DeCIDE-PC: Community Health Worker Based Intervention to Improve Palliative Care
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study aims to find out if community health worker (CHW) support will improve palliative care outcomes in African American patients with advanced cancer, by comparing the quality of life of patients who are receiving standard care to those whose standard care is supplemented with CHW support.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This research is being done to establish the effectiveness of a Community Health Worker based palliative care intervention among African American patients with advanced solid organ malignancies and their care givers.
The investigators' long-term goal is to reduce the research-to-practice gap in utilization of evidence-based palliative care in African Americans with advanced cancer. The objectives of this study are to establish the effectiveness of a CHW-based palliative care intervention and develop generalizable knowledge on how contextual factors influence implementation.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Standard care Standard cancer care |
|
Experimental: Standard care + DeCIDE PC intervention Community health worker support and standard cancer care |
Other: Community Health Worker (CHW) based palliative care
Those in the intervention group will receive support from a dedicated CHW trained in motivational interviewing, components of palliative care communication, and social determinants of health.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Subscale (FACIT-PAL) [6 months after enrollment]
Quality of Life; Score range: 0-184 [per scoring document, for total score] Higher scores signify better quality of life
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of participants who completed Advance Directives [6 months after enrollment]
Advanced care planning
- Number of participants who utilize hospice care [6 months after enrollment]
Hospice care utilization within 14 days of death (Yes/No)
- Goals of care as assessed by Quality of communication (QOC) scale [6 months after enrollment]
Goals of Care; Score range: 0-10 [scored 0-10 for each of 19 components] Higher scores signify: higher quality communication with physician
- Symptom Intensity as assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS) [6 months after enrollment]
Symptom; Score range: 0-10 [scored 0-10 for 10 components] Higher scores signify: higher intensity of cancer symptoms (worse symptoms)
- Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [6 months after enrollment]
Symptom; The score is the sum of the 20 questions. Possible range is 0-60. A score of 16 points or more is considered depressed.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
-
Self-identified African American patients with advanced (AJCC stage III or IV) solid organ malignancy
-
18 years old
-
English speaking
-
Intact cognition and ability to provide informed consent
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants < 18 years of age
-
Participants who are already receiving palliative care services
Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult (>18 years old) caregivers providing informal (unpaid) care to an eligible African American cancer patient (related or unrelated)
-
18 years old
-
English speaking
-
Intact cognition and ability to provide informed consent
Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants < 18 years of age
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21205 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins University
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fabian M Johnston, MD, MHS, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- IRB00283002
- 1R01CA252101-01A1