PART: Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the trial is to determine if 72-hour survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is improved with initial endotracheal intubation (ETI) over initial laryngeal tube (LT) airway management strategies.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The primary objective of the trial is to determine if 72-hour survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is improved with initial endotracheal intubation (ETI) over initial laryngeal tube (LT) airway management strategies.
The null hypothesis is that 72-hour survival is similar between primary Laryngeal Tube (LT) SGA and primary ETI airway management strategies.
Evaluated secondary outcomes will include return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, neurologically intact survival at hospital discharge, airway management performance, and clinical adverse events.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Endotracheal Intubation The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. |
Device: Endotracheal Intubation
In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT.
|
Active Comparator: Laryngeal Tube (King) Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) |
Device: Laryngeal Tube (King)
In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Patients Alive at 72 Hours After Episode. [72 hours]
Number of patient alive at 72 hours after episode.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) [Patients will be followed from the time of the CA until death or ROSC whichever occurs first. The time frame for this secondary outcome may vary from minutes to hours, but is not expected to last longer than 12 hours.]
Presence of palpable pulses on Emergency Department arrival. Patients pronounced dead in the field coded as ROSC=[none].
- Number of Patients Alive at Hospital Discharge [From enrollment through end of hospital course. Maximum time interval not specified. Maximum time interval observed in study was 138 days.]
Number of patients alive at time hospital discharge.
- Number of Patients With Favorable Neurologic Status on Hospital Discharge [From enrollment through end of hospital course.]
Number of patients with favorable neurologic status, defined as Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) <=3. MRS values for neurologic outcome include: 0 - No symptoms. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. - Dead.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
-
Adult (age ≥18 years or per local interpretation)
-
Non-traumatic etiology
-
Initiation of ventilatory support (e.g., bag-valve-mask device, non-rebreather mas, etc.)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Known pregnant women
-
Known prisoners
-
Major facial trauma (visible major deformity, copious oral bleeding, etc)
-
Major bleeding or exsanguination (e.g., major upper or lower GI bleed, visceral perforation, major uncontrolled bleeding from laceration or injury)
-
Patient receiving initial care by a non-PART participating EMS agency capable of performing ETI, LT, or other advanced airway management
-
Patients with ET tube, LT or other advanced airway device inserted prior to participating EMS agency arrival (e.g., inserted by healthcare facility personnel)
-
Patients with a pre-existing tracheostomy
-
Obvious asphyxial cardiac arrest (e.g., choking, foreign body aspiration, angioedema, epiglottitis, trauma to mouth and face, etc.)
-
Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart (TAH)
-
Patients with pre-existing written "do-not-attempt-resuscitation" (DNAR) orders
-
Inter-facility transports
-
Patients with a "do not enroll" bracelet
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alabama Resuscitation Center | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | 35294 |
2 | Portland Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, Oregon Health & Sciences University | Portland | Oregon | United States | 92739 |
3 | The Pittsburgh Resuscitation Network, University of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | 15261 |
4 | Dallas Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cente | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75390 |
5 | University of Washington (Data Coordinating Center) | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98115 |
6 | Milwaukee Resuscitation Network, Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States | 53226 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- American Heart Association
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Henry E Wang, MD, University of Alabama, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- HL077863-PART
- 5U01HL077863
- UH2HL125163
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 1499 | 1505 |
COMPLETED | 1495 | 1505 |
NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 1495 | 1505 | 3000 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
63
(16.9)
|
63.2
(17.0)
|
63.1
(17.0)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
598
40%
|
576
38.3%
|
1174
39.1%
|
Male |
897
60%
|
929
61.7%
|
1826
60.9%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
3
0.2%
|
7
0.5%
|
10
0.3%
|
Asian |
27
1.8%
|
35
2.3%
|
62
2.1%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
3
0.2%
|
2
0.1%
|
5
0.2%
|
Black or African American |
493
33%
|
385
25.6%
|
878
29.3%
|
White |
804
53.8%
|
903
60%
|
1707
56.9%
|
More than one race |
2
0.1%
|
3
0.2%
|
5
0.2%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
163
10.9%
|
170
11.3%
|
333
11.1%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
1495
100%
|
1505
100%
|
3000
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Patients Alive at 72 Hours After Episode. |
---|---|
Description | Number of patient alive at 72 hours after episode. |
Time Frame | 72 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. |
Measure Participants | 1495 | 1505 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
230
15.4%
|
275
18.3%
|
Title | Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) |
---|---|
Description | Presence of palpable pulses on Emergency Department arrival. Patients pronounced dead in the field coded as ROSC=[none]. |
Time Frame | Patients will be followed from the time of the CA until death or ROSC whichever occurs first. The time frame for this secondary outcome may vary from minutes to hours, but is not expected to last longer than 12 hours. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. |
Measure Participants | 1495 | 1505 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
361
24.1%
|
420
27.9%
|
Title | Number of Patients Alive at Hospital Discharge |
---|---|
Description | Number of patients alive at time hospital discharge. |
Time Frame | From enrollment through end of hospital course. Maximum time interval not specified. Maximum time interval observed in study was 138 days. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Outcome for 1 patient in LT group not known. |
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. |
Measure Participants | 1495 | 1504 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
121
8.1%
|
163
10.8%
|
Title | Number of Patients With Favorable Neurologic Status on Hospital Discharge |
---|---|
Description | Number of patients with favorable neurologic status, defined as Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) <=3. MRS values for neurologic outcome include: 0 - No symptoms. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. - Dead. |
Time Frame | From enrollment through end of hospital course. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Neurologic status not known for 4 patients in the ETI group and 5 patients in LT group. |
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. |
Measure Participants | 1495 | 1500 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
75
5%
|
107
7.1%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 72 hours of hospitalization. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) | ||
Arm/Group Description | The insertion of a plastic breathing tube through the mouth and into the trachea. Endotracheal Intubation: In this traditional model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use ETI as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. If the EMS agency is assigned to this arm, basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation only even if they would normally use an LT. | Insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) Laryngeal Tube (King): In this test model of OHCA airway management, advanced-level Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel will use LT as the primary (initial) airway management intervention. Basic-level EMS personnel will use bag-valve-mask ventilation. If trained to use LT, basic-level EMS personnel may perform LT insertion. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1265/1495 (84.6%) | 1230/1505 (81.7%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/1495 (0%) | 0/1505 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Endotracheal Intubation | Laryngeal Tube (King) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 582/1495 (38.9%) | 173/1505 (11.5%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Multiple (>=3) attempts to insert the assigned airway. | 245/1299 (18.9%) | 245 | 61/1353 (4.5%) | 61 |
Unsuccessful insertion of assigned airway. | 573/1299 (44.1%) | 573 | 159/1353 (11.8%) | 159 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Pneumothorax | 30/426 (7%) | 30 | 17/485 (3.5%) | 17 |
Rib Fracture | 30/426 (7%) | 30 | 16/85 (18.8%) | 16 |
Pneumonia or Aspiration Pneumonitis | 89/398 (22.4%) | 89 | 120/460 (26.1%) | 120 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Henry E. Wang, MD, MS |
---|---|
Organization | Unviersity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston |
Phone | 713-500-7878 |
henry.e.wang@uth.tmc.edu |
- HL077863-PART
- 5U01HL077863
- UH2HL125163