomfort" to "extreme problems"="I have extreme pain or discomfort"), and anxiety/depression (A/D) ("no problems"="I am not anxious or depressed" to "extreme problems"='I am extremely anxious or depressed"). |
Time Frame | Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n=number of participants completing the questionnaires at the corresponding timepoint. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 214 | 224 |
BL: M, no problems (n=214,224) |
60.3
24.4%
|
64.3
26%
|
BL: M, some problems (n=214,224) |
36.4
14.7%
|
34.8
14.1%
|
BL: M, extreme problems (n=214,224) |
0.5
0.2%
|
0.4
0.2%
|
BL: SC, no problems (n=214,224) |
82.7
33.5%
|
85.7
34.7%
|
BL: SC, some problems (n=214,224) |
12.6
5.1%
|
11.2
4.5%
|
BL: SC, extreme problems (n=214,224) |
0.5
0.2%
|
1.8
0.7%
|
BL: UA, no problems (n=214,224) |
53.7
21.7%
|
46.4
18.8%
|
BL: UA, some problems (n=214,224) |
40.2
16.3%
|
48.7
19.7%
|
BL: UA, extreme problems (n=214,224) |
2.8
1.1%
|
4.0
1.6%
|
BL: P/D, no problems (n=214,224) |
24.3
9.8%
|
27.7
11.2%
|
BL: P/D, some problems (n=214,224) |
68.7
27.8%
|
66.1
26.8%
|
BL: P/D, extreme problems (n=214,224) |
4.2
1.7%
|
5.4
2.2%
|
BL: A/D, no problems (n=214,224) |
33.6
13.6%
|
34.8
14.1%
|
BL: A/D, some problems (n=214,224) |
56.5
22.9%
|
58.5
23.7%
|
BL: A/D, extreme problems (n=214,224) |
5.6
2.3%
|
5.8
2.3%
|
Week 8/9: M, no problems (n=133,141) |
61.7
25%
|
51.8
21%
|
Week 8/9: M, some problems (n=133,141) |
34.6
14%
|
43.3
17.5%
|
Week 8/9: M, extreme problems (n=133,141) |
1.5
0.6%
|
2.1
0.9%
|
Week 8/9: SC, no problems (n=133,141) |
82.0
33.2%
|
75.9
30.7%
|
Week 8/9: SC, some problems (n=133,141) |
13.5
5.5%
|
17.0
6.9%
|
Week 8/9: SC, extreme problems (n=133,141) |
1.5
0.6%
|
3.5
1.4%
|
Week 8/9: UA, no problems (n=133,141) |
53.4
21.6%
|
40.4
16.4%
|
Week 8/9: UA, some problems (n=133,141) |
40.6
16.4%
|
51.8
21%
|
Week 8/9: UA, extreme problems (n=133,141) |
3.0
1.2%
|
5.0
2%
|
Week 8/9: P/D, no problems (n=133,141) |
29.3
11.9%
|
23.4
9.5%
|
Week 8/9: P/D, some problems (n=133,141) |
61.7
25%
|
68.1
27.6%
|
Week 8/9: P/D, extreme problems (n=133,141) |
5.3
2.1%
|
6.4
2.6%
|
Week 8/9: A/D, no problems (n=133,141) |
49.6
20.1%
|
46.8
18.9%
|
Week 8/9: A/D, some problems (n=133,141) |
40.6
16.4%
|
48.2
19.5%
|
Week 8/9: A/D, extreme problems (n=133,141) |
6.8
2.8%
|
2.8
1.1%
|
Week 16/18: M, no problems (n=84,123) |
66.7
27%
|
49.6
20.1%
|
Week 16/18: M, some problems (n=84,123) |
29.8
12.1%
|
47.2
19.1%
|
Week 16/18: M, extreme problems (n=84,123) |
0.0
0%
|
2.4
1%
|
Week 16/18: SC, no problems (n=84,123) |
81.0
32.8%
|
78.9
31.9%
|
Week 16/18: SC, some problems (n=84,123) |
14.3
5.8%
|
17.1
6.9%
|
Week 16/18: SC, extreme problems (n=84,123) |
0.0
0%
|
3.3
1.3%
|
Week 16/18: UA, no problems (n=84,123) |
50.0
20.2%
|
36.6
14.8%
|
Week 16/18: UA, some problems (n=84,123) |
42.9
17.4%
|
56.1
22.7%
|
Week 16/18: UA, extreme problems (n=84,123) |
3.6
1.5%
|
4.1
1.7%
|
Week 16/18: P/D, no problems (n=84,123) |
34.5
14%
|
19.5
7.9%
|
Week 16/18: P/D, some problems (n=84,123) |
59.5
24.1%
|
76.4
30.9%
|
Week 16/18: P/D, extreme problems (n=84,123) |
1.2
0.5%
|
3.3
1.3%
|
Week 16/18: A/D, no problems (n=84,123) |
51.2
20.7%
|
49.6
20.1%
|
Week 16/18: A/D, some problems (n=84,123) |
44.0
17.8%
|
43.1
17.4%
|
Week 16/18: A/D, extreme problems (n=84,123) |
0.0
0%
|
5.7
2.3%
|
Second-line PD: M, no problems (n=82,76) |
59.8
24.2%
|
47.4
19.2%
|
Second-line PD: M, some problems (n=82,76) |
34.1
13.8%
|
48.7
19.7%
|
Second-line PD: M, extreme problems (n=82,76) |
2.4
1%
|
3.9
1.6%
|
Second-line PD: SC, no problems (n=82,76) |
76.8
31.1%
|
75.0
30.4%
|
Second-line PD: SC, some problems (n=82,76) |
15.9
6.4%
|
18.4
7.4%
|
Second-line PD: SC, extreme problems (n=82,76) |
1.2
0.5%
|
6.6
2.7%
|
Second-line PD: UA, no problems (n=82,76) |
39.0
15.8%
|
30.3
12.3%
|
Second-line PD: UA, some problems (n=82,76) |
50.0
20.2%
|
59.2
24%
|
Second-line PD: UA, extreme problems (n=82,76) |
6.1
2.5%
|
10.5
4.3%
|
Second-line PD: P/D, no problems (n=82,76) |
19.5
7.9%
|
18.4
7.4%
|
Second-line PD: P/D, some problems (n=82,76) |
67.1
27.2%
|
69.7
28.2%
|
Second-line PD: P/D, extreme problems (n=82,76) |
8.5
3.4%
|
11.8
4.8%
|
Second-line PD: A/D, no problems (n=82,76) |
36.6
14.8%
|
26.3
10.6%
|
Second-line PD: A/D, some problems (n=82,76) |
50.0
20.2%
|
61.8
25%
|
