Self-Management in Parents of Technology-Dependent Children

Sponsor
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04105244
Collaborator
(none)
200
1
2
40.8
4.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Parent caregivers of children with chronic conditions who require life-saving technology such as mechanical ventilation or feeding tubes must maintain a high level of vigilance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They usually provide a majority of their children's care and are often overwhelmed by the caregiving demands thus neglect health promotion behaviors that result in a deterioration of their own mental and physical health. The goal of this study is to test a cognitive-behavioral resourcefulness intervention that will improve these caregivers' mental and physical health and health promotion behaviors while they continue to provide vital care for these vulnerable children.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Resourcefulness Training©
N/A

Detailed Description

Parent caregivers of children who require life-saving technology such as mechanical ventilation or feeding tubes must maintain a high level of vigilance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They report greater levels of stress, compromised self-management behaviors and poorer psychological and physical health than other caregiver groups which dramatically increases their mortality risk. Technology-dependent children (approximately 600,000) are among the sickest and most vulnerable subset of children with complex chronic conditions in the United States. They comprise 20% of all children discharged from the hospital to home, yet account for 61% of healthcare spending for children, up to $110 billion annually. Despite the adverse consequences for caregivers, there are no interventions to meet their specific needs. Resourcefulness Training, (cognitive-behavioral self-management intervention) has been shown to improve psychological and physical outcomes, mediate the effects of stress, and enhance the care provided to care-recipients. A Resourcefulness Training Intervention (RTI) will be tested in a randomized trial against an attention control group. The RTI includes face-to-face session for teaching social (help-seeking) and personal (self-help) resourcefulness skills, ongoing web access to the RTI video and video vignettes of caregivers of technology-dependent children describing resourcefulness skill application in daily life, 4 weeks of skills' reinforcement using daily log, weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks, and booster sessions at 2 and 4 months post enrollment. The Attention Control group will receive weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks and at 2 and 4 months post enrollment plus any usual care. The aims of the study are to: 1) Determine whether the RTI versus Attention Control improves psychological (mental HRQoL depressive cognitions, depressive symptoms, appraised stress, burden) and physical outcomes (physical HRQoL, chronic stress [hair cortisol]) over 9 months in parents of technology-dependent children, after controlling for covariates (parent race/ethnicity and gender, family income, and children's functional status, type of technology). 2) Determine whether changes in psychological and physical outcomes are mediated by changes in parents' levels of resourcefulness based on intervention condition. 3) Compare self-management behavior (sleep, positive health practices) over 9 months in parents who received RTI versus Attention Control. 4) Explore whether resourcefulness is a mediator between intervention condition and self-management behaviors controlling for baseline self-management behavior over 9 months. 5) Explore the relationship between self-management behavior and parent psychological and physical outcomes based on intervention condition. Our study will be the first to test a cognitive-behavioral RTI for this caregiver population. 6) Compare target children's ER visits, hospital days over 9 months based on parent intervention condition. If shown to be efficacious, it can be replicated with other caregivers of children with complex chronic conditions with strong potential for translation into practice.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The proposed study is a longitudinal (9-month) RCT in which primary caregiver parents of technology-dependent children will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms: (1) The Attention Control arm and (2) The Resourcefulness Training(c) arm.The proposed study is a longitudinal (9-month) RCT in which primary caregiver parents of technology-dependent children will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms: (1) The Attention Control arm and (2) The Resourcefulness Training(c) arm.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Data collectors and participants will be blinded to group assignment.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Resourcefulness Intervention to Promote Self-Management in Parents of Technology-Dependent Children
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 8, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Attention Control

The Attention Control arm will receive weekly phone calls for the first 4 weeks and at 2 and 4 months post-enrollment plus the current standard of care, whereby caregivers phone their healthcare providers when they have questions or concerns

Experimental: Resourcefulness Training Intervention©

The Resourcefulness Training© arm will receive (a) individually tailored instruction on personal and social resourcefulness skills via the Resourcefulness Video and intervention nurse, (b) journal-writing instruction to describe resourcefulness application, (c) access to the study website with videotape vignettes and Resourcefulness Video, and (d) boosters at 2 and 4 months post-enrollment that will include reinforcement of skills learned and additional journal writing.

Behavioral: Resourcefulness Training©
The intervention includes self-help and help-seeking skills.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Psychological Outcome- Health Related Quality of Life [Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline]

    Mental Health Related Quality of Life (PROMIS Short Form version 1.2- Global Health). Ten (10) Items. Score Range: 10 - 50. Global Mental Health (GMH) score converted to a T-Score metric - produces a physical and a mental health score. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured or better mental health.

  2. Depressive Cognitions [Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline]

    Screening Measure for Early Detection of Depressive Symptoms: The Depressive Cognition Scale. Measures depressive cognitions and negative thoughts that may lead to clinical depression. Eight (8) Items. Score Range: 0 - 40. Higher scores indicating more depressive cognitions.

  3. Physical Outcome [Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline]

    Physical Health Related Quality of Life (PROMIS Short Form version 1.2- Global Health), Ten (10) Items. Score Range: 10 - 50 Global Mental Health (GMH) score converted to a T-Score metric- produces a physical and a mental health score. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. Higher score means better physical health.

  4. Self-Management- Sleep- Subjective [Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline]

    Appraised Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a l-month time interval. Nineteen (19) items are grouped into seven component scores, each weighted equally on a 0-3 scale. Score Range (Global PSQI Score) is 0-21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. Sub Scales are summed

  5. Positive Health Practices [Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline]

    Personal Lifestyle Questionnaire- Positive Health Practices Personal Lifestyle Questionnaire (PLQ). Measures the positive health practices of exercise, substance use, nutrition, relaxation, safety, and health promotion. Twenty-four (24) items 4-point summated rating scale with a range of possible scores from 24 to 96 Higher scores reflect the practice of more health behaviors. Total scores are reported.

  6. Depressive Symptoms [Change Measured over 9 months of the study (baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months after baseline]

    "Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Short Form - Depressive Symtoms "Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Short Form Version 1.0 - Depression 8a. Assess self-reported negative mood , views of self , social cognition, and decreased positive affect and engagement." Eight (8) Items. Score Range: 5 (Min)-40 (Max) A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. Total Score is reported

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Technology-Dependent Children with ER Visits and Rehospitalizations [Total over the 9 months the parent is enrolled in the study]

    Number of ER Visits and Rehospitalizations of Technology-Dependent Child

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • parent primary caregiver (biological, adoptive, or foster mother, father, grandmother, or grandfather) for a technology-dependent child based on the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) classification criteria (Group 1, mechanical ventilators; Group 2, intravenous nutrition/medication; Group 3, respiratory or nutritional support);

  • at least 18 years of age;

  • able to speak and understand English;

  • the technology-dependent child must be age 17.2 years or younger and receive care in the home from his/her parent. For children with more than one type of technology, we will follow OTA guidelines for classification.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Parents of children with a cancer diagnosis due to the short term use of technology following initial diagnosis and treatment

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland Ohio United States 44106-5065

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Valerie A. Toly, PhD, RN, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Valerie Toly, Assistant Professor of Nursing, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04105244
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • STUDY20181088
First Posted:
Sep 26, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Sep 24, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Valerie Toly, Assistant Professor of Nursing, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 24, 2021