Effect of Cervical Manipulation on Mouth Opening
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Objectives: To compare the effects of cervical manipulation on the ranges of motion of
mouth opening and painful pressure points in the masseter and temporal muscles after
of cervical manipulation compared to the control group.
Material and methods: Single-blind randomized clinical trial with two arms, one group
intervention and a control group.
Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in mouth opening and painful pressure points
between the intervention group and the control group.
Expected results: The intervention group would significantly increase their mouth opening
maximal and decrease pressure pain in the masseter and temporalis muscles.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cervical manipulation group high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical manipulation |
Other: cervical manipulation
high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical manipulation
|
Sham Comparator: Control group placebo manipulation, the cervical spine will be tilted and rotated without reaching the end feel or the pump |
Other: Sham intervention
lateral flexion and cervical rotation without manipulation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- normal mouth opening in millimeters [Change from Baseline mouth open at 5 minutes]
With a buccal goniometer, the maximum mouth opening will be measured in millimeters.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- masseter muscle pressure points [Change from Baseline pain points at 5 minutes]
Pain points will be measured under pressure with a pressure pain meter or algo meter. This measurement will be measured in kilograms.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects over 18 years of age, men and women
-
Students with neck and/or facial pain minimum 3/10 VAS scale
-
Kinesiology students who regularly attend face-to-face classes
who have a mobility pass and a health declaration.
ยท Students who read and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Orthognathic surgery
-
Head and neck fracture or injury
-
Contraindication (red flag) to perform high-speed, low-amplitude cervical manipulation (bone cancer, osteoporosis, vertebral artery injury, etc.)
-
Positive cervical safety tests (example: Klein test positive)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Universidad de las Americas | Santiago de Chile | Santiago | Chile | 7750495 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Americas
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 60/2022