Safety and Effectiveness of a Multifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ZM900 Tecnis Multifocal lens. Results from two studies (an original study with 125 multifocal and 123 monofocal subjects, protocol DIOL-101-TCNS, and an expansion study with 222 additional multifocal subjects, protocol DIOL-104-TCNS) are combined to evaluate the ZM900 Tecnis Multifocal lens vs. a monofocal control. The original study was conducted in 2004-2006; the expansion study was conducted in 2007-2008. Results from both studies were analyzed together for FDA approval.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The original study was protocol DIOL-101-TCNS; the expansion study was protocol DIOL-104-TCNS. The study protocols were almost identical with the exception that no control subjects were enrolled in the expansion study; only additional multifocal subjects. All eligibility criteria and testing conducted in the expansion study was the same as that in the original study. The hypotheses were that best corrected distance visual acuity of the ZM900 lens would meet or exceed the FDA grid values, complication and adverse event rates of the ZM900 would be similar to the FDA grid rates for posterior chamber IOLs, and near visual acuity of the ZM900 lens would be improved compared to that of the monofocal control lens.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tecnis Multifocal IOL group Subjects implanted bilaterally with the Tecnis Multifocal IOL. Participants were enrolled in this arm in the original study and also in the expansion study. Outcomes of the first eye of each subject were analyzed for the primary study endpoints. |
Device: Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal Intraocular Lens
Investigational intraocular lens
|
Active Comparator: CeeOn 911A monofocal control IOL group Subjects implanted bilaterally with the CeeOn 911A monofocal IOL. Participants enrolled in this arm only in the original study; no control subjects were enrolled in the expansion study. Outcomes of the first eye of each subject were analyzed for the primary study endpoints. |
Device: CeeOn 911A monofocal IOL
Monofocal Control IOL
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants That Achieved Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity of 20/40 or Better in the First Eye. [One year]
Number of participants that achieved a best corrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the first eye. As most subjects were implanted bilaterally,"first eye" refers to the first implanted eye of each subject.
- Mean Binocular Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity in Snellen [One year]
Mean binocular near visual acuity with distance correction in place measured at 33 cm; Mean is reported in Snellen (e.g. 20/20, 20/40, etc.), standard deviation reported in ETDRS (Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study)eye chart log units.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Visual potential of 20/30 or better in each study eye
-
Preoperative BCDVA worse than Snellen 20/40 or worse than 20/30 in the presence of glare (as measured using a Snellen chart with BAT at medium)
-
Naturally dilated pupil size (in dim light) > 4.0 mm (with no dilation medications) for each study eye
-
Preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.0 D or less
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Use of systemic or ocular medications that may affect vision (the use of any miotic agent is specifically contraindicated)
-
Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase the operative risk or confound the study outcome(s),(e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, etc.)
-
Uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease
-
History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery or subjects expected to require retinal laser treatment or other surgical intervention
-
Presence of ocular pathology other than cataract such as:
-
Amblyopia or strabismus
-
Corneal abnormalities
-
Pupil abnormalities
-
Capsule or zonule abnormalities
-
Intraocular inflammation
-
Known pathology that may affect visual acuity and/or are predicted to cause future acuity losses to a level of 20/30 or worse (e.g. macular degeneration)
-
Requiring an intraocular lens outside the study diopter range
-
Contact lens usage prior to study procedure (time interval dependent upon contact lens type)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Abbott Medical Optics
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mark Packer, M.D., Drs. Fine, Hoffman and Packer
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- DIOL-104-TCNS & DIOL-101-TCNS
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Multifocal and monofocal control subjects were enrolled in the original study in 2004-2005 from the normal cataract populations at 13 USA sites. In the expansion study, additional multifocal subjects were enrolled from the normal cataract populations at 16 USA sites (13 who also participated in the original study) in 2007. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Subjects chose which type of lens to receive (multifocal or monofocal) in the original study. Subjects only received the multifocal lens in the expansion study. |
Arm/Group Title | Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Note: only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each Tecnis Multifocal subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. | Note: Only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each monofocal control subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 347 | 123 |
COMPLETED | 333 | 116 |
NOT COMPLETED | 14 | 7 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Note: only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each Tecnis Multifocal subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. | Note: Only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each monofocal control subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 347 | 123 | 470 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
144
41.5%
|
27
22%
|
171
36.4%
|
>=65 years |
203
58.5%
|
96
78%
|
299
63.6%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
65.9
(9.5)
|
68.7
(8.9)
|
66.7
(9.4)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
211
60.8%
|
81
65.9%
|
292
62.1%
|
Male |
136
39.2%
|
42
34.1%
|
178
37.9%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
347
100%
|
123
100%
|
470
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants That Achieved Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity of 20/40 or Better in the First Eye. |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants that achieved a best corrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the first eye. As most subjects were implanted bilaterally,"first eye" refers to the first implanted eye of each subject. |
Time Frame | One year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
First eye results from subjects at one year in both the original study and the expansion study combined. |
Arm/Group Title | Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Note: only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each Tecnis Multifocal subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. | Note: Only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each monofocal control subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. |
Measure Participants | 331 | 114 |
Number [Participants (First Eyes only)] |
329
94.8%
|
114
92.7%
|
Title | Mean Binocular Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity in Snellen |
---|---|
Description | Mean binocular near visual acuity with distance correction in place measured at 33 cm; Mean is reported in Snellen (e.g. 20/20, 20/40, etc.), standard deviation reported in ETDRS (Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study)eye chart log units. |
Time Frame | One year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Binocular subjects at one year available for testing for both studies combined. |
Arm/Group Title | Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Note: only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each Tecnis Multifocal subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. | Note: Only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each monofocal control subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. |
Measure Participants | 291 | 113 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Mean Snellen Line (with ETDRS line SD)] |
24
(1.09)
|
70
(1.64)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tecnis Multifocal Subjects, Monofocal Control Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ETDRS line scores used for statistical comparisons with mean Snellen values reported above. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects | ||
Arm/Group Description | Note: only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each Tecnis Multifocal subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. One additional multifocal subject was enrolled but received an incorrect lens; this subject is included for adverse event reporting for a total of 348 (347 +1) multifocal subjects. | Note: Only outcomes of the first eye implanted of each monofocal control subject were analyzed for primary endpoints. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 14/348 (4%) | 1/123 (0.8%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Endophthalmitis, hypopyon and surgical intervention | 1/348 (0.3%) | 5 | 0/123 (0%) | 0 |
Signifcant loss in vision due to stroke | 1/348 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/123 (0%) | 0 |
Lens-related lens removal | 1/348 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/123 (0%) | 0 |
Lens-related other surgical procedures | 1/348 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/123 (0%) | 0 |
Non-lens-related lens exchange | 4/348 (1.1%) | 4 | 0/123 (0%) | 0 |
Non-lens-related other surgical procedures | 6/348 (1.7%) | 6 | 1/123 (0.8%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Tecnis Multifocal Subjects | Monofocal Control Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/348 (0%) | 0/123 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
PIs may not publish or disclose study data without Sponsor's prior written approval.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Nicholas Tarantino, O.D., Head, Global Clinical Research & Development |
---|---|
Organization | Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. |
Phone | 866-427-8477 ext 8613 |
nicholas.tarantino@amo.abbott.com |
- DIOL-104-TCNS & DIOL-101-TCNS