FLUID: CPPF After Cardiac Surgery in High Risk Patients

Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05308589
Collaborator
Haermonics (Other), European Regional Development Fund (Other)
414
3
2
18.9
138
7.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In two randomized clinical trials the investigators have demonstrated that continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) therapy can reduce postoperative blood loss and bleeding-related complications after cardiac surgery and that CPPF therapy is safe and feasible in an experimental setting. The Haermonics investigational device is a novel medical device that enables CPPF therapy to be used in daily clinical setting. The aim of this study is three-fold. First, to evaluate the safety and functionality of the Haermonics investigational device. Secondly, to investigate the effect of CPPF therapy on bleeding related complications in a high-risk cardiac surgery population. Thirdly, to explore the effect of CPPF therapy on intraluminal chest tube clogging.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: CPPF
N/A

Detailed Description

CPPF therapy

Prolonged or excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery can lead to a broad spectrum of secondary complications. One of the underlying causes is incomplete wound drainage, with subsequent accumulation of blood and clots in the pericardium. It has been demonstrated that this retained blood and clots lead to even more fibrinolytic activity in the mediastinum and pericardial space, and therefore may contribute to increased or prolonged bleeding. Based on this principle, the method of continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) has been invented and further developed. The hypothesis is that CPPF therapy works by mechanical cleaning properties and by diminishing fibrinolysis and inflammation. The CPPF protocol includes the inflow of NaCl 0,9% flushing fluid into the pericardial cavity during the first postoperative hours in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In this way, the blood and clot mixture can be diluted into a lower viscosity solution, thereby enhancing the evacuation of blood and clots from the pericardial space and preventing chest tube obstruction.

The Haermonics investigational device

Because CPPF therapy includes the dilution of the normal postoperative mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), the clinical assessment of the exact amount of blood loss is more difficult. Yet, blood loss is an important factor in clinical decision making, namely the decision if the patient needs a surgical re-exploration for postoperative bleeding or not. Roughly, in patients who receive CPPF therapy, blood loss can be estimated by extracting the total inflow flushing volume from the total MCTD. This method was used in the experimental setting of the previous CPPF trails but is considered unsuitable for use in daily practice because of three reasons. First, the required registration of in- and outflow volume is labour intensive. Secondly, because this registration can only be done intermittently, which can be dangerous in case of a fast bleeding rate. Thirdly, blood loss calculation could potentially be inaccurate because sometimes, clinically insignificant, amounts of flushing fluid are retained or absorbed in the pericardial or pleural spaces, thereby making the blood loss calculation inaccurate.

The first commercial Haermonics device will have four essential functionalities that make CPPF therapy safe and feasible for daily clinical use. 1) Automatic monitoring of the outflow volume, 2) Quantification of the content of the outflow volume by means of real time and continuous haematocrit (hct) analysis of the MCTD, 3) Warming of the flushing fluid to body temperature and temperature measurements of the flushing fluid, and 4) Continuous intrapericardial pressure measurement. The investigational device that will be used in this study will have all these functionalities, but available data will not be used for clinical decision making yet.

Previous studies

CPPF, executed with a researcher instead of a medical device, has been investigated in two randomized clinical trials. The CPPF protocol included the inflow of 500 ml NaCl 0,9% flushing fluid into the pericardial cavity during the first 12 postoperative hours in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In this way, the blood and clot mixture were diluted into a lower viscosity solution, thereby enhancing the evacuation of blood and clots from the pericardial space and preventing chest tube obstruction. In two distinct cardiac surgery populations, both trials showed CPPF led to a statistically significant reduction in the primary outcome, i.e., blood loss, while pooled data showed a statistically significant difference for the clinically most relevant secondary end points, like the incidence of re-interventions for either non-surgical bleeding and/or acute cardiac tamponade (0 vs. 8 in CPPF vs. control group).

The present study is powered to assess the effects of CPPF, executed by the Haermonics investigational device, in comparison with standard care on these clinically more relevant endpoints in a population of cardiac surgery patients that have an increased risk for postoperative bleeding.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
414 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flushing After Cardiac Surgery in High Risk Patients With the Haermonics Investigational Device: Study Protocol of the FLUID (FLUsh With Investigational Device) Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 2, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flushing

Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flushing (inflow of 500 ml NaCl 0,9% flushing fluid into the pericardial cavity during the first 8 postoperative hours) executed with the Haermonics investigational device

Device: CPPF
Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flush

No Intervention: Control

Standard care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of re-exploration [30 day]

    The incidence of re-exploration for either cardiac tamponade and/or excessive bleeding due to non-surgical bleeding.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To assess safety and feasibility of the Haermonics investigational device [8 hours]

    Incidence of treatment related serious Adverse Events

  2. Hct-sensor validation [8 hours]

    comparibility of the hct values of the chest drain volume measured by the Haermonics investigational device (hourly during the first 10 hours in the ICU and at chest tube removal) and hct values of chest drain samples (drawn from the outflow tube during the first 10 hours in the ICU and at chest tube removal) performed by the local laboratory.

  3. Number of participants with new onset postoperative fibrillation requiring medical therapy or electrocardioversion (ECV) [3 months]

    incidence of new onset postoperative fibrillation requiring medical therapy or electrocardioversion (ECV)

  4. To investigate the clinical effects of CPPF on the use of blood products and administration of coagulation factors [3 months]

    Number of participants that reveived blood products and/or coagulation factors

  5. To investigate the clinical effects of CPPF on the use of blood products and administration of coagulation factors [3 months]

    Number of units per patients

  6. To investigate the clinical effects of CPPF on ICU and hospital stay [3 months]

    ICU stay (hours) and hospital stay (days)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. To assess cost-effectiveness [3 months]

    costs per QALY gained using the EQ-5D

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients scheduled for CABG with continued DAPT

  • Patients with aIE scheduled for valve replacement

  • Patients scheduled for complex or multiple cardiac (redo) procedures with an (expected) CPB time >300 minutes

  • Patients undergoing aortic surgery with DHCA

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Euroscore II > 20%

  • Intraoperatively diaphragm injury leading to an open connection between the thoracic and abdominal cavity

  • Age < 18

  • Inability to understand study information

  • Participation in any study involving an investigational drug or device

Exclusion criteria specific for the CABG group include:
  • Emergency CABG

  • Single anti-platelet medication

  • Off pump surgery

Exclusion criteria specific for the IE group include:

• Subacute or chronic endocarditis: no signs of ongoing infection under AB treatment.

Exclusion criteria specific for the aortic surgery group include:
  • Emergency procedures

  • Isolated ascending aorta replacement

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
2 Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Netherlands
3 St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein Netherlands

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Haermonics
  • European Regional Development Fund

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: R. Klautz, Prof, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Eva Diephuis, Medical doctor, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05308589
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NL74428
First Posted:
Apr 4, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Apr 4, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Eva Diephuis, Medical doctor, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 4, 2022