Comparing Two Different Surgical Techniques for Breast Reconstruction

Sponsor
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT04716959
Collaborator
(none)
0
7
2
10.9
0
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two standard techniques for breast reconstruction-the prepectoral technique and the subpectoral technique. Again, the prepectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle, while the subpectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle.

The standard approach used at MSK is the subpectoral technique. This study will help researchers find out whether the subpectoral approach is better, the same as, or worse than the prepectoral approach. To decide which approach is better, the researchers will look at which technique causes fewer complications after surgery (for example, infection or the need for a second surgery). Researchers are also interested in seeing which approach causes less pain and use of pain medication after surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
  • Procedure: Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 14, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 13, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 13, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Procedure: Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The prepectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle.

Active Comparator: Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Procedure: Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The subpectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle with or without acellular dermal matrix (ADM).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. major perioperative complications [90 days]

    90-day major complications for tissue expanders (i.e., infection, explantation, and reoperation for mastectomy flap necrosis): Infection: any event requiring restart of antibiotics (oral or intravenous) following completion of initial perioperative antibiotics or an admission to the hospital for cellulitis. Explantation: need for tissue expander removal for any cause. Reoperation: skin excision performed in either the clinic or the main operating room for mastectomy skin flap necrosis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. minor complications [90 days]

    Minor complication for tissue expanders is defined as: Seroma: clinically significant non-infected fluid collection requiring either needle aspiration or drain replacement

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
21 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Women aged 21-60 years

  • Planning to undergo immediate two stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with TE placement as the first stage.

  • Planning to undergo unilateral or bilateral mastectomy.

  • Planning to undergo nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy.

  • Mastectomy weight less than 800 grams.

  • Adequate mastectomy skin perfusion or patients with adequate perfusion but nonviable mastectomy skin that can be excised (≤ 4 cm) at the defect margins with otherwise adequate perfusion.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

  • Presence of preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis.

  • Presence of intraoperative sentinel node positivity.

  • History of radiotherapy.

  • Current smoker.

  • Planning to undergo direct-to-implant reconstruction.

  • BMI >35.

  • Prior sternotomy.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Memorial Sloan Kettering BaskingRidge (Consent and Followup) Basking Ridge New Jersey United States 07920
2 Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth (Consent and Followup) Middletown New Jersey United States 07748
3 Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Consent and Followup ) Montvale New Jersey United States 07645
4 Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack (Consent and Followup) Commack New York United States 11725
5 Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Consent and Followup) Harrison New York United States 10604
6 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (All Protocol Activities) New York New York United States 10065
7 Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Consent and Followup) Rockville Centre New York United States 11553

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evan Matros, MD, MMSc, MPH, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04716959
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 20-565
First Posted:
Jan 20, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jan 3, 2022
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 3, 2022