EVE: Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this work is to compare standard intubation with video laryngoscope (Glide scope Ranger ) in French pre hospital multicentric study.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
Introduction: In France, patients in critical status brought to hospital by emergency physicians and nurses experimented in tracheal intubation. It is an invasive act allowing a protection of airways and an optimal oxygenation of the patients in distress. The reference technique is the direct laryngoscopy by Macintosh . Corresponding data shows that a video laryngoscope - GLIDESCOPE laryngoscope - improve the conditions of intubation in the surgical unit thanks to a better display(visualization) of the opening. A derived device for pre hospital emergency units (GLIDESCOPE Ranger®) deserves to be compared with the classic laryngoscopy in emergency conditions.
Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method
Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1: Classical intubation
|
Device: Classical intubation
Classical intubation
|
Experimental: 2: Glidescope intubation
|
Device: GLIDESCOPE
GLIDESCOPE intubation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- IDS score in each group [during the intubation]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Vomit / regurgitation or inhalation per-procedure [during the intubation]
- Dental or throat traumatism [during the intubation]
- Broncho/laryngospasm [during the intubation]
- Hypoxia [per intubation]
- Hemodynamic instability [per intubation]
- Inhalation pneumonia [within 24 hours following the inclusion]
- Failure of intubate [during the intubation]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
patients of more than 18 years old
-
requiring an intubation
-
by medical out of hospital emergency operators
-
medical insurance
-
Consent signed
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Age <18, pregnant women
-
Refusal of consent or inability for understanding study
-
small mouth opening makes it impossible intubate
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Ministry of Health, France
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sébastien GALLULA, Ph, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Study Director: Patrick PLAISANCE, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- P100205
- 2010-A01512-37