Second-line PD: A/D, extreme problems (n=82,76) |
7.3
3%
|
11.8
4.8%
|
Title | Quality of Life Assessed As an Index Score Using the EQ-5D (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Based on large population surveys, an algorithm was used to combine the responses to each of these 5 measures into 1 single EQ-5D index score ranging from -0.59 (extreme problems) to +1 (no problems). |
Time Frame | Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n=number of participants who completed the assessment at the specified timepoint |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 202 | 219 |
BL (n=202,219) |
0.6806
|
0.6725
|
Week 8/9 (n=127,135) |
0.6953
|
0.6515
|
Week 16/18 (n=80,118) |
0.7496
|
0.6534
|
Second-line PD (n=77,76) |
0.6290
|
0.5553
|
Title | Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Index Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Based on large population surveys, an algorithm was used to combine the responses to each of these 5 measures into 1 single EQ-5D index score ranging from -0.59 (extreme problems) to +1 (no problems) where a negative value indicated a worsening of perceived quality of life and a positive value indicated an improvement of perceived quality of life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n=number of participants who completed the assessment at the specified timepoint. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 107 | 122 |
Week 8/9 (n=107,122) |
-0.0103
|
-0.0370
|
Week 16/18 (n=68,110) |
0.0387
|
-0.0508
|
Second-line PD (n=69,71) |
-0.0884
|
-0.0878
|
Title | Quality of Life Assessed Using the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The participant was asked to rate their overall health on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) vertical scale, where the lowest endpoint=0 (labeled as worst imaginable health state) and the highest endpoint =100 (labeled as the best imaginable health state). The participant marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the bottom was measured in millimeters. A higher value indicated a better health state. |
Time Frame | Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population; n=number of participants who completed the assessment at the specified timepoint. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 200 | 212 |
BL (n=200,212) |
66.5
|
63.4
|
Week 8/9 (n=123,135) |
69.3
|
66.5
|
Week 16/18 (n=75,119) |
67.3
|
66.4
|
Second-line PD (n=78,75) |
63.7
|
61.7
|
Title | Change From Baseline in VAS Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The participant was asked to rate their overall health on a 0-100 mm vertical scale, where the lowest endpoint = 0 (labeled as worst imaginable health state) and the highest endpoint =100 (labeled as the best imaginable health state). The participant marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the bottom was measured in millimeters. A negative value indicated a worsening of perceived quality of life and a positive value indicated an improvement of perceived quality of life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n=number of participants who completed the assessment at the specified timepoint. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 118 |
Week 8/9 (n=106,118) |
-2.0
|
2.0
|
Week 16/18 (n=66,107) |
-0.2
|
2.0
|
Second-line PD (n=70,69) |
-5.1
|
-1.3
|
Title | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) is composed of 5 multi-item sections where participants responded to questions assessing symptoms (scale: 0-4; 0="not at all" and 4="very much"), as follows: physical well-being (PWB) (7 items, total score 0-28), social/family well-being (SWB) (7 items, total score 0-28), emotional well-being (EWB) (6 items, total score 0-24), functional well-being (FWB) (7 items, total score 0-28); and breast cancer score based on the additional concerns section of FACT-B (10 items, total score 0-40). The FACT-B Trial Outcomes Index (TOI) score=sum of PWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-96). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscales scores (total score 0-108). The FACT-B total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscales scores (total score 0-148). In all cases a higher value indicated a better perceived quality of life. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n=number of participants who completed the questionnaire at the specified timepoints. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 215 | 224 |
