A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab)/Docetaxel in Patients With HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of Avastin plus Herceptin/docetaxel, versus Herceptin/docetaxel alone, in patients with HER2 positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either Avastin (15mg/kg iv q3weeks) + Herceptin (8mg/kg iv loading dose and 6mg/kg iv q3weeks maintenance) + docetaxel (100mg/m2 iv q3weeks) or Herceptin + docetaxel alone. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1
|
Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]
15mg/kg iv every 3 weeks
Drug: Docetaxel
100mg/m2 iv every 3 weeks
Drug: Herceptin
8mg/kg iv loading dose, followed by 6mg/kg iv every 3 weeks
|
Active Comparator: 2
|
Drug: Docetaxel
100mg/m2 iv every 3 weeks
Drug: Herceptin
8mg/kg iv loading dose, followed by 6mg/kg iv every 3 weeks
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Progression Free Survival (PFS) [Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years)]
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to time of first documented disease progression (unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions) or death, whichever occurred first as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0). Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started. Primary PFS variable was defined based on the investigators' assessments and the statistical conclusions on the primary efficacy endpoint were based on investigator assessed PFS. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Overall Survival (OS) [Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years)]
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
- Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (OR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) in Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline [Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years)]
Best OR was assessed using RECIST v1.0 criteria. Participants were classified as responders if their best OR was either confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or confirmed PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter [LD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD). Participants without any post-baseline assessments were regarded as non-responders. The 95% CI for the one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper method.
- Duration of Response (DR) [Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years)]
DR was defined as the time when response (CR or PR per RECIST v1.0) was first documented to the date of disease progression per RECIST v1.0 (unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions) or death. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started.
- Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) [Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years)]
TTF was defined as the time between randomization and date of disease progression (per RECIST v1.0; unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions), death, or withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events, withdrawal of informed consent, insufficient therapeutic response, refusal of treatment/failure to co-operate, or failure to return, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started.
- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Subscale Scores [Baseline, Cycles 3, 5, 11, and post progressive disease (PD; 14 to 28 days after disease progression [up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years])]
FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL (HRQoL): Physical Well-being (PWB), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB); each ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G ranged between 0-108. Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G, 0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. FACT -B is used for assessment of HRQoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: 7 items for each physical, functional, social/family; all 3 ranged from 0-28, emotional (6 items) ranged from 0-24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranged from 0-36. All single-item measures ranges from 0-144. High scale score represents a better QoL.
- Change From Baseline for FACT-G and FACT-B [Baseline, Cycles 3, 5, 11, and post PD (14 to 28 days after disease progression [up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years])]
FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL (HRQoL): Physical Well-being (PWB), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB); each ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G ranged between 0-108. Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G, 0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. FACT -B is used for assessment of HRQoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: 7 items for each physical, functional, social/family; all 3 ranged from 0-28, emotional (6 items) ranged from 0-24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranged from 0-36. All single-item measures ranges from 0-144. High scale score represents a better QoL.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
adult patients, >=18 years of age;
