Hemofiltration in Burns: RESCUE (Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Hemofiltration in Adult Burn Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Renal Failure)

Sponsor
American Burn Association (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01213914
Collaborator
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (U.S. Fed), Tampa General Hospital (Other), Medstar Health Research Institute (Other), Loyola University (Other), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Other), Valleywise Health (Other), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (Other), University of Kansas Medical Center (Other), Doctors Hospital-Joseph M Still Burn Center (Other)
37
9
2
85
4.1
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is determine if High-Volume Hemofiltration in addition to 'contemporary' care will result in an improvement of select clinical outcomes when compared to 'contemporary' care alone in the treatment of critically ill patients with ARF secondary to septic shock.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: An FDA approved continuous renal replacement device
  • Other: Control Group
N/A

Detailed Description

Acute renal failure (ARF) is a common and devastating complication in critically ill burn patients with mortality reported to be between 80 and 100%.(3-7) Despite recent advances in burn care, the unacceptably high mortality rate in this subgroup has not changed over time. The pathogenesis of ARF in burns, similar to other critically ill populations, is often multi-factorial with one major component being sepsis induced ischemic tubular necrosis. Thus, ARF secondary to septic shock is a common and devastating condition in the burn ICU.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
37 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The American Burn Association's Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Hemofiltration in Adult Burn Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Renal Failure
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2011
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: High-volume hemofiltration at 70ml/kg/hr

Paired randomization into four groups via central randomization center. Group 1: age 18-65 and <40%TBSA Group 2: age 18-65 and >40%TBSA Group 3: age >65 and <40%TBSA Group 4: age >65 and >40%TBSA

Device: An FDA approved continuous renal replacement device
70ml/kg/hr for treatment group for 48 hours with the following requirements: double lumen dialysis catheter should be placed in the internal jugular or femoral vein Anticoagulation will be determined by prescribing physician Use of 1.4 m2 or larger biocompatible synthetic hollow-fiber dialysis membrane that is changed every 24 hours Blood flow rate will be set to ensure a filtration fraction of no more than 25% Monitoring for electrolytes (specifically K+, Mg, Ca, and phos) during HVHF must be performed at least every 6 hours Replacement fluids will be bicarbonate-buffered with appropriate adjustments when citrate-anticoagulation is utilized All antibiotics will be dose adjusted for renal replacement therapy
Other Names:
  • High volume hemofiltration
  • Active Comparator: Control group

    Contemporary care via consideration of the Burn-Specific Sepsis Bundle adapted form the most recent Surviving Sepsis campaign recommendations and specifically modified to our patient population.

    Other: Control Group
    Both groups will receive 'contemporary' care via consideration of the Burn-specific Sepsis Bundle adapted from the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) (1) recommendations and specifically modified to our patient population
    Other Names:
  • Standard of care
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Vasopressor dependency index [first 48 hours]

      Vasopressor dependency index = MAP/Inotropic score • This index will correct for the inter-center variability that exists with regards to the point (minimum MAP) at which vasopressors are initiated or weaned off. Thus, this eliminates the need to 'standardize' starting/stopping criteria of vasopressors. Modified Inotropic index (30) = (dopamine dose X1)+(dobutamine dose X1)+(epi doseX100)+(norepi doseX100)+(phenylephrine doseX100)+(vasopressin doseX100) • All units recorded at each time point in mcg/kg/min Mean Arterial Pressure (mmHg)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Oxygenation index [first 48 hours]

    2. Vasopressors-free days [first 14 days]

    3. Survival [14 days, 28 days, and discharge]

    4. ICU days [Total number of days in ICU from date of Therapy Initiated through discharge]

    5. Ventilator free days [First 28 days after enrollment]

    6. Renal loss (need for long term renal replacement therapy) [greater than 28 days]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • All adult patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit (ICU) with burns of any size

    • Acute renal failure as previously defined by the Veterans Affairs/ National Institutes of Health (VA/NIH) Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study investigators(2)

    • Patient is > 48 hours post-burn and in Septic Shock

    • Patients 18 or older

    • Patient/legally authorized representative willing to provide consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Age <18

    • Non-thermal injury (exfoliating skin disorders or necrotizing fasciitis)

    • Pre-admission diagnosis of end stage renal failure

    • Patients already on renal replacement therapy for more than 24 hours

    • Patient not expected to survive more than 24 hours after randomization.

    • Pregnancy

    • Prisoners

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Arizona Burn Center Phoenix Arizona United States 85008
    2 The Burn Center at Washington Hospital Center Washington District of Columbia United States 20010
    3 Tampa General Hospital Tampa Florida United States 33606
    4 Doctors Hospital-Joseph M Still Burn Center Augusta Georgia United States 30909
    5 Loyola University Medical Center Maywood Illinois United States 60153
    6 University of Kansas Hospital Kansas City Kansas United States 66160
    7 Regional Medical Center at Memphis Memphis Tennessee United States 38103
    8 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center-Burn Center Parkland Health Dallas Texas United States 75235
    9 US Army Institute of Surgical Research Fort Sam Houston Texas United States 78234

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • American Burn Association
    • United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
    • Tampa General Hospital
    • Medstar Health Research Institute
    • Loyola University
    • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    • Valleywise Health
    • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    • University of Kansas Medical Center
    • Doctors Hospital-Joseph M Still Burn Center

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Kevin K Chung, MD, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
    • Study Director: Amy M Sprague, MD, Doctors Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    American Burn Association
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01213914
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • H-09-046
    • W81XWH-09-2-0194
    • Combat Casualty Grant
    First Posted:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 6, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by American Burn Association
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 6, 2018