Haloperidol Versus Ondansetron for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (HaVOC)

Sponsor
Queen's University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03056482
Collaborator
(none)
33
3
3
25.5
11
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) has become a well-documented syndrome since 2004 and is expected to increase in prevalence with continuing liberalization of marijuana and recognition of the disease. Regardless of whether the association with heavy cannabis use is recognized, there is well-documented resistance to traditional anti-emetic treatment. Given promising reports of the use of intravenous haloperidol, a randomized controlled trial comparing it to the commonly administered anti-emetic ondansetron will contribute to the management of CHS

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Ondansetron 8mg
  • Drug: Haloperidol 0.05mg/kg
  • Drug: Haloperidol 0.1mg/kg
Phase 4

Detailed Description

This is a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over clinical trial that will enroll approximately 80 subjects from at least four different research sites. Patients who have been diagnosed with CHS and enrolled in our study will act as their own controls upon their return to the ED for a subsequent bout of CHS for up to 3 visits per subject. Each patient will be allocated in a 1:1:1 fashion into one of three treatment groups: high- or low-dose haloperidol, or ondansetron, with a minimum 7-day washout period between treatments. As CHS tends to be a recurrent syndrome (presumably given the continued use of cannabis despite recommendations to taper and abstain), it is expected that most subjects will return at least once again, and a substantial subset of the study population will complete all three treatment visits during the trial.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
33 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This is a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over clinical trial that will allocate subjects in a 1:1:1 fashion into one of three treatment groups: high- or low-dose haloperidol, or ondansetron, with a minimum 7-day washout period between treatments.This is a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over clinical trial that will allocate subjects in a 1:1:1 fashion into one of three treatment groups: high- or low-dose haloperidol, or ondansetron, with a minimum 7-day washout period between treatments.
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Participants will be allocated to an intervention via a sealed, opaque envelope system to be opened by an unblinded nurse not otherwise involved in patient care or research procedures will prepare the intervention. The Attending physician, Research personnel and Investigator(s) will all remain blinded to the allocation.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Haloperidol Versus Ondansetron for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (HaVOC): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
May 21, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 7, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Ondansetron 8mg

8mg Ondansetron prepared in a 100mL normal saline mini-bag

Drug: Ondansetron 8mg
Ondansetron 8 MG prepared in a 100 mL normal saline min-bag
Other Names:
  • Zofran
  • Experimental: Haloperidol 0.05mg/kg

    0.05mg/kg of Haloperidol prepared in a 100mL normal saline mini-bag

    Drug: Haloperidol 0.05mg/kg
    Haloperidol 0.05 mg/kg prepared in a 100 mL normal saline min-bag
    Other Names:
  • Haldol
  • Experimental: Haloperidol 0.1mg/kg

    0.1mg/kg of Haloperidol prepared in a 100mL normal saline mini-bag

    Drug: Haloperidol 0.1mg/kg
    Haloperidol 0.1 mg/kg prepared in a 100 mL normal saline min-bag
    Other Names:
  • Haldol
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in pain and nausea [2 hours]

      Difference between arithmetic mean of Pain Score and Nausea Score (each on a 10-cm VAS) at 2 hours versus at baseline

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in pain [1, 2, 24 and 48 hours]

      Changes in abdominal pain score at 1, 2, 24 and 48 hours vs. baseline

    2. Change in nausea [1, 2, 24 and 48 hours]

      Changes in nausea score at 1, 2, 24 and 48 hours vs. baseline

    3. Treatment success [2, 24 and 48 hours]

      Treatment success = both abdominal pain and nausea score < 2 at 2, 24 and 48 hours

    4. Oral intake [2 hours]

      Cumulative oral intake from t=0 to 2 hours (in mL)

    5. Emesis volume [2 hours]

      Cumulative emesis from t=0 to 2 hours (in mL)

    6. Urine output [2 hours]

      Cumulative urine output (in mL)

    7. Discharge ready at 2 hours [2 hours]

      Deemed discharge-ready at 2 hours in the opinion of the treating physician

    8. Rescue anti-emetics in ED [at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first]

      Given rescue anti-emetics prior to discharge

    9. Time to discharge from ED [at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first]

      Time interval to discharge-ready from t=0 (min)

    10. Subject preferred arm [2 hours]

      Subject preference of high- vs low-dose haloperidol, and of haloperidol vs ondansetron (-10, 10)

    11. Return to ED [7 days]

      Unscheduled return visits to ED within 7 days (count)

    12. ED consult [From time of study intervention until admitting service consulted or subject discharged from Emergency Department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 48 hours]

      Consulted to admitting service

    13. Prolonged ED Length of stay [at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first]

      Outcome 10 "Time to Discharge from ED" > 12 hours (binary yes/no)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 100 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Age > 18 years

    2. Self-report of ≥3 episodes of emesis occurring in a cyclic pattern for greater than 1 month in the preceding 2 years

    3. Current episode >2 hours of emesis

    4. At least one episode of emesis/forceful retching witnessed (including products of emesis at bedside) or heard by an independent observer (healthcare provider or family/friend) in the emergency department

    5. Self-reported frequent (near daily to daily x at least 6 months) use of cannabis by inhalation.

    6. Working diagnosis of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome in the opinion of the treating emergency physician

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Chronic, daily use of opioid equivalent to ≥10mg morphine/day

    2. Inability to comprehend study consent or instructions

    3. Unreliable follow-up/unlikely to return for cross-over

    4. Administration of an intravenous antiemetic, anticholinergic or antipsychotic (other than up to 100mg dimenhydrinate) in the previous 24 hours

    5. Allergy or intolerance to haloperidol or ondansetron

    6. Pregnancy

    7. Any other medical or psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the enrolling physician would interfere with participation in the trial

    8. Current active participation in an investigational drug trial

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hotel Dieu Hospital Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 2V7
    2 Kingston General Hospital Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 2V7
    3 Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 3N6

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Queen's University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Marco LA Sivilotti, MD, MSc, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Dr. Marco L.A. Sivilotti, Principal Investigator, Queen's University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03056482
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EMED-251-17
    First Posted:
    Feb 17, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 21, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Dr. Marco L.A. Sivilotti, Principal Investigator, Queen's University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 21, 2020