-
HER2 positive breast cancer with locally recurrent or metastatic lesions;
-
eligible for chemotherapy;
-
baseline LVEF >=50%.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
previous chemotherapy for metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer;
-
previous radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (except for metastatic bone pain relief);
-
other primary tumor within last 5 years, with the exception of basal or squamous skin cancer, or in situ cancer of the cervix;
-
clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
-
chronic daily treatment with aspirin (>325mg/day) or clopidogrel (>75mg/day).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Buenos Aires | Argentina | 1417 | ||
2 | Cordoba | Argentina | 5004 | ||
3 | La Plata | Argentina | B1902CMK | ||
4 | Mar del Plata | Argentina | 7600 | ||
5 | Mendoza | Argentina | 5500 | ||
6 | Salta | Argentina | 4400 | ||
7 | San Martin | Argentina | 1650 | ||
8 | Santa Fe | Argentina | 03000 | ||
9 | Santa Fe | Argentina | 2000 | ||
10 | Lismore | New South Wales | Australia | 2480 | |
11 | Newcastle | New South Wales | Australia | 2298 | |
12 | Port Macquarie | New South Wales | Australia | 2444 | |
13 | Wahroonga | New South Wales | Australia | 2076 | |
14 | Wollongong | New South Wales | Australia | 2500 | |
15 | Auchenflower | Queensland | Australia | 4066 | |
16 | Nambour | Queensland | Australia | 4560 | |
17 | Fitzroy | Victoria | Australia | 3065 | |
18 | Geelong | Victoria | Australia | 3220 | |
19 | Perth | Western Australia | Australia | 6000 | |
20 | Graz | Austria | 8036 | ||
21 | Salzburg | Austria | 5020 | ||
22 | Vöcklabruck | Austria | 4840 | ||
23 | Wien | Austria | 1090 | ||
24 | Banja Luka | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 78000 | ||
25 | Sarajevo | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 71000 | ||
26 | Tuzla | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 75000 | ||
27 | Goiania | GO | Brazil | 74605-070 | |
28 | Porto Alegre | RS | Brazil | 90610-000 | |
29 | Florianopolis | SC | Brazil | 88034-000 | |
30 | Barretos | SP | Brazil | 14784-400 | |
31 | Sao Paulo | SP | Brazil | 01509-010 | |
32 | Calgary | Alberta | Canada | T2N 4N2 | |
33 | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | V5Z 4E6 | |
34 | Halifax | Nova Scotia | Canada | B3H 1V7 | |
35 | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada | L8V 5C2 | |
36 | Sudbury | Ontario | Canada | P3E 5J1 | |
37 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M4N 3M5 | |
38 | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H2W 1S6 | |
39 | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H3A 1A1 | |
40 | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H3T 1E2 | |
41 | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada | S7N 4H4 | |
42 | Quebec | Canada | G1S 4L8 | ||
43 | Praha 2 | Czech Republic | 128 08 | ||
44 | Praha 5 | Czech Republic | 150 06 | ||
45 | Avignon | France | 84918 | ||
46 | Besancon | France | 25030 | ||
47 | Bordeaux | France | 33076 | ||
48 | Caen | France | 14076 | ||
49 | Clermont Ferrand | France | 63011 | ||
50 | Dijon | France | 21079 | ||
51 | Lille | France | 59020 | ||
52 | Montpellier | France | 34298 | ||
53 | Villejuif | France | 94805 | ||
54 | Parma | Emilia-Romagna | Italy | 43100 | |
55 | Udine | Friuli-Venezia Giulia | Italy | 33100 | |
56 | Milano | Lombardia | Italy | 20133 | |
57 | Pavia | Lombardia | Italy | 27100 | |
58 | Acapulco | Mexico | 39850 | ||
59 | Guadalajara | Mexico | 45100 | ||
60 | Merida | Mexico | 97500 | ||
61 | Monterrey | Mexico | 66260 | ||
62 | Torreon | Mexico | 27000 | ||
63 | Bucharest | Romania | 050098 | ||
64 | Bucuresti | Romania | 022328 | ||
65 | Cluj Napoca | Romania | 400015 | ||
66 | Cluj-Napoca | Romania | 400015 | ||
67 | Iasi | Romania | 700106 | ||
68 | Kazan | Russian Federation | 420029 | ||
69 | Moscow | Russian Federation | 115478 | ||
70 | Obninsk | Russian Federation | 249036 | ||
71 | Ryazan | Russian Federation | 390011 | ||
72 | Saint-Petersburg | Russian Federation | 197758 | ||
73 | UFA | Russian Federation | 450054 | ||
74 | Sabadell, Barcelona | Barcelona | Spain | 08208 | |
75 | Barcelona | Spain | 08003 | ||
76 | Cordoba | Spain | 14004 | ||
77 | Madrid | Spain | 28046 | ||
78 | Zaragoza | Spain | 50009 | ||
79 | Izmir | Turkey | 35100 | ||
80 | Sıhhiye, ANKARA | Turkey | 06100 | ||
81 | Exeter | United Kingdom | EX2 5DW | ||
82 | London | United Kingdom | SE1 7EH | ||
83 | Manchester | United Kingdom | M20 4BX | ||
84 | Nottingham | United Kingdom | NG5 1PB | ||
85 | Preston | United Kingdom | PR2 9HT | ||
86 | Rhyl | United Kingdom | LL18 5UJ | ||
87 | Stoke-on-Trent | United Kingdom | ST4 6QG | ||
88 | Weston Super Mare | United Kingdom | BS23 4TQ | ||
89 | Montevideo | Uruguay | 11200 | ||
90 | Montevideo | Uruguay | 11600 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- BO20231
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | The participants were randomized 1:1 using a block design randomization procedure with stratification (for prior adjuvant/neo-adjuvant taxane, trastuzumab as part of adjuvant treatment versus no trastuzumab, estrogen/progesterone receptor hormone receptor status and measurable disease) to avoid an imbalance of important prognostic factors. |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 208 | 216 |
