PET-MRI in Diagnosing Patients With Cancer, Cardiac Diseases, or Neurologic Diseases
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized pilot clinical trial studies how well positron emission tomography (PET)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) works compared to standard-of-care PET-computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing patients with cancer, cardiac diseases, or neurologic diseases. PET-MRI combines two imaging methods that can be used to evaluate disease. PET-MRI is similar to standard-of-care PET-CT, but exposes the patient to less radiation. It is not yet known whether PET-MRI produces better image quality than PET-CT in diagnosing patients with cancer, cardiac disease, or neurologic disease.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
-
To assess and optimize image quality of PET and MRI focusing on technical artifacts and their correction.
-
To assess the accuracy of PET quantification based on MR attenuation correction (MRAC) derived from various MRI sequences and reconstruction algorithms including the effect of routinely used Gadolinium-based contrast agents on MRAC.
-
To determine the clinical and diagnostic accuracy of PET-MRI in comparison to standard-of-care diagnostic imaging.
-
To assess the efficacy and workflow in combining PET and MRI in one single examination as compared to separate imaging studies.
-
To assess the potential for radiation dose reduction if PET-CT is substituted by PET-MRI, thus avoiding the radiation exposure from the CT-component.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: PET-CT and PET-MRI Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. |
Device: positron emission tomography
Undergo PET
Other Names:
Device: computed tomography
Undergo CT
Other Names:
Device: magnetic resonance imaging
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall Image Quality Scores [Day 1]
Overall image quality scores obtained from the two imaging modalities will be compared with the hypothesis that hybrid PET-MRI images is as good as PET-CT images or superior (not inferior) to the PET-CT images. Evaluation of overall image quality will be assessed using the following criteria: 1=excellent, 2=good, 3=acceptable, 4=poor, 5=not acceptable. A Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) rank-sum test with a 0.100 significance level will be used.
- Lesion Based Standard Uptake Values (SUV) [Day 1]
Lesion based SUV will be estimated and compared for PET-MR and PET-CT images in normal organs and compared. A two-sided two-sample t-test will be used to show significance of difference.
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve [Day 1]
A two-sided z-test will be used to detect the difference in the area under the curve showing the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as accuracy of diagnostic information.
- Time Effort Associated With the PET-MRI Versus PET-CT With MRI [Day 1]
Statistical difference in time between PET-MRI versus sequential approach for PET-CT plus MRI. Workflow with shortest timely efforts and sufficient diagnostic information will be established as routine procedure.
- Radiation Dose Reduction With PET-MRI [Day 1]
Dose measurements will be used to calculate effective radiation dose in each patient. Dose calculations of effective dose will be used to estimate dose savings in omitting the CT component of PET-CT. Statistical tests will use a 0.10 significance level and will be 2-sided
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Clinically indicated PET/PET-CT (with or without clinically indicated diagnostic MRI)
-
Presenting with one of the four conditions specified below
-
Fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) avid cancers
-
Cardiac disease (cardiac viability assessment)
-
Neurologic disorders (dementia)
-
Inflammatory disease (for example fever of unknown origin, vasculitis, osteomyelitis)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnancy and lactation
-
Contraindications to undergo MRI
-
Cardiac pacemaker and metal devices (as specified in a separate MRI Informed consent)
-
Claustrophobia or inability to tolerate MRI examination (lay still for approximately 1 hour and hold breath intermittently)
-
Previously known allergies against MRI contrast agents (exclusion criterion only for contrast enhanced MRI)
-
Renal insufficiency: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 40ml/min/1.73m^2 and following European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines (exclusion criterion only for contrast enhanced MRI)
-
Individuals who are not willing or capable of giving informed consent or assent (with legal guardian consent)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44106-5065 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pablo Ros, MD, MPH, PhD, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CASE16Z12
- NCI-2014-00376
- CASE16Z12
- P30CA043703
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 72 |
COMPLETED | 72 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Overall Participants | 72 |
Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
10-19 years |
4
5.6%
|
20-29 years |
1
1.4%
|
30-39 years |
3
4.2%
|
40-49 years |
4
5.6%
|
50-59 years |
25
34.7%
|
60-69 years |
17
23.6%
|
70-79 years |
14
19.4%
|
80-89 years |
4
5.6%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
30
41.7%
|
Male |
42
58.3%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
Hispanic or Latino |
0
0%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
31
43.1%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
41
56.9%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
6
8.3%
|
White |
50
69.4%
|
More than one race |
8
11.1%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
8
11.1%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
72
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Overall Image Quality Scores |
---|---|
Description | Overall image quality scores obtained from the two imaging modalities will be compared with the hypothesis that hybrid PET-MRI images is as good as PET-CT images or superior (not inferior) to the PET-CT images. Evaluation of overall image quality will be assessed using the following criteria: 1=excellent, 2=good, 3=acceptable, 4=poor, 5=not acceptable. A Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) rank-sum test with a 0.100 significance level will be used. |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data was obtained from this study group as the patient cohort was inconsistent |
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Measure Participants | 0 |
Title | Lesion Based Standard Uptake Values (SUV) |
---|---|
Description | Lesion based SUV will be estimated and compared for PET-MR and PET-CT images in normal organs and compared. A two-sided two-sample t-test will be used to show significance of difference. |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data was obtained from this study group as the patient cohort was inconsistent |
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Measure Participants | 0 |
Title | Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve |
---|---|
Description | A two-sided z-test will be used to detect the difference in the area under the curve showing the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as accuracy of diagnostic information. |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data was obtained from this study group as the patient cohort was inconsistent |
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Measure Participants | 0 |
Title | Time Effort Associated With the PET-MRI Versus PET-CT With MRI |
---|---|
Description | Statistical difference in time between PET-MRI versus sequential approach for PET-CT plus MRI. Workflow with shortest timely efforts and sufficient diagnostic information will be established as routine procedure. |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data was obtained from this study group as the patient cohort was inconsistent |
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Measure Participants | 0 |
Title | Radiation Dose Reduction With PET-MRI |
---|---|
Description | Dose measurements will be used to calculate effective radiation dose in each patient. Dose calculations of effective dose will be used to estimate dose savings in omitting the CT component of PET-CT. Statistical tests will use a 0.10 significance level and will be 2-sided |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data was obtained from this study group as the patient cohort was inconsistent |
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI |
Measure Participants | 0 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | At time of scan | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | PET-CT and PET-MRI | |
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo PET-CT over approximately 30 minutes and PET-MRI over approximately 45-90 minutes. positron emission tomography: Undergo PET computed tomography: Undergo CT magnetic resonance imaging: Undergo MRI | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
PET-CT and PET-MRI | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
PET-CT and PET-MRI | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/72 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
PET-CT and PET-MRI | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/72 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Philipp Frank Graner |
---|---|
Organization | Cleveland Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center |
Phone | +1 216-844-8275 |
philipp.graner@uhhospitals.org |
- CASE16Z12
- NCI-2014-00376
- CASE16Z12
- P30CA043703