ReCell® Combined With Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, within-subject controlled study to compare the clinical performance of the ReCell device when used as an adjunct to meshed skin graft in subjects requiring skin grafts for closure of burn injuries. Co-primary effectiveness endpoints include: (1) confirmed treatment area closure (i.e., healing) prior to or at 8 weeks as assessed by a blinded evaluator, and (2) a comparison of the actual expansion ratio, computed as the ratio of measured treated area to the measured donor site area, achieved for the ReCell-treated and control treatment areas. Safety will be evaluated in terms of long-term durability, scar outcomes and treatment-related adverse events.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: All Participants (within patient control) All subjects will receive both ReCell and skin graft. Each patient serves as their own control. Their study treatment area (burn injury) will be divided into Area A and Area B. Investigational treatment will be randomly allocated to either Area A or Area B |
Device: ReCell Treatment
Procedure: Skin Graft
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Confirmed Treatment Area Closure of RECELL-treated Wounds Compared to Control (Non-inferiority) [Prior to or at 8 weeks]
Complete wound closure is defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage, confirmed at two consecutive study visits at least 2 weeks apart by direct visualization by a qualified clinician blinded to treatment assignment. The incidence of complete wound closure is hypothesized to be non-inferior for RECELL-treated areas as compared to control areas.
- Actual Expansion Ratios (Treatment Area to Donor Site Area, Inclusive of Donor Skin Needed for Secondary Treatments) [Prior to or at 8 weeks]
For this second co-primary endpoint, it is hypothesized that the expansion ratio associated with the RECELL treatment area will be superior to that of the control, i.e. less donor skin will be required for RECELL-treated areas compared with the control areas.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Observer Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale ( POSAS) Opinion Score [At 24 Week]
The observer component of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire required the blinded evaluator to provide an overall opinion of the treatment area compared to normal skin, scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar).
- Patient's Satisfaction/Treatment Preference [At 24 Week]
- Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Opinion Score [Week 24]
The patient component of the Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire required the patient to provide an overall opinion of the treatment area compared to normal skin, scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar). T
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
The subject requires skin grafting as a result of an acute thermal burn injury (i.e. injuries caused by exposure of the skin to fire/flames, excessive heat, hot steam or water).
-
The area of total burn injury is 5-50% TBSA inclusive.
-
Two areas requiring skin grafting, each at least 300cm2 (or 600cm2 contiguous), excluding hand/face and joints.
-
The subject is at least 5 years of age.
-
The subject (or family, for those under 18 years of age) is willing and able to complete all followup evaluations required by the study protocol.
-
The subject is to abstain from any other treatment of the wound(s) for the duration of the study unless medically necessary.
-
The subject agrees to abstain from enrollment in any other interventional clinical trial for the duration of the study.
-
The subject and/or guardian are able to read and understand instructions and give informed, voluntary, written consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
The subject's burn injuries were caused by chemicals, electricity, and/or radioactive substances.
-
The subject is unable to follow the protocol.
-
The subject has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.
-
The subject has a known hypersensitivity to trypsin or compound sodium lactate for irrigation (Hartmann's) solution.