Received Treatment | 206 | 215 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 208 | 216 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 208 | 216 | 424 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.0
(11.71)
|
53.5
(10.90)
|
53.7
(11.29)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
208
100%
|
216
100%
|
424
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Progression Free Survival (PFS) |
---|---|
Description | PFS was defined as the time from randomization to time of first documented disease progression (unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions) or death, whichever occurred first as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0). Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started. Primary PFS variable was defined based on the investigators' assessments and the statistical conclusions on the primary efficacy endpoint were based on investigator assessed PFS. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
Time Frame | Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 208 | 216 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
13.7
|
16.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0775 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank (unstratified) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.82 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.65 to 1.02 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Overall Survival (OS) |
---|---|
Description | OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
Time Frame | Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 208 | 216 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
38.3
|
38.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.9543 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.01 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.74 to 1.38 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (OR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) in Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline |
---|---|
Description | Best OR was assessed using RECIST v1.0 criteria. Participants were classified as responders if their best OR was either confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or confirmed PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter [LD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD). Participants without any post-baseline assessments were regarded as non-responders. The 95% CI for the one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper method. |
Time Frame | Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 176 | 183 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
69.9
33.6%
|
74.3
34.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3492 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in Response rates |
Estimated Value | 4.43 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -5.2 to 14.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | 95% CI for the difference in response rates using Hauck-Anderson method. |
Title | Duration of Response (DR) |
---|---|
Description | DR was defined as the time when response (CR or PR per RECIST v1.0) was first documented to the date of disease progression per RECIST v1.0 (unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions) or death. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started. |
Time Frame | Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population: only participants with a best OR of CR or PR were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 123 | 136 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
11.4
|
14.6
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.74 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.56 to 0.98 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) |
---|---|
Description | TTF was defined as the time between randomization and date of disease progression (per RECIST v1.0; unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions), death, or withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events, withdrawal of informed consent, insufficient therapeutic response, refusal of treatment/failure to co-operate, or failure to return, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started. |
Time Frame | Every 9 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 12 weeks until disease progression (up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 208 | 216 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
7.7
|
9.8
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.5392 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.94 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.76 to 1.15 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Subscale Scores |
---|---|
