VICA: Ventilation in Cardiac Arrest

Sponsor
Medical University of Graz (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04657393
Collaborator
(none)
120
1
2
31
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Over the last decades, research in cardiopulmonary resuscitation was primarily focused on uninterrupted chest compressions to restore sufficient circulation. Ventilation during ongoing chest compressions was regarded as potentially deleterious and thus not given any major scientific focus. Current guidelines advise that ventilation be monitored by end-tidal CO2 and emphasize that hyperventilation be avoided. Recent findings from arterial blood gas analyses showed high levels of arterial pCO2, resulting in a frequent occurrence of hypercapnic acidosis, which may be caused by iatrogenic hypoventilation. Ventilation during ongoing chest compressions can be hard to achieve, as nearly every breath may be terminated by simultaneous chest compressions. In case of bag ventilation the applied tidal volumes have not yet been measured und mechanical ventilators so far were not able to ventilate during chest compressions, because pressure limit settings induced termination of inspiration.

The aim of this study is to provide patients with the best possible ventilation, even under ongoing cardiac massage. Patients are ventilated with a new turbine-driven ventilator (Monnal T60, Air Liquide, France), which can deliver adequate tidal volumes within a very short inspiratory phase due to the inspiratory flow of > 200l/min. Thus, in deviation from the current recommendations, the ventilation rate can be doubled to 20/min, so that inspiration coincides with cardiac massage less often. The study compares effective ventilation volumes applied by two regimes, 10 breaths/min and 20/min. Success in gas exchange is monitored by arterial blood gas analysis; ventilation parameters are adapted for each patient to requirements accordingly

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: mechanical ventilation
N/A

Detailed Description

Restoration of circulation is undoubtedly the base of success in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current guidelines on CPR require that hyperventilation be avoided during CPR. Blood gas analysis results from the "BABICA trial" demonstrate that more than 90% of patients have highly elevated levels of pCO2 and are acidotic, mainly due to hypercapnia. No hyperventilated or alkalotic patients were found during CPR. Furthermore, higher pO2 values were found to be associated with improved outcomes. Current recommendations to limit ventilation frequency to 10/min was also critically questioned in a recent study from Belgium, which did not show any positive effect of low respiration rate compared to higher ones, cut-off 10/min. There are currently no clinical trials addressing optimal tidal volumes or minute volumes during CPR.

A major obstacle to continuous measurement of respiratory minute volumes during CPR is ongoing cardiac massage. In a retrospective study in which respiratory volumes were derived from bioimpedance curves, better outcomes were found in the group of more frequent ventilations. Common machine ventilators display set values, while expiratory volumes are averaged and may be overlaid by volume shifts of cardiac massage. In a recent study, investigators analyzed flow curves, where each breath can be evaluated individually and volumes can be derived correctly using dedicated software. We were able to test this method on a comparative study of three ventilators study on anatomical cadavers.

This study aims to detect whether a higher rate of ventilation using a turbine driven ventilator is able to provide higher breathing volumes during ongoing chest compressions in individuals suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Higher ventilation and oxygenation parameters as well as optimized acid-base-balance and increased rates of ROSC are expected.

Patient care (chest compressions, venous access, endotracheal intubation, application of drugs, defibrillation if necessary) is conducted according to current recommendation for Advanced Life Support (ALS) as issued by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). Ventilation is performed at one of two patterns: the control group is ventilated at 10 breaths per minute, the intervention group is ventilated at 20 breaths per minute. Patterns are selected randomly by opening a sealed envelope which is fixed on the ventilator. After successful endotracheal intubation mechanical ventilation is carried out using a turbine-driven ventilator (Monnal T60, AirLiquide, France). Ventilator settings are pre-set: respiratory frequency is set at 10/min or 20/min (see above), other ventilator parameters remain identical: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 5 mmHg, FiO2 1,0, tidal volume 6ml/kg ideal body weight [men: 50+(0.91x(body length-152.4)), women: 45+(0.91y(body length-152.4))]. These calculations can be performed on the ventilator itself by entering patients' age, height and gender. Chest compressions are carried out without interruptions and without considerations regarding the respiratory cycle. After initiation of ventilation arterial cannulization and arterial blood gas analysis - if possible- is performed after 5 and 10 minutes of CPR. If these analyses yield critically abnormal results (pCO2<35mmHg or

75mmHg) changes in ventilation may be made by the prehospital care physician. Study measurements end after disconnecting the ventilator.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
prospective, randomized, parallel studyprospective, randomized, parallel study
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
randomizing the study groups
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective Comparison of Ventilation Patterns During Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 30, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Alternative Ventilation Rate

ventilation is performed at 20 breaths/min

Procedure: mechanical ventilation
change of ventilation frequency

Active Comparator: Conventional Ventilation Rate

ventilation is performed at 10 breaths/min

Procedure: mechanical ventilation
change of ventilation frequency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Minute ventilation [during ongoing chest compressions]

    exspiratory ventilatory volume per minute

  2. adequacy of ventilation - pH [during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation]

    Evaluation of ventilation success per using arterial blood gas analyses (pH)

  3. adequacy of ventilation - paCO2 [during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation]

    Evaluation of ventilation success per using arterial blood gas analyses (paCO2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. ROSC [during prehospital resuscitation efforts]

    Return of Spontaneous Circulation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)

  • cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts

  • endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:
  • children and adolescents (age<18 years at inclusion)

  • pregnant women

  • previous documented lack of legal capacity

  • previous documented refusal to participate in trials

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Medical University of Graz Graz Styria Austria 8036

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Graz

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gerhard Prause, MD, Medical University of Graz

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Medical University of Graz
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04657393
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • VICA
First Posted:
Dec 8, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Jan 20, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Medical University of Graz
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 20, 2021