BL: PWB (n=215,222) |
20.621
|
20.253
|
BL: SWB (n=214,223) |
20.722
|
20.674
|
BL: EWB (n=215,224) |
14.847
|
15.062
|
BL: FWB (n=215,224) |
16.091
|
15.726
|
BL: Breast Cancer Score (n=210,224) |
24.986
|
24.388
|
BL: FACT-B TOI (n=204,219) |
61.677
|
60.277
|
BL: Total FACT-G Score (n=207,218) |
72.169
|
71.864
|
BL: Total FACT-B Score (n=201,218) |
96.908
|
96.115
|
Week 8/9: PWB (n=129,138) |
20.413
|
19.156
|
Week 8/9: SWB (n=127,135) |
20.833
|
21.116
|
Week 8/9: EWB (n=129,139) |
15.943
|
16.671
|
Week 8/9: FWB (n=129,139) |
16.662
|
16.169
|
Week 8/9: Breast Cancer Score (n=128,139) |
26.276
|
25.884
|
Week 8/9: FACT-B TOI (n=126,136) |
63.547
|
61.279
|
Week 8/9: Total FACT-G Score (n=122,134) |
74.255
|
73.393
|
Week 8/9: Total FACT-B Score (n=123,134) |
100.375
|
99.213
|
Week 16/18: PWB (n=83,107) |
21.733
|
19.629
|
Week 16/18: SWB (n=80,105) |
20.930
|
20.843
|
Week 16/18: EWB (n=80,107) |
17.330
|
16.806
|
Week 16/18: FWB (n=81,106) |
17.055
|
15.920
|
Week 16/18: Breast Cancer (n=81,106) |
26.923
|
25.755
|
Week 16/18: FACT-B TOI (n=78,105) |
65.628
|
61.107
|
Week 16/18: Total FACT-G (n=78,102) |
76.794
|
73.269
|
Week 16/18: Total FACT-B (n=76,103) |
103.503
|
98.906
|
Week 24/27: PWB (n=48,80) |
21.940
|
18.965
|
Week 24/27: SWB (n=47,78) |
20.840
|
21.399
|
Week 24/27: EWB (n=45,78) |
17.098
|
16.438
|
Week 24/27: FWB (n=45,79) |
18.244
|
16.051
|
Week 24/27: Breast Cancer (n=46,79) |
26.067
|
24.632
|
Week 24/27: FACT-B TOI (n=44,77) |
65.882
|
60.014
|
Week 24/27: Total FACT-G (n=44,77) |
78.305
|
73.083
|
Week 24/27: Total FACT-B (n=43,77) |
104.011
|
97.795
|
Week 32/36: PWB (n=26,44) |
22.949
|
19.686
|
Week 32/36: SWB (n=25,43) |
22.140
|
21.222
|
Week 32/36: EWB (n=26,44) |
18.385
|
16.755
|
Week 32/36: FWB (n=26,44) |
19.615
|
17.195
|
Week 32/36: Breast Cancer (n=26,43) |
29.568
|
26.163
|
Week 32/36: FACT-B TOI (n=26,42) |
72.132
|
63.017
|
Week 32/36: Total FACT-G (n=25,42) |
83.087
|
74.879
|
Week 32/36: Total FACT-B (n=25,42) |
112.904
|
100.904
|
Week 40/45: PWB (n=20,27) |
22.215
|
20.630
|
Week 40/45: SWB (n=21,26) |
19.658
|
20.915
|
Week 40/45: EWB (n=20,27) |
17.560
|
16.067
|
Week 40/45: FWB (n=20,27) |
18.450
|
16.519
|
Week 40/45: Breast Cancer (n=21,27) |
29.386
|
23.819
|
Week 40/45: FACT-B TOI (n=19,27) |
68.750
|
60.967
|
Week 40/45: Total FACT-G (n=19,26) |
76.955
|
75.235
|
Week 40/45: Total FACT-B (n=19,26) |
105.540
|
99.072
|
Week 48/54: PWB (n=13,24) |
23.308
|
20.033
|
Week 48/54: SWB (n=13,23) |
20.740
|
20.450
|
Week 48/54: EWB (n=13,23) |
19.308
|
17.270
|
Week 48/54: FWB (n=13,23) |
18.538
|
16.268
|
Week 48/54: Breast Cancer (n=13,23) |
28.912
|
26.237
|
Week 48/54: Fact-B TOI (n=13,23) |
70.758
|
62.679
|
Week 48/54: Total FACT-G (n=13,23) |
81.894
|
74.162
|
Week 48/54: Total FACT-B (n=13,23) |
110.806
|
100.399
|
Week 56/63: PWB (n=8,14) |
21.792
|
20.298
|
Week 56/63: SWB (n=8,14) |
19.583
|
20.817
|
Week 56/63: EWB (n=7,14) |
17.143
|
15.714
|
Week 56/63: FWB (n=7,14) |
17.143
|
16.476
|
Week 56/63: Breast Cancer (n=8,14) |
28.240
|
25.459
|
Week 56/63: FACT-B TOI (n=7,14) |
66.179
|
62.233
|
Week 56/63: Total FACT-G (n=6,14) |
73.667
|
73.305
|
Week 56/63: Total FACT-B (n=6,14) |
101.042
|
98.764
|
Week 64/72: PWB (n=7,9) |
21.857
|
21.889
|
Week 64/72: SWB (n=7,9) |
18.976
|
22.685
|
Week 64/72: EWB (n=7,9) |
18.143
|
17.889
|
Week 64/72: FWB (n=7,9) |
18.429
|
16.037
|
Week 64/72: Breast Cancer (n=7,9) |
27.464
|
26.889
|
Week 64/72: FACT-B TOI (n=7,9) |
67.750
|
64.815
|
Week 64/72: Total FACT-G (n=7,9) |
77.405
|
78.500
|
Week 64/72: Total FACT-B (n=7,9) |
104.869
|
105.389
|
Week 72/81: PWB (n=6,7) |
23.083
|
21.000
|
Week 72/81: SWB (n=5,7) |
19.667
|
20.043
|
Week 72/81: EWB (n=6,7) |
17.500
|
18.114
|
Week 72/81: FWB (n=6,7) |
17.333
|
16.429
|
Week 72/81: Breast Cancer (n=6,6) |
28.597
|
25.333
|
Week 72/81: FACT-B TOI (n=6,6) |
69.014
|
60.833
|
Week 72/81: Total FACT-G (n=5,7) |
76.467
|
75.586
|
Week 72/81: Total FACT-B (n=5,6) |
106.117
|
97.211
|
Week 80/90: PWB (n=2,3) |
19.250
|
18.000
|
Week 80/90: SWB (n=2,3) |
18.375
|
19.944
|
Week 80/90: EWB (n=2,3) |
14.000
|
15.733
|
Week 80/90: FWB (n=2,3) |
15.000
|
12.333
|