Description | FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL (HRQoL): Physical Well-being (PWB), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB); each ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G ranged between 0-108. Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G, 0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. FACT -B is used for assessment of HRQoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: 7 items for each physical, functional, social/family; all 3 ranged from 0-28, emotional (6 items) ranged from 0-24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranged from 0-36. All single-item measures ranges from 0-144. High scale score represents a better QoL. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Cycles 3, 5, 11, and post progressive disease (PD; 14 to 28 days after disease progression [up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; n (number) = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 173 | 189 |
Physical Well-Being: Baseline (n=173,189) |
21.20
(5.74)
|
21.47
(5.07)
|
Social Well-Being: Baseline (n=173,189) |
20.59
(5.75)
|
20.88
(5.77)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Baseline (n=173,189) |
14.95
(4.95)
|
15.54
(4.44)
|
Functional Well-Being: Baseline (n=173,189) |
16.34
(5.83)
|
16.36
(5.57)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Baseline (n=173,189) |
73.30
(16.60)
|
74.49
(14.50)
|
Breast Specific: Baseline (n=173,189) |
21.67
(6.43)
|
22.84
(5.85)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Baseline (n=173,189) |
94.97
(20.50)
|
97.46
(17.71)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Baseline (n=173,189) |
59.54
(14.03)
|
60.85
(12.61)
|
Physical Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
20.19
(4.89)
|
19.96
(5.05)
|
Social Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
20.64
(5.32)
|
21.19
(5.44)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
16.47
(4.19)
|
16.70
(4.36)
|
Functional Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145, 173) |
15.43
(5.33)
|
16.20
(5.22)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
72.94
(14.81)
|
74.05
(14.35)
|
Breast Specific: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
22.29
(5.78)
|
23.17
(5.34)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
95.26
(18.52)
|
97.23
(17.81)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
58.04
(12.80)
|
59.33
(12.49)
|
Physical Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
19.51
(4.83)
|
19.67
(4.56)
|
Social Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
19.36
(5.26)
|
20.68
(4.92)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
16.05
(4.44)
|
17.07
(4.30)
|
Functional Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
14.81
(5.45)
|
15.78
(4.77)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
69.78
(15.04)
|
73.21
(12.49)
|
Breast Specific: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
21.65
(5.83)
|
23.15
(4.90)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
91.43
(18.81)
|
96.36
(15.63)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
55.99
(13.09)
|
58.59
(11.01)
|
Physical Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
21.71
(4.54)
|
21.56
(4.53)
|
Social Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
19.71
(5.74)
|
20.78
(4.92)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
15.96
(4.50)
|
17.46
(3.70)
|
Functional Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
16.25
(5.16)
|
16.98
(4.92)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
73.26
(15.24)
|
76.55
(13.56)
|
Breast Specific: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
21.29
(5.55)
|
23.80
(4.92)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
94.57
(18.58)
|
100.43
(16.97)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
59.19
(12.00)
|
62.34
(11.79)
|
Physical Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
19.94
(4.99)
|
20.35
(5.37)
|
Social Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
19.02
(5.61)
|
19.68
(4.77)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
14.76
(4.83)
|
14.77
(4.64)
|
Functional Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
14.13
(5.57)
|
15.08
(5.16)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
67.84
(14.21)
|
70.04
(15.08)
|
Breast Specific: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
22.90
(4.48)
|
22.87
(5.14)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
90.74
(16.59)
|
92.92
(18.47)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
56.97
(11.16)
|
58.47
(12.43)
|
Title | Change From Baseline for FACT-G and FACT-B |
---|---|
Description | FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL (HRQoL): Physical Well-being (PWB), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB); each ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G ranged between 0-108. Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G, 0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. FACT -B is used for assessment of HRQoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: 7 items for each physical, functional, social/family; all 3 ranged from 0-28, emotional (6 items) ranged from 0-24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranged from 0-36. All single-item measures ranges from 0-144. High scale score represents a better QoL. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Cycles 3, 5, 11, and post PD (14 to 28 days after disease progression [up to the clinical cutoff of 30 June 2011, up to 4.75 years]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; n (number) = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. |
