PERSONNEL: Carpal Tunnel Release Under Local Infiltration Anaesthesia Versus Local Infiltration Anaesthesia and Median Nerve Block

Sponsor
Kuopio University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05372393
Collaborator
University of Eastern Finland (Other)
118
1
2
60
2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. Treatment options include both non-operative and surgical methods. Surgical treatment, carpal tunnel release (CTR), involves division of the transverse carpal ligament. Surgery can be done under, local, axillary- or intravenous block or general anaesthesia. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCT), comparing local infiltration anaesthesia to local infiltration anaesthesia augmented with distal median nerve block in CTR.

The investigators' aim is to find out if distal median nerve block in adjunct to WALANT surgery reduces pain during CTR and postoperatively. The investigators' primary hypothesis is that distal median nerve block, in adjunct to local infiltration anaesthesia does not reduce pain during and after CTR compared to pure local anaesthesia.

The study is a blinded randomized controlled trial in patients with CTR. Patients will be randomly divided into two study groups. CTR is performed under WALANT. The first group will have local infiltration anaesthesia and distal median nerve block and the other local infiltration anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure is the pain level perceived by patient during the procedure using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

CTR is the most common hand surgical procedure, which is well suited for WALANT. The optimal method of local anaesthesia is however not clear. Possible advantages or disadvantages of median nerve blockade in adjunct to local infiltration anaesthesia can be assessed by a high-quality RCT.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Distal median nerve block and local infiltration anaesthesia
  • Procedure: Local infiltration anaesthesia
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
118 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Two concurrent study groupsTwo concurrent study groups
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
The trial patients are blinded to the randomization. They can't see to the operation field. In the local anaesthesia group care provider pinches from the area of median nerve blockade prior to performing local anaesthesia.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Carpal Tunnel Release Under Local Infiltration Anaesthesia Versus Local Infiltration Anaesthesia and Median Nerve Block- a Study Protocol of a Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Local infiltration anaesthesia

The investigators allocate 59 patients in this arm. It serves as the control group, who receives local infiltration anaesthesia.

Procedure: Local infiltration anaesthesia
The anaesthetic cocktail consists of 4,5 ml of lidocaine with adrenalin 1%, 4,5 ml of bupivacaine with adrenalin 0.5% and 1 ml of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate. The investigators use a 24 gauge hypodermic needle to inject the solution.

Experimental: Local infiltration anaesthesia and distal median nerve block

The investigators allocate 59 patients in this arm. It serves as the experimental group, who receives local infiltration anaesthesia and distal median nerve block.

Procedure: Distal median nerve block and local infiltration anaesthesia
Local infiltration anaesthesia: The anaesthetic cocktail consists of 4,5 ml of lidocaine with adrenalin 1%, 4,5 ml of bupivacaine with adrenalin 0.5% and 1 ml of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate. The investigators use a 24 gauge hypodermic needle to inject the solution.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain level during the procedure with visual analogic scale (VAS) [Visual analogic scale is recorded immediately after the procedure]

    The investigators evaluate the pain level perceived by patient during the procedure using visual analogic scale. The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain sensitivity using PCS-FINv2.0 form [Preoperatively]

    The investigators evaluate pain sensitivity between patients using PCS-FINv2.0 form. The investigators ask patients to fill pain catastrophizing tendency evaluating form before the surgery in order to evaluate the pain levels between the experimental and control group.

  2. Expected pain level using visual analogic scale (VAS) [Preoperatively]

    The difference between the expected pain using visual analogic scale (VAS). The investigators ask the patients to evaluate the pain they expect to experience during procedure. The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

  3. Duration of anaesthesia [Every 4 hours while awake after the surgery until 3rd postoperative night.]

    The investigators assess the length of the anaesthesia by recording the pain level with visual analog scale (VAS) every 4 hours while awake. The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

  4. Patients' symptom severity and overall functional status [Before and 3 months after the surgery]

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate their symptoms using Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) score. It consists of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) containing 11 questions, and it uses a five-point Likert rating scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms), and Functional Status Scale (FSS), which has 8 questions assessing the degree of complaints on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms). Mean sum scores of both scales are calculated and used for analysis.

  5. Consumption of pain killers [After the surgery until 3rd postoperative night]

    The investigators record the consumption of pain killers after surgery

  6. Patient satisfaction [3 months after the surgery]

    Patients evaluate how likely they would recommend the procedure to the fellowman using Net Promoter Score (NPS). Net Promoter Score is a measurement taken from asking patients how likely they are to recommend the procedure to others on a scale of 0-10. The higher score the better outcome.

  7. Number of experienced needle stings [Immediately after the injection of local anaesthetic.]

    The investigators ask the patient to report how many needle stings they felt when the investigators performed the anaesthesia

  8. Pain caused by needle sting-, tension- and burning [Postoperatively, immediately after the procedure]

    The investigators record pain perceived during the injection of the anaesthetic solution caused by needle sting-, tension- and burning using VAS

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Over 17 years of age with CTS verified by nerve conduction studies
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients under 18 years, previous or recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, repeat surgery, peripheral neuropathies like cervical radiculopathy and cubital tunnel syndrome, known allergy to the trial drugs, profound cognitive impairment, and pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Kuopio University hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery Kuopio Pohjois-Savo Finland 70210

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Kuopio University Hospital
  • University of Eastern Finland

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Prof., Kuopio University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Kuopio University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05372393
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KUH5203140
First Posted:
May 12, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 15, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Kuopio University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 15, 2022