Comparison of Tuohy Needle and Quincke Needle During Caudal Epidural Injection
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Park et al. reported the results of a randomized study of the use of ultrasound and the use of C-arm in caudal epidural block. However, it is difficult to determine the overall epidural space contrast agent spread with ultrasound alone, and intravascular injection can be avoided with ultrasound. It was said that the evidence for the efficacy of exclusion of intravascular infusion was not as good as that of the C-arm. Therefore, it was suggested that ultrasound in caudal epidural block should be considered only when it is difficult to use the C-arm as an auxiliary means to guide the needle when the sacral hiatus is less than 2 mm and has a complex anatomical structure. The purpose of this study is to determine the difference between intravascular injection and epidural spread according to the type of needle during caudal block under ultrasound guidance.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tuohy needle group Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block with Touhy needle |
Device: Tuohy needle group
Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block with Touhy needle
|
Active Comparator: Quincke needle group Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block with Quincke needle |
Device: Quincke needle group
Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block with Quincke needle
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- incidence of intravascular injection [1 minute after finishing caudal epidural block]
incidence of intravascular injection during caudal epidural block
Secondary Outcome Measures
- time required to complete caudal epidural block [Baseline, 1 second after the completion of caudal epidural block]
time required to complete caudal epidural block
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
A patient who visited the pain clinic complaining of lower back pain due to lumbar disc/stenosis
-
When NRS of back and/or radiating pain is 4 or more
-
Patients over 19 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Malignancy
-
Systemic infection
-
Bleeding tendency
-
Contrast Allergy
-
Pregnant women
-
If you cannot read or agree to the consent form
-
If you cannot sign the consent form yourself
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Gangnam Severance Hospital
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 3-2022-0238