BEAT-Calci: Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis

Sponsor
University of Sydney (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05018221
Collaborator
Australasian Kidney Trials Network (Other), Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Waitemata District Health Board (Other)
350
19
6
63.2
18.4
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This global platform study will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care, in adult patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Vitamin K1
  • Drug: Magnesium citrate
  • Drug: Sodium Thiosulfate
  • Device: High Flux Dialyser
  • Device: Medium Cut-off Dialyser
  • Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline)
  • Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
  • Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
Phase 3

Detailed Description

BEAT-Calci is a randomized, adaptive, multi-center, platform trial that will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care. The objective of the study is to establish high-quality evidence on the effect of a range of interventions in patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis. Calciphylaxis is a rare disease affecting 1-2 people in 10,000.

The trial will commence with a Dialysis Membrane Domain and Pharmacotherapy Domain. The Pharmacotherapy Domain of BEAT-Calci is a placebo-controlled, double blind, response adaptive, randomised controlled trial that will investigate whether any of the pharmacotherapeutic agents is superior to placebo in improving outcomes. The Dialysis Membrane Domain of BEAT-Calci is an open-label, randomised controlled two-way comparison between two different dialysis technologies.

The BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) is the primary endpoint for the trial. It is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of disease outcomes and will be used to determine each participant's outcome.

The trial will utilise a Bayesian adaptive sample size re-estimation approach for sample size calculations. The trial will continue to recruit until predefined superiority or futility rules are met. As the trial progresses, in response to information accumulating during the trial, there are various adaptations that can occur, including addition or removal of an intervention arm, response adaptive randomisation and addition of new therapeutic domains.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
350 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Adaptive, platform, randomized controlled trial, involving multiple interventions spanning several domains of therapeutic care.Adaptive, platform, randomized controlled trial, involving multiple interventions spanning several domains of therapeutic care.
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Blinding of all parties will not be possible for all domains. The default position of the BEAT-Calci platform is that treatments determined by randomization will be blinded to as high a level is feasible. Within practical domains, a blind will be adopted, whereby participants, site personnel, trial investigators and outcome assessors will remain blinded to the treatment from the time of randomization until database lock of the comparisons to which that participant is contributing data. In blinded domains, randomization data will not be accessible by anyone else involved in the trial with the following exceptions: (1) data managers who work on the randomization and drug management system, (2) unblinded statistician(s) involved with the response adaptive randomization, and (3) the unblinded biostatistician who prepares reports for the IDMC. Information on the blind, or lack thereof, per domain will be described in the respective Domain-Specific Appendix.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 26, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (Double-Blind Period)

Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate

Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline)
Placebo to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.
Other Names:
  • 0.9% sodium chloride solution
  • Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
    Placebo to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Matching placebo capsule
  • Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
    Placebo to be administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Matching placebo tablet
  • Experimental: Vitamin K1 (Double-Blind Period)

    Dose: 10mg Vitamin K1 capsules, administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session. Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate

    Drug: Vitamin K1
    Vitamin K1 capsule (10mg) to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Phytonadione
  • Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline)
    Placebo to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.
    Other Names:
  • 0.9% sodium chloride solution
  • Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
    Placebo to be administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Matching placebo tablet
  • Experimental: Magnesium Citrate (Double-Blind Period)

    Dose: 150mg Magnesium Citrate tablets, administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session. Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate

    Drug: Magnesium citrate
    Magnesium Citrate tablet (150mg) to be administered 3 times per per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.

    Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline)
    Placebo to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.
    Other Names:
  • 0.9% sodium chloride solution
  • Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
    Placebo to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Matching placebo capsule
  • Experimental: Sodium Thiosulfate (Double-Blind Period)

    Dose: 25g Sodium Thiosulfate injection, administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis. Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate

    Drug: Sodium Thiosulfate
    Sodium Thiosulfate injection (25g/100ml) to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.
    Other Names:
  • Intravenous Sodium Thiosulfate Injection
  • Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
    Placebo to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Matching placebo capsule
  • Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
    Placebo to be administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.
    Other Names:
  • Matching placebo tablet
  • Active Comparator: High Flux Hemodialysis

    Hemodialysis using a high flux dialyser

    Device: High Flux Dialyser
    Hemodialysis using a high flux dialyser.
    Other Names:
  • High Flux Hemodialysis
  • Experimental: Medium Cut-off Hemodialysis

    Hemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser

    Device: Medium Cut-off Dialyser
    Hemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser.
    Other Names:
  • Medium Cut-off Hemodialysis
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) - Baseline to Week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 12 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale - Baseline to Week 26 [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 26 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death

    2. Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Weeks 4 [Week 4]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Weeks 4 Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death

    3. Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 12 Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death

    4. Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 26 [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 26. Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death

    5. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 4 [Week 4]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4 using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

    6. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

    7. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 26 [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

    8. Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4 [Week 4]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4

    9. Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12

    10. Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26 [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26

    11. All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4 [Week 4]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 4

    12. All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 12

    13. All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26 [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 26

    14. Change over time of self-reported pain [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain over time, assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale

    15. Self-reported pain at week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain use at week 12 assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale

    16. Change over time of analgesic use [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 26

    17. Analgesic use week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 12

    18. Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use over time [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use over time

    19. Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use at week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use at week 12

    20. Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 4 [Week 4]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 4, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument

    21. Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 12 [Week 12]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument

    22. Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 26 [Week 26]

      To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 26 using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument

    23. Time to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection from Baseline to Week 26 [Week 26]

      Time in days to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection within 26 weeks post-randomisation

    24. All-cause hospitalisation days [Weeks 0-26]

      Count of all cause hospitalisation days (excluding day admissions for dialysis treatment within 26 weeks post-randomisation

    25. Mortality [Up to 5 years]

      Incidence of mortality, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

    26. Kidney Transplantation [Up to 5 years]

      Incidence of kidney transplantation, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

    27. Calciphylaxis recurrence [Up to 5 years]

      Incidence of calciphylaxis recurrence as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Currently receiving haemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis that can be converted to haemodialysis, with planned ongoing haemodialysis a minimum of three times per week for at least the duration of the protocolised calciphylaxis treatments within this trial

    2. Have a new calciphylaxis ulcer present for less than 10 weeks

    3. Age ≥ 18 years

    4. Eligible for randomisation in at least one recruiting domain

    5. The participant and treating physician are willing and able to perform trial procedures

    Exclusion Criteria:

    Nil

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Auburn Hospital Auburn New South Wales Australia
    2 Blacktown Hospital Blacktown New South Wales Australia
    3 Concord Repatriation General Hospital Concord New South Wales Australia
    4 St George Hospital Kogarah New South Wales Australia
    5 Liverpool Hospital Liverpool New South Wales Australia
    6 Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
    7 Westmead Hospital Westmead New South Wales Australia
    8 Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service Birtinya Queensland Australia
    9 Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
    10 Bundaberg Base Hospital Bundaberg Queensland Australia
    11 Cairns Hospital Cairns Queensland Australia
    12 Townsville Hospital Townsville Queensland Australia
    13 Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
    14 Sunshine Hospital (Western Health) St Albans Victoria Australia
    15 Armadale Hospital (East Metropolitan Health Services) Armadale Western Australia Australia
    16 Royal Perth Hospital (East Metropolitan Health Services) Perth Western Australia Australia
    17 Auckland City Hospital (Auckland DHB) Grafton New Zealand
    18 Waikato Hospital (Waikato DHB) Hamilton New Zealand
    19 North Shore Hospital (Waitemata DHB) Takapuna New Zealand

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Sydney
    • Australasian Kidney Trials Network
    • Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
    • Waitemata District Health Board

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Meg Jardine, University of Sydney

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Sydney
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05018221
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • BEAT-Calci
    First Posted:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 20, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 20, 2021