Reader-02: Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio® Ultrasound

Sponsor
Seno Medical Instruments Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04030104
Collaborator
(none)
480
1
2
3.2
152.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The Imagio® Pivotal Study is intended to evaluate if the results observed in the previous Feasibility Study can be confirmed for pre-specified effectiveness endpoints. Using Intention-to-Diagnose (ITD) masses from the PIONEER Pivotal study, 480 to 840 masses are to be used for the Pivotal Study, the remaining masses will be reserved for training the SenoGram® model.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Reader Study - Imagio Ultrasound
  • Device: Reader Study Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic Imaging
  • Device: Mammography
N/A

Detailed Description

This will be a controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study using a sequential design. The study will include 15 readers with an additional 5 as back-up readers depending on qualifications and availability. Readers that participated in the Seno PIONEER Study (NCT01943916) or the Reader-01 Feasibility Study (NCT03708393) are not eligible to participate as readers in this Pivotal Study.

Imagio® [Ultrasound (IUS) + Optoacoustic (OA)] (IUS)(IUS+OA) training will be completed prior to any reads taking place. Read 1 will be immediately followed by Read 2 within the same read session.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
480 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This will be a controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study using a sequential design. The study will include 15 readers with an additional 5 as back-up readers depending on qualifications and availability. Readers that participated in the Seno PIONEER Study or the Reader-01 Feasibility Study are not eligible to participate as readers in this Pivotal Study.This will be a controlled, blinded, multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) study using a sequential design. The study will include 15 readers with an additional 5 as back-up readers depending on qualifications and availability. Readers that participated in the Seno PIONEER Study or the Reader-01 Feasibility Study are not eligible to participate as readers in this Pivotal Study.
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Readers will not be provided with information regarding the initial patient diagnosis
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Imagio® Pivotal Multi-Reader, Multi-Case Study of Optoacoustic Images Versus Imagio® Ultrasound to Guide Decision to Biopsy
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 30, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 3, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 3, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Imagio IUS

Read 1 (Control): History + Mammogram (if available) + IUS (Imagio Ultrasound) stills and videos provided), IUS Probability of Malignancy (POM) and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scored and the data form then locked.

Device: Reader Study - Imagio Ultrasound
Imagio ultrasound images to be reviewed as part of Reader study

Device: Mammography
Mammography as available per standard of care
Other Names:
  • Mammo
  • Experimental: Imagio (IUS+OA)

    Read 2 (Test): History + Mammogram (if available) + IUS (stills and videos provided), and Imagio (IUS+OA) (stills and videos provided). Imagio (IUS+OA) POM and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assigned after viewing the SenoGram® output. The dataform is locked.

    Device: Reader Study Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic Imaging
    Imagio Ultrasound + Optoacoustic images to be reviewed as part of Reader study

    Device: Mammography
    Mammography as available per standard of care
    Other Names:
  • Mammo
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp) [Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up]

      Primary effectiveness endpoint was the difference (gain) in specificity (fSp) at fixed 98% sensitivity for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). fSp derived from empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using endpoint interpolation.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR) [Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up]

      NLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). NLR = [(1-sensitivity) / specificity].

    2. Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR) [Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up]

      PLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). PLR = [sensitivity / (1-specificity)].

    3. Partial Area Under the Curve (pAUC) [Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up]

      pAUC considers only the region of the area under the ROC curve that corresponds to clinically relevant values of sensitivity, defined as 95% to 100%, for Imagio IUS+OA vs. IUS alone, averaged across 15 readers. Both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). A higher pAUC indicates better diagnostic accuracy.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • One analyzable mass per patient: BI-RADS 3 and 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 masses as declared by clinical site investigator via PIONEER study inclusion criteria and categorized as BIRADS 3, 4a, 4b 4c and 5 by conventional diagnostic ultrasound (CDU)

    • Masses declared to be in the PIONEER Intention to Diagnose (ITD)/analysis population, including high risk cases per original PIONEER protocol

    • Patient age, indication for study entry and available medical history

    • Evaluable mammograms and OA and IUS video loops and stills for each mass

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Critical missing IUS or OA still image and/or video loop views or incorrect IUS or OA stills and video loops that would preclude a case from being evaluated by readers

    • Reader-02 Proficiency Test and training cases

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 American College of Radiology Center for Research and Innovation Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19103

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Seno Medical Instruments Inc.