Week 80/90: Breast Cancer (n=2,3) |
21.667
|
25.000
|
Week 80/90: FACT-B TOI (n=2,3) |
55.917
|
55.333
|
Week 80/90: Total FACT-G (n=2,3) |
66.625
|
66.011
|
Week 80/90: Total FACT-B (n=2,3) |
88.292
|
91.011
|
Week 88/99: PWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
22.000
|
Week 88/99: SWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
23.333
|
Week 88/99: EWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
20.000
|
Week 88/99: FWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
21.000
|
Week 88/99: Breast Cancer (n=0,1) |
NA
|
35.000
|
Week 88/99: FACT-B TOI (n=0,1) |
NA
|
78.000
|
Week 88/99: Total FACT-G (n=0,1) |
NA
|
86.333
|
Week 88/99: Total FACT-B (n=0,1) |
NA
|
121.333
|
Week 96/108: PWB (n=2,1) |
26.000
|
22.000
|
Week 96/108: SWB (n=2,1) |
24.383
|
21.000
|
Week 96/108: EWB (n=2,2) |
22.000
|
18.000
|
Week 96/108: FWB (n=2,2) |
21.083
|
10.500
|
Week 96/108: Breast Cancer (n=2,2) |
30.389
|
24.500
|
Week 96/108: FACT-B TOI (n=2,1) |
77.472
|
59.000
|
Week 96/108: Total FACT-G (n=2,1) |
93.467
|
74.000
|
Week 96/108: Total FACT-B (n=2,1) |
123.856
|
96.000
|
Week 104/117: PWB (n=1,3) |
27.000
|
21.333
|
Week 104/117: SWB (n=1,2) |
26.600
|
20.5000
|
Week 104/117: EWB (n=1,3) |
22.000
|
18.000
|
Week 104/117: FWB (n=1,3) |
22.000
|
11.000
|
Week 104/117: Breast Cancer (n=1,3) |
27.143
|
28.000
|
Week 104/117: FACT-B TOI (n=1,3) |
76.143
|
60.333
|
Week 104/117: Total FACT-G (n=1,2) |
97.600
|
70.500
|
Week 104/117: Total FACT-B (n=1,2) |
124.743
|
100.500
|
Week 112/126: PWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
14.000
|
Week 112/126: SWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
15.400
|
Week 112/126: EWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
15.000
|
Week 112/126: FWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
11.000
|
Week 112/126: Breast Cancer (n=0,1) |
NA
|
20.000
|
Week 112/126: FACT-B TOI (n=0,1) |
NA
|
45.000
|
Week 112/126: Total FACT-G (n=0,1) |
NA
|
55.400
|
Week 112/126: Total FACT-B (n=0,1) |
NA
|
75.400
|
Second-Line PD: PWB (n=89,81) |
19.086
|
17.412
|
Second-Line PD: SWB (n=88,79) |
20.623
|
21.487
|
Second-Line PD: EWB (n=88,80) |
15.111
|
14.175
|
Second-Line PD: FWB (n=88,80) |
15.447
|
15.235
|
Second-Line PD: Breast Cancer (n=85,81) |
24.978
|
24.445
|
Second-Line PD: FACT-B TOI (n=84,80) |
59.230
|
57.002
|
Second-Line PD: Total FACT-G (n=86,78) |
69.829
|
68.485
|
Second-Line PD: Total FACT-B (n=82,78) |
94.930
|
92.983
|
Title | Change From Baseline in FACT-B Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013) |
---|---|
Description | The FACT-B is composed of 5 multi-item sections where participants responded to questions assessing symptoms (scale: 0-4; 0="not at all" and 4="very much"), as follows: PWB (7 items, total score 0-28), SWB (7 items, total score 0-28), EWB (6 items, total score 0-24), FWB (7 items, total score 0-28); and breast cancer score based on the additional concerns section of FACT-B (10 items, total score 0-40). The FACT-B TOI score=sum of PWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-96). The FACT-G total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscales scores (total score 0-108). The FACT-B total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-148). In all cases a higher value indicated a better perceived quality of life. |
Time Frame | Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n=number of participants who completed the assessment at the specified timepoint. |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 118 | 128 |
Week 8/9: PWB (n=118,125) |
-1.281
|
-1.289
|
Week 8/9: SWB (n=116,125) |
0.356
|
0.707
|
Week 8/9: EWB (n=116,128) |
0.408
|
1.024
|
Week 8/9: FWB (n=117,128) |
-0.226
|
-0.240
|
Week 8/9: Breast Cancer Score (n=113,128) |
0.228
|
0.950
|
Week 8/9: FACT-B TOI (n=110,122) |
-1.361
|
-0.357
|
Week 8/9: Total FACT-G Score (n=110,122) |
-0.760
|
0.369
|
Week 8/9: Total FACT-B Score (n=108,120) |
-0.728
|
1.342
|
Week 16/18: PWB (n=77,97) |
0.294
|
-1.823
|
Week 16/18: SWB (n=74,97) |
-0.443
|
0.359
|
Week 16/18: EWB (n=73,98) |
1.197
|
0.921
|
Week 16/18: FWB (n=75,98) |
-0.548
|
-0.517
|
Week 16/18: Breast Cancer (n=72,97) |
0.578
|
0.546
|
Week 16/18: FACT-TOI (n=68,95) |
-0.483
|
-1.732
|
Week 16/18: Total FACT-G (n=71,93) |
-0.019
|
-0.836
|
Week 16/18: Total Fact-B (n=66,93) |
-0.007