Measure Participants | 145 | 173 |
Physical Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
-1.01
(7.54)
|
-1.51
(7.16)
|
Social Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
0.05
(7.83)
|
0.32
(7.93)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
1.52
(6.49)
|
1.16
(6.22)
|
Functional Well-Being: Cycle 3 (n=145, 173) |
-0.91
(7.90)
|
-0.16
(7.63)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
-0.36
(22.25)
|
-0.44
(20.40)
|
Breast Specific: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
0.61
(8.65)
|
0.34
(7.92)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
0.29
(27.63)
|
-0.24
(25.12)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Cycle 3 (n=145,173) |
-1.50
(18.99)
|
-1.52
(17.75)
|
Physical Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-1.69
(7.50)
|
-1.80
(6.82)
|
Social Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-1.23
(7.79)
|
-0.20
(7.58)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
1.09
(6.65)
|
1.53
(6.18)
|
Functional Well-Being: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-1.53
(7.98)
|
-0.58
(7.33)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-3.53
(22.40)
|
-1.28
(19.14)
|
Breast Specific: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-0.03
(8.68)
|
0.31
(7.63)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-3.55
(27.82)
|
-1.10
(23.62)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Cycle 5 (n=139, 166) |
-3.55
(19.19)
|
-2.26
(16.74)
|
Physical Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
0.51
(7.32)
|
0.09
(6.80)
|
Social Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
-0.89
(8.13)
|
-0.10
(7.58)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
1.00
(6.69)
|
1.92
(5.78)
|
Functional Well-Being: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
-0.09
(7.79)
|
0.62
(7.43)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
-0.05
(22.54)
|
2.06
(19.85)
|
Breast Specific: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
-0.38
(8.49)
|
0.96
(7.64)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
-0.41
(27.67)
|
2.97
(24.53)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Cycle 11 (n=100, 133) |
-0.35
(18.46)
|
1.49
(17.26)
|
Physical Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-1.25
(7.61)
|
-1.12
(7.39)
|
Social Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-1.58
(8.03)
|
-1.19
(7.48)
|
Emotional Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-0.20
(6.92)
|
-0.78
(6.42)
|
Functional Well-Being: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-2.22
(8.06)
|
-1.28
(7.59)
|
Total FACT-G Score: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-5.46
(21.85)
|
-4.44
(20.92)
|
Breast Specific: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
1.22
(7.84)
|
0.03
(7.79)
|
Total FACT-B Score: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-4.23
(26.37)
|
-4.55
(25.59)
|
Trial Outcome Index: Post PD (n=33, 39) |
-2.57
(17.92)
|
-2.38
(17.70)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From time of first drug intake up to 28 days after last dose study treatment (up to 4.75 years). | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Safety population included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of the trial medication, whether withdrawn prematurely or not. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel | ||
Arm/Group Description | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent, and for a minimum of 6 cycles, respectively. | Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 on Day 2 of Cycle 1. Then a maintenance dose of trastuzumab at 6 mg/kg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel at 100 mg/m^2 were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-weekly cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (requiring discontinuation of study treatment), or withdrawal of participant's consent. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 63/206 (30.6%) | 72/215 (33.5%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Febrile neutropenia | 14/206 (6.8%) | 18/215 (8.4%) | ||
Neutropenia | 9/206 (4.4%) | 6/215 (2.8%) | ||
Anaemia | 1/206 (0.5%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Leukopenia | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Thrombocytopenia | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Cardiac failure | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Cardiac failure congestive | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Cardiomyopathy | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Coronary artery occlusion | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Coronary artery thrombosis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Left ventricular dysfunction | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Mitral vavle incompetence | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Myocardial infarction | 0/206 (0%) | 2/215 (0.9%) | ||
Arrhythmia | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Cardio-respiratory arrest | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Coronary artery stenosis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Diarrhoea | 4/206 (1.9%) | 6/215 (2.8%) | ||