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Shaan Schaeffer, Seno Medical

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Seno Medical Instruments Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04030104
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Reader-02 Study
    First Posted:
    Jul 23, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 12, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details New Independent Reader Study (new readers re-reading a sub-set of randomly selected images acquired during PIONEER-01 Study- (NCT01943916)). Reader-02 study execution dates: 30 Jul 2019 to 3 Nov 2019
    Pre-assignment Detail Imagio Ultrasound (IUS) and Imagio optoacoustic/ultrasound (IUS+OA) images of breast masses previously acquired from the PIONEER-01 study (NCT01943916) referenced above were used for this study. Reader-02 was a single-arm sequentially read multi reader/case (MRMC) study comparing IUS vs Imagio (IUS+OA). New readers were recruited-NO new subjects/masses. Results were based on biopsy diagnosis or truth panel decision as ground truth obtained during PIONEER-01.
    Arm/Group Title Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
    Arm/Group Description Each subject had one mass that was read by all readers. Each subject served as her own control, with imaging of each mass by both IUS and IUS+OA modalities. Therefore, baseline data are for overall population only.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 480
    COMPLETED 480
    NOT COMPLETED 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
    Arm/Group Description Each subject had one mass that was read by all readers. Each subject served as her own control, with imaging of each mass by both IUS and IUS+OA modalities. Therefore, baseline data derived from PIONEER-01 for sub set of 480 cases read during Reader-02 Study.
    Overall Participants 480
    Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    49.9
    (14.4)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    480
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    87
    18.1%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    387
    80.6%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    6
    1.3%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    Asian
    14
    2.9%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    1
    0.2%
    Black or African American
    54
    11.3%
    White
    389
    81%
    More than one race
    2
    0.4%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    20
    4.2%
    Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
    United States
    480
    100%
    Mass Diagnosis (Count of Participants)
    Subjects (Benign+TPB+HR)
    300
    62.5%
    Subjects (Cancer)
    180
    37.5%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp)
    Description Primary effectiveness endpoint was the difference (gain) in specificity (fSp) at fixed 98% sensitivity for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). fSp derived from empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using endpoint interpolation.
    Time Frame Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intent-to-diagnose (ITD)
    Arm/Group Title IUS Alone Imagio (IUS+OA)
    Arm/Group Description IUS alone imaging IUS+OA imaging
    Measure Participants 480 480
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [% benign+TPB masses correctly identified]
    38.22
    47.20
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection IUS Alone, Imagio (IUS+OA)
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0268
    Comments Threshold for statistical significance <0.05
    Method Random Reader, Random Mass
    Comments Curve Fitting Method: Empirical
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)
    Description NLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). NLR = [(1-sensitivity) / specificity].
    Time Frame Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intent-to-diagnose (ITD)
    Arm/Group Title Imagio Alone Imagio (IUS+OA)
    Arm/Group Description IUS alone imaging IUS+OA imaging
    Measure Participants 480 480
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Ratio]
    0.053
    0.047
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)
    Description PLR for the Imagio IUS+OA relative to IUS alone, across all 15 independent readers; both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). PLR = [sensitivity / (1-specificity)].
    Time Frame Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Total population of subjects/masses
    Arm/Group Title IUS Alone Imagio (IUS+OA)
    Arm/Group Description IUS alone imaging IUS+OA imaging
    Measure Participants 480 480
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Ratio]
    1.548
    1.959
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Partial Area Under the Curve (pAUC)
    Description pAUC considers only the region of the area under the ROC curve that corresponds to clinically relevant values of sensitivity, defined as 95% to 100%, for Imagio IUS+OA vs. IUS alone, averaged across 15 readers. Both imaging modalities used in each subject (subject as own control); results for each imaging modality compared to biopsy diagnosis or 12-month follow-up ruling of benign as determined by truth panel (ground truth). A higher pAUC indicates better diagnostic accuracy.
    Time Frame Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intent-to-diagnose (ITD)
    Arm/Group Title IUS Alone Imagio (IUS+OA)
    Arm/Group Description IUS Alone Imaging IUS+OA imaging
    Measure Participants 480 480
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of Probability]
    0.0205
    0.0244

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Baseline to 12 months +/- 30 days follow-up
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
    Arm/Group Description Each subject had one mass that was read by all readers. Each subject served as her own control, with imaging of each mass by both IUS and IUS+OA modalities. Therefore, safety data are for overall population only.
    All Cause Mortality
    Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/480 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 2/480 (0.4%)
    General disorders
    Device breakage 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Lung cancer 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Overall (Subjects Randomly Selected From PIONEER-01 Study)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 14/480 (2.9%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Tachycardia 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Gallbladder disorder 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Infections and infestations
    Postoperative wound infection 1/480 (0.2%) 2
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Post-procedural haematoma 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Procedural dizziness 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Upper limb fracture 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscle spasms 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Nervous system disorders
    Paraesthesia 5/480 (1%) 5
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dermatitis contact 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Skin warm 1/480 (0.2%) 1
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 1/480 (0.2%) 1

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The results of the study are the property of Seno Medical Instruments, Inc. All publications (manuscripts, abstracts or other modes of presentation) must be submitted and reviewed and approved in writing by Seno Medical Instruments, Inc., in advance of submission. The over all study results will first be submitted as a primary paper.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Vice President of Clinical Operations
    Organization Seno Medical Instruments, Inc.
    Phone 210-615-6501
    Email sschaeffer@senomedical.com
    Responsible Party:
    Seno Medical Instruments Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04030104
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Reader-02 Study
    First Posted:
    Jul 23, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 12, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2021