|
-0.127
|
Week 24/27: PWB (n=44,73) |
0.181
|
-1.996
|
Week 24/27: SWB (n=44,72) |
-0.193
|
1.375
|
Week 24/27: EWB (n=42,72) |
0.867
|
1.217
|
Week 24/27: FWB (n=42,72) |
0.119
|
0.056
|
Week 24/27: Breast Cancer (n=40,72) |
-0.038
|
0.078
|
Week 24/27: FACT-B TOI (n=38,70) |
0.221
|
-1.573
|
Week 24/27: Total FACT-G (n=40,70) |
0.764
|
0.817
|
Week 24/27: Total FACT-B (n=37,70) |
0.793
|
1.157
|
Week 32/36: PWB (n=25,39) |
0.880
|
-1.235
|
Week 32/36: SWB (n=24,40) |
-0.388
|
1.036
|
Week 32/36: EWB (n=25,40) |
1.064
|
1.555
|
Week 32/36: FWB (n=25,40) |
1.380
|
1.635
|
Week 32/36: Breast Cancer (n=23,40) |
0.928
|
1.278
|
Week 32/36: FACT-B TOI (n=23,38) |
3.123
|
1.471
|
Week 32/36: Total FACT-G (n=24,39) |
2.617
|
3.197
|
Week 32/36: Total FACT-B (n=22,38) |
3.529
|
3.896
|
Week 40/45: PWB (n=18,25) |
0.137
|
-0.680
|
Week 40/45: SWB (n=19,24) |
-0.589
|
0.951
|
Week 40/45: EWB (n=18,25) |
0.200
|
1.048
|
Week 40/45: FWB (n=18,25) |
1.417
|
0.857
|
Week 40/45: Breast Cancer (n=18,25) |
1.395
|
0.444
|
Week 40/45: FACT-B TOI (n=16,25) |
2.432
|
0.622
|
Week 40/45: Total FACT-G (n=17,24) |
1.444
|
2.432
|
Week 40/45: Total FACT-B (n=16,24) |
1.916
|
2.673
|
Week 48/54: PWB (n=13,20) |
1.295
|
-1.833
|
Week 48/54: SWB (n=13,20) |
1.529
|
2.008
|
Week 48/54: EWB (n=13,20) |
1.492
|
1.710
|
Week 48/54: FWB (n=13,20) |
2.269
|
1.592
|
Week 48/54: Breast Cancer (n=12,20) |
0.599
|
1.897
|
Week 48/54: FACT-B TOI (n=12,20) |
4.044
|
1.656
|
Week 48/54: Total FACT-G (n=13,20) |
6.586
|
3.477
|
Week 48/54: Total FACT-B (n=12,20) |
7.067
|
5.374
|
Week 56/63: PWB (n=8,13) |
-2.063
|
-0.526
|
Week 56/63: SWB (n=8,13) |
-1.500
|
3.033
|
Week 56/63: EWB (n=7,13) |
0.857
|
0.954
|
Week 56/63: FWB (n=7,13) |
0.000
|
5.654
|
Week 56/63: Breast Cancer (n=8,13) |
-0.830
|
1.675
|
Week 56/63: FACT-B TOI (n=7,13) |
-3.591
|
6.803
|
Week 56/63: Total FACT-G (n=6,13) |
-4.083
|
9.115
|
Week 56/63: Total FACT-B (n=6,13) |
-5.301
|
10.791
|
Week 64/72: PWB (n=7,9) |
0.000
|
0.926
|
Week 64/72: SWB (n=7,9) |
-2.014
|
3.570
|
Week 64/72: EWB (n=7,9) |
-0.057
|
3.667
|
Week 64/72: FWB (n=7,9) |
0.214
|
3.222
|
Week 64/72: Breast Cancer (n=7,9) |
-2.298
|
3.086
|
Week 64/72: FACT-B TOI (n=7,9) |
-2.083
|
7.235
|
Week 64/72: Total FACT-G (n=7,9) |
-1.857
|
11.385
|
Week 64/72: Total FACT-B (n=7,9) |
-4.155
|
14.472
|
Week 72/81: PWB (n=5,7) |
2.133
|
-0.429
|
Week 72/81: SWB (n=4,7) |
-1.208
|
6.829
|
Week 72/81: EWB (n=5,7) |
-0.600
|
4.686
|
Week 72/81: FWB (n=5,7) |
0.000
|
7.381
|
Week 72/81: Breast Cancer (n=5,6) |
-0.461
|
3.667
|
Week 72/81: FACT-B TOI (n=5,6) |
1.672
|
8.278
|
Week 72/81: Total FACT-G (n=4,7) |
-0.167
|
18.467
|
Week 72/81: Total FACT-B (n=4,6) |
1.174
|
16.906
|
Week 80/90: PWB (n=2,3) |
-3.750
|
-3.000
|
Week 80/90: SWB (n=2,3) |
-0.875
|
7.344
|
Week 80/90: EWB (n=2,3) |
-4.000
|
4.733
|
Week 80/90: FWB (n=2,3) |
-1.000
|
2.556
|
Week 80/90: Breast Cancer (n=2,3) |
-5.833
|
3.667
|
Week 80/90: FACT-B TOI (n=2,3) |
-10.583
|
3.222
|
Week 80/90: Total FACT-G (n=2,3) |
-9.625
|
11.633
|
Week 80/90: Total FACT-B (n=2,3) |
-15.458
|
15.300
|
Week 88/99: PWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-6.000
|
Week 88/99: SWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
23.333
|
Week 88/99: EWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
0.000
|
Week 88/99: FWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
21.000
|
Week 88/99: Breast Cancer (n=0,1) |
NA
|
3.000
|
Week 88/99: FACT TOI (n=0,1) |
NA
|
18.000
|
Week 88/99: Total FACT-G (n=0,1) |
NA
|
38.333
|
Week 88/99: Total FACT-B (n=0,1) |
NA
|
41.333
|
Week 96/108: PWB (n=2,1) |
7.333
|
-3.000
|
Week 96/108: SWB (n=2,1) |
2.183
|
1.400
|
Week 96/108: EWB (n=2,1) |
0.000
|
6.000
|
Week 96/108: FWB (n=2,1) |
6.583
|
-1.333
|
Week 96/108: Breast Cancer (n=2,1) |
3.167
|
-3.000
|
Week 96/108: FACT-B TOI (n=2,1) |
17.083
|
-7.333
|
Week 96/108: Total FACT-G (n=2,1) |
16.100
|
3.067
|
Week 96/108: Total FACT-B (n=2,1) |
19.267
|
0.067
|
Week 104/117: PWB (n=1,2) |
3.667
|
-2.000
|
Week 104/117: SWB (n=1,1) |
4.200
|
8.800
|
Week 104/117: EWB (n=1,2) |
0.000
|
10.000
|
Week 104/117: FWB (n=1,2) |
8.000
|
2.333
|
Week 104/117: Breast Cancer (n=1,2) |
6.032
|
4.000
|
Week 104/117: FACT-B TOI (n=1,2) |
17.698
|
4.333
|
Week 104/117: Total FACT-G (n=1,1) |
15.867
|
29.800
|
