Effect of SNF472 on Progression of Cardiovascular Calcification in End-Stage-Renal-Disease (ESRD) Patients on Hemodialysis (HD)

Sponsor
Sanifit Therapeutics S. A. (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02966028
Collaborator
Clinipace Worldwide (Industry)
274
75
3
34
3.7
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective is to assess the effect of 2 dose levels of SNF472 (300 mg and 600 mg) compared to placebo on the progression of coronary artery calcium volume score over a 12-month (52 weeks) period in ESRD patients on HD

Detailed Description

Reducing the progression of cardiovascular calcification (CVC) in HD patients may improve the severe burden of CV disease related to the underlying ESRD. As no therapy is currently indicated to target CVC, there is a need to investigate the ability of SNF472 to reduce CVC progression and, ultimately, to improve CV outcomes in HD patients. This phase 2b double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study is designed to assess the effect of SNF472 on the progression of CVC as measured by calcium volume and CAC/Agatston scores in ESRD patients receiving HD. The study hypothesis is that administration of SNF472 over 52 weeks can slow the progression of CVC in this patient population compared to placebo.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
274 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Effect of SNF472 on Progression of Cardiovascular Calcification on Top of Standard of Care in End-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) Patients on Hemodialysis (HD)
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: SNF472 300 mg

Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL)

Drug: SNF472
Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.

Experimental: SNF 472 600 mg

Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL)

Drug: SNF472
Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.

Placebo Comparator: Matching Placebo

Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline

Drug: Placebo
Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Log CAC Volume Score From Baseline to Week 52 for the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. The primary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Log CAC Volume Score From Baseline to Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.

  2. Change in Log CAC Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and for the Combined Dose Groups vs the Placebo Group [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed.

  3. Number of Subjects With <15% Progression in CAC Agatston Score From Baseline to Week 52 for Each Dose Group and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 were calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with <15% progression were counted.

  4. Number of Subjects With >=15% Progression in CAC Agatston Score at Week 52 for Each Dose Group and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 was calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with >=15% progression were counted for each treatment group, the combined treatments groups and placebo.

  5. Change in Log Thoracic Aorta Calcification Volume Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the thoracic aorta was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.

  6. Change in Log Thoracic Aorta Calcification Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in CAC Agatston Score in the thoracic aorta from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.

  7. Change in Log Aortic Valve Calcification Volume Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the aortic valve was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.

  8. Change in Log Aortic Valve Calcification Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score or the aortic valve from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.

  9. Number of Participants With the Composite Safety Endpoint (Cardiovascular Death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-fatal Stroke, Heart Failure or Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest. [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    The number of subjects meeting this composite safety endpoint were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population.terms resulting in death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure for each dose group and placebo were summarized .

  10. Mortality Rate (All-cause) for Each Dose Group and Placebo [Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52]

    The number of deaths were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Female or male patients, 18 to 80 years (inclusive) of age at randomisation

  • CAC score of 100 to 3500 AU (Agatston Units) inclusive within a 3-week period prior to randomisation as measured by a multi-detector CT scanner

  • Patients who are EITHER ≥ 55 years OR have a history of diabetes mellitus at randomisation

  • Patients on HD for ≥ 6 months prior to randomisation

  • Willing and able to understand and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Scheduled date for kidney transplant from a known living donor

  • Weight above 300 lbs (136 kg)

  • Hospitalisation in the previous 3 months prior to randomisation for unstable angina, MI, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, amputation or peripheral or coronary bypass surgery

  • History of unstable heart failure in the previous 3 months, defined as an unplanned presentation to a hospital or dialysis treatment facility with signs/symptoms of acute pulmonary edema and requiring ultrafiltration therapy

  • History of cancer that has been in remission for < 5 years prior to randomisation. A history of basal cell carcinoma or Stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed

  • Pregnant or trying to become pregnant, currently breast-feeding, or of child-bearing potential (including peri-menopausal women who have had a menstrual period within one year) and not willing to practice birth control using a double barrier method (criteria apply to women only) at least 30 days post last dose of study medication

  • Hypocalcaemia defined as a serum calcium below 8.0 mg/dL (or 2.0 mmol/L) for the serum calcium most proximal to screening per patient's medical records

  • Extreme elevation in serum phosphorous, defined as a serum phosphorous above 10 mg/dL (or 3.23 mmol/L) within the last 2 months proximal to screening per patient's medical records

