Evaluation of Caries Detection Methods

Sponsor
Nazan Kocak Topbas (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05064566
Collaborator
Mersin University (Other)
101
1
14
7.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators aim will be to compare the diagnostic performance of clinical visual examination (ICDAS II), intraoral/bite wing radiography (BW), near infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT), and laser fluorescence (LF), in comparison to microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) for the detection of non-cavitated occlusal enamel and dentin caries in third molar teeth. Potential participants will be consecutively recruited.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: caries assessment

Detailed Description

Studies regarding comparison of diagnostic techniques for caries detection are generally conducted under in vitro conditions due to ethical concerns. Considering the many recently published in vitro studies which attempted to assess the diagnostic ability of different caries diagnosis systems, it is not possible to know at what rate in vitro findings are applicable to the clinical situation.The investigators would like to assess initial occlusal caries lesions by using different diagnostic methods under in vivo conditions. In the present study, the investigators will assess diagnostic accuracy of clinical visual examination (ICDAS II), digital intraoral radiography, near infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT), and laser fluorescence (LF), by examining third molar teeth in comparison to gold standard micro-CT images. The null hypothesis of the study is that no significant difference exists for the clinical performance of the evaluated methods in detecting non-cavitated occlusal caries in either the enamel or the dentin. This prospective study will include 101 third molars of 101 patients with non-cavitated occlusal caries requiring extraction. ICDAS II, BW, NIR-LT and LF examinations will be carried out by two examiners. Gold standard will be determined by micro-CT imaging after extraction. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value will be calculated for examiner agreement. Accuracy rate, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (Az) will be calculated. Clinical application time and patient comfort/pain analysis will be compared. Nonparametric variables will be assessed by Kruskal Wallis Test. Significance level will be set at p<0.05.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
101 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Clinical Performance of Diagnostic Methods in Early Occlusal Caries
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 20, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 20, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 20, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
caries diagnosis

diagnostic accuracy of clinical visual examination (ICDAS II), digital intraoral radiography, near infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT), and laser fluorescence (LF), by examining third molar teeth in comparison to gold standard micro-CT images.

Device: caries assessment
clinical visual examination (ICDAS II), digital io radiography, near infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT), and laser fluorescence (LF), and micro-CT images.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Accuracy [1 month]

    The accuracy of caries detection methods will be evaluated when compared to the gold standard Micro CT.

  2. Receptor operating characteristic (ROC) curves [1 month]

    Receptor operating characteristic (ROC) curves (Az) will be calculated to show the caries distinguishing ability of each caries detection method and the observer.

  3. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [1 month]

    Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility will be assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient comfort/pain analysis by using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)(comparative assessment of the tests): [1 month]

    The patients will be asked to rate their feelings (based on comfort and pain) from absence of discomfort and pain to extreme discomfort and pain (between 0 and 10) for each clinical method.

  2. Clinical time efficacy (comparative assessment of the tests) [1 month]

    Clinical application times from the beginning of the procedure to the end of the procedure for each method will be calculated by using a stopwatch. (example: LF pen 10 sn)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) only status 1/ healthy patients

  • Completely erupted permanent dentition,

  • No fixed orthodontic apparatus, prosthetic restoration and filling material,

  • A minimum age of 18 years,

  • At least one third erupted molar teeth (third mandibular or third maxillary molar from each patient was included),

  • Non cavitated occlusal caries,

  • Teeth with no hypoplasia or hypomineralization,

  • Third molar teeth that require extraction for surgery, orthodontics and prosthetic reasons,

  • If clinical indicators suggest a current caries risk or activity that required additional diagnosis, the patients will be asked to participate in this additional examination.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients younger than 18

  • Patients that can not be recruited according to the inclusion criteria.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Mersin University Yenisehir Mersin Turkey 33150

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nazan Kocak Topbas
  • Mersin University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nazan Koçak Topbaş, PhD, Mersin University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nazan Kocak Topbas, Assist. Prof. Dr., Mersin University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05064566
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2017-1-AP1-2000
First Posted:
Oct 1, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Oct 1, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Nazan Kocak Topbas, Assist. Prof. Dr., Mersin University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 1, 2021