Week 104/117: Total GACT-B (n=1,1) |
21.898
|
38.800
|
Week 112/126: PWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-11.000
|
Week 112/126: SWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-4.200
|
Week 112/126: EWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
5.000
|
Week 112/126: FWB (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-5.333
|
Week 112/126: Breast Cancer (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-5.000
|
Week 112/126: FACT-B TOI (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-21.333
|
Week 112/126: Total FACT-G (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-15.533
|
Week 112/126: Total FACT-B (n=0,1) |
NA
|
-20.533
|
Second-Line PD: PWB (n=81,77) |
-0.871
|
-2.507
|
Second-Line PD: SWB (n=80,75) |
-0.106
|
-0.766
|
Second-Line PD: EWB (n=80,76) |
-0.440
|
-0.508
|
Second-Line PD: FWB (n=80,76) |
-1.415
|
-0.773
|
Second-Line PD: Breast Cancer (n=77,77) |
0.120
|
0.241
|
Second-Line PD: FACT-B TOI (n=74,76) |
-2.311
|
-3.003
|
Second-Line PD: Total FACT-G (n=76,74) |
-2.771
|
-4.702
|
Second-Line PD: Total FACT-B (n=72,74) |
-2.719
|
-4.440
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without secondline PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
16.9
6.8%
|
24.2
9.8%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 18 |
---|---|
Description | Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their secondline of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Month 18 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
9.9
4%
|
11.0
4.5%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 24 |
---|---|
Description | Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first. For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. |
Time Frame | Month 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population |
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. |
Measure Participants | 247 | 247 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
6.4
2.6%
|
6.5
2.6%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Baseline up to approximately 4 years. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy were included in the analysis. | |||
Arm/Group Title | CT Arm | CT+BV Arm | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | Participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, until the maximum cumulative dose of anthracycline was reached, or end of study (24 months after randomization of the last participant). Upon second-line disease progression participants received a single-agent chemotherapy at the discretion of the investigator according to the standard of care at the investigator's site plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg, IV, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant request for withdrawal, or end of study. Upon subsequent disease progression participants received treatment according the standard of care of the treatment site until end of study. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
CT Arm | CT+BV Arm | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
CT Arm | CT+BV Arm | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 55/238 (23.1%) | 89/245 (36.3%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Febrile neutropenia | 5/238 (2.1%) | 12/245 (4.9%) | ||
Neutropenia | 6/238 (2.5%) | 10/245 (4.1%) | ||
Leukopenia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Thrombocytopenia | 0/238 (0%) | 5/245 (2%) | ||
Anaemia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Pancytopenia | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Cardiac failure | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Acute coronary syndrome | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Cardiac failure congestive | 0/238 (0%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Cardiotoxicity | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Left ventricular failure | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Sinus tachycardia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Tachycardia | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Angina pectoris | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Atrial tachycardia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Congestive cardiomyopathy | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Left ventricular dysfunction | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Mitral valve incompetence | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Supraventricular tachycardia | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Diarrhoea | 2/238 (0.8%) | 4/245 (1.6%) | ||
