Comparison of Traditional, Web-based or a Combined Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study explores the different modes of Cardiac Rehabilitation delivery including the use of a web-based programme. Cardiac Rehabilitation provides a structured, comprehensive programme, proven to reduce cardiovascular mortality and improve overall Quality of Life. However, as uptake remains relatively low with only 50% attending, exploring the benefits of offering a menu of programme options may allow greater patient choice and accessibility, meeting individual needs.
This study aims to compare how effective Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes are on improving cardiovascular patients physical and mental wellbeing using a web-based compared with traditional cardiac rehab programmes in the hospital or through a combination of both.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This 8-week study, aims to compare quality of life (QOL), hospital anxiety and depression scores (HADs) and physical activity outcomes in web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR), web-based CR combined with traditional CR (TCR) and TCR in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).
The Web-based option will include the use of the MyHeart application.
Participants eligible for the study will include low-moderate cardiovascular patients (heart attack, stents or heart surgery) within 3-6 weeks post discharge. Participants will be involved in hospital or virtual exercise and educational sessions with the support of CR specialists. Primary outcomes will be measured through questionnaires and an incremental treadmill walking test.
To our knowledge, this would be the first study to compare all three groups, as combined CR (web-based alongside traditional CR) has not yet been evaluated. Additionally, the investigators currently work within the CR setting at Burton Hospital, and this study will be conducted within our current Hospital CR service. The outcomes will be applicable and relevant to future clinical practice.
As the UK's 50% uptake to CR remains poor, falling below the 85% national uptake recommendations, a CR menu-based approach, offering hospital or home-based programmes is recommended to encourage uptake, improve QOL and clinical outcomes.
Furthermore, as COVID-19 has enforced a web-based CR approach, further research to explore uptake, physical and psychological outcomes to benefit cardiovascular patients is paramount for current and future CR delivery.
This study will explore a menu of options recommended for CR.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation (Hospital based programme) Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation will involve 8 hospital-based exercise sessions, and one virtual education day over 8 weeks, supervised by CR health care professionals. |
Other: Hospital Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Classes
Participants will attend 8 Hospital based CR exercise sessions. QOL and Hospital anxiety and Depression scores through questionnaires and incremental Shuttle Walk tests will be carried out pre and post intervention.
|
Experimental: Traditional combined with Web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Traditional combined with Web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation. Patients will attend 8 hospital-based exercise sessions and one virtual education day over 8-weeks with access to additional web-based (MyHeart app) exercise and educational information. |
Other: Hospital Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Classes
Participants will attend 8 Hospital based CR exercise sessions. QOL and Hospital anxiety and Depression scores through questionnaires and incremental Shuttle Walk tests will be carried out pre and post intervention.
Other: Web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Sessions
Participants will complete 8 weeks of Web-based CR exercise sessions using the MyHeart app. QOL and Hospital anxiety and Depression scores through questionnaires and incremental Shuttle Walk tests will be carried out pre and post intervention.
|
Experimental: Web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation, using MyHeart app introduced during a pre-CR assessment, will follow an 8-week individualised self-managed platform, allowing contact with the CR health professionals via app messages only (no direct contact for web-based CR). |
Other: Web-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Sessions
Participants will complete 8 weeks of Web-based CR exercise sessions using the MyHeart app. QOL and Hospital anxiety and Depression scores through questionnaires and incremental Shuttle Walk tests will be carried out pre and post intervention.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Energy Expenditure [The Walk Test will be completed pre and post intervention (8 weeks apart)]
An Incremental Shuttle Walk test will be performed to determine the Metabolic equivalent achieved. Metabolic Equivalent (1 MET) is defined as the amount of energy required to serve the body's energy needs.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Psychological outcome - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score [Questionnaires will be given to the patient to complete pre and post intervention. (8 weeks apart)]
This will be evaluated through participants completing a Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire. Scoring range: 0-7 = normal range, 8-10 = borderline abnormal,11-21 abnormal and treatment is indicated.
- Psychological outcome - Dartmouth Coop Questionnaire [Questionnaires will be given to the patient to complete pre and post intervention. (8 weeks apart)]
This will be evaluated through participants completing questions measuring health status, physical fitness, feelings, daily activities, social activities, change in health status, current overall health perceptions and bodily pain. Each question gives 5 response options, 1= very good, 2= good, 3= Moderate, 4=Bad, 5= Very Bad. Total score gives a profile of health status.
- Heart Rate [The Walk Test will be completed pre and post intervention (8 weeks apart)]
An Incremental Shuttle Walk test will be performed to evaluate functional capacity and determine what percentage of predicted heart rate the participant has achieved. Heart Rate max will be calculated using the Karvonen Formula
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Low-moderate risk patients (low-mod Ejection Fraction (EF) (>40%), including clinically stable Myocardial Infarction (MI), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG) patients.
-
Acute patients, in-hospital patients (phase 3 rehab) to reflect true clinical representation.
-
Combination of male and female, as previous studies are predominately male.
-
Low-moderate Anxiety and depression scores (<11)
-
Achieve Level 4 (180metres, 5.1METs) on the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test
-
Internet and device access.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
<40% EF
-
High risk Heart Failure patients
-
Co-morbidities preventing exercise
-
No internet access
-
Unstable angina
-
Language barrier (English only, due to app)
-
Clinically depressed anxiety or depression scores (>11)
-
Incremental Shuttle Walk Test <Level 4 (180metres, 5.1METs)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust | Burton Upon Trent | Staffordshire | United Kingdom | DE13 0RB |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Chester
- University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Investigators
- Study Director: Mike Morris, University of Chester
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- 290193