  • Uncontrolled hypertension defined as any 2 or more consecutive post-dialysis diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 100 mmHg within the last 2 months proximal to screening expected survival < 2 years in the Investigator's medical opinion

  • Known active drug or alcohol abuse within 1 year of randomisation

  • Use of other investigational drugs within 30 days of randomisation

  • Non-compliance with dialysis treatment which, in the opinion of the Investigator, evidenced by either repeated missed dialysis treatments or significant non-compliance with the patient's medication regimen

  • Inability to comply with all required study procedures and schedule, inability to speak and read in the protocol-derived language of that patient's clinical site, or unwillingness or inability to give written informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Bakersfield California United States 93308
2 Chula Vista California United States 91910
3 Escondido California United States 92025
4 Granada Hills California United States 91344
5 La Palma California United States 90623
6 Long Beach California United States 90807
7 Los Angeles California United States 90048
8 Lynwood California United States 90262
9 Northridge California United States 91324
10 Riverside California United States 92505
11 San Diego California United States 92111
12 San Dimas California United States 91773
13 Simi Valley California United States 93065
14 Tarzana California United States 91356
15 Whittier California United States 90603
16 Arvada Colorado United States 80002
17 Westminster Colorado United States 80031
18 Middlebury Connecticut United States 06762
19 Orange Connecticut United States 06477
20 Hollywood Florida United States 33024
21 Lauderdale Lakes Florida United States 33313-1638
22 Miami Gardens Florida United States 33169
23 Miami Florida United States 33133
24 Ocala Florida United States 34471
25 Tampa Florida United States 33614
26 Evanston Illinois United States 60201
27 Shreveport Louisiana United States 71101
28 Pontiac Michigan United States 48341
29 Roseville Michigan United States 48066
30 Brookhaven Mississippi United States 39601
31 Las Vegas Nevada United States 89106
32 Reno Nevada United States 89511
33 North Brunswick New Jersey United States 08902
34 Bronx New York United States 10461
35 College Point New York United States 11356
36 Asheville North Carolina United States 28801
37 Cincinnati Ohio United States 45267
38 Bethlehem Pennsylvania United States 18017
39 Knoxville Tennessee United States 37923
40 Arlington Texas United States 76015
41 Houston Texas United States 77024
42 Houston Texas United States 77099
43 Richardson Texas United States 75080
44 San Antonio Texas United States 78207
45 Chesapeake Virginia United States 23320
46 Wauwatosa Wisconsin United States 53226
47 Palma de Mallorca Balearic Islands Spain 07198
48 Barcelona Catalonia Spain 08025
49 Palma Illes Balears Spain 07011
50 Palma Islas Baleares Spain 07120
51 Galdakao Vizcaya Spain 48960
52 Barcelona Spain 08003
53 Barcelona Spain 08035
54 Barcelona Spain 08036
55 Barcelona Spain 08208
56 Barcelona Spain 08970
57 Córdoba Spain 14004
58 Lleida Spain 25008
59 Lleida Spain 25198
60 Lugo Spain 27003
61 Madrid Spain 28040
62 Navarro Spain 31008
63 Oviedo Spain 33011
64 Palma Spain 07300
65 Santander Spain 39008
66 Sevilla Spain 41007
67 Valencia Spain 46010
68 Valencia Spain 46017
69 Zaragoza Spain 50009
70 Bradford United Kingdom BD5 0NA
71 Manchester United Kingdom M13 9WL
72 Salford United Kingdom M6 8HD
73 Shrewsbury United Kingdom SY3 8XQ
74 Swansea United Kingdom SA6 6NL
75 Westcliff-on-Sea United Kingdom SS0 0RY

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sanifit Therapeutics S. A.
  • Clinipace Worldwide

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alex Gold, MD, Sanifit Chief Medical Officer

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sanifit Therapeutics S. A.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02966028
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SNFCT2015-05
First Posted:
Nov 17, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Apr 15, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 92 91 91
COMPLETED 68 57 60
NOT COMPLETED 24 34 31

