EVE: Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy

Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT01374061
Collaborator
Ministry of Health, France (Other)
0
2
18

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this work is to compare standard intubation with video laryngoscope (Glide scope Ranger ) in French pre hospital multicentric study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Classical intubation
  • Device: GLIDESCOPE
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Introduction: In France, patients in critical status brought to hospital by emergency physicians and nurses experimented in tracheal intubation. It is an invasive act allowing a protection of airways and an optimal oxygenation of the patients in distress. The reference technique is the direct laryngoscopy by Macintosh . Corresponding data shows that a video laryngoscope - GLIDESCOPE laryngoscope - improve the conditions of intubation in the surgical unit thanks to a better display(visualization) of the opening. A derived device for pre hospital emergency units (GLIDESCOPE Ranger®) deserves to be compared with the classic laryngoscopy in emergency conditions.

Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method

Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy : a Comparative Study of Macintosh and GLIDESCOPE Ranger®
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2011
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 1: Classical intubation

Device: Classical intubation
Classical intubation

Experimental: 2: Glidescope intubation

Device: GLIDESCOPE
GLIDESCOPE intubation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. IDS score in each group [during the intubation]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Vomit / regurgitation or inhalation per-procedure [during the intubation]

  2. Dental or throat traumatism [during the intubation]

  3. Broncho/laryngospasm [during the intubation]

  4. Hypoxia [per intubation]

  5. Hemodynamic instability [per intubation]

  6. Inhalation pneumonia [within 24 hours following the inclusion]

  7. Failure of intubate [during the intubation]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients of more than 18 years old

  • requiring an intubation

  • by medical out of hospital emergency operators

  • medical insurance

  • Consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Age <18, pregnant women

  • Refusal of consent or inability for understanding study

  • small mouth opening makes it impossible intubate

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Ministry of Health, France

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sébastien GALLULA, Ph, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Study Director: Patrick PLAISANCE, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01374061
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • P100205
  • 2010-A01512-37
First Posted:
Jun 15, 2011
Last Update Posted:
May 8, 2014
Last Verified:
May 1, 2014

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 8, 2014