Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05557032
Collaborator
(none)
536
1
10.7
50.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The final approach adopted in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) is to minimize the time between chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pulse and rhythm checks are recommended between chest compressions and it is stated that this period should not exceed 10 seconds.

All guidelines also state that in cases of low cardiac output or low blood pressure, even if electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythms can be obtained, pulse checks may still fail and an arterial pulse may not be felt during chest compressions. This difficulty in sensing the arterial pulse causes delays in the decision of cardiac arrest in the patient. For this reason, there are cases of cardiac arrest in which the initiation of CPR is delayed or not started at all.

The most common method for checking the pulse is manual palpation. However, since it is an operator-dependent method, it is affected by the experience of the healthcare personnel, the vital values of the patient, and anatomical differences. Therefore, more objective criteria are required to detect a pulse. A clinical study of the reliability of pulse checks showed that most healthcare professionals are unable to detect the presence or absence of a pulse. Another study showed that pulse alone is not sufficient to initiate CPR, and 50% of decisions to initiate CPR based on heart rate are incorrect. Therefore, more objective criteria have been sought to detect the presence of a pulse. For this purpose, evaluations were made regarding the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac echo, and organized rhythm.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational [Patient Registry]
Anticipated Enrollment :
536 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Only
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Carotid Arteries in Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 25, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 15, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 15, 2022

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Carotid artery pulse control result using manual and USG in cardiopulmonary resuscitation [2 minute]

    Our aim is to compare the USG and manual methods in evaluating the presence of a pulse during CPR and to determine which method gives the most appropriate time and accuracy.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All adult patients (over 18 years of age) with in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with traumatic arrest

  • Conditions affecting carotid pulse palpation and/or USG application (patients with a history of carotid stenosis or dissection, patients undergoing neck surgery, patients with neck abscess hematoma)

  • Pregnant arrest patients

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 IKCU, Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Acil Tıp İzmir Turkey 35360

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Izmir Katip Celebi University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Adnan Yamanoğlu, Assistant professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05557032
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2021-GOKAE-0536
First Posted:
Sep 27, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Sep 27, 2022
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Adnan Yamanoğlu, Assistant professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 27, 2022