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo Total
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 92 91 90 273
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
54
58.7%
51
56%
40
44.4%
145
53.1%
>=65 years
38
41.3%
40
44%
50
55.6%
128
46.9%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
63
(9.5)
64
(8.9)
64.
(8.2)
63.5
(8.9)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
38
41.3%
36
39.6%
33
36.7%
107
39.2%
Male
54
58.7%
55
60.4%
57
63.3%
166
60.8%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
31
33.7%
36
39.6%
32
35.6%
99
36.3%
Not Hispanic or Latino
60
65.2%
51
56%
56
62.2%
167
61.2%
Unknown or Not Reported
1
1.1%
4
4.4%
2
2.2%
7
2.6%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2
2.2%
0
0%
0
0%
2
0.7%
Asian
2
2.2%
4
4.4%
4
4.4%
10
3.7%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
1
1.1%
0
0%
1
0.4%
Black or African American
27
29.3%
15
16.5%
19
21.1%
61
22.3%
White
59
64.1%
67
73.6%
62
68.9%
188
68.9%
More than one race
1
1.1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
0.4%
Unknown or Not Reported
1
1.1%
4
4.4%
5
5.6%
10
3.7%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
58
63%
53
58.2%
54
60%
165
60.4%
United Kingdom
6
6.5%
3
3.3%
5
5.6%
14
5.1%
Spain
28
30.4%
35
38.5%
31
34.4%
94
34.4%
CAC Agatston Score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
917
(697)
963
(702)
965
(762)
948
(744)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change in Log CAC Volume Score From Baseline to Week 52 for the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. The primary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg & 600 mg Combined Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose (300 mg or 600 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) or 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 142 77
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.11
1.20
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Log CAC Volume Score From Baseline to Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups vs placebo. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 77 65 77
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.12
1.10
1.20
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Log CAC Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and for the Combined Dose Groups vs the Placebo Group
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 77 65 142 77
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.10
1.13
1.11
1.20
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Subjects With <15% Progression in CAC Agatston Score From Baseline to Week 52 for Each Dose Group and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 were calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with <15% progression were counted.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 77 65 142 77
Count of Participants [Participants]
46
50%
41
45.1%
87
96.7%
37
13.6%
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Subjects With >=15% Progression in CAC Agatston Score at Week 52 for Each Dose Group and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Agatston score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. Change in Agatston Score values from baseline to Week 52 was calculated as a percentage of change (progression or worsening of calcification). The number of subjects with >=15% progression were counted for each treatment group, the combined treatments groups and placebo.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 77 65 142 77
Count of Participants [Participants]
31
33.7%
24
26.4%
55
61.1%
40
14.7%
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Log Thoracic Aorta Calcification Volume Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the thoracic aorta was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 74 60 134 75
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.25
1.21
1.23
1.28
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Log Thoracic Aorta Calcification Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score that reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in CAC Agatston Score in the thoracic aorta from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 74 60 134 75
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.30
1.28
1.29
1.32
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Log Aortic Valve Calcification Volume Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Volume Score is a calculation to quantify the calcification of coronary artery calcium without factoring in the calcium density as measured by the CAC Agatston Score. The CAC volume score observed in the aortic valve was used for this analysis. The CAC volume Score was log-transformed and the primary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Volume Score from Baseline to Week 52 for the combined dose groups and each dose group vs placebo. The secondary analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log volume score (log 52-week volume score - log baseline volume score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for the combined randomized treatment groups and log CAC volume score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for the treatment groups was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 75 63 138 69
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.28
1.01
1.14
1.98
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Log Aortic Valve Calcification Agatston Score Between Baseline and Week 52 for Each Dose Group (300 mg and 600 mg) vs Placebo and the Combined Dose Groups vs Placebo
Description Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) Agatston Score is a semi-automated tool to calculate a score the reflects the extent of coronary artery calcification as detected by an unenhanced CT scan. Scores range from 0 to >1000 Agatston units where higher scores indicate an increased amount of calcification and an increased risk for a major adverse cardiac event. This secondary outcome measure was the change in Log CAC Agatston Score or the aortic valve from Baseline to Week 52 for each dose group and the treated arms combined vs placebo. The analysis used an ANCOVA model with the change in log score (log 52-week score - log baseline score) as the dependent variable and with a fixed effect term for each randomized treatment groups and log CAC score at baseline as a covariate. The least squares means for each of the treatment groups separately and combined was estimated and back transformed. A smaller change from baseline to follow up is a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 75 63 138 69
Geometric Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
1.33
0.98
1.14
2.86
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Composite Safety Endpoint (Cardiovascular Death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-fatal Stroke, Heart Failure or Non-fatal Cardiac Arrest.
Description The number of subjects meeting this composite safety endpoint were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population.terms resulting in death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure for each dose group and placebo were summarized .
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 92 91 183 90
Count of Participants [Participants]
7
7.6%
6
6.6%
13
14.4%
10
3.7%
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Mortality Rate (All-cause) for Each Dose Group and Placebo
Description The number of deaths were counted and expressed by the randomized arm as a % of patients for the safety population.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 1, Day 1) and Week 52

