Coaching Intervention for Caregivers of Persons With Stroke

Sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04535284
Collaborator
American Occupational Therapy Foundation (Other)
80
1
2
23.2
3.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Caregivers of people with stroke experience strain that can reduce their quality of life. Caregivers are routinely engaged during hospital discharge for education and training related to the person with stroke. However, the critical period after stroke survivor's discharge is largely unsupported for the caregiver. This proposed study is a randomized controlled trial that will provide post-discharge support for caregivers using a health coaching program as compared to usual care and examine its effect of caregivers and people with stroke.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Coaching
N/A

Detailed Description

Caregiver strain reduces quality of life and can increase the chance of unplanned hospital readmission for the person with stroke. Caregivers are routinely engaged during hospital discharge for education and training. However, the critical period after discharge is largely unsupported. The proposed research will integrate occupational therapy and telehealth to provide a post-discharge, caregiver-focused program, the "Health Coaching-in-Context" that consists of up to 10 sessions, arranged once-a-week or multiple times a week based on convenience of scheduling for up to 10 weeks. The program targets improved caregiver health and reduction in readmissions for stroke survivor. The study aims to examine the effects of the coaching program for caregivers as compared to usual care and evaluate the feasibility of study design. A pilot randomized controlled trial will be conducted with two parallel groups, "Health Coaching-in-Context" and usual care. A sample of up to 40 pairs, including up to 40 stroke survivors and their respective 40 caregivers will be recruited from University hospitals and randomly assigned after consenting. The occupational therapist, unaware of the group assignment, will administer assessments before and after the intervention, and at 4-week follow-up. Data will be collected on general information, readmissions, performance, self-efficacy, and quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Single-blind randomized controlled trial design with two parallel groupsSingle-blind randomized controlled trial design with two parallel groups
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Assessor will be blinded to treatment group allocation
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Coaching Intervention for Caregivers of Persons With Stroke
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 24, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Coaching

Health Coaching-in-Context" includes coaching by trained coaches up to 10 sessions over teleconference.

Behavioral: Coaching
"Health Coaching-in-Context" that consists of up to 10 sessions, arranged once-a-week or multiple times a week based on convenience of scheduling for up to 10 weeks. The program targets improved caregiver health through occupational therapy coaching.
Other Names:
  • Health Coaching in Context
  • No Intervention: Usual Care

    The usual care group does not get any intervention but continues with any of their usual activities that would otherwise would have been provided to them.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [Week 1]

      Measure of performance and satisfaction with performance of daily tasks. Each domain score is out of 10, minimum is 1, and higher scores are better.

    2. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [Week 12]

      Measure of performance and satisfaction with performance of daily tasks.Each domain score is out of 10, minimum is 1, and higher scores are better.

    3. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [Week 15]

      Measure of performance and satisfaction with performance of daily tasks. Each domain score is out of 10, minimum is 1, and higher scores are better.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Re-admission [30 day re-admission]

      Number of subjects readmitted. Lower is better.

    2. Re-admission [60 day re-admission]

      Number of subjects readmitted. Lower is better.

    3. Re-admission [90 day re-admission]

      Number of subjects readmitted. Lower is better.

    4. Revised Caregiver Self-efficacy scale [Week 1]

      Measure of confidence with caregiving related tasks. 0 to 100 range for 15 items, higher score is better self-efficacy

    5. Revised Caregiver Self-efficacy scale [Week 12]

      Measure of confidence with caregiving related tasks. 0 to 100 range for 15 items, higher score is better self-efficacy

    6. Revised Caregiver Self-efficacy scale [Week 15]

      Measure of confidence with caregiving related tasks. 0 to 100 range for 15 items, higher score is better self-efficacy

    7. Zarit Burden Interview [Week 1]

      Burden experienced by caregiver while caring for person with stroke. Lower score is better, 22 items, range is 0 to 88.

    8. Zarit Burden Interview [Week 12]

      Burden experienced by caregiver while caring for person with stroke. Lower score is better, 22 items, range is 0 to 88.

    9. Zarit Burden Interview [Week 15]

      Burden experienced by caregiver while caring for person with stroke. Lower score is better, 22 items, range is 0 to 88.

    10. WHO-BREF Quality of Life scale [Week 1]

      World Health Organization-Brief Quality of life evaluation. Higher Scores are better. Scores in four domains 0 to 100 each

    11. WHO-BREF Quality of Life scale [Week 12]

      World Health Organization-Brief Quality of life evaluation. Higher Scores are better. Scores in four domains 0 to 100 each

    12. WHO-BREF Quality of Life scale [Week 15]

      World Health Organization-Brief Quality of life evaluation. Higher Scores are better. Scores in four domains 0 to 100 each

    13. Single-item life satisfaction scale [Week 1]

      Life Satisfaction Evaluation. Lower scores are better, range from 1 to 4 Satisfaction with life - one question Quality of life evaluation Satisfaction with life - one question Quality of life evaluation Satisfaction with life - one question Satisfaction with life - one question

    14. Single-item life satisfaction scale [Week 12]

      Life Satisfaction Evaluation. Lower scores are better, range from 1 to 4 Satisfaction with life - one question Quality of life evaluation Satisfaction with life - one question Quality of life evaluation Satisfaction with life - one question Satisfaction with life - one question

    15. Single-item life satisfaction scale [Week 15]

      Life Satisfaction Evaluation. Lower scores are better, range from 1 to 4 Satisfaction with life - one question Quality of life evaluation Satisfaction with life - one question Quality of life evaluation Satisfaction with life - one question Satisfaction with life - one question

    16. Stroke Impact Scale [Week 1]

      The impact of stroke on various areas of daily activities of the person with stroke. Range from 0 to 100, higher is better.

    17. Stroke Impact Scale [Week 12]

      The impact of stroke on various areas of daily activities of the person with stroke. Range from 0 to 100, higher is better.

    18. Stroke Impact Scale [Week 15]

      The impact of stroke on various areas of daily activities of the person with stroke. Range from 0 to 100, higher is better.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Survivor criteria: First-time stroke, discharged from hospital within the past 30 days.

    • Caregiver criteria: Informal caregiver primarily responsible for care (family member, friend, or partner), may or may not live in the same household. Passes cognition screen, willing to use teleconference using phone, tablet, or computer.

    • Both: 18 to 80 years of age, understand and speak English

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Children

    • 81 years of age or older

    • Unable to understand and speak English

    • Does not provide consent

    • Caregiver does not pass cognition screen

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19107

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Thomas Jefferson University
    • American Occupational Therapy Foundation

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Thomas Jefferson University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04535284
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20D.718
    First Posted:
    Sep 1, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 6, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Thomas Jefferson University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 6, 2021