-
Life expectancy is less than 1 year.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Arizona Burn Center at Maricopa Medical Center | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85008 |
2 | MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | 20010 |
3 | Tampa General Hospital | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33606 |
4 | North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States | 27599 |
5 | Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | 27157 |
6 | University of Tennessee Health Science Center | Memphis | Tennessee | United States | 38103-3409 |
7 | USAISR - US Army Institute of Surgical Research | Fort Sam Houston | Texas | United States | 78234 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Avita Medical
- MedDRA Assistance Inc
- Advanced Clinical Research Services, LLC
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: James H Holmes, IV, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CTP001-6
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Experimental: All Participants (Within Patient Control) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Every subject received both interventions (RECELL and CONTROL) such that each subject served as their own control. Each subject's study treatment area (burn injury) was divided into Area A and Area B before thee areas (A and B) were randomly assigned to receive CONTROL (grafting consistent with the pre-identified graft plan) or RECELL (RECELL-generated cell suspension applied over a graft more widely meshed than identified in the pre-specified graft plan). |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 30 |
COMPLETED | 27 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Experimental: All Participants (Within Patient Control) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects receive both ReCell treatment and autograft (Area A and Area B). Each subject serves as their own control. Wound regions were randomly assigned to receive an autograft consistent with the investigator's pre-identified graft plan (Control) or to receive application of the ReCell-generated cell suspension over an autograft more widely meshed than identified in the investigator's pre-specified graft plan (ReCell-treated). |
Overall Participants | 30 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
3
10%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
25
83.3%
|
>=65 years |
2
6.7%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
39.1
(15.84)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
25
83.3%
|
Male |
5
16.7%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
Asian |
1
3.3%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
6
20%
|
White |
20
66.7%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
3
10%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
30
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants With Confirmed Treatment Area Closure of RECELL-treated Wounds Compared to Control (Non-inferiority) |
---|---|
Description | Complete wound closure is defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage, confirmed at two consecutive study visits at least 2 weeks apart by direct visualization by a qualified clinician blinded to treatment assignment. The incidence of complete wound closure is hypothesized to be non-inferior for RECELL-treated areas as compared to control areas. |
Time Frame | Prior to or at 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per Protocol Population |
Arm/Group Title | RECELL-Treated | Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Wound received application of the RECELL-generated cell suspension over an autograft more widely meshed than identified in the investigator's pre-specified graft plan (RECELL-treated). | Wound received an autograft consistent with the investigator's pre-identified graft plan (Control). |
Measure Participants | 26 | 26 |
Confirmed Closure |
24
80%
|
22
NaN
|
Not Healed |
2
6.7%
|
4
NaN
|
Title | Actual Expansion Ratios (Treatment Area to Donor Site Area, Inclusive of Donor Skin Needed for Secondary Treatments) |
---|---|
Description | For this second co-primary endpoint, it is hypothesized that the expansion ratio associated with the RECELL treatment area will be superior to that of the control, i.e. less donor skin will be required for RECELL-treated areas compared with the control areas. |
Time Frame | Prior to or at 8 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent-to-Treat Population (primary analysis) |
Arm/Group Title | RECELL-Treated | Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Wound received application of the RECELL-generated cell suspension over an autograft more widely meshed than identified in the investigator's pre-specified graft plan (RECELL-treated). | Wound received an autograft consistent with the investigator's pre-identified graft plan (Control). |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Geometric Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm2] |
1.9657
(2.0415)
|
1.3486
(1.4143)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | RECELL-Treated, Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Geometric Mean Ratio |
Estimated Value | 1.4575 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Observer Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale ( POSAS) Opinion Score |
---|---|
Description | The observer component of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire required the blinded evaluator to provide an overall opinion of the treatment area compared to normal skin, scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar). |
Time Frame | At 24 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per-Protocol Population |
Arm/Group Title | RECELL-Treated | Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Wound received application of the RECELL-generated cell suspension over an autograft more widely meshed than identified in the investigator's pre-specified graft plan (RECELL-treated). | Wound received an autograft consistent with the investigator's pre-identified graft plan (Control). |
Measure Participants | 26 | 26 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
2.6
(1.20)
|
2.5
(1.42)
|
Title | Patient's Satisfaction/Treatment Preference |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | At 24 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per-Protocol Population |
Arm/Group Title | All Subjects |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Every subject received both interventions (RECELL and CONTROL) |
Measure Participants | 26 |
Preferred RECELL |
12
40%
|
Preferred CONTROL |
12
40%
|
No Preference |
2
6.7%
|
Title | Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Opinion Score |
---|---|
Description | The patient component of the Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire required the patient to provide an overall opinion of the treatment area compared to normal skin, scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar). T |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per-Protocol Population |
Arm/Group Title | RECELL-Treated | CONTROL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Wound received application of the RECELL-generated cell suspension over an autograft more widely meshed than identified in the investigator's pre-specified graft plan (RECELL-treated). | Wound received an autograft consistent with the investigator's pre-identified graft plan (Control). |