Vomiting | 0/206 (0%) | 3/215 (1.4%) | ||
Abdominal pain | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Anal Fistula | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Aphthous stomatitus | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Enteritis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Gastric haemorrhage | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Gastrointestinal perforation | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Stomatitus | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Abdominal wall haematoma | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Duodenal ulcer perforation | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Intestinal obstruction | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Pancreatitis acute | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Rectal Haemorrhage | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 1/206 (0.5%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
General physical health deterioration | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Oedema peripheral | 2/206 (1%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Performance status decreased | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Pyrexia | 2/206 (1%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Malaise | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholecystitis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Hepatic vein thrombosis | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Hepatocellular injury | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Cholestasis | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Immune system disorders | ||||
Anaphylactic reaction | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Hypersensitivity | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Neutropenic sepsis | 3/206 (1.5%) | 6/215 (2.8%) | ||
Neutropenic infection | 2/206 (1%) | 4/215 (1.9%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 1/206 (0.5%) | 2/215 (0.9%) | ||
Pneumonia | 2/206 (1%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Anal abscess | 0/206 (0%) | 4/215 (1.9%) | ||
Angina gangrenous | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Arthritis bacterial | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Cellulitis | 1/206 (0.5%) | 2/215 (0.9%) | ||
Erysipelas | 3/206 (1.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Lower respiratory tract infection | 1/206 (0.5%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Sepsis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Viral infection | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Device related infection | 1/206 (0.5%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Abscess soft tissue | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Endocarditis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Hepatitis C | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Lymphangitis | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Mastitis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Wound infection | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Infusion related reaction | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Comminuted fracture | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Fracture | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Vascular access complication | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Wrist fracture | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
General physical condition | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Pathological fracture | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Thyroid cancer | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Convulsion | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Syncope | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Bipolar I Disorder | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Psychotic disorder | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Bartholinitis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Female genital tract fistula | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Breast discharge | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Pleural effusion | 2/206 (1%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Acute pulmonary oedema | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Epistaxis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Pulmonary embolism | 2/206 (1%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 1/206 (0.5%) | 3/215 (1.4%) | ||
Cough | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Dysphonia | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Pneumothorax | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Respiratory failure | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Exfoliative rash | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 0/206 (0%) | 2/215 (0.9%) | ||
Hypertensive crisis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Vena cava thrombosis | 1/206 (0.5%) | 0/215 (0%) | ||