Vomiting | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Abdominal pain | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Anal fissure | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Diverticular perforation | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Faecaloma | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Melaena | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Nausea | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Pancreatitis | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Ileus paralytic | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Subileus | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorder | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Pyrexia | 2/238 (0.8%) | 4/245 (1.6%) | ||
Fatigue | 2/238 (0.8%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
General physical health deterioration | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Chest discomfort | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Chest pain | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Device failure | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Mucosal inflammation | 1/238 (0.4%) | 3/245 (1.2%) | ||
Pain | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Sudden death | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Device dislocation | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Device occlusion | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Impaired healing | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Multi-organ failure | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Patient-device incompatibility | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholelithiasis | 0/238 (0%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Cholecystitis | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Cholangitis | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Hepatitis toxic | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Infection | 2/238 (0.8%) | 3/245 (1.2%) | ||
Bronchitis | 0/238 (0%) | 3/245 (1.2%) | ||
Pneumonia | 0/238 (0%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Device related infection | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Device related sepsis | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Ear infection | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Enterocolitis infectious | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Erysipelas | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Herpes zoster | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Injection site infection | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Osteomyelitis | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Sepsis | 0/238 (0%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Tooth infection | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Wound infection | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Anal abscess | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Peritonitis bacterial | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Pseudomembranous colitis | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Urosepsis | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Foot fracture | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Femoral neck fracture | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Head injury | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Subdural haematoma | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Blood bilirubin increased | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Blood potassium increased | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Biopsy liver | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Hyponatraemia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Hypercalcaemia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Hypocalcaemia | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Hypoglycaemia | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Bone pain | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Osteonecrosis