Measure Participants | 25 | 25 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
5.2
(2.76)
|
5.1
(2.96)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 52 Weeks | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Experimental: All Participants (Within Patient Control) | |
Arm/Group Description | All subjects receive both ReCell treatment and autograft (Area A and Area B). Each subject serves as their own control. Wound regions were randomly assigned to receive an autograft consistent with the investigator's pre-identified graft plan (Control) or to receive application of the ReCell-generated cell suspension over an autograft more widely meshed than identified in the investigator's pre-specified graft plan (ReCell-treated). | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Experimental: All Participants (Within Patient Control) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/30 (3.3%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Experimental: All Participants (Within Patient Control) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 12/30 (40%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Nausea | 1/30 (3.3%) | 2 |
Vomiting | 1/30 (3.3%) | 2 |
Ileus | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||
Patient Concern for Infection | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||
Cellulitis Left Index Finger | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Cellulitis to Non-Study Donor Site | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Failed Skin Graft | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft Loss | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Re-grafting Due to Graft Failure | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Surgery for Failed Skin Graft | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft Loss to Left Lower Extremity (LLE) | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Re-Grafting Due to Graft Failure | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Open Wound Left Elbow | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft Loss | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft Shearing/Loss to Left Calf | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Severe Contracture left hand, left wrist, left fingers and left lower eyelid | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Increased Elbow Pain, Right | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Inability to Move Right Elbow | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Intractable Pain Right Arm | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Right Frontotemporal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Psychosis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
Pulmonary Edema | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Experimental: All Participants (Within Patient Control) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 26/30 (86.7%) | |
General disorders | ||
Chronic Pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Delayed Healing | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Increased Pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Chronic Pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Delayed Healing | 3/30 (10%) | 3 |
White creamy exudates left lower leg | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Chronic pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Non-healing wound to posterior left upper arm | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||
Mildly Infected | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Infection of the L Lower Leg | 1/30 (3.3%) | 2 |
Left thigh donor site with purulent drainage and open areas | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Arm burn cellulitis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Klebsiella Pneumonia | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Shearing of Graft on Site A 0.9x1 cm | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Abrasion | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Scratch on Back | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Small area of graft loss on anterior right lower extremity | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft Loss Posterior Back | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft Loss | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Abrasion to shin | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft loss posterior back | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Abrasion to knee | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Scratch at the back | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft loss l breast | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Medial left upper arm graft loss | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Graft loss chest wall at inner axilla | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Pain/Soreness Under Right Arm | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Ossification | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Pain right hand | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Heterotrophic ossification | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Contracture, right hand | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Neuropathic Pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Burning | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Neuropathic Pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Burning | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Neuropathic pain | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Burning | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Confusion | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
Itching | 6/30 (20%) | 6 |
Dermatitis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Pruritis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Rash | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Chronic non-healing wounds to RLE secondary to DM type 1 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Itching | 6/30 (20%) | 6 |
Dermatitis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Pruritis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Chronic non-healing wounds to LLE secondary to DM type 1 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Itching | 2/30 (6.7%) | 2 |
Pruritus | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Blisters | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Itching | 4/30 (13.3%) | 4 |
Dermatitis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Pruritis | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Rash | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Blisters to left thigh non-study donor | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Blisters to right thigh non-study graft | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Contact dermatitis at neck and upper back | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||
Scar Revision | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Scar Revision | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Scar revision | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | VP Clinical Research |
---|---|
Organization | AVITA Medical |
Phone | 661-367-9170 |
clinicaltrial@avitamedical.com |
- CTP001-6