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg SNF 472 Combined Dose Groups Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Doses 300 and 600 mg. 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active or 2 vials of active(10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
Measure Participants 92 91 183 90
Count of Participants [Participants]
1
1.1%
6
6.6%
7
7.8%
5
1.8%

Adverse Events

Time Frame Collected over one year
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo
Arm/Group Description Dose 1 arm (300 mg): 1 vial of physiological saline and 1 vial of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Dose 2 arm (600 mg): 2 vials of active (10 mL SNF472 at 30 mg/mL) SNF472: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions. Placebo arm: 2 vials of physiological saline Placebo: Administered 3 times weekly by intravenous infusion through the dialysis machine in conjunction with the patient's dialysis sessions.
All Cause Mortality
SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/92 (1.1%) 6/91 (6.6%) 5/90 (5.6%)
Serious Adverse Events
SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 38/92 (41.3%) 55/91 (60.4%) 49/90 (54.4%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Agranulocytosis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Anaemia of chronic disease 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Coagulopathy 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Haemorrhagic anaemia 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Nephrogenic anaemia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation 3/92 (3.3%) 3 3/91 (3.3%) 3 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Acute myocardial infarction 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 4/90 (4.4%) 4
Cardiac arrest 1/92 (1.1%) 1 3/91 (3.3%) 3 0/90 (0%) 0
Atrial flutter 0/92 (0%) 0 3/91 (3.3%) 3 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Cardiac failure 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Coronary artery disease 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Angina unstable 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Aortic valve stenosis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Atrioventricular block complete 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Cardiac failure congestive 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Cardiogenic shock 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Coronary artery stenosis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Hypertensive heart disease 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Left ventricular failure 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Mitral valve incompetence 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Myocardial infarction 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Sinus node dysfunction 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Vitreous haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 4/91 (4.4%) 4 0/90 (0%) 0
Pancreatitis acute 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Abdominal pain 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Colitis ischaemic 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Abdominal hernia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Abdominal mass 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Ascites 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Diabetic gastroparesis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Diarrhoea 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Gastrointestinal necrosis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Gastrointestinal ulcer haemorrhage 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Impaired gastric emptying 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Inguinal hernia 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Rectal haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Ulcerative gastritis 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
General disorders
Chest pain 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 3/90 (3.3%) 3
Pyrexia 0/92 (0%) 0 3/91 (3.3%) 3 0/90 (0%) 0
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Asthenia 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Non-cardiac chest pain 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Hepatobiliary disorders
Acute hepatic failure 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Cholecystitis acute 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Cholecystitis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Cholelithiasis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Drug-induced liver injury 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Hepatic ischaemia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Hepatitis acute 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia 4/92 (4.3%) 4 3/91 (3.3%) 3 7/90 (7.8%) 7
Sepsis 2/92 (2.2%) 2 2/91 (2.2%) 2 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Cellulitis 2/92 (2.2%) 2 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Septic shock 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Staphylococcal bacteraemia 2/92 (2.2%) 2 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriovenous graft site infection 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Bronchitis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Device related infection 0/92 (0%) 0 2/91 (2.2%) 2 0/90 (0%) 0
Endocarditis 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Gangrene 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Respiratory tract infection 0/92 (0%) 0 2/91 (2.2%) 2 0/90 (0%) 0
Urinary tract infection 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriovenous graft site abscess 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Arthritis infective 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Bacteraemia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Clostridium difficile colitis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Diabetic foot infection 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Diverticulitis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Emphysematous cystitis 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Enterocolitis viral 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Gastroenteritis 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Gastroenteritis bacterial 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Herpes zoster 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Influenza 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Localised infection 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Osteomyelitis bacterial 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Pseudomonas infection 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Urosepsis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Vascular access site infection 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Wound infection 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Wound infection pseudomonas 