of jaw | 0/238 (0%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Musculoskeletal pain | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Pathological fracture | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Osteolysis | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Endometrial adenocarcinoma | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Metastases to liver | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Ischaemic stoke | 2/238 (0.8%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Cerebrovascular accident | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Cerebrovascular disorder | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Convulsion | 0/238 (0%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Headache | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Motor dysfunction | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Partial seizures | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Polyneuropathy | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Spinal cord compression | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Facial paresis | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Ruptured cerebral aneurysm | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Confusional state | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Obstructive uropathy | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Postrenal failure | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Menstrual disorder | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Metrorrhagia | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Pulmonary embolism | 2/238 (0.8%) | 6/245 (2.4%) | ||
Pleural effusion | 1/238 (0.4%) | 2/245 (0.8%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 1/238 (0.4%) | 3/245 (1.2%) | ||
Pneumothorax | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Pneumonia aspiration | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Skin ulcer | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Salpingo-oophorectomy | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Tooth extraction | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Large intestine anastomosis | 1/238 (0.4%) | 0/245 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Embolism venous | 1/238 (0.4%) | 3/245 (1.2%) | ||
Haemorrhage | 1/238 (0.4%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Embolism arterial | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Infarction | 0/238 (0%) | 1/245 (0.4%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
CT Arm | CT+BV Arm | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 181/238 (76.1%) | 218/245 (89%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Neutropenia | 55/238 (23.1%) | 64/245 (26.1%) | ||
Leukopenia | 18/238 (7.6%) | 30/245 (12.2%) | ||
Anaemia | 13/238 (5.5%) | 22/245 (9%) | ||
Thrombocytopenia | 4/238 (1.7%) | 16/245 (6.5%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Diarrhoea | 27/238 (11.3%) | 35/245 (14.3%) | ||
Nausea | 31/238 (13%) | 33/245 (13.5%) | ||
Vomiting | 22/238 (9.2%) | 16/245 (6.5%) | ||
Abdominal pain | 3/238 (1.3%) | 15/245 (6.1%) | ||
Constipation | 9/238 (3.8%) | 13/245 (5.3%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 33/238 (13.9%) | 49/245 (20%) | ||
Mucosal inflammation | 9/238 (3.8%) | 26/245 (10.6%) | ||
Asthenia | 5/238 (2.1%) | 14/245 (5.7%) | ||
Pyrexia | 11/238 (4.6%) | 14/245 (5.7%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Urinary tract infection | 2/238 (0.8%) | 16/245 (6.5%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 4/238 (1.7%) | 21/245 (8.6%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Peripheral sensory neuropathy | 10/238 (4.2%) | 15/245 (6.1%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Proteinuria | 70/238 (29.4%) | 133/245 (54.3%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Epistaxis | 3/238 (1.3%) | 18/245 (7.3%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | 58/238 (24.4%) | 72/245 (29.4%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 55/238 (23.1%) | 90/245 (36.7%) | ||
Haemorrhage | 7/238 (2.9%) | 29/245 (11.8%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Medical Communications |
---|---|
Organization | Hoffman-LaRoche |
Phone | 800-821-8590 |
genentech@druginfo.com |
- MO22998
- 2010-020998-16