Circulatory collapse | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Deep vein thrombosis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Jugular vein thrombosis | 0/206 (0%) | 1/215 (0.5%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Docetaxel | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 198/206 (96.1%) | 202/215 (94%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Neutropenia | 51/206 (24.8%) | 44/215 (20.5%) | ||
Anaemia | 24/206 (11.7%) | 16/215 (7.4%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Left ventricular dysfunction | 17/206 (8.3%) | 24/215 (11.2%) | ||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Vertigo | 13/206 (6.3%) | 3/215 (1.4%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Lacrimation increased | 59/206 (28.6%) | 75/215 (34.9%) | ||
Conjuctivitis | 9/206 (4.4%) | 22/215 (10.2%) | ||
Dry eye | 6/206 (2.9%) | 12/215 (5.6%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Diarrhoea | 85/206 (41.3%) | 107/215 (49.8%) | ||
Nausea | 76/206 (36.9%) | 82/215 (38.1%) | ||
Stomatitis | 61/206 (29.6%) | 95/215 (44.2%) | ||
Constipation | 47/206 (22.8%) | 54/215 (25.1%) | ||
Vomiting | 37/206 (18%) | 42/215 (19.5%) | ||
Dyspepsia | 18/206 (8.7%) | 34/215 (15.8%) | ||
Abdominal pain upper | 24/206 (11.7%) | 23/215 (10.7%) | ||
Abdominal pain | 15/206 (7.3%) | 27/215 (12.6%) | ||
Haemorrhoids | 8/206 (3.9%) | 22/215 (10.2%) | ||
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | 11/206 (5.3%) | 8/215 (3.7%) | ||
Toothache | 7/206 (3.4%) | 12/215 (5.6%) | ||
Gingival bleeding | 1/206 (0.5%) | 15/215 (7%) | ||
Rectal Haemorrhage | 1/206 (0.5%) | 10/215 (4.7%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 76/206 (36.9%) | 75/215 (34.9%) | ||
Fatigue | 48/206 (23.3%) | 69/215 (32.1%) | ||
Oedema peripheral | 72/206 (35%) | 37/215 (17.2%) | ||
Pyrexia | 41/206 (19.9%) | 51/215 (23.7%) | ||
Influenza like illness | 18/206 (8.7%) | 17/215 (7.9%) | ||
Chills | 11/206 (5.3%) | 15/215 (7%) | ||
Spinal pain | 4/206 (1.9%) | 11/215 (5.1%) | ||
Immune system disorders | ||||
Hypersensitivity | 14/206 (6.8%) | 10/215 (4.7%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Urinary tract infection | 33/206 (16%) | 27/215 (12.6%) | ||
Nasopharyngitis | 20/206 (9.7%) | 18/215 (8.4%) | ||
Cystitis | 17/206 (8.3%) | 19/215 (8.8%) | ||
Rhinitis | 16/206 (7.8%) | 17/215 (7.9%) | ||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 11/206 (5.3%) | 21/215 (9.8%) | ||
Bronchitis | 15/206 (7.3%) | 9/215 (4.2%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Weight decreased | 6/206 (2.9%) | 20/215 (9.3%) | ||
Weight increased | 13/206 (6.3%) | 8/215 (3.7%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 25/206 (12.1%) | 39/215 (18.1%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Myalgia | 60/206 (29.1%) | 59/215 (27.4%) | ||
Arthralgia | 41/206 (19.9%) | 63/215 (29.3%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 37/206 (18%) | 35/215 (16.3%) | ||
Musculoskeletal pain | 32/206 (15.5%) | 39/215 (18.1%) | ||
Back pain | 26/206 (12.6%) | 32/215 (14.9%) | ||
Bone pain | 25/206 (12.1%) | 23/215 (10.7%) | ||
Neck pain | 10/206 (4.9%) | 17/215 (7.9%) | ||
Muscle spasms | 8/206 (3.9%) | 18/215 (8.4%) | ||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 7/206 (3.4%) | 14/215 (6.5%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 40/206 (19.4%) | 66/215 (30.7%) | ||
Peripheral sensory neuropathy | 52/206 (25.2%) | 46/215 (21.4%) | ||
Dysgeusia | 32/206 (15.5%) | 37/215 (17.2%) | ||
Paraesthesia | 28/206 (13.6%) | 37/215 (17.2%) | ||
Neuropathy peripheral | 18/206 (8.7%) | 22/215 (10.2%) | ||
Dizziness | 16/206 (7.8%) | 14/215 (6.5%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Insomnia | 21/206 (10.2%) | 19/215 (8.8%) | ||
Anxiety | 16/206 (7.8%) | 12/215 (5.6%) | ||
Depression | 15/206 (7.3%) | 13/215 (6%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Proteinuria | 1/206 (0.5%) | 22/215 (10.2%) | ||
Dysuria | 7/206 (3.4%) | 13/215 (6%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Epistaxis | 35/206 (17%) | 109/215 (50.7%) | ||
Cough | 43/206 (20.9%) | 43/215 (20%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 46/206 (22.3%) | 36/215 (16.7%) | ||
Rhinorrhoea | 18/206 (8.7%) | 26/215 (12.1%) | ||
Oropharyngeal pain | 13/206 (6.3%) | 26/215 (12.1%) | ||
Dysphonia | 8/206 (3.9%) | 21/215 (9.8%) | ||
Respiratory disorder | 8/206 (3.9%) | 11/215 (5.1%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Alopecia | 141/206 (68.4%) | 135/215 (62.8%) | ||
Nail disorder | 59/206 (28.6%) | 68/215 (31.6%) | ||
Rash | 41/206 (19.9%) | 37/215 (17.2%) | ||
Dry skin | 25/206 (12.1%) | 28/215 (13%) | ||
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | 26/206 (12.6%) | 27/215 (12.6%) | ||
Pruritus | 24/206 (11.7%) | 19/215 (8.8%) | ||
Nail toxicity | 24/206 (11.7%) | 15/215 (7%) | ||
Erythema | 12/206 (5.8%) | 16/215 (7.4%) | ||
Onycholysis | 5/206 (2.4%) | 16/215 (7.4%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 27/206 (13.1%) | 79/215 (36.7%) | ||
Hot flush | 16/206 (7.8%) | 12/215 (5.6%) | ||
Lymphoedema | 17/206 (8.3%) | 8/215 (3.7%) | ||
Flushing | 10/206 (4.9%) | 12/215 (5.6%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request the Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Medical Communications |
---|---|
Organization | Hoffmann-LaRoche |
Phone | 800-821-8590 |
genentech@druginfo.com |
- BO20231