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Clostridium difficile infection 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arteriovenous fistula site complication 1/92 (1.1%) 1 3/91 (3.3%) 3 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis 2/92 (2.2%) 2 0/91 (0%) 0 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Hip fracture 0/92 (0%) 0 2/91 (2.2%) 2 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Vascular graft complication 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Ankle fracture 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Arterial injury 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriovenous fistula site haematoma 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriovenous fistula site haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriovenous graft aneurysm 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Arteriovenous graft thrombosis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Fall 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Femoral neck fracture 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Fractured sacrum 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Limb injury 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Lower limb fracture 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Post procedural complication 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Post procedural haemorrhage 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Procedural hypotension 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Tendon rupture 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Toxicity to various agents 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Upper limb fracture 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Investigations
Blood lactic acid increased 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Cardiac stress test abnormal 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Influenza a virus test positive 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
International normalised ratio increased 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Myocardial necrosis marker increased 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Stress echocardiogram abnormal 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Troponin increased 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid overload 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 3/90 (3.3%) 3
Hyperkalaemia 2/92 (2.2%) 2 1/91 (1.1%) 1 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Hyperglycaemia 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Hypoglycaemia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Calciphylaxis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Malnutrition 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Arthralgia 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Musculoskeletal pain 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Large intestine benign neoplasm 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Nervous system disorders
Metabolic encephalopathy 2/92 (2.2%) 2 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Transient ischaemic attack 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Ischaemic stroke 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Loss of consciousness 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Cognitive disorder 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Dizziness postural 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Epilepsy 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Myasthenia gravis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Seizure 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Syncope 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Uraemic encephalopathy 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal mass 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Urinary retention 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Acute respiratory failure 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Asthma 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Respiratory distress 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Respiratory failure 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Dyspnoea 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Haemoptysis 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Pleural effusion 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Pneumonitis 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Pulmonary embolism 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Pulmonary oedema 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Surgical and medical procedures
Renal Transplant 6/92 (6.5%) 6 14/91 (15.4%) 14 11/90 (12.2%) 11
Lymphadenectomy 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Toe amputation 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Vascular disorders
Hypotension 3/92 (3.3%) 3 2/91 (2.2%) 2 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Hypertension 1/92 (1.1%) 1 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Haematoma 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Hypertensive crisis 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Peripheral vascular disorder 0/92 (0%) 0 2/91 (2.2%) 2 0/90 (0%) 0
Aortic stenosis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Deep vein thrombosis 0/92 (0%) 0 1/91 (1.1%) 1 0/90 (0%) 0
Foreign body embolism 1/92 (1.1%) 1 0/91 (0%) 0 0/90 (0%) 0
Peripheral ischaemia 0/92 (0%) 0 0/91 (0%) 0 1/90 (1.1%) 1
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
SNF472 300 mg SNF 472 600 mg Matching Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 62/92 (67.4%) 64/91 (70.3%) 67/90 (74.4%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea 7/92 (7.6%) 7 11/91 (12.1%) 11 10/90 (11.1%) 10
Abdominal pain upper 11/92 (12%) 11 2/91 (2.2%) 2 2/90 (2.2%) 2
Vomiting 1/92 (1.1%) 1 8/91 (8.8%) 8 4/90 (4.4%) 4
Nausea 2/92 (2.2%) 2 5/91 (5.5%) 5 4/90 (4.4%) 4
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection 2/92 (2.2%) 2 4/91 (4.4%) 4 6/90 (6.7%) 6
Nasopharyngitis 3/92 (3.3%) 3 1/91 (1.1%) 1 6/90 (6.7%) 6
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity 7/92 (7.6%) 7 7/91 (7.7%) 7 7/90 (7.8%) 7
Musculoskeletal pain 3/92 (3.3%) 3 6/91 (6.6%) 6 5/90 (5.6%) 5
Back pain 6/92 (6.5%) 6 2/91 (2.2%) 2 4/90 (4.4%) 4
Arthralgia 5/92 (5.4%) 5 2/91 (2.2%) 2 4/90 (4.4%) 4
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 10/92 (10.9%) 10 9/91 (9.9%) 9 8/90 (8.9%) 8
Dyspnoea 5/92 (5.4%) 5 7/91 (7.7%) 7 7/90 (7.8%) 7

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title SVP Clinical Development Operations
Organization Sanifit
Phone 18582815976
Email Claire.Padgett@sanifit.com
Responsible Party:
Sanifit Therapeutics S. A.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02966028
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SNFCT2015-05
First Posted:
Nov 17, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Apr 15, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021