INTERCEPT: Prophylactic EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy in Advanced Periampullary Cancers

Sponsor
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05994521
Collaborator
Jewish General Hospital (Other), Unity Health Toronto (Other)
74
2
40

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Prophylactic EUS-gastroenterostomy (ProEUS-GE) as a preventative approach for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) in men and women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with periampullary cancer.

The main question this study aims to answer is can ProEUS-GE effectively prevent the occurrence of MGOO in patients with periampullary cancer?

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 (ERCP alone) or Group 2 (ERCP + ProEUS-GE). The study will compare the outcomes between these groups to determine the effectiveness of ProEUS-GE in preventing MGOO.

Researchers will compare Group 1 (ERCP alone) with Group 2 (ERCP + ProEUS-GE) to see if the addition of ProEUS-GE leads to a reduced occurrence of MGOO in patients with periampullary cancer.

The primary endpoint is the rate of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: ERCP alone
  • Procedure: ERCP +ProEUS-GE
N/A

Detailed Description

Research Question:

The principal research question is whether ProEUS-GE can prevent the occurrence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic head cancer. We hypothesize that the addition of ProEUS-GE during ERCP reduces the rate of development of subsequent MGOO in advanced periampullary solid cancer without significantly increasing the rate of adverse events when compared to ERCP alone.

The Proposed Trial Trial Design: This is a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded multicentre randomized controlled superiority trial. The endoscopist performing the procedure will not be blinded to treatment allocation.

Planned Trial Interventions: 1) ERCP with biliary decompression + prophylactic EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (ProEUS-GE) and 2) ERCP with biliary decompression alone. All procedures will be performed by experienced endoscopists with or without trainee involvement. Following informed consent, sedation will be via conscious sedation or general anesthesia, as per existing institutional procedural protocols. A medical effectiveness approach will be adopted where only the initial randomly allocated treatment is dictated by the trial.

Participant Allocation: After confirmation of fulfillment of all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and pre-procedural consent, patients will be randomly allocated, intra-procedurally during the ERCP, to one of the two approaches.

The primary endpoint is the rate of gastric outlet obstruction.

Sample Size Calculation:

Using the currently available data in the literature and local data from the MUHC, we estimate a MGOO risk of 5% vs. 30% with ERCP + ProEUS-GE vs. ERCP alone, respectively, up to 18 months of follow-up. To achieve a statistical power of 80% with a two-sided type I error of 5% while considering a loss to follow-up of 5%, a final sample size of 74 patients (37 patients in each arm) is needed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
74 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be randomly allocated, intra-procedurally during the ERCP, to one of the two approaches.Patients will be randomly allocated, intra-procedurally during the ERCP, to one of the two approaches.
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
As with most procedural interventional trials, blinding of the endoscopist is not feasible. To limit detection biases, outcome assessors and patients are blinded to the treatment allocation. Outcome assessors are independent individuals not involved with patient consent or randomization and not present at the index procedure.
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Prophylactic EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy in Advanced Periampullary Cancers: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: ERCP alone

ERCP procedure alone and management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed

Procedure: ERCP alone
ERCP with biliary stenting will be performed alone. ERCP is part of standard of care for biliary drainage. An endoscope is advanced to the small intestines and a metal stent is inserted through the tumor instead of bypassing the tumor to effectively drain the biliary system under x-ray guidance. Management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed

Experimental: ERCP + ProEUS-GE

ERCP with prophylactic eus-guided gastroenterostomy

Procedure: ERCP +ProEUS-GE
ERCP is performed as described above. following the ERCP, the scoped is switched for an echoendoscope which is advanced to the stomach. A stent is then placed between the stomach and the small intestines, creating a connection (ProEUS-GE).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) [18 months]

    Gastric outlet obstruction is defined as GOOSS of < 2 AND radiological and/or endoscopic confirmation of the presence of GOO either from a gastroduodenal stricture, stent obstruction, or stent migration.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of adverse events [18 months]

    Adverse events are defined and rated according to the ASGE lexicon for endoscopic adverse events.

  2. Quality of life of the participant [18 months]

    Quality of life will be assessed through the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire

  3. Nutritional status [18 months]

    Nutritional status will be assessed using the patient-generated subjective global assessment short form (PG-SGA). The PG-SGA scoring scales from 0 to >9, with a higher score indicating a need for symptom management or nutritional intervention. We will also assess for sarcopenia by incorporating objective quantification of muscle and adipose tissue compartments. These compartments have been shown to have significant prognostic value in patients with pancreatic cancer, including overall survival.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria (all of the following):
  1. Radiological diagnosis of a periampullary cancer that is precluded from upfront surgical resection of curative intent due to advanced tumor stage. These include locally advanced or metastatic cancers of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, or ampulla. cancers.

  2. Elevated liver function tests requiring ERCP without evidence of MGOO of significant gastroparesis (see exclusion criterion #3 and #4)

  3. ECOG 0 or 1

  4. ASA<4

  5. Provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria (any of the following):
  1. Resectable periampullary cancer

  2. Patient with clinical and radiological evidence of malignant gastric outlet obstruction defined as Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) of < 3 with radiological and/or endoscopic evidence of a mechanical obstruction from a gastric or duodenal stricture. GOOSS is a validated tool for assessing MGOO and is scored based on the diet tolerated by the patient: 0 for no oral intake, 1 for liquids only, 2 for soft diet, and 3 for low residue or full diet.

  3. Gastroparesis with a Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) of >2. Gastroparesis is defined as having symptoms of MGOO without radiological and/or endoscopic evidence of mechanical obstruction.

  4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy and/or thrombocytopenia

  5. Age < 18

  6. Ascites > grade I

  7. Liver metastasis > 30% of the liver volume

  8. Portal hypertension with gastroesophageal varices and/or ascites

  9. Surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • Unity Health Toronto

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Yen-I Chen, assistant professor of medicine, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05994521
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MP-37-2024-9711
First Posted:
Aug 16, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 18, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Yen-I Chen, assistant professor of medicine, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 18, 2023